Knowledge (XXG)

Survey (archaeology)

Source 📝

479:
alluvial fans, or turf in built-up neighbourhoods may render near-surface artifacts and sites invisible even at short distances. In such instances, archaeological surveyors may concentrate on above-ground structures such as burial cairns, collapsed field walls and rock art panels, look for unnatural changes in the vegetation and landscape to decide what may be hidden under the vegetation, or survey by subsurface testing (SST). SSTs can consist of a series of shovel-test pits that penetrate the humus layer or turf or, where substantial later sediments may cover archaeological materials, series of auger or core holes. SSTs are much more costly than fieldwalking, and surveys by SST usually have very low probability of intersecting and detecting archaeological remains unless intensity (density of SSTs), and thus cost, is prohibitively high. The various Scandinavian sites and monuments registers mainly list above-ground monuments, not ploughed-out sites with scattered pottery.
458:
pottery and even chipped stone (typically flint, chert or obsidian) flakes. Conversely, the plateau and upper scarp or valley side soils will move down slope, forming a deep seal over low-lying archaeological deposits, rendering them inaccessible to surface survey. Even artifacts on the surface and with relatively high visibility (i.e., little obscuring vegetation), however, are not consistently detected by surveyors. Consequently, it is unrealistic to expect 100% recovery of artifacts or even sites. We can evaluate surveyors' effectiveness at detecting artifacts with "Sweep width," which is the theoretical width of a transect in which the number of artifacts detected outside the sweep is identical to the number missed within the sweep.The poorer the visibility, the poorer the contrast between the artifact "targets" and their surroundings, or the poorer the surveyor's skill or attention, the narrower the sweep width will be.
231: 546:
for a settlement hierarchy; what sites are contemporary with each other; how has the modern landscape interfered with the visibility of archaeological remains; what sorts of activities can be recognized (e.g., dwellings, tombs, field systems); how many people lived in this area at any given time or how did population density change over time; why did people choose to live where they did; how has the landscape changed over time; what changes in settlement patterns have there been? However, answering such questions depends on the quality of the evidence, which is why it is important to evaluate the effectiveness and thoroughness of the survey or surveys that contribute that evidence.
510:
electrical or magnetic properties contrast measurably with their surroundings. In some cases, individual artifacts, especially metal, may be detected as well. Readings taken in a systematic pattern become a dataset that can be rendered as image maps for interpretation. Survey results can be used to guide excavation and to give archaeologists insight into the patterning of non-excavated parts of the site. Unlike other archaeological methods, geophysical survey is not invasive or destructive. For this reason, it is often used where preservation (rather than excavation) is the goal for project preservation and compliance with applicable laws.
243:
threat as part of a research program or conservation efforts. Prior to engaging in fieldwork, desk-based assessments will likely take place, during which, written, visual, and electronic information is gathered for the purpose of evaluating and developing a plan for future fieldwork. Consideration should be given to the nature of the landscape (vegetation coverage, existing settlement or industry, soil depth, climate) before a range of techniques is selected to be applied within an appropriate overarching method.
133: 294:: Many areas of the world have developed limited knowledge about the nature and organization of past human activity at the regional level. (Although one or more sites may be known from an area, often little is known about the wider distribution of contemporary settlements, and how settlement patterns may change over time.) An archaeological field survey is the primary tool for discovering information about previously uninvestigated areas. 491:" to narrow down the search for archaeological materials. This is particularly important for purposive surveys, but can also be used to guide sampling surveys by eliminating the need to survey areas where, for geological or other reasons, we can reasonably expect all ancient traces to be destroyed (e.g., by erosion) or far too deeply buried (e.g., by alluvium) to be detectable. Modern predictive models in archaeology employ 1590: 36: 433:", involves cases where archaeologists are searching for a particular site or a particular kind of archaeological material. For example, they might be searching for a particular shipwreck or an historic fort whose exact location is no longer certain. However, they may also be searching for archaeological materials in particular locations to test hypotheses about past use of those spaces. 164:, and often in excess of many km). Archaeologists conduct surveys to search for particular archaeological sites or kinds of sites, to detect patterns in the distribution of material culture over regions, to make generalizations or test hypotheses about past cultures, and to assess the risks that development projects will have adverse impacts on archaeological heritage. 1601: 470:). Databases containing existing regional archaeological data as well as other landscape GIS layers such as soils, vegetation, modern features, and development plans can be loaded on a mobile GIS for referencing, for sampling purposes, and for groundtruth updating directly in the field, resulting a more informed archaeological survey process. 288:: Excavations carried out before the middle of the 20th century are notoriously poorly documented. They were often carried out by methods that left behind much of the evidence the modern-day archaeologist is looking for. Early excavators were often interested only in fine pottery, jewelry and statues and referred to as rescue archaeologists. 537:, and of the way it is expressed geophysically. Appropriate instrumentation, field survey design, and data processing are essential for success, and must be adapted to the unique geology and archaeological record of each site. In the field, control of data quality and spatial accuracy are critical to a successful mission completion. 454:
The method works best on either ploughed ground or surfaces with little vegetation. On ploughed surfaces, as the soil is turned regularly artifacts will move to the top. Erosion and soil loss on uncultivated and lightly vegetated soil (e.g., in semi-arid environments) may cause artifacts to also 'rise' to the surface.
