Knowledge (XXG)

Battle of the Yalu River (1894)

Source 📝

1185: 1210: 922:, together with both torpedo boats, immediately steamed up the river and dropped their anchors approximately 12–13 nautical miles (22–24 km) from the mouth of the Yalu. The troops were disembarked and the landing operation lasted until the morning of 17 September. Meanwhile, the remaining warships of the Beiyang Fleet anchored in shallow waters about 7–8 nautical miles (13–15 km) from the shore, south-west of the mouth of the river, where they remained for the rest of the day and the entire night. On 17 September, at 9:20 am, the fleet left its position and conducted a one-and-a-half-hour training exercise before returning to their previous anchorage. Soon thereafter, at 11:28 am, observers on board the Chinese warships spotted smoke from unknown vessels heading from the south-west. 1176:
wrong caliber and could not be fired. Philo McGiffin noted that many of the gunpowder charges were "thirteen years old and condemned". What little ammunition there was, was to be preserved for real battle. Live ammunition training was rarely carried out. Li wanted to delay the battle against the Japanese fleet, thus allowing the Chinese more time to equip their ships with additional ammunition. However, the Imperial Court called him a coward and his recommendation was turned down. The Chinese fleet was bigger and armed with bigger guns. The Japanese fleet was much faster. As a result, the Japanese would have an advantage in open water.
816:, in the process removing all effective Chinese military presence on the Korean peninsula. Shortly before the convoy's departure, Admiral Ding received a message concerning the battle at Pyongyang. Although it was rather inaccurate, it informed him about the defeat and subsequently made the redeployment of the troops to near the mouth of the Taedong River unnecessary. Admiral Ding, who then correctly assumed that the next Chinese line of defence would be established on the Yalu River, decided to redeploy the embarked soldiers there. On 16 September, at about 1:00 am, the convoy of five transport ships departed from the 1551:
against the line abreast formation was not yet absolutely certain, but the wedge formation adopted purposely or accidentally by the Chinese could only have been effective in the hands of a commander whose ship captains had mastered fleet movements, which Ding's subordinates had not. Secondly, the one common denominator between Lissa and the Yalu appeared to be that the victor had fought in separated squadrons. This arrangement provided tactical flexibility and consequently widened the options for maneuver during the chaos of battle.
299: 288: 245: 233: 276: 265: 170: 638: 1348: 1336:, but it was a mistranslation of Philo T. McGiffin's memoir, which says that he and Ding were "catapulted" by the shockwave. Now historians agree it was Japanese gunfire that destroyed the flying bridge, leaving Admiral Ding with his legs crushed under the wreckage and thus out of combat for the remainder of the battle. Most of his staff officers on the bridge were likewise injured or killed. The situation was worsened when the Japanese destroyed 1616:, providing front-page coverage and crediting the Japanese victory to its rapid assimilation of western methods and technology. Many credited the prompt action of foreign advisers in the Beiyang Fleet (most notably McGiffin) from keeping the fleet from total annihilation, and for keeping even the most heavily damaged Chinese ships fighting until the very end of the engagement. Some contemporary military analysts, notably U.S. 54: 1270:, but in doing so inadvertently allowed the other Chinese vessels to escape. By this time the main Japanese squadron under Admiral Itō was circling what remained of the Chinese force, the major Japanese ships fired their heavy and quick-firing guns that swept the decks of the Chinese ships and smashed their superstructures. Many of the Japanese ships, however, also received major damage. 772:
the Chinese fleet returned to Weihaiwei on 28 July. The Chinese warships immediately resupplied themselves with coal while the weather improved, and the main force of the Beiyang Fleet was put to sea again on the following day but without the torpedo boats, heading for the Korean coast. This second cruise lasted longer, until 3 August, but the fleet did not encounter the Japanese.
1623:, called the battle 'nearly a draw' – although the Chinese had lost several warships, the Japanese had suffered considerable damage, and if the Chinese ammunition had been of higher quality, the outcome might have been different. In addition to Herbert, several other American officials published analyses of the battle, including Alfred Thayer Mahan and William F. Halsey Sr. 1238:(15 to 26 km/h; 9.2 to 16.1 mph) and headed for the very centre of the Chinese formation; the tactic held the puzzled enemy in position. Turning slightly to port, the flying squadron then moved around the right flank of the Chinese formation to strike at the weakest units there. Holding fire until they were in effective range, the cruisers battered 1632:
infancy with significant advances still some years away, neither side achieved more than a fraction of hits out of the total number of rounds fired. A contemporary European diplomat also concurs, observing that Japan's naval "victories were due to the skill and daring of her sailors, and not to the ships which they manned".
1478:
The Japanese fleet's more reliable, better-maintained ordnance and overwhelming superiority in rapid-firing guns gave it a tactical advantage over the Beiyang Fleet, which fought with limited stocks, consisting of older foreign ammunition and shoddy domestic products. Japanese shells set four Chinese
791:
where two days later, on 14 September, they were joined by another 2,000 soldiers. Initially, Admiral Ding wanted to send the transports under a light escort with only a few ships, while the main force of the Beiyang Fleet would locate and operate directly against Combined Fleet, in order to prevent
628:
in order to defeat the Chinese army and bring the war to a swift conclusion. If the engagement were to be a draw and neither side gained control of the sea, the army would concentrate on the occupation of Korea. Lastly, if the Combined Fleet was defeated and consequently lost command of the sea, the
1518:
in 1866, the battle was studied for its tactical lessons not only by the Japanese Navy General Staff, but by naval staffs around the globe. The lessons to a degree were unclear, since the two fleet encounters seemed to be contradictory and cancelled each other out. At Lissa, the Austrians had used
1175:
Though well drilled, the Chinese had not engaged in sufficient gunnery practice beforehand. This lack of training was the direct result of a serious lack of ammunition. Corruption seems to have played a major role; many Chinese shells appear to have been filled with cement or porcelain, or were the
1640:
were insufficient, as the foreign press would come to find that many of China's claims were false, discrediting them in the eyes of the international community. The Battle of the Yalu and the naval defeats of 1894–1895 in general have been the topic of extensive discussion among Chinese historians
1631:
and Davids Evans state the principal factors in the Japanese victory was their superiority in firepower, particularly an overwhelming advantage in quick-firing guns which proved to be devastating in the hands of well-trained and disciplined gun crews. At the time fire control systems were in their
1550:
However, there were some conclusions that could be drawn from the course and outcome of the battle. The first was that the line ahead was the best formation which preserved the greatest flexibility and simplicity of movement, minimized tactical confusion and also maximized broadside fire. The case
771:
for repairs. After arriving in Korean waters on the morning of the following day, the Chinese ships cruised the area looking to engage the enemy. However, the abrupt change in the weather made the patrolling of the Korean waters more arduous, especially for the small torpedo boats and consequently
1374:
The Chinese fleet opened fire on the Japanese fleet as they passed from port to starboard, across the bows of the Chinese vessels. They failed to score any significant hits on the Japanese with their 12-inch (305 mm) and 8.2-inch (208 mm) guns. At about 2,700 metres (3,000 yd) (the
1233:
When the enemy was well in sight Admiral Sukeyuki Ito ordered the Flying Squadron to attack the Beiyang Fleet's right flank. The Chinese opened fire at a range of 5,000 metres (5,500 yd), which was far too great to cause any damage. The Japanese, meanwhile, held their fire for another twenty
1249:
The main squadron of the Japanese fleet initially followed the same course as the flying squadron towards the Chinese left but completed the turn all the way round to circle behind the Chinese fleet. As the flying squadron again turned south, the Beiyang Fleet was caught between the two Japanese
1229:
Late in the morning the two fleets approached each other, in contrasting formations. The Chinese had intended to form a line abreast, but due to confusion in signals and the differing speeds of the ships, they were in a wedge formation, with the two battleships at the fore and the other vessels
1131:
However, examination reveals the truth about China's seemingly advantageous position, as most of their warships were over-age and obsolescent; the ships were also not maintained properly and indiscipline was common among their crews. The greater armour of major Chinese warships and the greater
1635:
The Chinese government, after initially denying that its fleet had been defeated, put the blame for the Chinese defeat on Viceroy Li Hongzhang and Admiral Ding Ruchang, both of whom were demoted and stripped of honors. Their subordinates and relatives suffered similar fates. However, both men
1265:
that had attempted to ram one of the Japanese cruisers, then set off in pursuit of one of several ships on the Chinese left which were deserting their fleet and had fled toward the shallow waters to the north. The squadron successfully hunted down and destroyed the cruiser
1304:
By sunset the Beiyang Fleet's main formation was near the point of total collapse with both wings gone (the two ships of the Port wing had fled and four units of the Starboard wing destroyed); the four units of the centre were variously damaged and the two largest ships
1297:, however, was the most severe; where the lack of armour was made apparent when she was struck by two 12-inch shells that tore open the deck and ignited ready ammunition causing nearly one hundred casualties and forcing Admiral Itō to transfer his flag to 586:
and not in the river itself. There is no agreement among contemporary sources on the exact numbers and composition of each fleet, but both were of a similar size, and the battle is considered to be one of the Imperial Japanese Navy's greatest victories.
