427:
tastes. It amounts to "bad" painting, in the more general sense, of poor judgement, technical incompetence or outsider indulgence. Its appearance and impact in 1990 demonstrates a further plurality to figurative styles of painting, an extension to Bad
Painting, although not an exhaustive one. Because of the priority given to place of purchase in Thrift Store Painting, works are mainly easel-scale and devoted to traditional themes, factual and fictional. There is no place for "bad" Minimalism on a site-specific scale or geometric abstraction, for instance, no works abandoned by recent ambitious art students or failed post modernists. Thrift Store Paintings is devoted to the peripheral, the clumsy and comic, as was Tucker's Bad Painting. The difference is that Shaw allows a wider array of figurative styles, from the Naïve to Surreal or Expressionist, the Photo-realistic to Pop or decorative. But again, importantly, works are never wholly of one style; instead, hover uncomfortably or "badly" between conflicting categories, summoning too many standards, too weakly. Thrift Store Paintings is rarely linked to Bad Painting in published criticism, however.
381:(1969), exchanges stencils for simple outlines, usually of a familiar or topical object. Yet the structure retains some of Johns' ambivalence. The precise outline constrains boldly brushed filling in narrow areas or shapes, while in broader, less defined areas, allows the brushwork greater prominence, so that it undermines content there, creates a decorative or detached ground. Significantly, Jenney described this development as "bad drawing". But Jenney's selection for "Bad" Painting is curious, in that the work was nine years old at the time of the exhibition, and widely recognised. However, Tucker's selection concentrates on examples where the object or drawing style loses some of its familiarity and gives the rugged treatment a more mannered, arbitrary quality. A Chatelain example such as
194:, as inspiration or opposition. High and non-high (or low) art cannot be a matter of imagery or iconography, since high-art features as much irreverence and caricature as it does realism and veneration (for example, the work of Goya or Daumier, Lautrec or Arcimboldo). Nor can the difference rest purely upon technique, since paintings may be high or low-art. Yet, comics as a source, along with other commercial illustration cited, surely separates "Bad" Painting from earlier Expressionism and Surrealism, surely picks out a crucial trait across this otherwise disparate group. Tucker's essay cannot quite put her finger on it, but one might tease this out by considering preceding developments in figurative painting in the 1960s and 70s, a little closer.
214:. One way of understanding "Bad" Painting is to notice how these preceding styles progressively depart from common or mass print imagery, while spelling out crucial differences between painting and prints – defining painting. In this way, they disclose telling differences in meaning between the two, even when imagery remains much the same. Tucker rightly senses this project travels in tandem with Minimalism, but without quite grasping the consequences. "Bad" Painting signals a further and final dissolution to this project, an end rather than a beginning.
389:
but essentially confirms her choices. "Bad" Painting remains a useful style with which to survey
American figurative painting toward the end of the 1970s. Tucker's sense of an emerging post modern era was in part true, in as much as she detected a pervasive dissolution, but "Bad" Painting did not announce the end of progress, or further development in painting, as she supposed (see quote below). The style itself was too diffuse, too peripheral, geographically and stylistically, to exert a decisive influence.
377:' (b. 1930) use of stencils and templates, filled with short, broad, impasto strokes. Stencils, like prints, afford multiple instances and establish strict conventions in wide use, acquire a certain authority for it. They are essentially designs, whether of the American flag or a target. John's compliance with them remains rugged but respectful, or highly ambivalent. His work from the 1950s is usually seen as an important precursor, if not initiator, of Pop Art. Jenney's work from the late 1960s, such as
398:
of the concept of progress per se... It would seem that, without a specific idea of progress toward a goal, the traditional means of valuing and validating works of art are useless. Bypassing the idea of progress implies an extraordinary freedom to do and to be whatever you want. In part, this is one of the most appealing aspects of "bad" painting - that the ideas of good and bad are flexible and subject to both the immediate and the larger context in which the work is seen."
317:, and add equally stylised figures, much as architectural illustration uses. All four artists extend the derivation from print styles to less obvious means, less compelling features. The work is "bad" in comparison with Pop Art, for pursuing techniques and imagery to trivial or nugatory ends for painting, for blurring or obscuring reference in prints. This is something Tucker's catalogue essay actually celebrates, a point to be returned to presently.
