373:
also considered to have more of a developmental intent than an administrative intent, such as in a performance appraisal. One difference in organizational and/or project management is that the debriefing process is not only conducted after the conclusion of other events, but can also be conducted in real-time to continuously evolve plans during execution. The main reason for focusing on debriefing in an organizational or even in a project management capacity, is to increase effectiveness of the team, both individually and collectively. One study found that properly conducted debriefings can help organizations realize individual and team performance improvements by about 20-25%.
325:
trial of debriefing for consecutive subjects admitted to the hospital following a traffic accident. The patients were assessed in the hospital using the Impact of Event Scale (IES), Brief
Symptom Inventory (BSI) and a questionnaire, and were then reassessed at 3 years and 3 months. The intervention used was psychological debriefing. The results showed that the intervention group had significantly worse psychiatric symptoms, travel anxiety, physical problems, and financial problems.
440:
team of doctors to be high-performing in coming up with innovative solutions to health problems while maintaining the patients quality of life. Debriefings in the health care field are becoming increasingly popular and more widely used after claims of malpractice in emergency departments were reviewed and over 50 cases examined that showed how a high-performing team could have eliminated or mitigated major problems including death and impairments.
239:
unit. It also provides them with an outlet rather than forcing them to become consumed by their thoughts. Typically, the role of a soldier is seen as a job and a courageous duty, which does not give value to the psychological and emotional need of reflection. Conclusively, in order to make the role of a soldier more sustainable, captains and group leaders must prioritize debriefing strategies to focus more on the whole person.
464:
key characteristics of effective and ineffective developmental interactions shows that interactions that allow someone to discover their own needs and come up with workable solutions are more effective than those where a leader tells the team what they need. Leaders should perform participative debriefs and give their team members the opportunity to reflect, discuss, and share their own perspectives before providing direction.
25:
134:
in the determination of success or failure of the operation. The processes may involve receiving an explanation; receiving information and situation-based reminders of context; and reporting of measures of performance, and/or opportunities to further investigate the results of a study, investigation, or assessment of performance after participation in an immersive activity is complete.
436:(KSAs) significantly when conducted formally using pre-defined measures of performance derived from front-end analysis. Debriefing organization can be based on linear or non-linear (or a combination of both) organization of markers used for recall. Typically the structure will use: Temporal, Spatial, Objective, and/or Performance derived markers to bring focus to a specific activity.
248:
adequate sequence that let the participants reflect what happened, giving important insights with the aim of that project towards the future, linking the challenge with the actions and the future." It is analogous to "providing feedback" as it constitutes a vital component of any simulation intervention or any educational intervention, involving a process of explanation,
166:
836:"Yturralde's Debriefing Model of the 4 Elements: Water, Air, Earth and Fire", Association for Challenge Course Technology 22nd Conference at Boston, Massachusetts, on February 2012 and presented at the Association for Experiential Education International Conference at Colombia in June 2012. Yturralde, Ernesto. "Andragogía…¿ Qué es la Andragogía."
451:
Many leaders display all of the correct skills for successful leadership including interpersonal skills, technical competence, etc., but lack a very important skill which is the ability to effectively debrief and ensure continuous learning of their team. Without guidance or structure for an effective
424:
was performed to determine whether there is a consistent improvement in team effectiveness using debriefing techniques. Meta-analysis are statistical researching technique that include data from findings of all prior studies and are considered to be more reliable than findings that are derived from a
372:
Debriefing in the business discipline is largely instrumental to project management, particularly in "accelerating projects, innovating novel approaches, and hitting difficult objectives." Debriefs are considered to primarily serve developmental purposes rather than evaluative or judgmental. They are
363:
Methodological advantages of a debriefing include "the ability of researchers to check the effectiveness of a manipulation, or to identify participants who were able to guess the hypothesis or spot a deception." If the data have been compromised in this way, then those participants should be excluded
463:
Be sure to involve the team in discussions surrounding team effectiveness and allow the team to establish their own action plans. It is important to gather the perspective of the people who are most involved so that subsequent decisions are made with complete information. A study which discusses the
439:
Teams in occupations and high-risk settings such as the healthcare field, emergency services like fire-fighting and policing, and military settings frequently use debriefing techniques for team learning and to avoid making costly mistakes. For example, in the health care field, it is important for a
177:
Throughout the existence of combat and the history of war, engaging with the emotional and psychological impact on soldiers has been an ongoing and conflicting conversation. Debriefings in the military originated for three purposes: to mitigate the psychological impact of traumatic events, alleviate
133:
The popular meaning of debriefing is that "of telling about what has happened" with a sense of reviewing or going over an experience or actions in order to achieve order and meaning concerning what was reported. It is a structured process that also evaluates the contributions of various participants
328:
In an earlier study conducted by
Carlier et al. in 1998, they looked at the symptomatology in police officers that had been debriefed and not debriefed following a civilian plane crash. The results showed that the two groups did not differ in pre-event or post event distress. Furthermore, those who
285:
find that psychological debriefing is unhelpful and is potentially harmful. A 2019 Cochrane
Systematic Review found low-quality evidence suggesting potential benefit for some people, however, the studies performed had a high degree of uncertainty due to bias and the evidence is not strong enough to
206:
refers to the process of collecting historical patterns of trauma through the use of group therapy. This process happens with soldiers recounting combat events in chronological order and adding their own reactions of thoughts and feelings. The key objective of this strategy is to allow men to "talk
137:
Aside from the goal of inciting reflection and encourage communication, debriefing is also used to explore the emotions of the participant. This variable helps frame the experience in such a way that it enhances the learning. Effective debriefings typically include the following essential elements:
459:
Avoid discussing task work issues, and instead, focus on addressing teamwork issues. Teamwork is especially important when team members need to rely on each other for information or support to see the project through. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes found that teams that function effectively
238:
All of these debriefing strategies maximize on the collective experience of soldiers, rather than on the individual. There is a growing belief that allowing soldiers to reflect and problem-solve as a group builds their relationship with each other over time and ultimately, their effectiveness as a
233:
is similar to the other debriefing strategies in that it focuses on the group narrative, however it differs because it prioritizes the leadership and effectiveness of the facilitators who lead the debriefing sessions. These facilitators are provided with professional development on how to plan for
213:
is a form of psychological debriefing that features a specific structure and format, which were developed to address critical incident stress experienced by emergency service workers. It was developed by
Jeffrey Mitchell and is considered the most widely used today. It operates using the following
467:
Debriefs should not only be effective but must be efficient as well. Teams can easily get into the weeds and spend valuable time discussing topics that can be taken offline or tabled for a later discussion. Spending too much time covering topics that do not add value to the project can discourage
124:
is a report of a mission or project or the information so obtained. It is a structured process following an exercise or event that reviews the actions taken. As a technical term, it implies a specific and active intervention process that has developed with more formal meanings such as operational
324:
The goal of this type of debriefing is to stop the individuals from developing PTSD. Although this debriefing is widely used, there is uncertainty how it affects an individual. Researchers Mayou, Ehlers and Hobbs in 2000 were interested in evaluating the 3-year results of a randomized controlled
407:
Digital tools have emerged aiming to automate the preparation of a debriefing session, based on the anonymous answers to questions asked of individual team members. This information can then be used to generate a discussion guide for the person in charge of the debrief to guide that particular
247:
Ernesto
Yturralde, experiential trainer and researcher, explains: "In the field of experiential learning methodology, the debriefing is a semi-structured process by which the facilitator, once a certain activity is accomplished, makes a series of progressive questions in this session, with an
297:
Critical
Incident Stress Debriefing is a crisis intervention program that is used to provide initial psychosocial relief to rescue workers. It is generally conducted in a group session and held between 24 and 72 hours of the disaster. Each debriefing session follows seven phases:
234:
and lead the group sessions. In cases of deception-based experiences where the participant was manipulated or provided with false information, the process include a discussion with the participant how the deception might have temporarily altered or influenced his self-perceptions.
416:
Studies show that when done correctly, debriefs work; and teams that practice regular debriefing outperform teams who do not by about 25%. This demonstrates how debriefing can put a team on the fast-track to practical and observed learning and ensure team effectiveness.
964:
Gartlehner, Gerald; Forneris, Catherine A.; Brownley, Kimberly A.; Gaynes, Bradley N.; Sonis, Jeffrey; Coker-Schwimmer, Emmanuel; Jonas, Daniel E.; Greenblatt, Amy; Wilkins, Tania M.; Woodell, Carol L.; Lohr, Kathleen N. (2013). "Discussion".
398:
Often, structuring debriefings by following a plan or outline visiting the main functions of the debriefing process are considered more efficient. Most debriefings require at least some planning and organization prior to assembly of the team.
332:
Overall, these results showed that caution should be used when using
Critical Incident Stress Debriefing. Studies have shown that it is ineffective and has adverse long-term effects, and is not an appropriate treatment for trauma victims.
