Knowledge (XXG)

Bangladesh Italian Marble Works Ltd. v. Government of Bangladesh

Source 📝

104:
filed a writ petition under Article 102 of the constitution claiming that the declaration of the cinema hall as an "abandoned property" was unlawful. It sought a direction upon the government to return the premises to their original owners. In that writ petition, the petitioners challenged the
142: 190: 300: 196: 84:
is a case of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. In a significant verdict in 2010, the court overturned the fifth amendment to the
145:
null and void. It ruled that martial law was illegal and unconstitutional. Hence, all martial law proclamations were also illegal.
154: 305: 161:
as a fundamental principle from the constitution. The verdict was implemented by the Fifteenth Amendment Act 2011 in the
126: 30: 85: 295: 162: 122: 129:-led government appealed in the Supreme Court and obtained a stay on the High Court's judgement. In 2009, the 177: 114: 176:
on the grounds of the doctrine of necessity. The verdict was interpreted as a victory for democracy and
51: 118: 71: 66: 56: 46: 89: 110: 241: 216: 109:
Proclamation Orders between 1975 and 1979. A verdict was reached on 29 August 2005 in the
61: 289: 242:"Microsoft Word - C.P. Nos. 1044 & 1045 of 2009 _5th Amendment_ Final 25.7.1..." 130: 265: 106: 158: 169: 168:
The verdict overturned earlier judicial precedents in Bangladesh and
125:
to return the Moon Cinema Hall to its original owners. The erstwhile
105:
constitutionality of the Fifth Amendment Act 1979, which validated
173: 101: 121:
declared the Fifth Amendment Act 1979 unlawful and directed the
81:
Bangladesh Italian Marble Works Ltd. v. Government of Bangladesh
22:
Bangladesh Italian Marble Works Ltd v. Government of Bangladesh
153:
The verdict invalidated Proclamation Orders issued by the
141:
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court declared the
180:. Martial law was declared to be illegal for good. 41: 36: 26: 21: 143:Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of Bangladesh 191:Federation of Pakistan v. Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan 157:between 1975 and 1979, including the removal of 100:In 2000, the owner of the Moon Cinema Hall in 133:-led government withdrew the state's appeal. 8: 197:Article 70 of the Constitution of Bangladesh 18: 264:Julfikar Ali Manik and Ashutosh Sarkar. 172:, in which the courts sought to support 208: 92:character of the Bangladeshi republic. 16:2010 Supreme Court of Bangladesh case 7: 266:"Martial law stays illegal for good" 217:"5th Amendment: A critical analysis" 301:Bangladeshi constitutional case law 88:made in 1979; and strengthened the 14: 155:Chief Martial Law Administrator 1: 127:Bangladesh Nationalist Party 31:Supreme Court of Bangladesh 322: 86:Constitution of Bangladesh 67:Mohammad Muzammel Hossain 163:Parliament of Bangladesh 123:Government of Bangladesh 178:parliamentary supremacy 47:Mohammad Tafazzul Islam 115:A. B. M. Khairul Haque 52:Mohammad Fazlul Karim 306:Trials in Bangladesh 221:Law & Our Rights 119:A. T. M. Fazle Kabir 72:Surendra Kumar Sinha 57:Mohammad Abdul Matin 113:, in which Justice 90:secular democratic 77: 76: 313: 296:2010 in case law 280: 279: 277: 276: 261: 255: 254: 252: 251: 246: 238: 232: 231: 229: 228: 223:. The Daily Star 213: 111:Dhaka High Court 37:Court membership 19: 321: 320: 316: 315: 314: 312: 311: 310: 286: 285: 284: 283: 274: 272: 263: 262: 258: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 226: 224: 215: 214: 210: 205: 186: 151: 139: 98: 69: 64: 62:Bijan Kumar Das 59: 54: 49: 17: 12: 11: 5: 319: 317: 309: 308: 303: 298: 288: 287: 282: 281: 270:The Daily Star 256: 233: 207: 206: 204: 201: 200: 199: 194: 185: 182: 150: 147: 138: 135: 97: 94: 75: 74: 45:Chief Justice 43: 42:Judges sitting 39: 38: 34: 33: 28: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 318: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 293: 291: 271: 267: 260: 257: 243: 237: 234: 222: 218: 212: 209: 202: 198: 195: 193: 192: 188: 187: 183: 181: 179: 175: 171: 166: 164: 160: 156: 148: 146: 144: 136: 134: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 95: 93: 91: 87: 83: 82: 73: 68: 63: 58: 53: 48: 44: 40: 35: 32: 29: 25: 20: 273:. Retrieved 269: 259: 248:. Retrieved 236: 225:. Retrieved 220: 211: 189: 167: 152: 149:Significance 140: 131:Awami League 117:and Justice 99: 80: 79: 78: 107:Martial Law 290:Categories 275:2017-07-11 250:2017-07-11 227:2017-07-11 203:References 159:secularism 137:Judgement 184:See also 170:Pakistan 70:Justice 65:Justice 60:Justice 55:Justice 50:Justice 245:(PDF) 174:coups 102:Dhaka 96:Facts 27:Court 292:: 268:. 219:. 165:. 278:. 253:. 230:.

Index

Supreme Court of Bangladesh
Mohammad Tafazzul Islam
Mohammad Fazlul Karim
Mohammad Abdul Matin
Bijan Kumar Das
Mohammad Muzammel Hossain
Surendra Kumar Sinha
Constitution of Bangladesh
secular democratic
Dhaka
Martial Law
Dhaka High Court
A. B. M. Khairul Haque
A. T. M. Fazle Kabir
Government of Bangladesh
Bangladesh Nationalist Party
Awami League
Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of Bangladesh
Chief Martial Law Administrator
secularism
Parliament of Bangladesh
Pakistan
coups
parliamentary supremacy
Federation of Pakistan v. Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan
Article 70 of the Constitution of Bangladesh
"5th Amendment: A critical analysis"
"Microsoft Word - C.P. Nos. 1044 & 1045 of 2009 _5th Amendment_ Final 25.7.1..."
"Martial law stays illegal for good"
Categories

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.