1343:
s foremast, making it impossible for the flagship to signal the rest of the fleet. The Chinese fleet, with some foresight, had anticipated something like this happening and formed into three pairs of mutually supporting vessels to carry the fight on.
804:
the following day. The Chinese warships spent the entire day cruising the area, waiting for the Japanese. However, since there was no sighting of the Japanese, Admiral Ding decided to return to Dalian, arriving there in the morning of 15 September.
1288:
also sustained serious damage as a result of her inferior speed, her captain decided not to try to follow the Flying Squadron on its sweep around the Chinese fleet, but instead to pass directly through the Chinese line. This maneuver made
1079:
The Beiyang Fleet had completed escorting a convoy to the mouth of the Yalu River, and was returning to its base at Lüshunkou when it was engaged by the Japanese Navy. On paper, the Beiyang Fleet had the superior ships, including two
1590:
were only slightly damaged, and the Japanese had no way of knowing that the battleships suffered from a lack of ammunition. What remained of the Beiyang Fleet was finally destroyed during a combined Japanese land and naval attack at
800:, which were on reconnaissance sortie, thwarted these plans. The Chinese mistook them for the main Japanese fleet. Consequently on 12 September, the entire Beiyang Fleet departed Dalian, heading for Weihaiwei and arriving near the 1626:
However, other factors were responsible for the Chinese defeat such as that most of the Chinese ships were over-age, obsolescent and ill-maintained. Additionally undisciplined crews and deficient naval tactics were also at fault.
1316:
Several different explanations have been put forward as to why the Beiyang Fleet did not change their formation to react to the Japanese tactics more effectively. Per Royal Navy Lieutenant William Ferdinand Tyler, stationed on
1159:
Tactically, Chinese naval vessels entered the war with only the crudest sets of instructions – ships that were assigned to designated pairs were to keep together and all ships were to fight end-on, as far forward from the
1506:, the converted liner, urged on by Admiral Kabayama Sukenori despite its lack of offensive armament, had been hit by four 12-inch (305 mm) shells and was left sailing virtually out of control as a result. 1674:
due to his refusal to send reinforcements north from the fleet. Zhang began organising 5 cruisers from the Nanyang fleet to reinforce the Beiyang fleet which would negate the losses of the Beiyang fleet.
1321:, Admiral Ding ordered his ships to change course in such a way that would have exposed his ship, the flagship, but put the rest of the squadron in a good position to fire on the Japanese fleet. However, 1234:
minutes as they headed diagonally across the Beiyang Fleet at twice the speed. On the signal of Admiral Ito, the Japanese squadrons divided. The flying squadron under Tsuboi increased speed from 8 to 14
577:
The battle is also known by a variety of names: Battle of Haiyang Island, Battle of Dadonggou, Battle of the Yellow Sea and Battle of Yalu, after the geographic location of the battle, which was in the
1164:
as possible, a tactic dictated by the obsolescent arrangement of guns aboard Chinese warships. The only vague semblance of a fleet tactic was that all ships were to follow the visible movements of the
414: 1547:-class cruisers had malfunctioned and thus the heaviest Japanese shells had not hit the two Chinese battleships, no other shells had penetrated their armor belts deeper than 4 inches. 1184: 600:
Japan's initial strategy was to gain command of the sea, which was critical to its operations in Korea. Command of the sea would allow Japan to transport troops to the mainland. The
3030: 629:
bulk of the army would remain in Japan and prepare to repel a Chinese invasion, while the Fifth Division in Korea would be ordered to hang on and fight a rearguard action.
1554:
Due to the Chinese Navy's weak preparations for the battle, faulty ammunition, and a lack of communication and discipline, which was the cause of at least one account of
1332:
to fire its main guns before the Japanese were in range. There is a long-repeated legend that firing the main battery directly forward resulted in the destruction of the
775:
At the beginning of September, Li Hongzhang decided to reinforce the Chinese forces at Pyongyang, by employing the Beiyang Fleet to escort transports to the mouth of the
407: 71: 1383:. Both those vessels burst into flames, because of their heavily varnished and polished wooden surfaces. Burning fiercely, both tried to save themselves by beaching. 1209: 1578:
The remnants of the Beiyang Fleet retired into Lüshunkou for repairs, but were withdrawn to Weihaiwei to avoid a second encounter with the Japanese fleet during the
3020: 1490:
The Chinese severely damaged four Japanese warships and lightly damaged two others. Japanese losses were roughly 180 killed and 200 wounded. The Japanese flagship
1929:
in Capt. McGiffin's reports) (7,430 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), 4–12.2, 2–5.9, 12MG, 3TT) (Lin Tai-tseng & McGiffin, Philo) – Left group to join flag. Damaged
2966: 1375:
Chinese had been steadily closing the range), the Japanese concentrated their fire on the right flank of the Chinese line, with devastating barrages poured into
616:
into the Yellow Sea, where it would be engaged in decisive battle. Depending on the outcome of this engagement, Japan would make one of three choices; If the
400: 2645: 1598:
The defeat of the Beiyang Fleet at the Battle of Yalu River was a major propaganda victory for Japan, with many major European newspapers, including the
1539:
formation. What also remained unresolved by the encounter was the debate between the proponents of the big gun and advocates of armor. Although the
1413:
The Japanese had intended to swing the flying division around the right flank of the Chinese line in an encirclement, but the timely arrival of the
2484: 1487:
stayed afloat and had casualties of 14 dead and 25 wounded. A total of about 850 Chinese sailors were killed in the battle, with 500 wounded.
