133:
22:
448:. The Appeals Court rejected her argument, stating that her withdrawal of the plea bargain started with her conversation with the sheriff's deputy, not Toca. The Court stated "hen a defendant proclaims…innocence…, it is not objectively unreasonable to recommend that the defendant refrain from pleading guilty-no matter how 'good' the deal may appear".
485:
The court held unanimously, with
Justice Alito writing for the majority. The Court reversed the Sixth Circuit arguing that the Appellate Court had not applied the doubly differential standard. Under this standard federal courts must give credit to the State Court's factual findings so long as it was
489:
Alito makes the point that where there is a record the defendant adamantly asserted her innocence; therefore on its face the plea withdrawal was reasonable. In addition, there is no factual record on how long Toca took to prepare for Titlow's case, therefore the court cannot jump to the conclusion
431:
After her plea withdrawal, Titlow was placed on trial for murder. Her lawyer, however, did no investigation in the case before representing her in trial nor did he contact her previous lawyer. In addition as a retainer fee he obtained some legal rights to Titlow's biography, creating a conflict of
422:
While Titlow was in custody waiting to testify against Rogers, a sheriff's deputy advised her not to plead guilty if she did not believe that she was guilty. Not understanding the felony murder rule, she then obtained a new attorney, Fred Toca. Through Toca she demanded a lower sentence (three to
407:
Vonlee Titlow and Billie Rogers were arrested for the murder of Rogers' husband (Titlow's uncle). Titlow poured vodka down her uncle's throat while her aunt smothered him with a pillow. Rogers then paid her niece $ 100,000 for assistance and the promise to remain quiet. Even though Titlow did not
472:
The Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the District Court's ruling. It found in the record that Titlow's decision to withdraw her offer was based on the fact that the offer was much higher than Michigan's guidelines for second-degree murder. The record also shows that there is no
435:
During her trial, Titlow testified that she did not harm her uncle in any way and tried to prevent her aunt from harming him. However, Titlow had made out-of-court statements that plainly described her participation in her uncle's death. The jury convicted her of murder in the second degree
497:
Justice
Ginsburg did not join with the majority only concurring the outcome of the case. She found the State's argument that Toca had acted reasonably "dubious". However, because Titlow's aunt was later acquitted then died, there was no ability for the State to reoffer her original plea.
493:
Justice
Sotomayor concurred with the entire judgment expanding on Alito's opinion stating that regardless of a defendant's assertion of innocence counsel must make its own conclusion and offer clear advice of outcomes. Only then may counsel bow to the wishes of the defendant.
463:
The
District Court rejected Titlow's argument and the Michigan Courts decision was "completely reasonable". It made the point that "counsel could not be ineffective by trying to negotiate a better plea agreement…". Titlow appealed.
476:
The
Circuit Court remanded the case, ordering that the prosecution reoffer the original plea bargain and that the state court should find some remedy for the violation of her right to ineffectual counsel.
636:
444:
Removing Toca as counsel Titlow appealed to the
Michigan Court of Appeals. She argued that Toca had advised her to withdraw her plea without doing any research on her case therefore providing her with
473:
indication that Toca informed his client of the consequences of withdrawing her plea. Therefore, she was rendered ineffective counsel because Titlow lost the benefit of the plea bargain.
423:
seven as opposed to seven to 15). The prosecutor declined the offer and Titlow withdrew her plea in open court. Without Titlow's testimony, Billie Rogers was acquitted and later died.
546:
518:
255:
181:
606:
452:
382:
399:
case in which the Court held that when a state court makes a factual determination the federal courts must defer to its judgment so long as it is reasonable.
621:
631:
415:
The attorney for Titlow explained that the prosecution had the evidence to convict her for murder in the first degree. The attorney obtained a
607:
http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/11/opinion-analysis-court-says-more-about-federal-habeas-review-than-ineffective-assistance-in-plea-bargaining/
601:
626:
396:
137:
105:
43:
36:
86:
593:
58:
419:
for manslaughter in exchange for her testimony against her aunt and the
Michigan trial court approved the plea bargain.
65:
32:
72:
54:
550:
522:
259:
176:
602:
http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/10/a-messy-follow-up-to-lafler-and-frye-can-fun-facts-produce-good-law/
272:
Federal Courts must defer to a State Court's finding of fact as long as their judgement is reasonable.
566:
445:
315:
409:
408:
actually participate in the murder of her uncle, she could be found guilty of murder through the
232:
557:
204:
79:
331:
307:
303:
319:
295:
575:
525:
165:
615:
416:
327:
287:
243:
227:
900 (2004); 480 Mich. 890, 738 N.W.2d 715 (2007); habeas corpus petition denied,
339:
21:
251:
236:
192:
188:
356:
Alito, joined by
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
584:
490:
that just because there is an absence of record counsel was ineffective.
