720:. Assessments are made by a decision maker on the probabilities of events that determine the profitability of alternative actions where the outcomes are uncertain. Assessments are also made for the profit (utility) for each possible combination of action and event. The decision maker can decide how much research, if any, needs to be conducted in order to investigate the consequences associated with the courses of action under evaluation. This is done before a final decision is made, but in order to do this costs would be incurred, time used and may overall be unreliable. For each possible action, expected profit can be computed, that is a
935:. The advancements and developments of these types of statistical software have allowed for the growth of Bayes by offering ease of calculation. This is achieved by the generation of samples from the posterior distributions, which are then used to produce a range of options or strategies which are allocated numerical weights. MCMC obtains these samples and produces summary and diagnostic statistics while also saving the posterior samples in the output. The decision maker can then assess the results from the output data set and choose the best option to proceed.
890:. The Bayes approach to this decision suggests: 1) These alternative courses of action for which the consequences are uncertain are a necessary condition in order to apply Bayes'; 2) The advertising manager will pick the course of action which allows him to achieve some objective i.e. a maximum return on his advertising investment in the form of profit; 3) He must determine the possible consequences of each action into some measure of success (or loss) with which a certain objective is achieved.
786:
judgements in light of economically justifiable information gathering. An example of the application of
Bayesian decision theory for promotional purposes could be the use of a test sample in order to assess the effectiveness of a promotion prior to a full scale rollout. By combining prior subjective data about the occurrence of possible events with experimental empirical evidence gained through a test market, the resultant data can be used to make decisions under risk.
901:. For example, he can run a test campaign to decide if the total level of advertising should be in fact increased. Based on the outcome of the experiment he can re-evaluate his prior probability and make a decision on whether to go ahead with increasing the advertising in the market or not. However gathering this additional data is costly, time-consuming and may not lead to perfectly reliable results. As a decision makers he has to deal with experimental and
805:. Bayesian decision making under uncertainty lets a marketing manager assess his/her options for channel logistics by computing the most profitable method choice. A number of different costs can be entered into the model that helps to assess the ramifications of change in distribution method. Identifying and quantifying all of the relevant information for this process can be very time-consuming and costly if the analysis delays possible future earnings.
39:
829:
carrying out a large number of trials with each one producing an outcome from a set of possible outcomes. The planning and implementation of trials to see how a decision impacts in the 'field' e.g. observing consumers reaction to a relabeling of a product, is time-consuming and costly, a method many firms cannot afford. In place of taking the frequentist route in aiming for a universally acceptable conclusion through
700:. It was predicted that the Bayesian approach would be used widely in the marketing field but up until the mid-1980s the methods were considered impractical. The resurgence in the use of Bayesian methods is largely due to the developments over the last few decades in computational methods; and expanded availability of detailed marketplace data – primarily due to the birth of the
846:
beliefs into a mathematically formulated prior to ensure that the results will not be misleading and consequently lead to the disproportionate analysis of preposteriors. The subjective definition of probability and the selection and use of the priors have led to statisticians critiquing this subjective definition of probability that underlies the
Bayesian approach.
818:
decision maker. It is complete because the solution is often clear and unambiguous, for a given choice of model and prior distribution. It allows for the incorporation of prior information when available to increase the robustness of the solutions, as well as taking into consideration the costs and risks that are associated with choosing alternative decisions.
909:
can use the
Bayesian approach to deal with his dilemma and update his prior judgments in light of new information he gains. He needs to take into account the profit (utility) attached to the alternative acts under different events and the value versus cost of information in order to make his optimal decision on how to proceed.
771:
evaluating possible pricing strategies does have its limitations as it requires a number of assumptions to be made about the market place in which an organisation operates. As markets are dynamic environments it is often difficult to fully apply
Bayesian decision theory to pricing strategies without simplifying the model.