2896: 2877: 2828: 2796: 2777: 2754: 118: 1092:, for which the Japanese had no counterparts. The Beiyang Fleet could also call on the assistance of numerous military advisers, including 90: 1230:
trailing behind on both flanks. The Japanese were in column formation with the Flying Squadron in front, followed by the main squadron.
1258:
resisted the heaviest bombardment as a result of their armour; however, the quick firing Japanese guns decimated crews on their decks.
2452: 97: 137: 1452:, which had been unable to keep up with the main line, and had then been engaged by the left-hand vessels of the Chinese line when 1144:. The worst feature of both Chinese battleships was actually their main armament; each was armed with short-barreled guns in twin 1371:. He opined that it was not surprising that the Chinese had suffered such losses if an army officer was directing a naval fleet. 2941: 2344: 2948: 1952: 1940: 855: 839: 104: 31: 1172:
book used by the Chinese was written in English, a language with which few officers in the Beiyang Fleet had any familiarity.
3035: 1636:
remained in their posts, and would oversee the final destruction of the Beiyang Fleet at Weihaiwei. However, this attempt to
505: 75: 1973:(1,350 t, 16 knots (30 km/h), 2–10, 4–4.7, 6MG) (Lin Li-chung) – Quickly caught fire, beached, wreck torpedoed next day 30:
This article is about the naval battle of the First Sino-Japanese War. For the first battle of the Russo-Japanese War, see
2852: 1612: 497: 86: 35: 1787: 1744: 1671: 965: 683: 643: 1152:
which could fire only in restricted arcs. The short barrels of the Chinese main armament meant that the shells had low
1998: 1763: 1189: 953: 897: 1072:, having escorted a convoy upriver, had to catch up, and only joined the action around 2:30 pm, in time to chase off 620:
were to win decisively, the larger part of the Japanese army would undertake immediate landings on the coast between
1558:, the Japanese forces were able to operate under very desirable conditions. Their victory in the battle established 3025: 2957: 1884: 1799: 1720: 971: 935: 879: 809: 728:, which was carrying 1,200 Chinese troops. When the Chinese troops on board refused to surrender or to be interned 677: 563: 478: 448: 1494:
suffered the worst single-ship loss, with more than 100 dead or wounded after being hit by a heavy Chinese round.
1328:
s captain deliberately did not acknowledge this order or pass it on to the rest of the fleet. Instead, he ordered
64: 1984: 1957:, 1886 (2,300 t, 18 knots (33 km/h), 3–8.3, 2–5.9, 16MG, 4TT) (Yeh Tus-kuei) – Stayed back to avoid shelling 1920: 1900: 1815: 980: 833: 827: 821: 1479:
vessels ablaze, destroying three. However, firefighting was well organized on the Chinese vessels. For example,
658:
With tensions with Japan increasing over the situation on the peninsula, the Chinese government chartered three
1960: 1779: 1704: 959: 930:
The Japanese Combined Fleet consisted of two formations. A flying squadron, composed of the four fast cruisers
873: 689: 532: 42: 1965:(1,350 t, 16 knots (30 km/h), 2–10, 4–4.7, 6MG) (Huang Chien-hsun) – Quickly caught fire, sank or beached 1738: 1440:
The Japanese fast cruisers veered to port and were then dispatched by Admiral Itoh to go to the assistance of
1368: 1101: 1097: 2843: 1968: 1932: 1892: 1889:(1,290 t, 16 knots (29.6 km/h), 1–4.7, 4–5, 8MG) (Wu Ching-jung) – Fled at start, ran aground, scuttled 1732: 1293:
an easy target and it sustained a number of serious hits before the ship moved out of range. The damage to
1169: 1043: 867: 861: 845: 792:
the Japanese from intercepting the convoy. However, the appearance near Weihaiwei of the Japanese cruisers
739:
had learned about the engagement at Pungdo on the morning of 26 July, when, at 6:00 am, the damaged cruiser
695: 559: 424: 161: 169: 111: 3045: 3010: 3005: 2046: 2041: 1869: 1838: 1823: 1579: 1515: 1283: 1010: 986: 667: 601: 567: 463: 458: 1793: 2809: 2420: 2036: 1617: 1246:. The flying squadron then moved northward to engage Chinese reinforcements coming from the Yalu River. 1026:
Admiral Ding attempted to form his fleet into a southward-facing line abreast with the strongest ships (
1006: 1195: 768: 637: 1347: 1750: 1081: 330: 1726: 1140:
on most first-line Japanese warships, which gave the Japanese the edge in any sustained exchange of
3040: 3015: 2488: 2345:"The Battle of the Yalu, Personal Recollections by the Commander of the Chinese Ironclad Chen Yuen" 1710: 1592: 1402:
became lost, ran aground, and was scuttled a few days later by its own crew. Some sources also say
1217: 1133: 720:
captured. Although the first two of the three troopships arrived safely in Korea, on 25 July 1894,
468: 443: 178: 1809: 1562:, demonstrated the weakness of the Chinese military, and by extension, the strength of their own. 2913:
The Battle of the Yalu, Personal Recollections by the Commander of the Chinese Ironclad Chen Yuen
1937:(2,830 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), 2–8.3, 2–5.9, 16MG, 4TT) (Chiu Pao-jen) – Aft on fire, damaged 1567: 1563: 1200: 801: 345: 335: 2646:"Same Water Different Dreams: Salient Lessons of the Sino-Japanese War for Future Naval Warfare" 763:
with eleven warships and seven torpedo boats and headed for the Korean coast, while the damaged
2892: 2873: 2838: 2824: 2792: 2773: 2750: 2448: 2442: 1714: 1620: 1149: 1016: 949: 820:
under escort from the main force of the Beiyang Fleet which included the ironclad battleships
523: 473: 340: 280: 1108:
Reserve and an Imperial Maritime Customs officer, was appointed as von Hanneken's assistant.
2856: 1649: 1137: 1113: 977: 705: 438: 17: 1653: 1645: 1559: 1161: 1153: 996: 237: 2352: 1773: 1769: 1363:
According to an account from James Allan, an officer aboard the U.S.-flagged supply ship
992: 906:. They reached the mouth of the Yalu River at about 6:00 pm. The transports, escorted by 662:
to carry reinforcements to Korea in late July to bolster their position there. The three
269: 2738:
The Gunpowder Age, China, Military Innovation, and the Rise of the West in World History
1367:, who witnessed the battle, rumors abounded that Admiral Ding deferred command to Major 743:
arrived at Weihaiwei. Although the Chinese admiral had not been aware of the sinking of
1846: 1426: 1109: 1000: 780: 779:. About 4,500 additional troops were to be redeployed, these had been stationed in the 617: 352: 324: 562:, and took place on 17 September 1894, the day after the Japanese victory at the land 2999: 1946: 1667: 1663: 1532: 1434: 1333: 1093: 776: 613: 571: 362: 1897:(2,300 t, 18 knots (33 km/h), 3–8.3, 2–5.9, 16MG, 4TT) (Teng Shih-chang) – Sunk 612:, both to engage and push Chinese forces northwest up the peninsula and to draw the 2922: 2860: 2765: 1906: 1628: 1600: 1528: 756: 736: 621: 292: 250: 2770:
Kaigun: strategy, tactics, and technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941
1875: 1235: 53: 2509:
Jukkoku Matsuda,Tōgō heihachirō to akiyama saneyuki, PHP Kenkyūjo, 2008, p. 187
2953: 1656:
predated it), there were significant lessons for naval observers to consider.