1786:
37. Calle-Domínguez, C. (2022)Debriefing entre iguales como herramienta de aprendizaje para la formación de enfermeras experiencia en postgrado de emergencias hospitalarias . Madrid: Universidad
Europea de Madrid. Recuperado a partir de:
1712:
LePine, Jeffery A.; Piccolo, Ronald F.; Jackson, Christine L.; Mathieu, John E.; Saul, Jessica R. (June 2008). "A Meta-Analysis of
Teamwork Processes: Tests of a Multidimensional Model and Relationships with Team Effectiveness Criteria".
280:
in an effort to prevent PTSD, which consists of interviews that are meant to allow individuals to directly confront the event and share their feelings with the counselor and to help structure their memories of the event. However, several
721:
The
Practices and Procedures of the Investigating Services of the Department of Defense and the Military Departments Concerning the Investigations Into the Deaths of Military Personnel Which May Have Resulted from Self-Inflicted
226:
occur usually at least 24 hours after an incident to give the soldiers a bit more time to deescalate from a having high stress response to that incident. The process is peer-driven but backed-up by a group of professional
408:
session. There is also an emergent debriefing model called "digital debriefing", which involves video-facilitated instructor debriefing. Due to the technologies used, this type of debriefing can be conducted remotely.
352:. The debriefing is an important ethical consideration to make sure that participants are fully informed about, and not psychologically or physically harmed in any way by, their experience in an experiment. Along with
207:
it out" in a way that they are not commonly socialized to do so. Though this group therapy process does not aim to reduce stress, it has resulted in providing a feeling of relief and connection amongst the soldiers.
1625:
Risser, Daniel T; Rice, Matthew M; Salisbury, Mary L; Simon, Robert; Jay, Gregory D; Berns, Scott D (September 1999). "The Potential for Improved Teamwork to Reduce Medical Errors in the Emergency Department".
1174:
Carlier, Ingrid V. E.; Lamberts, Regina D.; Van Uchelen, Annephine J.; Gersons, Berthold P. R. (1998). "Disaster-related post-traumatic stress in police officers: a field study of the impact of debriefing".
1794:
1261:
1793:
38. Calle-Domínguez, C. Evaluación y satisfacción del debriefing facilitado por un instructor frente al facilitado por iguales. Metas de Enfermería. 2022; 25 (6):15-23. Recuperado a partir de:
360:
experiments that use deception. Debriefing is typically not used in surveys, observational studies, or other forms of research that involve no deception and minimal risk to participants.
1487:
1319:
428:
Debriefings are most effective when conducted interactively between the participants of the immersive activity and the assessment or observation personnel. Self-facilitated
460:
are more committed, believe they can succeed, and ultimately are about 25% more successful which supports why debrief sessions should include an examination of teamwork.
990:
Feldner MT, Monson CM, Friedman MJ (2007). "A critical analysis of approaches to targeted PTSD prevention: current status and theoretically derived future directions".
566:
222:
entails brief discussions and unstructured therapy sessions that occur within a few hours of an incident that may cause high stress responses in soldiers. Finally,
443:
Several examples of low-risk teams that can benefit from debriefing include: project teams, sports teams, production or manufacturing teams, and consultant teams.
1795:
https://www.enfermeria21.com/revistas/metas/articulo/81957/evaluacion-y-satisfaccion-del-debriefing-facilitado-por-un-instructor-frente-al-facilitado-por-iguales/
364:
from the analysis. Many psychologists feel that these benefits justify a postexperimental follow-up even in the absence of deception or stressful procedures.
582:"Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and Rationale for a Blended Approach to Health Care Simulation Debriefing"
1145:
1258:
1669:
Dismukes, R. Key; McDonnell, Lori K.; Jobe, Kimberly K. (January 2000). "Facilitating LOFT Debriefings: Instructor Techniques and Crew Participation".
820:
345:, a debriefing is a short interview that takes place between researchers and research participants immediately following their participation in a
182:, also known as PTSD. Though there are several types of debriefing strategies, the following three are frequently used within military groups:
1543:
1518:
1287:
886:
754:
729:
703:
550:
1303:
Aronson, E.; Wilson, T. D.; Brewer, M. B. (1998). "Experimentation in social psychology". In D. T. Gilbert; S. T. Fiske; G. Lindzey (eds.).
455:
Below are some ways to maximize team effectiveness, avoid the common challenges faced in debriefing, and maintain high team performance:
1435:
Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Cerasoli, Christopher P. (February 2013). "Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis".
356:, the debriefing is considered to be a fundamental ethical precaution in research involving human beings. It is especially important in
1188:
525:
287:
1559:
Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Cerasoli, Christopher P. (2012-06-04). "Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis".