893:
This 3 component example explains how the payoffs are conditional upon which outcomes occur. The advertising manager can characterize the outcomes based on past experience and knowledge and devise some possible events that are more likely to occur than others. He can then assign to these events prior
752:
and 'stop'/'go' procedures. If the predicted payoff (the posterior) is acceptable for the organisation the project should go ahead, if not, development should stop. By reviewing the posterior (which then becomes the new prior) on regular intervals throughout the development stage managers are able to
747:
in new product development allows for the use of subjective prior information. Bayes in new product development allows for the comparison of additional review project costs with the value of additional information in order to reduce the costs of uncertainty. The methodology used for this analysis is
813:
The
Bayesian approach is superior to use in decision making when there is a high level of uncertainty or limited information in which to base decisions on and where expert opinion or historical knowledge is available. Bayes is also useful when explaining the findings in a probability sense to people
908:
It approaches the experimental problem by asking; is additional data required? If so, how much needs to be collected and by what means and finally, how does the decision maker revise his prior judgment in light of the results of the new experimental evidence? In this example the advertising manager
800:
Bayesian decision analysis can also be applied to the channel selection process. In order to help provide further information the method can be used that produces results in a profit or loss aspect. Prior information can include costs, expected profit, training expenses and any other costs relevant
845:
In marketing situations, it is important that the prior probability is (1) chosen correctly, and (2) is understood. A disadvantage to using
Bayesian analysis is that there is no 'correct' way to choose a prior, therefore the inferences require a thorough analysis to translate the subjective prior
785:
When dealing with promotion a marketing manager must account for all the market complexities that are involved in a decision. As it is difficult to account for all aspects of the market, a manager should look to incorporate both experienced judgements from senior executives as well modifying these
770:
can be used in looking at pricing decisions. Field information such as retail and wholesale prices as well as the size of the market and market share are all incorporated into the prior information. Managerial judgement is included in order to evaluate different pricing strategies. This method of
828:
Bayes methods are more cost-effective than the traditional frequentist take on marketing research and subsequent decision making. The probability can be assessed from a degree of belief before and after accounting for evidence, instead of calculating the probabilities of a certain decision by
817:
The three principle strengths of Bayes' theorem that have been identified by scholars are that it is prescriptive, complete and coherent. Prescriptive in that it is the theorem that is the simple prescription to the conclusions reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning for the consistent
833:, it is sometimes more effective to take advantage of all the information available to the firm to work out the 'best' decision at the time, and then subsequently when new knowledge is obtained, revise the posterior distribution to be then used as the prior, thus the inferences continue to
695:
While the concepts of
Bayesian statistics are thought to date back to 1763, marketers' exposure to the concepts are relatively recent, dating from 1959. Subsequently, many books and articles have been written about the application of Bayesian statistics to marketing decision-making and
862:, which aims to question and falsify instead of prove hypotheses, where there is very strong evidence X, it does not necessarily mean there is a very high probability that A leads to B, but in fact should be interpreted as a very low probability of A not leading to B.
825:(see Savage and De Finetti). This is further complemented by the fact that Bayes inference satisfies the likelihood principle, which states that models or inferences for datasets leading to the same likelihood function should generate the same statistical information.
857:
based on a decision, they are interpreted as: where there is evidence X that shows condition A might hold true, is misread by judging A's likelihood by how well the evidence X matches A, but crucially without considering the prior frequency of A. In alignment with
584:
which is the recalculated probability, or updated belief about the hypothesis. It is a result of the prior beliefs as well as sample information. The posterior is a conditional distribution as the result of collecting or in consideration of new relevant data.
873:
means of describing how individuals combine new evidence with their predetermined judgements. Therefore, "the model may have some value as a first approximation to the development of descriptive choice theory" in consumer and managerial instances.
681:
To sum up this formula: the posterior probability of the hypothesis is equal to the prior probability of the hypothesis multiplied by the conditional probability of the evidence given the hypothesis, divided by the probability of the new evidence.
869:, in consumer decisions have utilised the Bayesian model, or similar models, but found that it may not be relevant quantitatively in predicting human information processing behaviour. Instead the model has been proven as useful as a
814:
who are less familiar and comfortable with comprehending statistics. It is in this sense that
Bayesian methods are thought of as having created a bridge between business judgments and statistics for the purpose of decision-making.