545:
The most important parts of the survey are analysis and evaluation. The types of questions that archaeologist often ask of survey data include: what is the evidence for first occupation of an area; when was this area occupied; how are sites distributed; where are sites located; what evidence is there
348:
It is usually a simple matter to gain permission to perform a cultural field survey, especially a non-intrusive one. If the area is privately owned, the local laws may or may not require the landowners' co-operation. Permission for an intrusive form of survey may be more difficult to acquire, due to
453:
has formed the backbone of archaeological survey fieldwork, at least where visibility is fairly good. A single researcher or team will walk slowly through the target area looking for artifacts or other archaeological indicators on the surface, often recording aspects of the environment at the time.
198:
A common role of a field survey is in assessment of the potential archaeological significance of places where development is proposed. This is usually connected to construction work and road building. The assessment determines whether the area of development impact is likely to contain significant
549:
At times, one part of the survey may not have yielded the evidence one wanted to find. For instance, very little may have been found during a field walk, but there are strong indications from geophysical survey and local stories that there is a building underneath a field. In such a case, the only
509:
A geophysical survey is used for subsurface mapping of archaeological sites. In recent years, there have been great advances in this field, and it is becoming an increasingly useful and cost-effective tool in archaeology. Geophysical instruments can detect buried archaeological features when their
457:
Even with optimal surface conditions the efficacy of fieldwalking varies according to long-term land use, topography, weather conditions, the skill and experience of the fieldwalkers, and other factors. Intensive arable agriculture on hilltops will first expose and then pulverize artifacts such as
242:
Survey work is conducted for a variety of reasons, some of which are motivated by threats to the preservation of archaeological material. These threats may include proposed land development or risks associated with processes such as decay or erosion. Surveys can also be conducted in the absence of
478:
Fieldwalking involves picking up scattered artifacts in ploughed fields. In heavily wooded areas such as Scandinavia or the North American Northeast, or deeply alluviated areas as in the Netherlands, fieldwalking is not always a practical method. Humus and fallen leaves in forested areas, silt on
300:: Some kinds of archaeological theories — about changes in agricultural strategies or population density for example — are investigated or tested through the use of archaeological surveys of areas that should or should not contain particular kinds of archaeological materials if the theory is true. 270:: In many locations, local stories contain some hint of a greater past, and often they have a basis in history. For instance, someone may remember that a grandfather who used to walk the hills as a shepherd used to talk about columns from an old temple, although the descendant never saw the ruins. 553:
The analysis therefore includes careful examination of all the evidence collected. A method often used to determine its value is to compare it to sites of the same period. As the number of well-documented surveys grow, this becomes a slightly easier task, as it is sometimes easier to compare two
330:
Aerial photography is a good tool for planning a survey. Remains of older buildings often show in fields as cropmarks; just below the topsoil, the remains may affect the growth of crops or grass. There should preferably be photographs of the same area at different times of the year, allowing the
315:
Map regression, comparing maps from different periods of the same area, can reveal past structures that were recorded but are no longer visible as surface features. Using modern maps to transcribe or re-project earlier maps can help to locate these features with contemporary survey controls and
339:
If the indicator that started the process was not a record of previous work, the archaeologists will need to check if any work has been done prior to commencement of the pending project. As many older surveys and excavations were published in papers that are not widely available, this may be a
465:
has made survey recording much easier, as positions of artifacts or artifact clusters ("sites") can be taken well within the limits of accuracy and precision necessary for survey work. Recording the position and attributes of archaeological features has been expedited by customizable portable
532:
Although geophysical surveying has been used in the past with intermittent success, good results are very likely when it is applied appropriately. It is most useful when it is used in a well-integrated research design where interpretations can be tested and refined. Interpretation requires a
367:
Another form of intrusive research is bore holes. Small holes are drilled into the ground, most often with hand-powered bores. The contents are examined to determine the depths at which one might find cultural layers, and where one might expect to strike virgin soil. This can be valuable in
550:
way to decide if an excavation is worth the cost is to carefully analyze the evidence to determine which part to trust. On the one hand, the geophysics might just show an old and forgotten water-pipe, but it might also show the wall of just the building the archaeologists were looking for.