1384:
Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Cerasoli, Christopher P. (2013-02-01). "Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis".
125:
debriefing. It is classified into different types, which include military, experiential, and psychological debriefing, among others.
859:
108:
1323:
543:
Nursing Education, Administration, and Informatics: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice
218:
refers to the education and coping mechanisms taught to those who are more vulnerable to traumatization before they enter combat.
1843:
433:
452:
debriefing process, it is more likely that leaders will experience some of the common challenges that are found in debriefing.
165:
1853:
357:
46:
255:"Emotional Decompression" is one style of psychological debriefing proposed by David Kinchin in his 2007 book by that name.
1352:
286:
recommend multiple sessions of early psychological interventions for all people who are exposed to trauma. As of 2017 The
271:
179:
968:
Interventions for the Prevention of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults After Exposure to Psychological Trauma
425:
single study. This one fully supports the idea that debriefing is a key component of successful project team management.
89:
1858:
61:
1848:
1088:
Roberts, Neil P.; Kitchiner, Neil J.; Kenardy, Justin; Robertson, Lindsay; Lewis, Catrin; Bisson, Jonathan I. (2019).
42:
1812:
Berscheid, E., Abrahams, D., & Aronson, V. (1967). Effectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments.
169:
Female intelligence officer at the Royal Air Force Station receiving a report from members of the crew of G George,
432:(AAR) or debriefings are common in small unit and crew activities, and in a training context are shown to improve
68:
35:
1863:
1826:
Pavlov, O., K. Saeed, and L. Robinson. (2015) “Improving Instructional Simulation with Structural Debriefing.”
75:
999:
1748:
Eddy, Erik R.; D'Abate, Caroline P.; Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Givens-Skeaton, Susan; Robinson, Greg (2006).
1090:"Multiple session early psychological interventions for the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder"
878:
A Guide to Psychological Debriefing: Managing Emotional Decompression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
1152:. Society of Clinical Psychology: Division 12 of The American Psychological Association. 19 August 2014
57:
214:
three components: pre-incident functions, on-scene support services, and post-incident interventions.
1004:
429:
1694:
1592:
1468:
1417:
1025:
943:
619:
560:
259:
910:
Fanning, Ruth M.; Gaba, David M. (2007). "The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning".
1771:
1730:
1686:
1651:
1643:
1584:
1576:
1539:
1514:
1460:
1452:
1409:
1401:
1360:
1283:
1241:
1233:
1192:
1127:
1109:
1070:
1017:
972:
935:
927:
892:
882:
855:
801:
793:
750:
725:
699:
673:
665:
611:
603:
546:
521:
517:
771:
644:"Time-Driven Battlemind Psychological Debriefing: A Group-Level Early Intervention in Combat"
1761:
1722:
1678:
1635:
1568:
1444:
1393:
1223:
1184:
1117:
1101:
1060:
1052:
1009:
919:
783:
655:
593:
509:
505:
353:
317:
educational phase to learn about post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and coping strategies
1788:
1265:
329:
had undergone debriefing had significantly more disaster-related hyper arousal symptoms.
82:
1122:
1089:
1065:
1044:
170:
1639:
1837:
1726:
510:
478:
421:
282:
1698:
1596:
1472:
1421:
1029:
947:
623:
1105:
320:
re-entry phase to discuss any other issues and to provide any additional services.
923:
912:
Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
876:
598:
581:
1682:
788:
24:
1045:"Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)"
966:
1056:
349:
346:
342:
1775:
1750:"Key characteristics of effective and ineffective developmental interactions"
1734:
1690:
1647:
1580:
1572:
1456:
1448:
1405:
1397:
1364:
1237:
1196:
1113:
1013:
931:
896:
797:
669:
660:
643:
607:
1655:
1588:
1464:
1413:
1245:
1131:
1074:
1021:
976:
939:
805:
677:
615:
1536:
Clinical Simulation: Education, Operations and Engineering, Second Edition
1259:
Code of Ethics and Conduct, 3.4, 20 from the British Psychological Society
1228:
1211:
1189:
10.1002/(sici)1099-1700(199807)14:3<143::aid-smi770>3.0.co;2-s
381:
Fundamentally, key questions to consider during a debriefing session are:
772:"Evaluation of Stress Debriefing Interventions with Military Populations"
249:
1509:
Konstantinidis, Stathis Th; Bamidis, Panagiotis D.; Zary, Nabil (2020).
142:
Active participation with more than just the passive receipt of feedback
1766:
1749:
1561:
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
1486:
Reyes, Denise L.; Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Salas, Eduardo (2018-03-22).