1536: 1524: 1105: 817: 813: 784: 583: 579: 303: 201: 2981: 2968: 1659: 1641:
and naval officers since events held to mark the 120th anniversary in 2014.
1540: 1520: 1121: 1117: 663: 659: 205: 2915:- Philo N. McGiffin, Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine, May–October 1895 34:. For the first battles of the Chinese Intervention in the Korean War, see 392: 1606: 1555: 1165: 1145: 605: 1851:(merchantman, 2913, 10 knots (19 km/h), small guns) (Kanō Yunoshin) 1156:
and poor penetration, and their accuracy was also poor at long ranges.
1100:, recently from Korea, who was appointed as the naval adviser to Ding. 625: 357: 1989:(2,100 t, 12 knots (22 km/h), 1–12.2, 2–6, 8MG, 4TT) (Li Ho-lien) 1637: 788: 760: 701: 513: 2821:
The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy
2740:. New Jersey, US & Oxshireford, UK: Princeton University Press. 2572:
The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy
1995:(1,000 t, 16 knots (30 km/h), 3–4.7, 8MG, 4TT) (Chen Pi-kuang) 1945:, 1887 (2,850 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), 2–8.3, 2–5.9. 8MG, 4TT) ( 1905:(flag, 7,355 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), 4–12.2, 2–5.9, 12MG,3TT) ( 1124:
and an instructor at the Weihaiwei Naval Academy, was appointed to
1828:(2200 t, 9 knots (17 km/h), 9–6) (Sakurai Kikunojō) – Damaged 1346: 1208: 1183: 1141: 636: 609: 2444:
Under the dragon flag: My experiences in the Chino-Japanese war
2003:(torpedo-boat, 128 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), MGs, 3TT) (Choy) 1214:
The Japanese warship Saikyōmaru at the Battle of the Yalu River
732:
sank the vessel. Over 800 Chinese soldiers died in the action.
396: 1475:) but failed. She sank along with her captain, Deng Shichang. 1261:
The Flying Squadron meanwhile re-engaged, sinking the cruiser
47: 2954:
Battle of the Yalu: All-Steel Warship – Dr. Terry Beckenbaugh
2553: 2551: 2549: 2547: 2545: 2543: 2530: 2528: 2526: 2524: 2403: 2401: 2399: 2397: 2395: 2393: 2380: 2378: 2376: 2374: 2372: 2370: 2326: 2324: 2322: 2279: 2277: 2275: 1874:(2,355 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), 2–8.3, 1–5.9, 10MG, 4TT) ( 1768:(4277 t, 14 knots (26 km/h), 1–12.6, 12–4.7) (Omoto and 2155: 2153: 1068:, were lined from left to right. The four-ship group led by 2262: 2260: 2116: 2114: 2112: 2110: 2108: 2106: 2104: 2102: 2100: 2098: 2096: 2094: 2064: 2062: 2009:(torpedo-boat, 69 t, 16 knots (30 km/h), MGs, 3TT) (?) 1843:(615 t, 8 knots (15 km/h), 2–4.7) (Sakamoto Hachirota) 2092: 2090: 2088: 2086: 2084: 2082: 2080: 2078: 2076: 2074: 755:
as an act of war. On the same day, without even notifying
2841:(1964). "The Battle off the Tayang, 17 September 1894". 1005:
under the command of Swedish-born merchant navy captain
2928:
Chinese Battleship vs Japanese Cruiser, Yalu River 1894
2235: 2233: 2231: 2229: 2227: 2225: 2223: 2221: 2219: 2206: 2204: 2202: 2200: 2187: 2185: 2172: 2170: 2168: 1582:. The Japanese did not pursue the retreating ships, as 1136:
they could fire were more than offset by the number of
2349:
Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine, May–October 1895
1531:
formation, whereas the Yalu had been won by broadside
537: 812:
had succeeded in pushing Chinese troops north to the
787:
on five specially chartered transports and headed to
1820:(3718 t, 11 knots (20 km/h), 4–9.4, 2–6) (Arai) 1498:
was severely damaged and retired from the conflict;
374:
380 killed and wounded 5 protected cruisers damaged
1792:(4277 t, 14 knots (26 km/h), 1–12.6, 11–4.7) ( 1502:suffered from heavy fire, with great loss of life. 78:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 2812:, American Captain in the Chinese Navy (1885–1895) 783:. On 12 September, half of the troops embarked at 666:were escorted by three naval vessels, the cruiser 1737:(3650 t, 16 knots (30 km/h), 2–10.2, 6–6) ( 1725:(3650 t, 15 knots (28 km/h), 2–10.2, 6–6) ( 2574:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 179–185. 1749:(3150 t, 16 knots (30 km/h), 4–6, 6–4.7) ( 1709:(4150 t, 20 knots (37 km/h), 4–6, 8–4.7) ( 154: 2772:. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. 2023:Order of battle party sourced from JC Perry's 1463:At 3:20 pm, the severely crippled and burning 682:. A Japanese force consisting of the cruisers 651:being rescued by sailors from the French ship 1878:) – Fled at start perhaps then collided with 704:, precipitating the action. Within one hour, 408: 8: 3031:Naval battles of the First Sino-Japanese War 2682: 2666: 2600: 2557: 2534: 2407: 2384: 2330: 2283: 2159: 2144: 1644:While it was not the first battle involving 1168:, an arrangement made necessary because the 2447:. Frederick A. Stokes Company. p. 34. 2068:War History Studies (Chinese) Vol. 2, p. 56 952:. The main fleet consisted of the cruisers 700:intercepted the three Chinese warships off 543: 27:Naval battle of the First Sino-Japanese War 1980:, front to rear, moved to the right flank 1784:(2450 t, 19kts, 10–4.7) (Uchida Masatoshi) 1514:As it was the first fleet encounter since 558:) was the largest naval engagement of the 415: 401: 393: 151: 138:Learn how and when to remove this message 2686: 2670: 2313: 1437:-built vessel), diverted this maneuver. 2930:– Benjamin Lai, Osprey Publishing, 2019 2710: 2251: 2239: 2210: 2191: 2176: 2058: 1019:was on a tour of inspection and aboard 832:, the small coastal defence battleship 641:Illustration from the French newspaper 3021:Battles of the First Sino-Japanese War 2823:. London: Cambridge University Press. 1359:under fire from the Japanese cruisers. 2698: 2639: 2637: 2628: 2616: 2612: 2588: 2584: 2266: 2132: 2120: 7: 2956:, YouTube video of a lecture at the 2650:Journal of Advanced Military Studies 1015:. The Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral 87:"Battle of the Yalu River" 1894 76:adding citations to reliable sources 1386:As the Japanese ships opened fire, 1194:(left) attacking Chinese warships, 747:, he considered the destruction of 2485:"(转帖连载126)大清海军的落日辉煌——"济远"撞坏"扬威"考正" 1483:burned severely, yet kept firing. 