724:
of the possible profits, the weights being the probabilities. The decision maker can then choose the action for which the expected profit is the highest. The theorem provides a formal reconciliation between judgment expressed
753:
make the best possible decision with the information available at hand. Although the review process may delay further development and increase costs, it can help greatly to reduce uncertainty in high risk decisions.
677:
240:
89:, in which evidence about the true state of the world is expressed in terms of degrees of belief through subjectively assessed numerical probabilities. Such a probability is known as a
105:
as well as numerous other mathematicians, statisticians and scientists. Bayesian inference has experienced spikes in popularity as it has been seen as vague and controversial by rival
541:
821:
Lastly Bayes theorem is coherent. It is considered the most appropriate way to update beliefs by welcoming the incorporation of new information, as is seen through the
578:
378:
492:
463:
434:
408:
338:
309:
283:
263:
93:. The fundamental ideas and concepts behind Bayes' theorem, and its use within Bayesian inference, have been developed and added to over the past centuries by
1044:
1587:
1448:
Dynamic marketing for a changing world: proceedings of the 43rd national conference of the
American Marketing Association, June 15, 16, 17, 1960
133:
approach when interpreting the prior probability, which is then updated in light of new relevant information. The concept is a manipulation of
1521:
1283:
960:
1419:
Green, Paul E.; Peters, William S.; Robinson, Patrick J. (February 1966). "A Behavioral
Experiment In Decision-Making Under Uncertainty".
1128:
Pratt, John W.; Raiffa, Howard; Schlaifer, Robert (June 1964). "The Foundations of Decision under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition".
109:
statisticians. In the past few decades Bayesian inference has become widespread in many scientific and social science fields such as
1568:
1549:
1469:
Cox, Donald F.; Rich, Stuart U. (November 1964). "Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making—The Case of Telephone Shopping".
58:
evaluation under uncertainty and with limited data. The communication between marketer and market can be seen as a form of
590:
1407:
113:. Bayesian inference allows for decision making and market research evaluation under uncertainty and limited data.
849:
Bayesian probability is often found to be difficult when analysing and assessing probabilities due to its initial
920:(MCMC) is a flexible procedure designed to fit a variety of Bayesian models. It is the underlying method used in
822:
143:
134:
1592:
928:
917:
767:
126:
1061:
Chernoff, H. and Moses, L. E. (1959). Elementary Decision Theory. New York: Wiley; London: Chapman & Hall
738:
106:
1361:
865:
In the field of marketing, behavioural experiments which have dealt with managerial decision-making, and
1387:
780:
581:
102:
90:
1366:
245:
Alternatively, a more simple understanding of the formula may be reached by substituting the events
1408:
SAS Institute Inc. (2009). SAS/STAT® 9.2 User's Guide, Second Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
921:
802:
381:
59:
1486:
1379:
1334:
1252:
1212:
1110:
1000:
887:
74:
51:
32:
497:
1564:
1545:
1517:
1451:
1279:
1271:
1070:
Schlaifer, R. (1959). Probability and Statistics for Business Decisions, New York: McGraw Hill
956:
850:
122:
70:
28:
886:
manager is deciding whether or not to increase the advertising for a product in a particular
1509:
1478:
1428:
1371:
1326:
1244:
1204:
1164:
1137:
1102:
992:
902:
870:
546:
346:
17:
866:
744:
697:
468:
465:
is the assigned prior probability or initial belief about the hypothesis; the denominator
439:
340:. The rule allows for a judgment of the relative truth of the hypothesis given the data.
55:
413:
387:
317:
288:
1508:. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Vol. 132. pp. 234–235.
38:
1432:
983:
Green, Paul E.; Frank, Ronald E. (1966). "Bayesian Statistics and Marketing Research".
859:
749:
726:
701:
268:
248:
1155:
Rossi, Peter E.; Allenby, Greg M. (August 2003). "Bayesian Statistics and Marketing".