385:(1977) extends this development, so that figures have become more cursory, perhaps Expressionist. Any rationale for the stooping figure on the left of the picture, for example, is now lost and the surrounding ground, granted even greater latitude to impasto brushstroke and colour. Once more, the work exhausts a seam of rigid iconography and painterly treatment, arrives at a ‘bad’ icon, or an icon treated "badly".
455:. Such work is sometimes associated with "bad" painting, for degrading or conflating traditional iconography, but the difference lies in a narrowed scope for these later artists. Fewer "bad" elements are managed within a more obvious structure, are "bad" perhaps in anatomy or drawing, but "good" in volume or tone, colour or composition. Such work remains popular but generally earns no more precise grouping than
35:'good painting', which is characterized by deformation of the figure, a mixture of art-historical and non-art resources, and fantastic and irreverent content. In its disregard for accurate representation and its rejection of conventional attitudes about art, 'bad' painting is at once funny and moving, and often scandalous in its scorn for the standards of good taste." "Bad," as Tucker's use of
241:(1937–2021), similarly continued to mine a strong illustrational style devoted to fine, continuous outline and mainly flat colours, even as it adopted less familiar content. In both cases, the work maintains a cool detachment in manner, as painting, even as its content is much less obviously popular or commonplace. Pop Art is also quick to use art historical references, such as Warhol's
402:
with number of individuals. Flexibility and subjectivity on these terms becomes excessive. Indeed, the development Tucker sketches might also be described as a drastic dissolution for the critic, whereby each work must be accorded its own style, each style applied only to one work. Comparison or assessment thus becomes futile. Badness, on these terms, has little to recommend it.
89:
415:
light-hearted in sentiment. Similarly, "Bad" Painting is often associated with New Image
Painting, another trend in figurative painting defined by an exhibition later in 1978, curated by Richard Marshall. But there, the trend is focused upon New York-based artists and a derivation closer to that outlined for Jenney, who was also included.
190:
shared theme of iconoclasm, and a preference for parody and antagonism for her selection, but again, these are qualities common to
Expressionism and Surrealism, and even some Photo-realism. A further feature noted is the use of "non-high-art sources", the most prevalent being comics. Yet curiously, Tucker makes no mention of
357:(1977). Works are generally executed in broad, open or loose brushstrokes, bright colours, a staple of textile design. Brown's work from this time often features patterned borders along the bottom of the picture; however, examples selected for "Bad" Painting concentrate instead on the centralised motif, flat colours and an
467:
within the same work, with demonstrating degrees or a spectrum between them. Good and bad here fall between a purity of means – formal or intrinsic properties to painting – and impurity of ends – extrinsic content to a picture. This is a far broader criterion for figurative painting than Tucker's Bad
369:
cat mask (a flattened picture within a flattened picture) worn by the woman, is also executed in the casual brushstrokes favoured by textile design. The picture thus shares an insouciant confluence of styles, an amusing "badness". Again though, it is worth noting that Brown's drawing of the figure in
266:
With these precedents in mind, Tucker's examples of "Bad" Painting may be divided into roughly four groups. To be clear, Tucker does make this division in either her essay or exhibition. What is offered here is simply a demonstration of the consistency of her selection, even as her description proves
401:
Unfortunately, Tucker does not supply this larger context, in which one might see a "progression" of figurative painting styles up to 1978. Nor does she acknowledge that "the extraordinary freedom" accorded the artist under such an arrangement is also useless, if standards for individuality multiply
271:
styles derived from print sources, although more remotely than Pop Art. The works by
Albertson, Carrillo, Hilton and Staley favour this. Note: reproductions of examples cited here, can be found on the New Museum of Contemporary Art's website, listed in the external references below. Albertson's mock
197:
While art historical allusion, humour and fantasy are undoubtedly features of her selection, more precisely, they arise in deliberately citing popular print or publication sources, albeit with increasing distance or restraint. The strand to figurative painting discerned by Tucker surely derives from
397:
It is clear from her catalogue essay, that Tucker saw "Bad" Painting as a dilemma for notions of progress and assessment. "The freedom with which these artists mix classical and popular art-historical sources, kitsch and traditional images, archetypal and personal fantasies, constitutes a rejection
320:
The second group brackets the work by Cply and Siler, whom retain the strong outlines of comic-strip or animated cartoon figures, stylised drawing and mostly flat colours. Although, Cply's figures are notably looser in drawing than most comic- strips, while the attention to pattern and a decorative
388:
All four groups thus trace a steady diffusion to print sources and the means with which painting distinguishes itself from them. The stylistic lineage offered here demonstrates a greater coherence and articulation than Tucker's catalogue essay, and indicates several inaccuracies to her description
145:
On paper, Tucker's criterion for "Bad" Painting is rather generous, allowing merely that "the artists whose work will be shown have discarded classical drawing modes in order to present a humorous, often sardonic, intensely personal view of the world". But this alone would simply permit work with
471:
Finally, the influence of "Bad" Painting was not immediate or sustained, on
American painting or internationally. Albertson, Carrillo, Chatelain, Hilton, Siler and Staley achieved no wider recognition. However, the style anticipated a growing interest in other kinds of pictures for painting, not
189:
represent a prevalent "classicizing" style for
American painting and against which "Bad" Painting presents a challenge (although not a movement). At best, this explains the selection as a retreat from photographic or "classicizing" standards for figuration to an older style. Tucker identifies a
34:
Tucker defined "Bad" Painting as a focused or deliberate disrespect for recent styles of painting, not the more common sense of technical incompetence, poor artistic judgement, or amateur or outsider dabbling. The press release for the exhibition summarized "Bad" Painting as "an ironic title for
426:
in 1990. As the title suggests, Shaw's collection is drawn from humble, second-hand sources, rather than an explicit criterion of badness. But the collection is not concerned with surprising bargains for the conventional art collector. On the contrary, it is a catalogue of discarded or rejected
257:
and stripes, soon allows overlapping planes – a minimal depth – then shadows or volume, then more concrete objects in symmetrical patterns, and with these a measure of figuration. Patterns of repeating pictures, or serial motifs, are eventually a prominent feature of the style. Sources become
414:
or metaphorical themes, frequently political or historical. Her selection is more wide-ranging. Bad
Painting shares none of the shrillness, the social provocation often found in Neo-Expressionism. "Bad" Painting is typically more restrained, in scale and scope, more light-handed in touch,
262:
quality with their earnest, sentimental motifs, once these are removed from a print context and scrutinised as painting. Kitsch, in these cases, becomes something like a badge for the extended exploitation of prints and pattern by painting, a sign of the project's exhaustion.
258:
textiles and other printed matter, such as wallpaper or wrapping paper. With these, P&D converges with Pop Art and following styles, dissipates as a project, or turns "bad" in the hands of fringe practitioners. P&D sources often carry an additional vulgar or
333:(born 1940), as well as Funk artists, such as the watercolours of Wiley from the late 1960s. The combination itself is a symptom of a growing diffusion, a weakening distinction for both styles. The work is "bad" for its minor variation, its feeble allusion.
430:
Shaw's publication was received favourably and led to later exhibitions. Critics still occasionally revile them, but this is perhaps to miss their sophisticated appeal, their potent suggestion. Their acceptance also coincides, and possibly prompts work by
409:
that follows in the early 80s, a style with branches in
Germany, Italy and France, amongst other nations. But there are important differences. Tucker's selection does not concentrate upon large-scale works, featuring broad, urgent facture, applied to
365:(1972) – one of the standouts to the show – it is presumably the attention given to modish black lace lingerie and high heels, content that recalls advertising, included within a more relaxed composition, that appealed to Tucker. The witty,
336:
The third group brackets works by Brown, Garabedian, Hendon, Linhares, Urquhart and Wegman, where a derivation from P&D is foremost. Here, more decorative, frontal motifs often emphasise fabric supports, in works such as
Urquhart's
249:
illustrations, as a way of driving home the point about painting and print's differences. Subsequent allusion in following styles to famous paintings, inherits some of this irony, although the project steadily dilutes, turns "bad".