247:
224:
240:
132:
15:
156:
Sherry L. Burt, Warden, Petitioner v. Vonlee Nicole Titlow
637:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
376:
368:
360:
352:
347:
276:
266:
215:
210:
200:
171:
161:
151:
144:
125:
219:Leave to appeal denied by Michigan Supreme Court,
453:Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
383:Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
8:
436:sentencing her to 20 to 40 years in prison.
122:
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
455:, requesting a review by federal court.
594:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
507:
42:Please improve this article by adding
120:2013 United States Supreme Court case
7:
138:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
622:United States Supreme Court cases
553:12 (2013) is available from:
451:Titlow filed a motion under The
131:
20:
632:2013 in United States case law
239:Oct. 19, 2010), reversed, 680
1:
44:secondary or tertiary sources
395:, 571 U.S. 12 (2013), was a
397:United States Supreme Court
653:
585:Oyez (oral argument audio)
627:Legal history of Michigan
381:
281:
271:
130:
147:Decided November 5, 2013
372:Ginsburg (in judgment)
195:8039; 82 U.S.L.W. 4007
145:Argued October 8, 2013
31:relies excessively on
481:Decision of the court
223:, 470 Mich. 867, 680
205:Opinion announcement
201:Opinion announcement
446:ineffective counsel
316:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
187:134 S. Ct. 10; 187
410:felony murder rule
292:Associate Justices
388:
387:
233:No. 2:07-cv-13614
116:
115:
108:
90:
644:
598:
592:
589:
583:
580:
574:
571:
565:
562:
556:
529:
512:
277:Court membership
262:1191 (2013).
221:People v. Titlow
135:
134:
123:
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
55:"Burt v. Titlow"
48:
24:
16:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
612:
611:
596:
590:
587:
581:
578:
572:
569:
563:
560:
554:
538:
533:
532:
513:
509:
504:
483:
470:
461:
442:
429:
405:
332:Sonia Sotomayor
330:
318:
308:Clarence Thomas
306:
304:Anthony Kennedy
196:
146:
140:
121:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
41:
37:primary sources
25:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
640:
639:
634:
629:
624:
614:
613:
610:
609:
604:
599:
567:Google Scholar
543:Burt v. Titlow
537:
536:External links
534:
531:
530:
515:Burt v. Titlow
506:
505:
503:
500:
482:
479:
469:
466:
460:
459:District Court
457:
441:
438:
428:
425:
404:
401:
392:Burt v. Titlow
386:
385:
379:
378:
374:
373:
370:
366:
365:
362:
358:
357:
354:
350:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
320:Stephen Breyer
296:Antonin Scalia
293:
290:
285:
279:
278:
274:
273:
269:
268:
264:
263:
229:Titlow v. Burt
217:
213:
212:
208:
207:
202:
198:
197:
186:
173:
169:
168:
163:
159:
158:
153:
152:Full case name
149:
148:
142:
141:
136:
128:
127:
126:Burt v. Titlow
119:
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
619:
617:
608:
605:
603:
600:
595:
586:
577:
568:
559:
558:CourtListener
552:
548:
544:
540:
539:
535:
527:
524:
520:
516:
511:
508:
501:
499:
495:
491:
487:
480:
478:
474:
468:Appeals Court
467:
465:
458:
456:
454:
449:
447:
439:
437:
433:
426:
424:
420:
418:
413:
411:
402:
400:
398:
394:
393:
384:
380:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:Case opinions
346:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:Chief Justice
283:
282:
280:
275:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
209:
206:
203:
199:
194:
190:
184:
183:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
160:
157:
154:
150:
143:
139:
129:
124:
118:
110:
107:
99:
96:December 2019
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
39:
38:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
542:
514:
510:
496:
492:
488:
486:reasonable.
484:
475:
471:
462:
450:
443:
440:State appeal
434:
430:
421:
417:plea bargain
414:
406:
391:
390:
389:
377:Laws applied
335:
328:Samuel Alito
323:
311:
299:
288:John Roberts
228:
220:
211:Case history
180:
155:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
30:
369:Concurrence
361:Concurrence
340:Elena Kagan
254:. granted,
616:Categories
502:References
432:interest.
403:Background
237:E.D. Mich.
193:U.S. LEXIS
191:348; 2013
162:Docket no.
66:newspapers
33:references
364:Sotomayor
189:L. Ed. 2d
172:Citations
541:Text of
353:Majority
248:6th Cir.
267:Holding
250:2012);
80:scholar
597:
591:
588:
582:
579:
576:Justia
573:
570:
564:
561:
555:
517:,
338:
336:·
334:
326:
324:·
322:
314:
312:·
310:
302:
300:·
298:
225:N.W.2d
166:12-414
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
549:
521:
427:Trial
258:
216:Prior
87:JSTOR
73:books
551:U.S.
523:U.S.
260:U.S.
252:cert
241:F.3d
182:more
179:12 (
177:U.S.
175:571
59:news
547:571
519:571
256:568
244:577
35:to
618::
545:,
526:12
412:.
231:,
46:.
528:.
246:(
235:(
185:)
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