708:ended in a Japanese victory, with 25: 2814:. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co. 2789:Sino-Japanese Naval War 1894–1895 2747:Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795–1989 2889:The Chinese Steam Navy 1862–1945 1648:technology on a wide scale (the 1456:tried to finish off the beached 604:'s Fifth Division would land at 297: 286: 274: 263: 243: 231: 168: 52: 1421:, along with the torpedo boats 1313:were nearly out of ammunition. 1128:as an adviser or co-commander. 991:, under the command of Admiral 63:needs additional citations for 32:Battle of the Yalu River (1904) 2891:. London: Chatham Publishing. 2887:Wright, Richard N. J. (2000). 2861:10.1080/00253359.1964.10657787 2295:McGiffin (1968) pp. 35, 36, 96 1225:Initial contact and engagement 553:Naval Battle of the Yellow Sea 518: 509: 501: 1: 2853:Society for Nautical Research 1613:Sankt-Peterburgskie Vedomosti 1390:turned and fled, followed by 896:as well as the torpedo boats 566:. It involved ships from the 36:UN offensive into North Korea 2942:The Battle of the Yalu River 2644:Rhodes, Andrew (Fall 2020). 387:1 composite cruiser scuttled 2868:Sondhaus, Lawrence (2001). 2722:McGiffin (1968) pp. 118–132 1683: 1034:) in the center. The newer 948:, was under the command of 538: 18:Battle of Yalu River (1894) 3062: 2958:Dole Institute of Politics 2919:The Imperial Japanese Navy 2745:Elleman, Bruce A. (2001). 2304:Andrade (2016) pp. 287–290 1855: 1691: 1566:would liken the battle to 1104:, a sub-lieutenant in the 40: 29: 2025:The Battle off the Tayang 1925:(This vessel is known as 1398:was hit only once, while 1188:Japanese print depicting 647:, showing survivors from 527: 434: 381:1 protected cruiser sunk 379:1,350 killed and wounded 368: 309: 256: 224: 184: 167: 159: 2945:by Philo Norton McGiffin 2870:Naval Warfare, 1815–1914 2683:Evans & Peattie 1997 2667:Evans & Peattie 1997 2601:Evans & Peattie 1997 2558:Evans & Peattie 1997 2535:Evans & Peattie 1997 2408:Evans & Peattie 1997 2385:Evans & Peattie 1997 2331:Evans & Peattie 1997 2284:Evans & Peattie 1997 2160:Evans & Peattie 1997 2145:Evans & Peattie 1997 1369:Constantin von Hannecken 1282:were put out of action. 808:The Japanese victory at 716:stranded on a shoal and 608:on the western coast of 595: 494:Battle of the Yalu River 383:1 armoured cruiser sunk 175:Battle of the Yellow Sea 43:Battle of the Yellow Sea 41:Not to be confused with 2787:Olender, Piotr (2014). 2736:Andrade, Tonio (2016). 1410:, causing her sinking. 1098:Constantin von Hanneken 724:intercepted the third, 560:First Sino-Japanese War 426:First Sino-Japanese War 162:First Sino-Japanese War 2982:39.21389°N 123.12639°E 2806:McGiffin, Lee (1968). 2421:"马吉芬:大东沟海战丁汝昌重伤因被炮风震倒" 2047:Naval history of China 2042:Naval history of Japan 1360: 1221: 1206: 999:, the converted liner 995:. There were also two 655: 602:Imperial Japanese Army 568:Imperial Japanese Navy 385:2 light cruisers sunk 257:Commanders and leaders 3036:September 1894 events 2851:(4). United Kingdom: 2819:Paine, S.C.M (2003). 2810:Philo Norton McGiffin 2749:. London: Routledge. 2037:Henry Walton Grinnell 1949:) – Caught fire, sank 1858:China (Beiyang Fleet) 1618:Secretary of the Navy 1471:(Chinese source says 1350: 1212: 1187: 866:, the small cruisers 640: 582:off the mouth of the 369:Casualties and losses 315:7 protected cruisers 2844:The Mariner's Mirror 2808:Yankee of the Yalu, 2441:James Allen (1898). 2343:McGriffin, Philo N. 1112:, a graduate of the 1082:ironclad battleships 349:1 composite cruiser 331:ironclad battleships 155:Battle of Yalu River 72:improve this article 2987:39.21389; 123.12639 2978: /  2689:, pp. 169–170. 2673:, pp. 169–170. 2631:, pp. 184–185. 2619:, pp. 243–259. 2591:, pp. 243–259. 2355:on 21 December 2010 2316:, pp. 169–170. 2269:, pp. 179–189. 2135:, pp. 179–180. 2123:, pp. 243–259. 1580:Battle of Lüshunkou 1134:weight of broadside 1060:, and the obsolete 564:Battle of Pyongyang 506:traditional Chinese 179:Kobayashi Kiyochika 2839:Perry, John Curtis 1909:& Liu Pu-chan) 1564:The New York Times 1361: 1222: 1207: 1122:soldier of fortune 1009:, and the gunboat 884:, torpedo gunboat 802:Shandong Peninsula 656: 498:simplified Chinese 376:1 ironclad damaged 346:protected cruisers 336:coastal battleship 3026:Conflicts in 1894 2898:978-1-86176-144-6 2879:978-0-415-21477-3 2830:978-0-521-81714-1 2798:978-83-63678-30-2 2779:978-0-87021-192-8 2756:978-0-415-21474-2 2491:on 6 October 2014 2020: 2019: 2015: 2014: 1751:Kamimura Hikonojō 1621:Hilary A. Herbert 1535:delivered from a 1196:Shunsai Toshimasa 1154:muzzle velocities 1138:quick-firing guns 1017:Kabayama Sukenori 926:Fleet composition 672:and the gunboats 536: 519:Huáng Hǎi Hǎizhàn 487: 486: 391: 390: 341:armoured cruisers 317:1 belted cruiser 220: 219: 192:17 September 1894 148: 147: 140: 122: 16:(Redirected from 3053: 2993: 2992: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2983: 2979: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2971: 2902: 2883: 2864: 2834: 2815: 2802: 2783: 2764:Evans, David C; 2760: 2741: 2723: 2720: 2714: 2708: 2702: 2696: 2690: 2680: 2674: 2664: 2658: 2657: 2641: 2632: 2626: 2620: 2610: 2604: 2598: 2592: 2582: 2576: 2575: 2567: 2561: 2555: 2538: 2532: 2519: 2516: 2510: 2507: 2501: 2500: 2498: 2496: 2487:. Archived from 2481: 2475: 2472: 2466: 2465: 2463: 2461: 2438: 2432: 2431: 2429: 2427: 2417: 2411: 2405: 2388: 2382: 2365: 2364: 2362: 2360: 2351:. Archived from 2340: 2334: 2328: 2317: 2311: 2305: 2302: 2296: 2293: 2287: 2281: 2270: 2264: 2255: 2249: 2243: 2237: 2214: 2208: 2195: 2189: 2180: 2174: 