304:
to figures in both Albertson and Carrillo does largely maintain classical proportions and foreshortening, contrary to Tucker's sweeping claims. Hilton's architectural scenes, from Roman and Medieval painting, feature precision and
321:
flattening in projection also aligns the work with P&D. In some examples, ribald subject matter pose something of an extension to the genres, presents a more eccentric extension. Siler's equally casual arrangements, such as
225:(1923–1997), soon prompted painting from other kinds of cartoon and illustration and other qualities of painting with which to highlight such sources. The Hairy Who, for example, broadens the project, arriving at more
373:
The fourth group brackets the work of Jenney and Chatelain, where vigorously brushed grounds to central, simple motifs are prominent. The derivation is not so much to Pop Art and print sources, but to
237:
as the graphics of Pop Art. However, their wider acceptance with shows between 1966 and -68 surely reflects a momentum created by the success of Pop Art. Funk Art in San Francisco, as in the work of
544:, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, 1978, Unfortunately there are no page numbers to the catalogue, so numbers offered here count from the first page of Tucker's essay (as 1) - p.3, p.17.
284:(1976) all supply humorous content in contrast with earnest titles, in a broad-brushed style, akin to movie posters or magazine illustration of an earlier era. Carrillo's large-scale
158:, styles already well established within a canon of good taste. In practice though, Tucker's criterion is much stricter, and excludes for example, the established Expressionism of a
463:(b. 1954) for dual exhibitions, contrasting bodies of work dedicated to "bad painting" and "good painting". But Oehlen's concern is really with accommodating figuration and
443:(b. 1957), for example, where the focus is upon portraiture and stereotypes, much like Thrift Store Paintings, but provides a more directed mix of technical
606:
31:, New York, featuring the work of fourteen artists mostly unknown in New York at the time. The exhibition ran from January 14 to February 28, 1978.
253:
Pattern and Decoration (P&D) actually derives from Minimalist abstraction, but through progressive expansion to compositional formats of basic
492:, Village Voice, March 23, 1999, in Seeing Out Loud: The Village Voice Art Columns, Fall 1998 - Winter 2003, Geoffrey Young, 2003, p376.
497:
349:, but the focus for this group is mainly upon the picture as a single, central motif, often with a border or frame, as in Linhares'
132:
300:
native to print. It is the clash or confusion to style here that signals a poverty or "badness" to standards. Also of note, the
742:
99:
28:
217:
To briefly summarise the development - the use of cartoons and banal illustrations in the work of Pop Art pioneers, such as
72:
288:(1974) presents a futuristic scene peopled with glowing skeletons, female nudes and a strangely mechanical bird. By
727:
620:
Tucker, Marcia, Press Release, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, 1978, see external link for reference.
114:
306:
110:
52:
39:
suggests, is thus a term of approval for eccentric and amusing deviations from accepted styles at the time.
203:
642:
Thrift store paintings are cited as inspiration for "Bad" Painting by Tucker in Albertson, James et al.,
310:
268:
24:
358:
267:
misleading or inadequate. The first group (in no particular order) brackets works that highlight
56:
366:
493:
423:
419:
406:
226:
211:
175:
370:
this example is traditional in proportion and modelling, contrary to Tucker's prescription.
238:
222:
71:(b. 1940), P. Walter Siler (b. 1939), Earl Staley (b. 1938), Shari Urquhart (b. 1938), and
314:
293:
68:
452:
436:
330:
181:
In the catalogue essay, a context of the preceding fifteen years is sketched, in which
736:
460:
229:
or abstracted cartoon captions and characters, although their inspiration is as much
207:
186:
171:
147:
20:
633:, Whitney Museum of American Art (catalogue) New York, December 1978 - January 1979.
509:
Tucker, Marcia, Press Release, see external link for New Museum of Contemporary Art.
518:
Tucker, Marcia, Press Release, see external link for New Museum of Contemporary Art
440:
374:
234:
36:
51:(1938–1990), Eduardo Carrillo (1937–1997), James Chatelain (b. 1947), Cply (alias
468:
Painting or related subsequent developments and gains little by an association.
464:
456:
432:
411:
326:
289:
218:
163:
64:
60:
553:
Tucker, Marcia, "Bad" Painting, catalogue essay, in Albertson, James, et al.,
540:
Tucker, Marcia, "Bad" Painting, catalogue essay, in Albertson, James, et al.,
527:
Tucker, Marcia, "Bad" Painting, catalogue essay, in Albertson, James, et al.,
254:
246:
182:
167:
159:
155:
151:
48:
472:
exclusively predicated upon print models, not exclusively private or remote.