525:(GPR) and electromagnetic (EM) conductivity. These methods provide excellent resolution of many types of archaeological features, and are capable of high sample density surveys of very large areas and of operating under a wide range of conditions. While common 1001:: South Cad-bury Environs Project. Archaeological survey of the landscape of a prehistoric Hillfort in south west Britain. Notable for its large-scale application of archaeological geophysics and the geophysical survey in conjunction with expansive test pits. 437:, on the other hand, have the goal of obtaining a representative sample of some population of sites or artifacts in order to make generalizations about that population. This involves some probability sampling of spatial units, such as random or stratified 396:
and/or building remains. However, variations in artifact visibility related to topography, vegetation, and soil character, not to mention the imperfect detection abilities of human observers, bring into question the very concept of complete coverage. An
264:: Old literary sources have provided archaeologists with clues about settlement locations that have not been archaeologically documented. Sometimes the texts may be quite recent; for instance, a book on local history may mention an interesting area. 368:
determining the cost of an excavation - if there is a build-up of several meters of soil above the layers the archaeologist is interested in, the price will obviously be much higher than if artifacts are found only centimeters below ground.
276:: In many cases, locals know where to find something of interest to archaeologists. They may not have reported it because of taking it as part of their world, or because of fearing intrusions on their land or community. 413:, isolated finds, etc.). An intensive survey is the more costly, timely, and ultimately informative of the two approaches, although extensive surveys can provide important information about previously unknown areas. 258:: Locals have picked up physical artifacts, sometimes held by the local museum but more often collected in private homes or old buildings such as churches and synagogues, and it is unclear where they are coming from. 340:
difficult task. A common way to handle this is through a visit to the area, to check with local museums, historians and older people who might remember something about the former activities in a particular locale.
384:. The former is characterised by the complete or near-complete coverage of the survey area at a high resolution, most often by having teams of survey archaeologists walk in a systematic way (e.g. in parallel 364:
An intrusive survey can mean different things. In some cases, all artifacts of archaeological value are collected. This is often the case if it is a rescue survey, but less common in a regular survey.
195:(as a way of recording the basic details of a possible site), but may also be ends in themselves, as they produce important information about past human activities in a regional context. 282:: In some places, a past survey may have been recorded in an academic journal. The use of more recent technologies and finds from other sites may provide reason to re-examine the site. 160:) search for archaeological sites and collect information about the location, distribution and organization of past human cultures across a large area (e.g. typically in excess of one 529:
are geophysical sensors, they are not capable of generating high-resolution imagery. Other established and emerging technologies are also finding use in archaeological applications.
230: 1157: 199:
archaeological resources and makes recommendations as to whether the archaeological remains can be avoided or an excavation is necessary before development work can commence.
357:
In a non-intrusive survey, nothing is touched, just recorded. An accurate survey of the earthworks and other features can enable them to be interpreted without the need for
401:, on the other hand, is characterised by a low-resolution approach over targets within a study area (sometimes including hundreds of km²). Sometimes this involves a 885:
Verhagen, Philip (2013). C. Corsi; et al. (eds.). "Site Discovery and Evaluation Through Minimal Interventions: Core Sampling, Test Pits and Trial Trenches".
