Knowledge (XXG)

Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co

Source 📝

130: 293: 24: 219:
In order to process the loan, Hill's solicitors, Haddow & Co certified to Allied Finance "that the instrument by way of security is fully binding on Roger Kenneth Hill" as well as "on behalf of our client, that there are no other charges whatsoever of the yacht
227:
Haddow issued this certificate despite the fact that Roger was not purchasing the yacht himself, but by his company Equity Dealers Ltd instead, which resulted in Allied having arguably a legally unenforceable security over the yacht.
41: 334: 231:
Ultimately, Hill used the $ 25,000 for other purposes than pay for the yacht, resulting in the seller, Mr Johnson repossessing the yacht and selling it for $ 25,000.
368: 234:
Allied claimed from Johnson that they were legally owed the sale proceeds, and they settled on a payment of $ 16,000, leaving a shortfall remaining of $ 7095.
204:
ruled that a lawyer owed a duty of care to the holder of a security for a loan to his client, in preparing a certificate attesting to his client's liability.
88: 60: 67: 74: 327: 56: 373: 353: 320: 107: 363: 201: 140: 45: 248:
The court of Appeal ruled that Haddow owed a duty of care to Allied, and thus were liable to reimburse them for their loss.
81: 266: 34: 358: 212:
Allied Finance, a finance company was lending Roger Hill $ 25,000 to personally purchase a yacht called
181: 300: 240:
Haddow argued that they only owed a duty of care to their client, and not to any other parties.
129: 304: 189: 185: 347: 292: 200:
NZLR 22 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding negligence by a solicitor. The
23: 237:
With Hill now bankrupt, Allied sued his solicitors for the shortfall.
17: 308: 216:, with the yacht being used as security for the loan. 177: 172: 164: 156: 146: 136: 122: 48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 57:"Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co" 151:Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co 198:Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co 123:Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co 276:– via Victoria University of Wellington. 328: 8: 335: 321: 128: 119: 108:Learn how and when to remove this message 257: 267:"Barristers' immunity in New Zealand" 7: 369:Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases 289: 287: 46:adding citations to reliable sources 307:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 291: 265:Osborne, Philip (January 1986). 22: 33:needs additional citations for 141:Court of Appeal of New Zealand 1: 390: 374:New Zealand case law stubs 286: 354:New Zealand tort case law 299:This article relating to 127: 364:1983 in New Zealand law 301:case law in New Zealand 274:New Zealand Law Journal 42:improve this article 316: 315: 195: 194: 118: 117: 110: 92: 381: 359:1983 in case law 337: 330: 323: 295: 288: 278: 277: 271: 262: 173:Court membership 132: 120: 113: 106: 102: 99: 93: 91: 50: 26: 18: 389: 388: 384: 383: 382: 380: 379: 378: 344: 343: 342: 341: 284: 282: 281: 269: 264: 263: 259: 254: 246: 210: 202:Court of Appeal 114: 103: 97: 94: 51: 49: 39: 27: 12: 11: 5: 387: 385: 377: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 346: 345: 340: 339: 332: 325: 317: 314: 313: 296: 280: 279: 256: 255: 253: 250: 245: 242: 209: 206: 193: 192: 179: 178:Judges sitting 175: 174: 170: 169: 166: 162: 161: 158: 154: 153: 148: 147:Full case name 144: 143: 138: 134: 133: 125: 124: 116: 115: 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 386: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 351: 349: 338: 333: 331: 326: 324: 319: 318: 312: 310: 306: 302: 297: 294: 290: 285: 275: 268: 261: 258: 251: 249: 243: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 225: 223: 217: 215: 207: 205: 203: 199: 191: 187: 183: 180: 176: 171: 167: 163: 160:19 April 1983 159: 155: 152: 149: 145: 142: 139: 135: 131: 126: 121: 112: 109: 101: 90: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 62: 59: –  58: 54: 53:Find sources: 47: 43: 37: 36: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 309:expanding it 298: 283: 273: 260: 247: 239: 236: 233: 230: 226: 221: 218: 213: 211: 197: 196: 186:Richardson J 150: 104: 95: 85: 78: 71: 64: 52: 40:Please help 35:verification 32: 15: 222:Sagittarius 214:Sagittarius 98:August 2024 348:Categories 252:References 208:Background 190:McMullin J 68:newspapers 165:Citation 182:Cooke P 168:NZLR 22 157:Decided 82:scholar 84:  77:  70:  63:  55:  303:is a 270:(PDF) 137:Court 89:JSTOR 75:books 305:stub 244:Held 61:news 224:". 44:by 350:: 272:. 188:, 184:, 336:e 329:t 322:v 311:. 111:) 105:( 100:) 96:( 86:· 79:· 72:· 65:· 38:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Allied Finance and Investments v Haddow & Co"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

Court of Appeal of New Zealand
Cooke P
Richardson J
McMullin J
Court of Appeal
"Barristers' immunity in New Zealand"
Stub icon
case law in New Zealand
stub
expanding it
v
t
e
Categories
New Zealand tort case law
1983 in case law
1983 in New Zealand law
Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.