178:(1920–2009). Some further condition was obviously at work in her criterion.
418:
Where "Bad" Painting does find later resonance is with the publication of
448:
444:
230:
728:
Press release and catalogue excerpts for the 1978 New Museum exhibition
301:
199:
191:
259:
47:
Artists included in the exhibition were James Albertson (1944–2015),
405:
Bad Painting is sometimes seen a precursor to the wider movement of
117:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
27:
in the 1970s. Tucker curated an exhibition of the same name at the
557:, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, 1978; p.7, p.15, p.17.
345:(1977). Repeating motifs are incorporated as a bold wall paper in
297:
531:, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, 1978. - Footnote 33.
82:
459:. By contrast, "bad painting" has been invoked by the artist
689:, catalogue, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New YOrk, 1978.
672:, exhibition catalogue, Museum Moderner Kunst, Vienna, 2008,
646:, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, 1978, p.1, p.13.
579:
Tucker, Marcia, "Bad" Painting, in Albertson, James, et al
583:, New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, 1978, p.13.
106:
325:(1976) share affinities with Chicago artists such as
701:
Hunger Nach Bildern: deutsche malerei der gegenwart
210:, and affiliated Chicago groups, and Californian
8:
292:rather than technique, the work alludes to
699:Faust, Wolfgang Max & de Vries, Gerd,
608:And When He Was Bad, He Certainly Was Busy
133:Learn how and when to remove this message
717:, Oxford University Press, London, 2000.
272:symbolic or allegorical scenes, such as
19:is the name given by critic and curator
657:Good. Bad. It's all the same in the end
481:
278:Sex, Violence, Religion + The Good Life
63:(1936–2014), Joseph Hilton (b. 1946),
710:, Laurence King, London and NY. 2000.
7:
596:, New York Magazine, April 20, 1987.
708:Art Since 1940: Strategies of Being
703:, Dumont Buchverlag, Cologne, 1982.
694:Super Realism: A Critical Anthology
568:Super Realism: A Critical Anthology
341:(1977) and Hendon's tapestry-like
174:(1913–1980), the fantasy of later
14:
659:, The Independent, July 16, 2006.
611:, New York Times, March 30, 2001.
166:(1915–2010), the caricature of a
447:with vulgarity, caricature with
87:
296:as much as Surrealism and to a
245:or Lichtenstein's Mondrian and
594:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
570:, Dutton, New York, 1975 p.39.
29:New Museum of Contemporary Art
1:
361:to the surrounding space. In
668:Badura-Triska, Eva, et al.,
605:Smith, Roberta, ART REVIEW;
113:the claims made and adding
759:
715:After Modern Art 1945–2000
685:Albertson, James, et al.,
696:, Dutton, New York, 1975.
347:Interior with Sugar Talk
339:Interior with Sugar Talk
670:Bad Painting – good art
282:The Triumph of Chastity
154:tendencies, not to say
23:to a trend in American
743:American art movements
420:Thrift Store Paintings
204:Pattern and Decoration
353:(1977), Garabedian's
706:Fineberg, Jonathan,
629:Marshall, Richard,
363:Woman Wearing a Mask
309:akin to the work of
692:Battcock, Gregory,
566:Battcock, Gregory,
451:, stylisation with
343:Mallard with Friend
313:(1941–1997), a key
25:figurative painting
655:Darwent, Charles,
631:New Image Painting
359:oblique projection
98:possibly contains
57:Charles Garabedian
490:A Pettibon Primer
407:Neo-Expressionism
143:
142:
135:
100:original research
750:
713:Hopkins, David,
673:
666:
660:
653:
647:
640:
634:
627:
621:
618:
612:
603:
597:
590:
584:
577:
571:
564:
558:
551:
545:
538:
532:
525:
519:
516:
510:
507:
501:
486:
329:(1939–2021) and
239:William T. Wiley
223:Roy Lichtenstein
221:(1928–1987) and
138:
131:
127:
124:
118:
115:inline citations
91:
90:
83:
758:
757:
753:
752:
751:
749:
748:
747:
733:
732:
724:
682:
680:Further reading
677:
676:
667:
663:
654:
650:
641:
637:
628:
624:
619:
615:
604:
600:
591:
587:
578:
574:
565:
561:
552:
548:
539:
535:
526:
522:
517:
513:
508:
504:
487:
483:
478:
422:by the painter
395:
315:Chicago Imagist
294:science fiction
162:(1922–2004) or
139:
128:
122:
119:
104:
92:
88:
81:
69:Judith Linhares
55:) (1919–1996),
45:
12:
11:
5:
756:
754:
746:
745:
735:
734:
731:
730:
723:
722:External links
720:
719:
718:
711:
704:
697:
690:
687:"Bad" Painting
681:
678:
675:
674:
661:
648:
644:"Bad" Painting
635:
622:
613:
598:
585:
581:"Bad" Painting
572:
559:
555:"Bad" Painting
546:
542:"Bad" Painting
533:
529:"Bad" Painting
520:
511:
502:
488:Saltz, Jerry,
480:
479:
477:
474:
439:(b. 1962) and
437:Lisa Yuskavage
394:
391:
331:Gladys Nilsson
286:Los Tropicanas
269:illustrational
198:the styles of
176:Honoré Sharrer
141:
140:
95:
93:
86:
80:
77:
73:William Wegman
53:William Copley
44:
41:
17:"Bad" Painting
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
755:
744:
741:
740:
738:
729:
726:
725:
721:
716:
712:
709:
705:
702:
698:
695:
691:
688:
684:
683:
679:
671:
665:
662:
658:
652:
649:
645:
639:
636:
632:
626:
623:
617:
614:
610:
609:
602:
599:
595:
589:
586:
582:
576:
573:
569:
563:
560:
556:
550:
547:
543:
537:
534:
530:
524:
521:
515:
512:
506:
503:
499:
498:1-930589-17-4
495:
491:
485:
482:
475:
473:
469:
466:
462:
461:Albert Oehlen
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
428:
425:
421:
416:
413:
408:
403:
399:
392:
390:
386:
384:
380:
379:Girl and Vase
376:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
334:
332:
328:
324:
323:Spookie Stove
318:
316:
312:
308:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
264:
261:
256:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
213:
209:
208:The Hairy Who
205:
201:
195:
193:
188:
187:Photo-realism
184:
179:
177:
173:
172:Philip Guston
170:(b. 1934) or
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:Expressionist
137:
134:
126:
116:
112:
108:
102:
101:
96:This article
94:
85:
84:
78:
76:
74:
70:
66:
62:
59:(1923–2016),
58:
54:
50:
42:
40:
38:
32:
30:
26:
22:
21:Marcia Tucker
18:
714:
707:
700:
693:
686:
669:
664:
656:
651:
643:
638:
630:
625:
616:
607:
601:
593:
592:Larson, Kay
588:
580:
575:
567:
562:
554:
549:
541:
536:
528:
523:
514:
505:
489:
484:
470:
441:George Condo
429:
417:
404:
400:
396:
387:
382:
378:
375:Jasper Johns
372:
367:trompe-l'œil
362:
355:Adam and Eve
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
322:
319:
285:
281:
277:
274:Memento Mori
273:
265:
252:
242:
235:outsider art
216:
196:
180:
144:
129:
120:
97:
46:
37:scare quotes
33:
16:
15:
465:abstraction
457:Post Modern
435:(b. 1962),
433:John Currin
412:allegorical
327:Karl Wirsum
311:Roger Brown
307:projections
290:iconography
280:(1976) and
219:Andy Warhol
164:Jack Levine
75:(b. 1943).
67:(b. 1945),
65:Neil Jenney
61:Cham Hendon
476:References
445:virtuosity
255:symmetries
183:Minimalism
168:Peter Saul
160:Leon Golub
156:caricature
152:Surrealist
107:improve it
49:Joan Brown
393:Influence
243:Mona Lisa
123:June 2017
111:verifying
737:Category
449:idealism
424:Jim Shaw
383:Untitled
227:stylised
212:Funk Art
453:realism
302:drawing
276:(1975)
247:Cézanne
200:Pop Art
192:Pop Art
105:Please
43:Artists
496:
351:Turkey
260:kitsch
298:genre
231:naïve
79:Style
494:ISBN
233:and
185:and
150:or
109:by
739::
206:,
202:,
500:.
136:)
130:(
125:)
121:(
103:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.