2163: 2157: 2148: 2142: 2136: 2130: 2124: 2118: 2069: 2066: 1916:, left to right 1865:, left to right 1699:Flying Squadron: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1662:was replaced by 1650:Battle of Fuzhou 1351:Illustration of 1342: 1327: 1218:Hasegawa Chikuyō 1204: 1114:US Naval Academy 997:dispatch vessels 751:and shelling of 712:forced to flee, 644:Le Petit Journal 596:Japan's strategy 570:and the Chinese 557: 554: 551: 548: 545: 541: 531: 529: 520: 511: 503: 429: 427: 417: 410: 403: 394: 302: 301: 300: 291: 290: 289: 279: 278: 277: 268: 267: 266: 249: 247: 246: 236: 235: 234: 216:Japanese victory 186: 185: 172: 152: 143: 136: 132: 129: 123: 121: 80: 56: 48: 21: 3061: 3060: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3052: 3051: 3050: 2996: 2995: 2986: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2965: 2964: 2937: 2909: 2907:Further reading 2899: 2886: 2880: 2867: 2837: 2831: 2818: 2805: 2799: 2786: 2780: 2766:Peattie, Mark R 2763: 2757: 2744: 2735: 2732: 2727: 2726: 2721: 2717: 2709: 2705: 2701:, pp. 182. 2697: 2693: 2681: 2677: 2665: 2661: 2643: 2642: 2635: 2627: 2623: 2615:, p. 182; 2611: 2607: 2599: 2595: 2587:, p. 181; 2583: 2579: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2556: 2541: 2533: 2522: 2517: 2513: 2508: 2504: 2494: 2492: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2473: 2469: 2459: 2457: 2455: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2425: 2423: 2419: 2418: 2414: 2406: 2391: 2383: 2368: 2358: 2356: 2342: 2341: 2337: 2329: 2320: 2312: 2308: 2303: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2282: 2273: 2265: 2258: 2250: 2246: 2238: 2217: 2209: 2198: 2190: 2183: 2175: 2166: 2158: 2151: 2143: 2139: 2131: 2127: 2119: 2072: 2067: 2060: 2055: 2033: 2021: 2016: 1860: 1794:Arima Shin'ichi 1739:Tōgō Heihachirō 1696: 1681: 1679:Order of battle 1666:as head of the 1654:Sino-French War 1646:pre-dreadnought 1576: 1560:naval supremacy 1525:bows-on frontal 1512: 1340: 1325: 1227: 1198: 1182: 928: 888:, the gunboats 838:, the cruisers 635: 598: 593: 555: 552: 549: 546: 490: 489: 488: 483: 430: 425: 423: 421: 386: 384: 382: 380: 375: 360: 355: 350: 348: 343: 338: 333: 322: 320: 318: 316: 298: 296: 295: 287: 285: 275: 273: 272: 264: 262: 244: 242: 232: 230: 208: 173: 144: 133: 127: 124: 81: 79: 69: 57: 46: 39: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3059: 3057: 3049: 3048: 3043: 3038: 3033: 3028: 3023: 3018: 3013: 3008: 2998: 2997: 2962: 2961: 2951: 2946: 2936: 2935:External links 2933: 2932: 2931: 2925: 2916: 2908: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2897: 2884: 2878: 2865: 2835: 2829: 2816: 2803: 2797: 2784: 2778: 2761: 2755: 2742: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2715: 2713:, p. 211. 2703: 2691: 2685:, p. 39; 2675: 2669:, p. 38; 2659: 2633: 2621: 2605: 2593: 2577: 2570:Paine, Sarah. 2562: 2539: 2520: 2511: 2502: 2476: 2467: 2454:978-1421958439 2453: 2433: 2412: 2389: 2366: 2335: 2318: 2306: 2297: 2288: 2271: 2256: 2254:, p. 101. 2244: 2215: 2196: 2181: 2164: 2149: 2137: 2125: 2070: 2057: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2032: 2029: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2004: 1996: 1990: 1978:Joined Halfway 1975: 1974: 1966: 1958: 1950: 1938: 1930: 1911: 1910: 1898: 1890: 1882: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1844: 1830: 1829: 1821: 1813: 1797: 1785: 1777: 1755: 1754: 1742: 1730: 1727:Nomura Tadashi 1718: 1695: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1575: 1572: 1511: 1508: 1406:collided with 1226: 1223: 1181: 1178: 1110:Philo McGiffin 927: 924: 706:the engagement 634: 631: 618:Combined Fleet 597: 594: 592: 589: 485: 484: 482: 481: 476: 471: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 441: 435: 432: 431: 422: 420: 419: 412: 405: 397: 389: 388: 377: 371: 370: 366: 365: 353:light cruisers 327: 325:transport ship 312: 311: 307: 306: 283: 259: 258: 254: 253: 240: 227: 226: 222: 221: 218: 217: 214: 210: 209: 200: 198: 194: 193: 190: 182: 181: 165: 164: 157: 156: 150: 149: 146: 145: 128:September 2016 60: 58: 51: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3058: 3047: 3046:1890s battles 3044: 3042: 3039: 3037: 3034: 3032: 3029: 3027: 3024: 3022: 3019: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3011:1895 in Japan 3009: 3007: 3006:1894 in China 3004: 3003: 3001: 2994: 2991: 2959: 2955: 2952: 2950: 2949:External site 2947: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2929: 2926: 2924: 2920: 2917: 2914: 2911: 2910: 2906: 2900: 2894: 2890: 2885: 2881: 2875: 2872:. Routledge. 2871: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2826: 2822: 2817: 2813: 2811: 2804: 2800: 2794: 2790: 2785: 2781: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2762: 2758: 2752: 2748: 2743: 2739: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2719: 2716: 2712: 2707: 2704: 2700: 2695: 2692: 2688: 2687:Sondhaus 2001 2684: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2671:Sondhaus 2001 2668: 2663: 2660: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2640: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2609: 2606: 2603:, p. 46. 2602: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2578: 2573: 2566: 2563: 2560:, p. 48. 2559: 2554: 2552: 2550: 2548: 2546: 2544: 2540: 2537:, p. 47. 2536: 2531: 2529: 2527: 2525: 2521: 2515: 2512: 2506: 2503: 2490: 2486: 2480: 2477: 2471: 2468: 2456: 2450: 2446: 2445: 2437: 2434: 2422: 2416: 2413: 2410:, p. 44. 2409: 2404: 2402: 2400: 2398: 2396: 2394: 2390: 2387:, p. 42. 2386: 2381: 2379: 2377: 2375: 2373: 2371: 2367: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2339: 2336: 2333:, p. 39. 2332: 2327: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314:Sondhaus 2001 2310: 2307: 2301: 2298: 2292: 2289: 2286:, p. 38. 2285: 2280: 2278: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2245: 2242:, p. 60. 