1353:"Debriefing: A Simple Tool to Help Your Team Tackle Tough Problems"
642:
Adler, Amy B.; Castro, Carl Andrew; McGurk, Dennis (January 2009).
252:, and synthesis, with an active facilitator-participant interface.
173:
of 460 Squadron RAAF, after an attack on Berlin, 26 November 1943.
311:
reaction phase to discuss emotions associated with what happened
258:
Experiential learning debriefing is the basis for debriefing in
16:
Report back and review on a project or mission after completion
852:
Quality of Anesthesia Care, An Issue of Anesthesiology Clinics
18:
1146:"Psychological Debriefing for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder"
1807:
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
1212:"Psychological debriefing for road traffic accident victims"
745:
Crano, William D.; Brewer, Marilynn B.; Lac, Andrew (2014).
1809:. (6th ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Society
314:
symptoms phase to learn the signs and symptoms of distress
276:
Trauma-exposed individuals often receive treatment called
918:(2). Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health): 115–125.
1511:
Digital Innovations in Healthcare Education and Training
747:
Principles and Methods of Social Research, Third Edition
145:
Developmental intent focused on learning and improvement
1789:
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/tesis?codigo=310220
1169:
1167:
854:. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company. p. 17.
696:
Psychological Debriefing: Theory, Practice and Evidence
541:
Resources, Management Association, Information (2018).
512:
Psychological Debriefing: Theory, Practice and Evidence
308:
cognition phase to discuss thoughts about what happened
1318:
Professional Practice Board Working Party (May 2002).
1043:
Rose, S; Bisson, J; Churchill, R; Wessely, S (2002).
1821:
Psychological debriefing and emotional decompression
698:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 2.
292:
No Research Support/Treatment is Potentially Harmful
971:. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
724:. Washington, D.C.: DIANE Publishing. p. 148.
178:acute stress response, and reduce the frequency of
49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
516:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.
1828:Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal
1671:The International Journal of Aviation Psychology
1322:. British Psychological Society. Archived from
1222:(6). Royal College of Psychiatrists: 589–593.
394:What should we start, stop, or continue doing?
8:
1814:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1805:American Psychological Association. (2011).
1210:Mayou, R. A.; Ehlers, A.; Hobbs, M. (2000).
565:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
1612:CADS Validation Statistical Report (Rev. 4)
1488:"Team Development: The Power of Debriefing"
1346:
1344:
1094:The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
1049:The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
959:
957:
850:Neuman, Mark; Martinez, Elizabeth (2011).
580:Eppich, Walter; Cheng, Adam (April 2015).
388:Where did we hit (or miss) our objectives?
211:Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD)
1765:
1227:
1121:
1064:
1003:
787:
659:
597:
109:Learn how and when to remove this message
1282:. Delhi: Pearson Education. p. 71.
694:Raphael, Beverley; Wilson, John (2000).
545:. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. p. 240.
164:
490:
1538:. London: Academic Press. p. 28.
1513:. London: Academic Press. p. 24.
821:"Battlemind Psychological Debriefings"
770:MacDonald, Catherine M. (2003-12-01).
558:
305:fact phase to establish what happened
290:assessed psychological debriefing as
7:
1823:. London:Jessica Kingsley Publishers
1754:Human Resource Development Quarterly
749:. New York: Routledge. p. 432.
689:
687:
637:
635:
633:
500:
498:
496:
494:
47:adding citations to reliable sources
192:critical incident stress debriefing
385:What were we trying to accomplish?
288:American Psychological Association
14:
1305:The handbook of social psychology
468:future participation in debriefs.
262:, used widely within healthcare.
1727:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
819:Adler, Dr. Amy (April 2, 2007).
434:Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
23:
881:. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
34:needs additional citations for
1106:10.1002/14651858.CD006869.pub3
180:post-traumatic stress disorder
1:
1640:10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70134-4
1351:Sundheim, Doug (2015-07-02).
1216:British Journal of Psychiatry
148:Discussion of specific events
1628:Annals of Emergency Medicine
1307:. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
924:10.1097/sih.0b013e3180315539
599:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072
187:historical group debriefing,
1683:10.1207/s15327108ijap1001_3
224:post-incident interventions
204:Historical Group Debriefing
151:Input from multiple sources
1880:
1320:"Psychological Debriefing"
269:
1534:Chiniara, Gilles (2019).
1057:10.1002/14651858.CD000560
789:10.1093/milmed/168.12.961
302:Introduction to set rules
220:On-scene support services
1573:10.1177/0018720812448394
1449:10.1177/0018720812448394
1398:10.1177/0018720812448394
1268:Retrieved March 7, 2018.