409:
across a large area, whereas intensive surveys are designed to provide a more comprehensive picture of the location of sites and the nature of off-site data (e.g.
554:
survey results than to compare a survey result with an excavated site. However, it remains difficult to compare datasets produced by different research teams.
405:
or some other kind of probability sample to gain a representative sample of the study area. Extensive surveys may be designed to target the identification of
1546: 1026: 779: 729: 704: 679: 651: 53: 667: 909: 754: 119: 999: 1167: 504: 467: 100: 1631: 1626: 72: 1553: 1066: 492: 57: 211: 203: 79: 1575: 1285: 1172: 593: 349:
the fear of destroying evidence or property values and the threat of lawsuit for said damages from the property owner.
1508: 1351: 1280: 1121: 563: 86: 1061: 842:
Shott, Michael (1989). "Shovel-Test Sampling in Archaeological Survey: Comments on Nance and Ball, and Lightfoot".
430: 46: 1395: 1383: 1249: 1189: 1142: 1019: 462: 215: 207: 1417: 1310: 1259: 1209: 1199: 578: 522: 358: 192: 68: 1636: 1523: 1448: 1346: 1224: 598: 1568: 1558: 1478: 1473: 1443: 1422: 1295: 1290: 1254: 1043: 623: 1563: 1483: 1239: 1152: 1147: 1137: 927:"Re-discovering archaeological discoveries. Experiments with reproducing archaeological survey analysis" 534: 518: 176: 157: 434: 1593: 1493: 1488: 1463: 1458: 1453: 1244: 1234: 1091: 1086: 1012: 931: 808: 488: 1388: 1373: 1275: 1081: 1071: 1051: 406: 132: 1468: 1331: 867: 859: 824: 325: 219: 93: 1518: 1513: 1498: 944: 905: 775: 750: 725: 700: 675: 647: 603: 566: – process of visually communicating the structure of an archaeological site or artifact 238:
indicating the areas that have been subjected to some form of archaeological survey (in blue)
1503: 1438: 1405: 1116: 1101: 952: 936: 851: 816: 398: 17: 1341: 1194: 1096: 438: 402: 487:
Because of the high costs involved in some kinds of surveys, it is often helpful to use "
812: 1605: 1410: 1400: 1361: 1336: 1106: 526: 310: 153: 1620: 1378: 871: 410: 388:) over parcels of the landscape in question, documenting archaeological data such as 191:
in question. Surveys can be a practical way to decide whether or not to carry out an
926: 904:. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International series 1203. pp. 41–46. 828: 749:. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International series 1203. pp. 48–52. 1229: 1076: 514: 376:
One way to classify archaeological field surveys is to divide them into two types:
979: 699:. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International series 97. pp. 8–12. 1305: 1184: 1056: 1035: 797:"Flexibility by Design: How mobile GIS meets the needs of archaeological survey" 235: 141: 35: 1368: 1300: 389: 948: 820: 1356: 1315: 956: 587: 575: – Means through which sub-surface features can be visible from the air 450: 188: 202:
Archaeologists use a variety of tools when carrying out surveys, including
27:
Non-destructive exploration of the archaeological material in a given area
1111: 796: 572: 385: 175:, depending on the needs of the survey team (and the risk of destroying 136:
Ground penetrating radar is a tool used in archaeological field surveys.
1177: 722:
Interpreting Artefact Scatters: Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology
393: 161: 863: 251:
An area may be considered worthy of surveying based on the following:
989: 940: 625:
Standard and guidance for historic environment desk-based assessment
581: – Exposure, processing and recording of archaeological remains 984: 855: 976:: Intensive archaeological survey of the Aegean island of Kythera. 229: 187:, depending on the types of research questions being asked of the 131: 513:
The geophysical methods most commonly applied to archaeology are
466:
computing interfaces or mobile Geographical Information Systems (
421:
Archaeological field surveys can also be characterized as either
902:
Regional Perspectives in Archaeology: From Strategy to Narrative
747:
Regional Perspectives in Archaeology: From Strategy to Narrative
1008: 1004: 631:. Chartered Institute for Archaeologists. 2014. pp. 1–16. 29: 449:
Conventionally, fieldwalking in grids or along lines called
973: 697:
Off-site archaeology and human adaptation in Eastern Africa
644:
The Emerging Past: Air Photography and the Buried Landscape
441:
of geometrical (often square) or irregular spatial units.