2241: 2236: 2234: 2232: 2230: 2228: 2226: 2224: 2222: 2220: 2216: 2213:, p. 57. 2212: 2207: 2205: 2203: 2201: 2197: 2194:, p. 98. 2193: 2188: 2186: 2182: 2179:, p. 97. 2178: 2173: 2171: 2169: 2165: 2162:, p. 41. 2161: 2156: 2154: 2150: 2147:, p. 40. 2146: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2129: 2126: 2122: 2117: 2115: 2113: 2111: 2109: 2107: 2105: 2103: 2101: 2099: 2097: 2095: 2093: 2091: 2089: 2087: 2085: 2083: 2081: 2079: 2077: 2075: 2071: 2065: 2063: 2059: 2052: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2028: 2026: 2008: 2005: 2002: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1979: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1955: 1951: 1948: 1947:Lin Yongsheng 1944: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1915: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1864: 1857: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1810:Hidaka Sōnojō 1807: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1752: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1711:Kawara Yōichi 1708: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1685: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1672:Grand Council 1669: 1668:Nanyang fleet 1665: 1664:Zhang Zhidong 1661: 1657: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1639: 1633: 1630: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1602: 1596: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1573: 1571: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1552: 1548: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533:naval gunfire 1530: 1527:attack, in a 1526: 1522: 1517: 1509: 1507: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1488: 1486: 1482: 1476: 1474: 1470: 1467:tried to ram 1466: 1461: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1382: 1378: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1345: 1339: 1335: 1334:flying bridge 1331: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1302: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1257: 1253: 1247: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1231: 1224: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1186: 1179: 1177: 1173: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1157: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1129: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094:Prussian Army 1091: 1087: 1083: 1077: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1008: 1004: 1003: 998: 994: 990: 989: 984: 983: 979: 975: 974: 969: 968: 963: 962: 957: 956: 951: 947: 943: 939: 938: 933: 925: 923: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 900: 895: 891: 887: 883: 882: 877: 876: 871: 870: 865: 864: 859: 858: 853: 849: 848: 843: 842: 837: 836: 831: 830: 825: 824: 819: 815: 811: 806: 803: 799: 795: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777:Taedong River 773: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 733: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 698: 693: 692: 687: 686: 681: 680: 675: 671: 670: 665: 661: 654: 650: 646: 645: 639: 633:Chinese moves 632: 630: 627: 623: 619: 615: 614:Beiyang Fleet 611: 607: 603: 590: 588: 585: 581: 575: 573: 572:Beiyang Fleet 569: 565: 561: 540: 534: 525: 521: 515: 507: 499: 495: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 467: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 436: 433: 428: 418: 413: 411: 406: 404: 399: 398: 395: 378: 373: 372: 367: 364: 363:torpedo boats 359: 354: 347: 342: 337: 332: 328: 326: 314: 313: 308: 305: 294: 284: 282: 271: 261: 260: 255: 252: 241: 239: 229: 228: 223: 215: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 196: 195: 191: 188: 187: 183: 180: 176: 171: 166: 163: 158: 153: 142: 139: 131: 120: 117: 113: 110: 106: 103: 99: 96: 92: 89: –  88: 84: 83:Find sources: 77: 73: 67: 66: 61:This article 59: 55: 50: 49: 44: 37: 33: 19: 2963: 2940: 2927: 2923:Fred T. Jane 2918: 2912: 2888: 2869: 2848: 2842: 2820: 2807: 2791:. MMPBooks. 2788: 2769: 2746: 2737: 2718: 2711:Olender 2014 2706: 2694: 2678: 2662: 2653: 2649: 2624: 2608: 2596: 2580: 2571: 2565: 2514: 2505: 2493:. Retrieved 2489:the original 2479: 2470: 2458:. Retrieved 2443: 2436: 2424:. Retrieved 2415: 2357:. Retrieved 2353:the original 2348: 2338: 2309: 2300: 2291: 2252:Elleman 2001 2247: 2240:Olender 2014 2211:Olender 2014 2192:Elleman 2001 2177:Elleman 2001 2140: 2128: 2024: 2022: 2006: 1999: 1992: 1985: 1977: 1976: 1969: 1961: 1953: 1941: 1933: 1926: 1921: 1913: 1912: 1907:Ding Ruchang 1901: 1893: 1885: 1879: 1870: 1862: 1861: 1847: 1839: 1832: 1831: 1824: 1816: 1805: 1800: 1788: 1780: 1774:Itō Sukeyuki 1770:Dewa Shigetō 1764: 1757: 1756: 1745: 1733: 1721: 1705: 1698: 1697: 1658: 1652:in the 1884 1643: 1634: 1629:Mark Peattie 1625: 1611: 1605: 1601:London Times 1599: 1597: 1587: 1583: 1577: 1553: 1549: 1544: 1529:line abreast 1513: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1489: 1484: 1480: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1462: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1439: 1430: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1385: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1364: 1362: 1356: 1352: 1337: 1329: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1274:was hit and 1271: 1267: 1262: 1260: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1243: 1239: 1232: 1228: 1213: 1190: 1174: 1158: 1130: 1125: 1089: 1085: 1078: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1011: 1001: 993:Itō Sukeyuki 987: 981: 972: 966: 960: 958:(flagship), 954: 945: 941: 936: 931: 929: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 898: 893: 889: 885: 880: 874: 868: 862: 856: 851: 846: 840: 834: 828: 822: 807: 797: 793: 774: 764: 757:Li Hongzhang 752: 748: 744: 740: 737:Ding Ruchang 734: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 702:Pungo Island 696: 690: 684: 678: 673: 668: 657: 652: 648: 642: 622:Shanhai Pass 599: 576: 539:Kōkai-kaisen 517: 493: 491: 459:Jiuliancheng 453: 319:2 ironclads 293:Ding Ruchang 270:Itō Sukeyuki 225:Belligerents 174: 160:Part of the 134: 125: 115: 108: 101: 94: 82: 70:Please help 65:verification 62: 2985: / 2973:123°07′35″E 2855:: 243–259. 