1014:10.1177/0145445506295057
719:Thurmond, Strom (1998).
661:10.7205/MILMED-D-00-2208
586:Simulation in Healthcare
391:What caused our results?
278:psychological debriefing
272:Psychological debriefing
1844:Experimental psychology
1830:. v. 46 (3-4): 383–403.
1819:Kinchin, David, (2007)
1357:Harvard Business Review
875:Kinchin, David (2007).
508:; Wilson, John (2003).
412:Efficacy and challenges
1278:Husain, Akbar (2012).
343:psychological research
337:Psychological research
216:Pre-incident functions
174:
1854:Experiential learning
1610:Blanchard, James W.,
1492:People & Strategy
1229:10.1192/bjp.176.6.589
1183:(3). Wiley: 143–148.
243:Experiential learning
168:
1715:Personnel Psychology
430:after action reviews
43:improve this article
1859:Military psychology
266:Crisis intervention
1849:Military doctrines
1264:2018-03-07 at the
260:Medical Simulation
231:Process Debriefing
197:process debriefing
175:
1767:10.1002/hrdq.1161
1545:978-0-12-815657-5
1520:978-0-12-813144-2
1289:978-81-317-6000-0
1280:Social Psychology
888:978-1-84642-661-2
776:Military Medicine
756:978-1-317-66607-3
731:978-0-7881-4236-9
705:978-0-521-64700-7
648:Military Medicine
552:978-1-5225-5491-2
506:Raphael, Beverley
447:Common challenges
358:social psychology
119:
118:
111:
93:
1871:
1780:
1779:
1769:
1745:
1739:
1738:
1709:
1703:
1702:
1666:
1660:
1659:
1622:
1616:
1615:
1607:
1601:
1600:
1556:
1550:
1549:
1531:
1525:
1524:
1506:
1500:
1499:
1483:
1477:
1476:
1432:
1426:
1425:
1381:
1375:
1374:
1372:
1371:
1348:
1339:
1338:
1336:
1334:
1328:
1315:
1309:
1308:
1300:
1294:
1293:
1275:
1269:
1256:
1250:
1249:
1231:
1207:
1201:
1200:
1171:
1162:
1161:
1159:
1157:
1142:
1136:
1135:
1125:
1085:
1079:
1078:
1068:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1007:
987:
981:
980:
961:
952:
951:
907:
901:
900:
872:
866:
865:
847:
841:
834:
828:
827:
825:
816:
810:
809:
791:
767:
761:
760:
742:
736:
735:
716:
710:
709:
691:
682:
681:
663:
639:
628:
627:
601:
577:
571:
570:
564:
556:
538:
532:
531:
515:
502:
354:informed consent
114:
107:
103:
100:
94:
92:
51:
27:
19:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1864:Research ethics
1834:
1833:
1802:
1800:Further reading
1784:
1783:
1747:
1746:
1742:
1711:
1710:
1706:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1546:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1521:
1508:
1507:
1503:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1434:
1433:
1429:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1369:
1367:
1350:
1349:
1342:
1332:
1330:
1326:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1290:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1266:Wayback Machine
1257:
1253:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1177:Stress Medicine
1173:
1172:
1165:
1155:
1153:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1100:(8): CD006869.
1087:
1086:
1082:
1051:(2): CD000560.
1042:
1041:
1037:
1005:10.1.1.595.9186
989:
988:
984:
963:
962:
955:
909:
908:
904:
889:
874:
873:
869:
862:
849:
848:
844:
835:
831:
823:
818:
817:
813:
782:(12): 961–968.
769:
768:
764:
757:
744:
743:
739:
732:
718:
717:
713:
706:
693:
692:
685:
641:
640:
631:
579:
578:
574:
557:
553:
540:
539:
535:
528:
504:
503:
492:
487:
475:
449:
414:
405:
379:
370:
339:
274:
268:
245:
163:
158:
131:
115:
104:
98:
95:
52:
50:
40:
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1877:
1875:
1867:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1836:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1824:
1817:
1810:
1801:
1798:
1782:
1781:
1740:
1721:(2): 273–307.
1704:
1661:
1634:(3): 373–383.
1617:
1602:
1567:(1): 231–245.
1551:
1544:
1526:
1519:
1501:
1478:
1443:(1): 231–245.
1427:
1392:(1): 231–245.
1376:
1340:
1310:
1295:
1288:
1270:
1251:
1202:
1163:
1137:
1080:
1035:
982:
953:
902:
887:
867:
860:
842:
829:
811:
762:
755:
737:
730:
711:
704:
683:
654:(1): 021–028.