994: 583:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
474:
Visible above-ground structures and Subsurface Testing
1158:
Conservation and restoration of archaeological sites
568:
Pages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
1536: 1431: 1324: 1268: 1217: 1208: 1130: 1042: 60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 331:analyst to find the best time to see cropmarks. 801:Cartography and Geographic Information Science 1020: 774:. Stroud: The History Press. pp. 32–33. 599:Survey (disambiguation) § Earth sciences 429:surveys. The former, sometimes also called " 8: 887:Good Practices in Archaeological Diagnostics 1214: 1027: 1013: 1005: 772:Cadbury Castle: A hillfort and landscapes 120:Learn how and when to remove this message 179:if intrusive methods are used) and; (b) 995:Archaeological Field Workers Job Source 980:Archaeological Survey in Sphakia, Crete 615: 990:Archaeological Field Work Organization 7: 58:adding citations to reliable sources 353:Intrusive vs. non-intrusive surveys 167:Archaeological surveys may be: (a) 590: – Geographic data discipline 25: 925:Néhémie Strupler (14 June 2021). 672:Fieldwork in Medieval Archaeology 1599: 1589: 1588: 505:Geophysical survey (archaeology) 34: 156:by which archaeologists (often 45:needs additional citations for 493:Geographic Information Systems 372:Extensive vs. intensive survey 1: 795:Tripcevich, Nicholas (2004). 417:Purposive vs. sampling survey 1173:electrical resistance survey 985:Archaeological Surveys Group 674:. Batsford. pp. 59–60. 594:Institute for Field Research 564:Archaeological illustration 335:Previous work in the region 18:Archaeological field survey 1653: 1062:Johann Joachim Winckelmann 974:The Kythera Island Project 502: 461:Modern technology such as 431:archaeological prospection 323: 308: 1584: 1143:Philosophy of archaeology 720:Schofield, A. J. (1991). 298:Archaeological hypotheses 69:"Survey" archaeology 821:10.1559/1523040042246025 579:Excavation (archaeology) 523:ground-penetrating radar 445:Fieldwalking (transects) 158:landscape archaeologists 900:Tabor, Richard (2004). 770:Tabor, Richard (2008). 745:Tabor, Richard (2004). 541:Analysis and evaluation 177:archaeological evidence 1632:Methods in archaeology 1627:Exploration geophysics 695:Foley, Robert (1981). 533:knowledge both of the 239: 137: 1153:Archaeological ethics 1148:Archaeological diving 1138:Archaeological theory 642:Whimster, R. (1989). 535:archaeological record 519:electrical resistance 233: 226:Research and planning 135: 1092:Augustus Pitt Rivers 1087:William Henry Holmes 1052:Archaeological sites 932:Internet Archaeology 489:predictive modelling 407:archaeological sites 286:Previous excavations 54:improve this article 1082:John Lloyd Stephens 1072:Heinrich Schliemann 889:. pp. 209–225. 813:2004CGISc..31..137T 668:Taylor, Christopher 646:. London: RCHM(E). 234:Satellite image of 1606:History portal 1168:geophysical survey 844:American Antiquity 499:Geophysical survey 326:Aerial archaeology 320:Aerial photography 240: 220:aerial photography 216:geophysical survey 138: 1614: 1613: 1532: 1531: 1514:Pseudoarchaeology 1131:Method and theory 781:978-0-7524-4715-5 731:978-0-946897-25-4 724:. Oxford: Oxbow. 706:978-0-86054-114-1 681:978-0-7134-2850-6 653:978-0-9507236-9-3 604:Systematic survey 483:Narrowing it down 292:Lack of knowledge 130: 129: 122: 104: 16:(Redirected from 1644: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1592: 1591: 1439:Archaeoastronomy 1406:Paleoethnobotany 1215: 1117:Alfred V. Kidder 1102:Mortimer Wheeler 1029: 1022: 1015: 1006: 961: 960: 941:10.11141/IA.56.6 922: 916: 915: 897: 891: 890: 882: 876: 875: 839: 833: 832: 792: 786: 785: 767: 761: 760: 742: 736: 735: 717: 711: 710: 692: 686: 685: 664: 658: 657: 639: 633: 632: 630: 620: 584: 569: 435:Sampling surveys 399:extensive survey 280:Previous surveys 262:Literary sources 125: 118: 114: 111: 105: 103: 62: 38: 30: 21: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1610: 1600: 1598: 1580: 1528: 1427: 1342:Archaeogenetics 1320: 1264: 1210:Sub-disciplines 1204: 1200:Post-excavation 