1581:
1490:
1383:
1216:
1026:
925:
721:
717:
98:
1256:
1235:
Little, Roderick J (August 2006). "Calibrated Bayes: A Bayes/Frequentist Roadmap".
1141:
130:
94:
1540:
Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr. (1991). "The Research Process and Problem Formulation".
1513:
1391:
1168:
883:
86:
1482:
1375:
1208:
898:
82:
78:
1248:
801:
to the decision as well as managerial experience which can be displayed in a
830:
795:
110:
47:
1455:
729:
in the prior distribution and the statistical evidence of the experiment.
854:
705:
1352:
Efron, Bradley (March 2005). "Bayesians, Frequentists, and Scientists".
1338:
1317:
Birnbaum, Allan (1962). "On the Foundations of Statistical Inference".
1114:
1004:
985:
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics)
932:
762:
1195:
Roberts, Harry V. (January 1963). "Bayesian Statistics in Marketing".
1330:
1298:
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Wiley
996:
1106:
1504:
Green, Paul E. (1976). "Bayesian Decision Theory in Advertising".
834:
37:
1307:
De Finetti, B. (1974). The Theory of Probability, New York: Wiley
897:
He can test out his predictions (prior probabilities) through an
716:
Bayesian decision theory can be applied to all four areas of the
894:
probabilities, which would be in the form of numerical weights.
312:
1544:(5th ed.). Fort Worth: Dryden Press. pp. 67–124.
1278:. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 342–357.
1446:
Baur, R. A. (1960). "Consumer Behaviour as Risk Taking".
1276:
Breakthroughs in Statistics: Foundations and Basic Theory
1093:
Roberts, Harry V. (1960). "The New Business Statistics".
343:
This is done through the calculation shown below, where
1079:
Rossi, P. E., Allenby, G. M. and McCulloch, R. (2005).
593:
549:
500:
471:
442:
416:
390:
384:. This assesses the probability of the observed data
349:
320:
291:
271:
251:
146:
1450:. American Marketing Association. pp. 389–398.
790:
Channel decisions and the logistics of distribution
837:contribute to one another based on Bayes theorem.
671:
572:
535:
486:
457:
428:
402:
372:
332:
303:
277:
257:
234:
121:Bayesian probability specifies that there is some
672:{\displaystyle P(H|D)={\frac {P(D|H)P(H)}{P(D)}}}
81:, providing a mathematical framework for forming
1354:Journal of the American Statistical Association
1319:Journal of the American Statistical Association
1130:Journal of the American Statistical Association
1542:Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations
1274:. In Kotz, Samuel; Johnson, Norman L. (eds.).
8:
494:is formed by the integrating or summing of
235:{\displaystyle P(AB)=P(A|B)P(B)=P(B|A)P(A)}
1365:
1183:Planning and Problem Solving in Marketing
629:
617:
603:
592:
559:
548:
510:
499:
470:
441:
415:
389:
359:
348:
319:
290:
270:
250:
209:
174:
145:
125:. Bayesian statisticians can use both an
27:This article is about the application of
1045:"The Mathematics of Changing Your Mind"
943:
285:to become respectively the hypothesis
7:
1403:
1401:
1230:
1228:
1226:
1043:Paulos, John Allen (5 August 2011).
1025:Olshausen, Bruno A. (1 March 2004).
853:nature. Often when deciding between
1563:. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
1020:
1018:
1016:
1014:
978:
976:
974:
972:
905:and this is where Bayes' comes in.
1588:Applications of Bayesian inference
1433:10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00819.x
1181:Alderson, W., Green, P. E. (1964)
31:in marketing. For other uses, see
25:
1561:Decision Making under Uncertainty
1081:Bayesian Statistics and Marketing
951:McGrayne, Sharon Bertsch (2011).