629:
592:(2): 106–115.
572:
551:
533:
527:978-0521647007
526:
489:
488:
486:
483:
482:
481:
474:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
448:
445:
413:
410:
404:
401:
396:
395:
392:
389:
386:
378:
375:
369:
368:Organizational
366:
338:
335:
322:
321:
318:
315:
312:
309:
306:
303:
267:
264:
244:
241:
236:
235:
228:
208:
200:
199:
194:
189:
171:Avro Lancaster
162:
159:
157:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
143:
130:
127:
117:
116:
99:September 2018
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1876:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1841:
1839:
1829:
1825:
1822:
1818:
1816:, 6, 371–380.
1815:
1811:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1797:
1796:
1791:
1790:
1777:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1744:
1741:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1708:
1705:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1665:
1662:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1621:
1618:
1613:
1606:
1603:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1555:
1552:
1547:
1541:
1537:
1530:
1527:
1522:
1516:
1512:
1505:
1502:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1482:
1479:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:Human Factors
1431:
1428:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1386:Human Factors
1380:
1377:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1347:
1345:
1341:
1329:on 2007-09-27
1325:
1321:
1314:
1311:
1306:
1299:
1296:
1291:
1285:
1281:
1274:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1255:
1252:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1206:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1170:
1168:
1164:
1151:
1150:www.div12.org
1147:
1141:
1138:
1133:
1129:
1124:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1084:
1081:
1076:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1036:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1001:
998:(1): 80–116.
997:
993:
986:
983:
978:
974:
970:
969:
960:
958:
954:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
906:
903:
898:
894:
890:
884:
880:
879:
871:
868:
863:
861:9781455704194
857:
853:
846:
843:
839:
838:Recuperado el
833:
830:
822:
815:
812:
807:
803:
799:
795:
790:
785:
781:
777:
773:
766:
763:
758:
752:
748:
741:
738:
733:
727:
723:
715:
712:
707:
701:
697:
690:
688:
684:
679:
675:
671:
667:
662:
657:
653:
649:
645:
638:
636:
634:
630:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
600:
595:
591:
587:
583:
576:
573:
568:
562:
554:
548:
544:
537:
534:
529:
523:
519:
514:
513:
507:
501:
499:
497:
495:
491:
484:
480:
479:Briefing note
477:
476:
472:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
453:
446:
444:
441:
437:
435:
431:
426:
423:
422:meta-analysis
418:
411:
409:
402:
400:
393:
390:
387:
384:
383:
382:
376:
374:
367:
365:
361:
359:
355:
351:
348:
344:
336:
334:
330:
326:
319:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
300:
299:
295:
293:
289:
284:
283:meta-analyses
279:
273:
265:
263:
261:
256:
253:
251:
242:
240:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
209:
205:
202:
201:
198:
195:
193:
190:
188:
185:
184:
183:
181:
172:
167:
160:
155:
150:
147:
144:
141:
140:
139:
135:
128:
126:
123:
113:
110:
102:
91:
88:
84:
81:
77:
74:
70:
67:
63:
60: –
59:
55:
54:Find sources:
48:
44:
38:
37:
32:This article
30:
26:
21:
20:
1827:
1820:
1813:
1806:
1792:
1785:
1760:(1): 59–84.
1757:
1753:
1743:
1718:
1714:
1707:
1677:(1): 35–57.
1674:
1670:
1664:
1631:
1627:
1620:
1611:
1605:
1564:
1560:
1554:
1535:
1529:
1510:
1504:
1495:
1491:
1481:
1440:
1436:
1430:
1389:
1385:
1379:
1368:. Retrieved
1356:
1331:. Retrieved
1324:the original
1313:
1304:
1298:
1279:
1273:
1254:
1219:
1215:
1205:
1180:
1176:
1154:. Retrieved
1149:
1140:
1097:
1093:
1083:
1048:
1038:
995:
991:
985:
967:
915:
911:
905:
877:
870:
851:
845:
837:
832:
814:
779:
775:
765:
746:
740:
720:
714:
695:
651:
647:
589:
585:
575:
542:
536:
511:
454:
450:
442:
438:
427:
419:
415:
406:
397:
380:
371:
362:
340:
331:
327:
323:
296:
291:
277:
275:
257:
254:
246:
237:
230:
223:
219:
215:
210:
203:
196:
191:
186:
176:
136:
132:
121:
120:
105:
96:
86:
79:
72:
65:
58:"Debriefing"
53:
41:Please help
36:verification
33:
1498:(2): 46–52.