1876:Fang Boqian 1848:Saikyō Maru 1806:Itsukushima 1789:Itsukushima 1776:) – Damaged 1758:Main Fleet: 1746:Akitsushima 1715:Tsuboi Kōzō 1504:Saikyō Maru 1454:Saikyō Maru 1446:Saikyō Maru 1280:Saikyō Maru 1250:squadrons. 1199: [ 1148:mounted in 1102:W. F. Tyler 1074:Saikyō Maru 1021:Saikyō Maru 1007:John Wilson 1002:Saikyō Maru 967:Itsukushima 950:Tsuboi Kōzō 942:Akitsushima 685:Akitsushima 281:Tsuboi Kōzō 3041:Yalu River 3016:Yellow Sea 3000:Categories 2970:39°12′50″N 2730:References 2699:Paine 2003 2629:Paine 2003 2617:Perry 1964 2613:Paine 2003 2589:Perry 1964 2585:Paine 2003 2518:McGriffin 2267:Paine 2003 2133:Paine 2003 2121:Perry 1964 1914:Right Wing 1765:Matsushima 1541:Canet guns 1537:line ahead 1492:Matsushima 1425:(built at 1415:Kuang Ping 1295:Matsushima 1191:Matsushima 1120:and now a 1106:Royal Navy 955:Matsushima 818:Dalian Bay 814:Yalu River 767:sailed to 759:, he left 718:Tsao-kiang 679:Tsao-kiang 664:troopships 591:Background 584:Yalu River 580:Yellow Sea 479:Pescadores 454:Yalu River 321:1 gunboat 304:Liu Buchan 202:Yalu River 98:newspapers 2921:(1904) – 2495:5 October 2426:5 October 1993:Guangbing 1927:Chen Yuen 1886:Kwan Chia 1863:Left Wing 1801:Hashidate 1722:Takachiho 1660:Liu Kunyi 1638:save face 1593:Weihaiwei 1574:Aftermath 1545:Sankeikan 1299:Hashidate 1146:barbettes 1118:Annapolis 978:ironclads 973:Hashidate 937:Takachiho 920:Zhenzhong 912:Guangbing 894:Zhenzhong 886:Guangbing 881:Kwan Chia 810:Pyongyang 769:Lüshunkou 761:Weihaiwei 533:romanized 469:Weihaiwei 464:Lüshunkou 449:Pyongyang 444:Seonghwan 206:Korea Bay 2768:(1997). 2474:McGiffin 2460:7 August 2359:4 August 2031:See also 2027:(1964). 1986:Pingyuan 1962:Chaoyong 1954:Jingyuen 1942:Jingyuan 1922:Zhenyuan 1902:Dingyuan 1880:Chaoyung 1607:Le Temps 1588:Zhenyuan 1584:Dingyuan 1568:Waterloo 1556:fragging 1510:Analysis 1485:Dingyuan 1427:Schichau 1419:Pingyuan 1400:Guangjia 1392:Guangjia 1377:Chaoyong 1365:Columbia 1357:Zhenyuan 1353:Dingyuan 1338:Dingyuan 1330:Dingyuan 1323:Dingyuan 1319:Dingyuan 1311:Zhenyuan 1307:Dingyuan 1268:Jingyuan 1256:Zhenyuan 1252:Dingyuan 1240:Chaoyong 1166:flagship 1126:Jingyuan 1090:Zhenyuan 1086:Dingyuan 1070:Pingyuan 1062:Chaoyong 1058:Jingyuen 1050:Jingyuan 1040:Guangjia 1032:Zhenyuan 1028:Dingyuan 908:Pingyuan 875:Chaoyong 857:Jingyuan 841:Jingyuen 835:Pingyuan 829:Zhenyuan 823:Dingyuan 749:Kwang-yi 745:Kowshing 735:Admiral 726:Kowshing 714:Kwang-yi 674:Kwang-yi 660:steamers 649:Kowshing 606:Chemulpo 524:Japanese 310:Strength 197:Location 1970:Yangwei 1934:Laiyuan 1894:Zhiyuen 1833:Others: 1781:Chiyoda 1706:Yoshino 1670:as the 1543:of the 1481:Laiyuan 1473:Yoshino 1465:Zhiyuan 1458:Yangwei 1431:Choi Ti 1423:Fu Lung 1408:Yangwei 1381:Yangwei 1272:Yoshino 1263:Zhiyuan 1244:Yangwei 1150:echelon 1066:Yangwei 1054:Laiyuan 1045:Zhiyuan 961:Chiyoda 932:Yoshino 916:Zhennan 890:Zhennan 869:Yangwei 863:Zhiyuen 847:Laiyuan 794:Yoshino 691:Yoshino 653:Le Lion 626:Tianjin 547:  535::  474:Yingkou 358:gunboat 112:scholar 2895:  2876:  2827:  2795:  2776:  2753:  2451:  2000:Fulong 1871:Jiyuan 1734:Naniwa 1469:Naniwa 1435:Yarrow 1429:) and 1404:Jiyuan 1396:Jiyuan 1388:Jiyuan 1220:, 1894 1205:, 1894 1180:Battle 1170:signal 1142:salvos 1096:major 1036:Jiyuan 985:, and 976:, the 946:Naniwa 944:, and 899:Fulong 852:Jiyuan 798:Naniwa 789:Dalian 765:Jiyuan 753:Jiyuan 741:Jiyuan 730:Naniwa 722:Naniwa 710:Jiyuan 697:Naniwa 669:Jiyuan 516:: 514:pinyin 508:: 500:: 439:Pungdo 248:  213:Result 114:  107:  100:  93:  85:  2053:Notes 2007:Zuo 1 1840:Akagi 1772:, VA 1713:, RA 1694:Japan 1523:in a 1516:Lissa 1500:Akagi 1450:Akagi 1341:' 1326:' 1276:Akagi 1236:knots 1203:] 1012:Akagi 904:Zuo 1 781:Zhili 610:Korea 251:China 238:Japan 119:JSTOR 105:books 2893:ISBN 2874:ISBN 2825:ISBN 2793:ISBN 2774:ISBN 2751:ISBN 2656:(2). 2497:2014 2462:2011 2449:ISBN 2428:2014 2361:2013 1825:Hiei 1817:Fusō 1804:(as 1610:and 1586:and 1519:the 1496:Hiei 1448:and 1442:Hiei 1417:and 1379:and 1355:and 1309:and 1291:Hiei 1285:Hiei 1278:and 1254:and 1242:and 1162:beam 1088:and 1064:and 988:Hiei 982:Fusō 902:and 892:and 878:and 860:and 826:and 796:and 785:Taku 694:and 676:and 624:and 544:lit. 528:黄海海戦 510:黃海海戰 502:黄海海战 492:The 189:Date 91:news 2857:doi 1808:) ( 1521:ram 1433:(a 1116:at 74:by 3002:: 2849:50 2847:. 2654:11 2652:. 2648:. 2636:^ 2542:^ 2523:^ 2392:^ 2369:^ 2347:. 2321:^ 2274:^ 2259:^ 2218:^ 2199:^ 2184:^ 2167:^ 2152:^ 2073:^ 2061:^ 1604:, 1595:. 1570:. 1460:. 1444:, 1394:. 1301:. 1216:, 1201:ja 1084:, 1076:. 1056:, 1052:, 1048:, 1042:, 1038:, 1030:, 1023:. 970:, 964:, 940:, 934:, 918:, 914:, 910:, 872:, 854:, 850:, 844:, 688:, 574:. 542:; 530:, 526:: 522:; 512:; 504:; 361:2 356:1 351:2 344:3 339:2 334:1 329:2 323:1 204:, 177:, 2960:. 2901:. 2882:. 2863:. 2859:: 2833:. 2801:. 2782:. 2759:. 2499:. 2464:. 2430:. 2363:. 1812:) 1796:) 1753:) 1741:) 1729:) 1717:) 556:' 550:' 496:( 416:e 409:t 402:v 141:) 135:( 130:) 126:( 116:· 109:· 102:· 95:· 68:. 45:. 38:. 20:)

Index

Battle of Yalu River (1894)
Battle of the Yalu River (1904)
UN offensive into North Korea
Battle of the Yellow Sea

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Battle of the Yalu River" 1894
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
First Sino-Japanese War

Kobayashi Kiyochika
Yalu River
Korea Bay
Japan
China
Itō Sukeyuki
Tsuboi Kōzō
Ding Ruchang
Liu Buchan
transport ship
ironclad battleships
coastal battleship
armoured cruisers

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.