1195:Lithic analysis 1126: 1097:Flinders Petrie 1038: 1033: 970: 965: 964: 924: 923: 919: 912: 899: 898: 894: 884: 883: 879: 841: 840: 836: 794: 793: 789: 782: 769: 768: 764: 757: 744: 743: 739: 732: 719: 718: 714: 707: 694: 693: 689: 682: 666: 665: 661: 654: 641: 640: 636: 628: 622: 621: 617: 612: 582: 567: 560: 543: 527:metal detectors 507: 501: 485: 476: 447: 439:random sampling 419: 403:random sampling 374: 355: 346: 337: 328: 322: 313: 307: 274:Local knowledge 256:Artifacts found 249: 228: 126: 115: 109: 106: 63: 61: 51: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1650: 1648: 1640: 1639: 1637:Field research 1634: 1629: 1619: 1618: 1612: 1611: 1609: 1608: 1596: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1579: 1578: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1569:Assyriologists 1566: 1559:Archaeologists 1556: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1540: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1526: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1441: 1435: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1411:Zooarchaeology 1408: 1403: 1401:Geoarchaeology 1393: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1371: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1362:Paleopathology 1359: 1354: 1349: 1344: 1337:Bioarchaeology 1334: 1328: 1326: 1325:Methodological 1322: 1321: 1319: 1318: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1272: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1263: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1221: 1219: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1107:Dorothy Garrod 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1057:Antiquarianism 1054: 1048: 1046: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1032: 1031: 1024: 1017: 1009: 1003: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 977: 969: 968:External links 966: 963: 962: 917: 910: 892: 877: 856:10.2307/281714 850:(2): 396–404. 834: 807:(3): 137–151. 787: 780: 762: 755: 737: 730: 712: 705: 687: 680: 659: 652: 634: 614: 613: 611: 608: 607: 606: 601: 596: 591: 585: 576: 570: 559: 556: 542: 539: 503:Main article: 500: 497: 484: 481: 475: 472: 446: 443: 418: 415: 373: 370: 354: 351: 345: 342: 336: 333: 324:Main article: 321: 318: 311:Map regression 309:Main article: 306: 305:Map regression 303: 302: 301: 295: 289: 283: 277: 271: 265: 259: 248: 245: 227: 224: 212:remote sensing 154:field research 128: 127: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1649: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1622: 1607: 1597: 1595: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1564:Egyptologists 1562: 1561: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1542: 1541: 1539: 1535: 1525: 1522: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1509:Phenomenology 1507: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396:Environmental 1394: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1384:Computational 1382: 1380: 1379:Archaeogaming 1377: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1343: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1327: 1323: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1267: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1250:Post-Medieval 1248: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1230:Protohistoric 1228: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1220: 1218:Chronological 1216: 1213: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1179: 1176: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1133: 1129: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1078: 1075: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1067:Richard Hoare 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1030: 1025: 1023: 1018: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1007: 1000: 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 975: 972: 971: 967: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 933: 928: 921: 918: 913: 911:1-84171-350-3 907: 903: 896: 893: 888: 881: 878: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 838: 