1506:Mathematical Models in Marketing
1272:"Statistical Decision Functions"
1185:. Richard D. Irwin Inc Illinois
54:allows for decision making and
1142:10.1080/01621459.1964.10482164
663:
657:
649:
643:
637:
630:
623:
611:
604:
597:
567:
560:
553:
530:
524:
518:
511:
504:
481:
475:
452:
446:
423:
417:
397:
391:
367:
360:
353:
327:
321:
298:
292:
229:
223:
217:
210:
203:
194:
188:
182:
175:
168:
159:
150:
1:
1559:Holloway, Charles A. (1979).
1471:Journal of Marketing Research
1027:"Bayesian probability theory"
953:The Theory That Would Not Die
913:Bayes in computational models
1514:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_75
410:arising from the hypothesis
18:Bayesian theory in marketing
1169:10.1287/mksc.22.3.304.17739
1609:
1483:10.1177/002224376400100405
1376:10.1198/016214505000000033
1209:10.1177/002224296302700101
793:
778:
760:
736:
536:{\displaystyle P(D|H)P(H)}
26:
1237:The American Statistician
955:. Yale University Press.
823:probability distributions
135:conditional probabilities
1249:10.1198/000313006X117837
918:Markov chain Monte Carlo
768:Bayesian decision theory
712:Application in marketing
1095:The Journal of Business
739:New product development
733:New product development
85:through the concept of
1270:Wald, Abraham (1993).
673:
574:
573:{\displaystyle P(H|D)}
537:
488:
459:
430:
404:
374:
373:{\displaystyle P(D|H)}
334:
305:
279:
259:
236:
116:
43:
1421:Journal of Purchasing
924:software such as the
781:Promotion (marketing)
775:Promotional campaigns
704:and explosion of the
674:
575:
538:
489:
460:
431:
405:
375:
335:
306:
280:
260:
237:
41:
1197:Journal of Marketing
743:The use of Bayesian
591:
547:
498:
487:{\displaystyle P(D)}
469:
458:{\displaystyle P(H)}
440:
414:
388:
347:
318:
289:
269:
249:
144:
103:Pierre Simon Laplace
91:Bayesian probability
77:. It is a subset of
803:normal distribution
429:{\displaystyle (H)}
403:{\displaystyle (D)}
382:likelihood function
333:{\displaystyle (D)}
304:{\displaystyle (H)}
60:Bayesian persuasion
1049:The New York Times
669:
570:
533:
484:
455:
426:
400:
370:
330:
301:
275:
255:
232:
75:Bayesian inference
73:is fundamental to
52:Bayesian inference
44:
33:Bayesian inference
1523:978-3-540-07869-2
1285:978-0-387-94037-3
1157:Marketing Science
1083:, New York: Wiley
962:978-0-300-17509-7
851:counter intuitive
757:Pricing decisions
667:
278:{\displaystyle B}
258:{\displaystyle A}
123:prior probability
16:(Redirected from
1600:
1574:
1555:
1528:
1527:
1501:
1495:
1494:
1466:
1460:
1459:
1443:
1437:
1436:
1416:
1410:
1405:
1396:
1395:
1369:
1349:
1343:
1342:
1325:(298): 269–306.
1314:
1308:
1305:
1299:
1296:
1290:
1289:
1267:
1261:
1260:
1232:
1221:
1220:
1192:
1186:
1179:
1173:
1172:
1152:
1146:
1145:
1136:(306): 353–375.