1333:December 8,
1156:9 September
992:Behav Modif
227:counselors.
1838:Categories
1370:2020-04-19
485:References
403:Technology
377:Techniques
350:experiment
347:psychology
270:See also:
122:Debriefing
69:newspapers
1776:1044-8004
1735:0031-5826
1691:1050-8414
1648:0196-0644
1614:, US Navy
1581:0018-7208
1457:0018-7208
1406:0018-7208
1365:0017-8012
1238:0007-1250
1197:0748-8386
1114:1469-493X
1000:CiteSeerX
932:1559-2332
897:175298673
798:0026-4075
670:0026-4075
608:1559-2332
561:cite book
1699:51739430
1656:10459096
1597:22260709
1589:23516804
1473:22260709
1465:23516804
1422:22260709
1414:23516804
1262:Archived
1246:10974967
1132:31425615
1075:12076399
1030:44619491
1022:17179532
977:23658936
948:18613707
940:19088616
840:2009;20.
806:14719618
678:19216294
624:11105878
616:25710312
473:See also
250:analysis
161:Military
1123:6699654
1066:7032695
83:scholar
1774:
1733:
1697:
1689:
1654:
1646:
1595:
1587:
1579:
1542:
1517:
1471:
1463:
1455:
1420:
1412:
1404:
1363:
1286:
1244:
1236:
1195:
1130:
1120:
1112:
1073:
1063:
1028:
1020:
1002:
975:
946:
938:
930:
895:
885:
858:
804:
796:
753:
728:
722:Causes
702:
676:
668:
622:
614:
606:
549:
524:
85:
78:
71:
64:
56:
1695:S2CID
1593:S2CID
1469:S2CID
1418:S2CID
1327:(pdf)
1026:S2CID
944:S2CID
824:(PDF)
620:S2CID
156:Types
129:Model
90:JSTOR
76:books
1772:ISSN
1731:ISSN
1687:ISSN
1652:PMID
1644:ISSN
1585:PMID
1577:ISSN
1540:ISBN
1515:ISBN
1461:PMID
1453:ISSN
1410:PMID
1402:ISSN
1361:ISSN
1335:2008
1284:ISBN
1242:PMID
1234:ISSN
1193:ISSN
1158:2017
1128:PMID
1110:ISSN
1098:2019
1071:PMID
1018:PMID
973:PMID
936:PMID
928:ISSN
893:OCLC
883:ISBN
856:ISBN
802:PMID
794:ISSN
751:ISBN
726:ISBN
700:ISBN
674:PMID
666:ISSN
612:PMID
604:ISSN
567:link
547:ISBN
522:ISBN
62:news
1762:doi
1723:doi
1679:doi
1636:doi
1569:doi
1445:doi
1394:doi
1224:doi
1220:176
1185:doi
1118:PMC
1102:doi
1061:PMC
1053:doi
1010:doi
920:doi
784:doi
780:168
656:doi
652:174
594:doi
341:In
45:by
1840::
1770:.
1758:17
1756:.
1752:.
1729:.
1719:61
1717:.
1693:.
1685:.
1675:10
1673:.
1650:.
1642:.
1632:34
1630:.
1591:.
1583:.
1575:.
1565:55
1563:.
1496:41
1494:.
1490:.
1467:.
1459:.
1451:.
1441:55
1439:.
1416:.
1408:.
1400:.
1390:55
1388:.
1359:.
1355:.
1343:^
1240:.
1232:.
1218:.
1214:.
1191:.
1181:14
1179:.
1166:^
1148:.
1126:.
1116:.
1108:.
1096:.
1092:.
1069:.
1059:.
1047:.
1024:.
1016:.
1008:.
996:31
994:.
956:^
942:.
934:.
926:.
914:.
891:.
800:.
792:.
778:.
774:.
686:^
672:.
664:.
650:.
646:.
632:^
618:.
610:.
602:.
590:10
588:.
584:.
563:}}
559:{{
520:.
493:^
420:A
294:.
1778:.
1764::
1737:.
1725::
1701:.
1681::
1658:.
1638::
1599:.
1571::
1548:.
1523:.
1475:.
1447::
1424:.
1396::
1373:.
1337:.
1292:.
1248:.
1226::
1199:.
1187::
1160:.
1134:.
1104::
1077:.
1055::
1032:.
1012::
979:.
950:.
922::
916:2
899:.
864:.
826:.
808:.
786::
759:.
734:.
708:.
680:.
658::
626:.
596::
569:)
555:.
530:.
518:1
112:)
106:(
101:)
97:(
87:·
80:·
73:·
66:·
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