835: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 791: 788: 783: 777: 773: 766: 763: 758: 756:1-84171-350-3 752: 748: 741: 738: 733: 727: 723: 716: 713: 708: 702: 698: 691: 688: 683: 677: 673: 669: 663: 660: 655: 649: 645: 638: 635: 627: 626: 619: 616: 609: 605: 602: 600: 597: 595: 592: 589: 586: 580: 577: 574: 571: 565: 562: 561: 557: 555: 551: 547: 540: 538: 536: 530: 528: 524: 520: 516: 515:magnetometers 511: 506: 498: 496: 494: 490: 482: 480: 473: 471: 469: 464: 459: 455: 452: 444: 442: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 416: 414: 412: 411:field systems 408: 404: 400: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 371: 369: 365: 362: 360: 352: 350: 343: 341: 334: 332: 327: 319: 317: 312: 304: 299: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 253: 252: 246: 244: 237: 232: 225: 223: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 200: 196: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 173:non-intrusive 170: 165: 163: 159: 155: 152:is a type of 151: 147: 143: 134: 124: 121: 113: 102: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: –  70: 66: 65:Find sources: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 37: 32: 31: 19: 1444:Archaeometry 1418:Experimental 1352:Near Eastern 1311:Near Eastern 1306:Mesopotamian 1260:Contemporary 1162: 1077:Arthur Evans 930: 920: 901: 895: 886: 880: 847: 843: 837: 804: 800: 790: 771: 765: 746: 740: 721: 715: 696: 690: 671: 662: 643: 637: 624: 618: 552: 548: 544: 531: 512: 508: 486: 477: 460: 456: 448: 426: 422: 420: 381: 377: 375: 366: 363: 356: 347: 338: 329: 316:techniques. 314: 297: 291: 285: 279: 273: 268:Oral sources 267: 261: 255: 250: 241: 201: 197: 184: 180: 172: 168: 166: 150:field survey 149: 145: 139: 116: 110:October 2010 107: 97: 90: 83: 76: 64: 52:Please help 47:verification 44: 1524:Transgender 1449:Battlefield 1225:Prehistoric 1185:Burnt layer 1122:George Bass 1036:Archaeology 344:Permissions 236:Mesopotamia 142:archaeology 1621:Categories 1547:by country 1479:Industrial 1474:Indigenous 1423:Underwater 1369:Calceology 1291:Australian 1269:Geographic 1255:Historical 1190:Excavation 957:Q110811952 610:References 359:excavation 193:excavation 80:newspapers 1484:Landscape 1357:Osteology 1240:Classical 949:1363-5387 872:163372346 588:Geomatics 451:transects 423:purposive 386:transects 382:extensive 378:intensive 247:Rationale 189:landscape 185:intensive 181:extensive 169:intrusive 1594:Category 1576:Journals 1494:Mortuary 1489:Maritime 1464:Funerary 1459:Feminist 1454:Conflict 1432:Thematic 1347:Medieval 1301:Egyptian 1296:Oceanian 1281:American 1245:Medieval 1235:Biblical 1112:Max Uhle 953:Wikidata 829:73534049 670:(1974). 573:Cropmark 558:See also 521:meters, 427:sampling 394:ceramics 1554:Periods 1389:Virtual 1374:Digital 1276:African 1178:Sondage 1044:History 809:Bibcode 495:(GIS). 390:lithics 162:hectare 94:scholar 1543:Sites 1469:Gender 1332:Aerial 1316:Nubian 1163:Survey 955:  947:  935:(56). 908:  870:  864:281714 862:  827:  778:  753:  728:  703:  678:  650:  146:survey 96:  89:  82:  75:  67:  1537:Lists 1519:Queer 1499:Music 1286:Asian 868:S2CID 860:JSTOR 825:S2CID 629:(PDF) 101:JSTOR 87:books 1504:Nazi 945:ISSN 906:ISBN 776:ISBN 751:ISBN 726:ISBN 701:ISBN 676:ISBN 648:ISBN 380:and 218:and 73:news 937:doi 852:doi 817:doi 468:GIS 463:GPS 425:or 208:GPS 204:GIS 183:or 171:or 148:or 140:In 56:by 1623:: 951:. 943:. 929:. 866:. 858:. 848:54 846:. 823:. 815:. 805:31 803:. 799:. 517:, 392:, 361:. 222:. 214:, 210:, 206:, 144:, 1028:e 1021:t 1014:v 959:. 939:: 914:. 874:. 854:: 831:. 819:: 811:: 784:. 759:. 734:. 709:. 684:. 656:. 123:) 117:( 112:) 108:( 98:· 91:· 84:· 77:· 50:. 20:)

Index

Archaeological field survey

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Survey" archaeology
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message

archaeology
field research
landscape archaeologists
hectare
archaeological evidence
landscape
excavation
GIS
GPS
remote sensing
geophysical survey
aerial photography

Mesopotamia
Map regression
Aerial archaeology
excavation

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.