1125:
1119:
1118:
1090:
1084:
1077:
1071:
1068:
1062:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1022:
1009:
1008:
980:
967:
966:
948:
903:systematic error
686:Use in marketing
678:
676:
675:
670:
668:
666:
652:
633:
618:
607:
580:is known as the
579:
577:
576:
571:
563:
542:
540:
539:
534:
514:
493:
491:
490:
485:
464:
462:
461:
456:
435:
433:
432:
427:
409:
407:
406:
401:
379:
377:
376:
371:
363:
339:
337:
336:
331:
310:
308:
307:
302:
284:
282:
281:
276:
264:
262:
261:
256:
241:
239:
238:
233:
213:
178:
21:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:Market research
1578:
1577:
1571:
1558:
1552:
1539:
1536:
1534:Further reading
1531:
1524:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1445:
1444:
1440:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1406:
1399:
1367:10.1.1.179.1454
1351:
1350:
1346:
1331:10.2307/2281640
1316:
1315:
1311:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1286:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1234:
1233:
1224:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1180:
1176:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1029:
1024:
1023:
1012:
997:10.2307/2985299
982:
981:
970:
963:
950:
949:
945:
941:
915:
880:
867:risk perception
843:
811:
798:
792:
783:
777:
765:
759:
748:in the form of
745:decision theory
741:
735:
714:
698:market research
693:
688:
653:
619:
589:
588:
545:
544:
496:
495:
467:
466:
438:
437:
412:
411:
386:
385:
345:
344:
316:
315:
287:
286:
267:
266:
247:
246:
142:
141:
119:
68:
56:market research
36:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1606:
1604:
1596:
1595:
1590:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1569:
1556:
1550:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1529:
1522:
1496:
1461:
1438:
1411:
1397:
1344:
1309:
1300:
1291:
1284:
1262:
1243:(3): 213–223.
1222:
1187:
1174:
1163:(3): 304–328.
1147:
1120:
1107:10.1086/294306
1085:
1072:
1063:
1054:
1035:
1010:
991:(3): 173–190.
968:
961:
942:
940:
937:
914:
911:
879:
876:
842:
839:
810:
807:
794:Main article:
791:
788:
779:Main article:
776:
773:
761:Main article:
758:
755:
750:decision trees
737:Main article:
734:
731:
727:quantitatively
713:
710:
702:World Wide Web
692:
689:
687:
684:
665:
662:
659:
656:
651:
648:
645:
642:
639:
636:
632:
628:
625:
622:
616:
613:
610:
606:
602:
599:
596:
569:
566:
562:
558:
555:
552:
532:
529:
526:
523:
520:
517:
513:
509:
506:
503:
483:
480:
477:
474:
454:
451:
448:
445:
425:
422:
419:
399:
396:
393:
369:
366:
362:
358:
355:
352:
329:
326:
323:
300:
297:
294:
274:
254:
243:
242:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
118:
117:Bayes' theorem
115:
71:Bayes' theorem
67:
64:
42:Bayes' Theorem
29:Bayes' theorem
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1605:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1585:
1583:
1572:
1570:0-13-197749-0
1566:
1562:
1557:
1553:
1551:0-03-031472-0
1547:
1543:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1525:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1500:
1497:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1465:
1462:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1442:
1439:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1348:
1345:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1313:
1310:
1304:
1301:
1295:
1292:
1287:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1266:
1263:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1231:
1229:
1227:
1223:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1178:
1175:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1151:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1124:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1076:
1073:
1067:
1064:
1058:
1055:
1050:
1046:
1039:
1036:
1028:
1021:
1019:
1017:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
979:
977:
975:
973:
969:
964:
958:
954:
947:
944:
938:
936:
934:
930:
927:
926:LaplacesDemon
923:
922:computational
919:
912:
910:
906:
904:
900:
895:
891:
889:
885:
877:
875:
872:
868:
863:
861:
860:Falsification
856:
852:
847:
840:
838:
836:
832:
826:
824:
819:
815:
808:
806:
804:
797:
789:
787:
782:
774:
772:
769:
764:
756:
754:
751:
746:
740:
732:
730:
728:
723:
722:weighted mean
719:
718:marketing mix
711:
709:
707:
703:
699:
690:
685:
683:
679:
660:
654:
646:
640:
634:
626:
620:
614:
608:
600:
594:
586:
583:
564:
556:
550:
527:
521:
515:
507:
501:
478:
472:
449:
443:
420:
394:
383:
364:
356:
350:
341:
324:
314:
295:
272:
252:
226:
220:
214:
206:
200:
197:
191:
185:
179:
171:
165:
162:
156:
153:
147:
140:
139:
138:
136:
132:
128:
124:
114:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:Richard Price
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
65:
63:
61:
57:
53:
49:
40:
34:
30:
19:
1560:
1541:
1505:
1499:
1477:(4): 32–39.
