24:
130:
337:
535:
618:
528:
258:
from Lowell Thomas Hart and
Patricia Hart. Buffaloe had previously rented the barns based on verbal agreements. Both parties agreed to sell the barns in four annual installments based on a
372:
419:
774:
452:
433:
542:
930:
722:
365:
266:
with the purpose written in the subject line but they sent it back to him as they had found a buyer willing to pay more. Buffaloe sued for breach of contract.
625:
878:
1044:
1029:
903:
358:
1049:
1034:
833:
507:
500:
412:
1024:
715:
549:
107:
514:
611:
574:
426:
1039:
649:
255:
235:
140:
88:
729:
590:
556:
60:
45:
38:
677:
67:
767:
318:
978:
708:
471:
381:
74:
521:
923:
444:
405:
56:
760:
663:
636:
563:
287:
34:
1054:
862:
840:
671:
199:
482:
396:
969:
796:
659:
896:
871:
781:
597:
239:
203:
998:
989:
914:
792:
294:, the sale of goods exceeding $ 500 is governed by the UCC. Additionally, the UCC calls for a
283:
279:
81:
937:
751:
701:
688:
944:
604:
583:
959:
824:
813:
644:
263:
259:
1018:
692:
341:
207:
462:
291:
251:
23:
490:
350:
486:
536:
Arizona
Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.
295:
129:
340:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
619:
Atlantic Marine
Construction Co. v. United States District Court
529:
In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data
Security Breach Litigation
354:
17:
176:
114 N.C. App. 52, 441 S.E.2d 172, 1994 N.C. App. LEXIS 267
420:
Kansas City
Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Weber Packing Corp.
262:
without any written documentation. Buffaloe sent them a
151:
Homer
Buffaloe v. Patricia Hart and Lowell Thomas HART
298:
to accompany the sale of goods in certain instances.
988:
968:
958:
913:
888:
861:
854:
823:
791:
750:
743:
687:
658:
635:
573:
481:
461:
443:
395:
388:
218:
213:
195:
190:
180:
172:
164:
156:
146:
136:
122:
775:Douglas v. U.S. District Court ex rel Talk America
453:Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States
434:Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc
931:Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United States
543:Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology
723:G. L. Christian and Associates v. United States
290:which requires the contract be in writing. In
366:
301:The jury decided in favor of Homer Buffaloe.
8:
626:Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
250:Homer Buffaloe verbally agreed to buy five
965:
879:Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly
858:
747:
392:
373:
359:
351:
119:
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
904:SCO Group, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
413:Gottlieb v. Tropicana Hotel & Casino
834:Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.
508:Ticketmaster Corp. v. Tickets.com, Inc.
310:
44:Please improve this article by adding
716:Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.
550:Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc.
7:
282:on one party's behalf can trump the
515:Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
14:
650:Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent
612:King v. Trustees of Boston Univ.
427:Ever-Tite Roofing Corp. v. Green
335:
234:, 114 N.C. App. 52 (1994) was a
128:
22:
1045:Franklin County, North Carolina
1030:United States contract case law
236:North Carolina Court of Appeals
141:North Carolina Court of Appeals
1050:United States tobacco case law
1035:1994 in United States case law
730:Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton
591:Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon
557:Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc.
1:
1025:North Carolina state case law
678:MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
286:requirements outlined in the
46:secondary or tertiary sources
222:K. Edward Greene, joined by
768:Harris v. Blockbuster, Inc.
1071:
979:Drennan v. Star Paving Co.
799:(unwritten & informal)
709:Seixas and Seixas v. Woods
472:Ellefson v. Megadeth, Inc.
382:United States contract law
744:Defense against formation
522:ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg
185:
127:
924:United States v. Spearin
445:Implied-in-fact contract
406:Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.
761:Morrison v. Amway Corp.
637:Substantial performance
564:Feldman v. Google, Inc.
288:Uniform Commercial Code
1040:1994 in North Carolina
33:relies excessively on
841:Buchwald v. Paramount
672:De Cicco v. Schweizer
397:Offer and acceptance
238:case dealing with a
970:Promissory estoppel
855:Cancelling Contract
186:affirmed a judgment
897:Stoddard v. Martin
872:Sherwood v. Walker
782:McMichael v. Price
598:Kirksey v. Kirksey
501:Specht v. Netscape
389:Contract formation
325:. January 10, 2022
319:"Buffaloe v. Hart"
240:breach of contract
57:"Buffaloe v. Hart"
1012:
1011:
1008:
1007:
999:Britton v. Turner
990:Unjust enrichment
954:
953:
915:Misrepresentation
850:
849:
793:Statute of frauds
739:
738:
296:written agreement
284:statute of frauds
229:
228:
118:
117:
110:
92:
1062:
966:
938:Laidlaw v. Organ
859:
807:Buffaloe v. Hart
795:(written) &
752:Illusory promise
748:
702:Hawkins v. McGee
689:Implied warranty
393:
375:
368:
361:
352:
345:
339:
338:
334:
332:
330:
315:
280:part performance
232:Buffaloe v. Hart
200:K. Edward Greene
191:Court membership
160:February 4, 1994
132:
123:Buffaloe v. Hart
120:
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
91:
50:
26:
18:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1004:
984:
950:
945:Smith v. Bolles
909:
884:
846:
819:
787:
735:
683:
654:
631:
605:Angel v. Murray
584:Hamer v. Sidway
569:
477:
457:
439:
384:
379:
349:
348:
336:
328:
326:
317:
316:
312:
307:
272:
256:Franklin County
248:
114:
103:
97:
94:
51:
49:
43:
39:primary sources
27:
12:
11:
5:
1068:
1066:
1058:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1017:
1016:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1003:
1002:
994:
992:
986:
985:
983:
982:
974:
972:
963:
960:Quasi-contract
956:
955:
952:
951:
949:
948:
941:
934:
927:
919:
917:
911:
910:
908:
907:
900:
892:
890:
886:
885:
883:
882:
875:
867:
865:
856:
852:
851:
848:
847:
845:
844:
837:
829:
827:
825:Unconscionable
821:
820:
818:
817:
814:Foman v. Davis
810:
802:
800:
797:Parol evidence
789:
788:
786:
785:
778:
771:
764:
756:
754:
745:
741:
740:
737:
736:
734:
733:
726:
719:
712:
705:
697:
695:
685:
684:
682:
681:
674:
668:
666:
656:
655:
653:
652:
647:
645:Lucy v. Zehmer
641:
639:
633:
632:
630:
629:
622:
615:
608:
601:
594:
587:
579:
577:
571:
570:
568:
567:
560:
553:
546:
539:
532:
525:
518:
511:
504:
496:
494:
479:
478:
476:
475:
467:
465:
459:
458:
456:
455:
449:
447:
441:
440:
438:
437:
430:
423:
416:
409:
401:
399:
390:
386:
385:
380:
378:
377:
370:
363:
355:
347:
346:
309:
308:
306:
303:
271:
268:
264:personal check
260:handshake deal
247:
244:
227:
226:
220:
216:
215:
211:
210:
197:
196:Judges sitting
193:
192:
188:
187:
183:
182:
178:
177:
174:
170:
169:
168:March 15, 1994
166:
162:
161:
158:
154:
153:
148:
147:Full case name
144:
143:
138:
134:
133:
125:
124:
116:
115:
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1067:
1056:
1055:Tobacco barns
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1001:
1000:
996:
995:
993:
991:
987:
981:
980:
976:
975:
973:
971:
967:
964:
961:
957:
947:
946:
942:
940:
939:
935:
933:
932:
928:
926:
925:
921:
920:
918:
916:
912:
906:
905:
901:
899:
898:
894:
893:
891:
887:
881:
880:
876:
874:
873:
869:
868:
866:
864:
860:
857:
853:
843:
842:
838:
836:
835:
831:
830:
828:
826:
822:
816:
815:
811:
809:
808:
804:
803:
801:
798:
794:
790:
784:
783:
779:
777:
776:
772:
770:
769:
765:
763:
762:
758:
757:
755:
753:
749:
746:
742:
732:
731:
727:
725:
724:
720:
718:
717:
713:
711:
710:
706:
704:
703:
699:
698:
696:
694:
693:caveat emptor
690:
686:
680:
679:
675:
673:
670:
669:
667:
665:
661:
657:
651:
648:
646:
643:
642:
640:
638:
634:
628:
627:
623:
621:
620:
616:
614:
613:
609:
607:
606:
602:
600:
599:
595:
593:
592:
588:
586:
585:
581:
580:
578:
576:
575:Consideration
572:
566:
565:
561:
559:
558:
554:
552:
551:
547:
545:
544:
540:
538:
537:
533:
531:
530:
526:
524:
523:
519:
517:
516:
512:
510:
509:
505:
503:
502:
498:
497:
495:
492:
488:
484:
480:
474:
473:
469:
468:
466:
464:
460:
454:
451:
450:
448:
446:
442:
436:
435:
431:
429:
428:
424:
422:
421:
417:
415:
414:
410:
408:
407:
403:
402:
400:
398:
394:
391:
387:
383:
376:
371:
369:
364:
362:
357:
356:
353:
343:
342:public domain
324:
320:
314:
311:
304:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:According to
269:
267:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:tobacco barns
245:
243:
241:
237:
233:
225:
221:
217:
214:Case opinions
212:
209:
208:Robert F. Orr
205:
201:
198:
194:
189:
184:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
139:
135:
131:
126:
121:
112:
109:
101:
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59: –
58:
54:
53:Find sources:
47:
41:
40:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
997:
977:
943:
936:
929:
922:
902:
895:
877:
870:
839:
832:
812:
806:
805:
780:
773:
766:
759:
728:
721:
714:
707:
700:
676:
624:
617:
610:
603:
596:
589:
582:
562:
555:
548:
541:
534:
527:
520:
513:
506:
499:
470:
463:Mailbox rule
432:
425:
418:
411:
404:
327:. Retrieved
322:
313:
300:
292:contract law
275:
273:
249:
231:
230:
223:
150:
104:
95:
85:
78:
71:
64:
52:
32:
15:
664:3rd parties
329:January 23,
204:Jack Cozort
1019:Categories
962:obligation
889:Illegality
493:agreements
491:Browsewrap
483:Shrinkwrap
323:Justia Law
305:References
246:Background
98:April 2022
68:newspapers
35:references
487:Clickwrap
224:unanimous
157:Submitted
276:Buffaloe
270:Decision
219:Majority
173:Citation
863:Mistake
660:Privity
181:Holding
165:Decided
82:scholar
662:&
84:
77:
70:
63:
55:
137:Court
89:JSTOR
75:books
331:2022
206:and
61:news
254:in
37:to
1021::
691:,
489:,
485:,
321:.
278:,
242:.
202:,
48:.
374:e
367:t
360:v
344:.
333:.
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
86:·
79:·
72:·
65:·
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