1474:
1470:
1464:
1447:
1441:
1427:(1): 18–31.
1424:
1420:
1414:
1360:(469): 1–5.
1357:
1353:
1347:
1322:
1318:
1312:
1303:
1294:
1275:
1265:
1240:
1236:
1200:
1196:
1190:
1182:
1177:
1160:
1156:
1150:
1133:
1129:
1123:
1101:(1): 21–30.
1098:
1094:
1088:
1080:
1075:
1066:
1057:
1048:
1038:
988:
984:
952:
946:
931:Package and
916:
907:
896:
892:
881:
864:
848:
844:
827:
820:
816:
812:
799:
784:
766:
742:
715:
694:
680:
587:
342:
244:
120:
95:Thomas Bayes
69:
66:Introduction
45:
884:advertising
871:qualitative
107:frequentist
87:probability
1582:Categories
1203:(1): 1–4.
939:References
899:experiment
855:strategies
841:Weaknesses
131:subjective
83:inferences
79:statistics
1491:167671294
1392:274829688
1384:123082238
1362:CiteSeerX
1217:167494436
835:logically
831:iteration
809:Strengths
796:Logistics
582:posterior
127:objective
111:marketing
48:marketing
1388:ProQuest
1257:53505632
706:internet
311:and the
1456:2326074
1339:2281640
1115:2350532
1005:2985299
933:WinBUGS
878:Example
763:Pricing
691:History
380:is the
1567:
1548:
1520:
1489:
1454:
1390:
1382:
1364:
1337:
1282:
1255:
1215:
1113:
1003:
959:
888:market
129:and a
1487:S2CID
1380:S2CID
1335:JSTOR
1253:S2CID
1213:S2CID
1111:JSTOR
1030:(PDF)
1001:JSTOR
1565:ISBN
1546:ISBN
1518:ISBN
1452:OCLC
1280:ISBN
957:ISBN
313:data
265:and
101:and
1510:doi
1479:doi
1429:doi
1372:doi
1358:100
1327:doi
1245:doi
1205:doi
1165:doi
1138:doi
1103:doi
993:doi
882:An
46:In
1584::
1516:.
1485:.
1473:.
1423:.
1400:^
1386:.
1378:.
1370:.
1356:.
1333:.
1323:57
1321:.
1251:.
1241:60
1239:.
1225:^
1211:.
1201:27
1199:.
1161:22
1159:.
1134:59
1132:.
1109:.
1099:33
1097:.
1047:.
1013:^
999:.
989:15
987:.
971:^
708:.
543:;
436:;
137::
97:,
62:.
50:,
1573:.
1554:.
1526:.
1512::
1493:.
1481::
1475:1
1458:.
1435:.
1431::
1425:2
1394:.
1374::
1341:.
1329::
1288:.
1259:.
1247::
1219:.
1207::
1171:.
1167::
1144:.
1140::
1117:.
1105::
1051:.
1032:.
1007:.
995::
965:.
929:R
664:)
661:D
658:(
655:P
650:)
647:H
644:(
641:P
638:)
635:H
631:|
627:D
624:(
621:P
615:=
612:)
609:D
605:|
601:H
598:(
595:P
568:)
565:D
561:|
557:H
554:(
551:P
531:)
528:H
525:(
522:P
519:)
516:H
512:|
508:D
505:(
502:P
482:)
479:D
476:(
473:P
453:)
450:H
447:(
444:P
424:)
421:H
418:(
398:)
395:D
392:(
368:)
365:H
361:|
357:D
354:(
351:P
328:)
325:D
322:(
299:)
296:H
293:(
273:B
253:A
230:)
227:A
224:(
221:P
218:)
215:A
211:|
207:B
204:(
201:P
198:=
195:)
192:B
189:(
186:P
183:)
180:B
176:|
172:A
169:(
166:P
163:=
160:)
157:B
154:A
151:(
148:P
35:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
