29:
276:
282:
225:
Indeed, the duty to protect neighbouring property owners in such cases as are involved in this question before us renders the question hardly arguable. There are many instances of other nuisances which can be better rectified by local legislation within the power of the legislatures over property and
241:
I am of the opinion that this statute in no way impinges on the domain of the criminal law but is concerned exclusively with the control and enjoyment of property and the safeguarding of the community from the consequences of an illegal and injurious use being made of it--a pure matter of civil
213:
legislature and allowed for private citizens to apply to the Court to close down a premises if it was being used as a "disorderly house". The Court upheld a provincial Act on the grounds that the law was in relation to property and civil rights and not criminal matters as was the case for an
242:
right. In my opinion in enacting the statute now under consideration a legislature exercises the power which it undoubtedly possesses to provide for the suppression of a nuisance and the prevention of its recurrence by civil process.
260:
206:. The Court held that the provinces could legislate in matters related to the prevention of crime even though the federal government had exclusive power over criminal law.
325:
349:
254:
344:
354:
318:
359:
311:
233:
131:
203:
34:
139:
135:
100:
74:
28:
226:
civil rights than by designating them crimes and leaving them to be dealt with by
Parliament as such.
96:
116:
295:
275:
338:
217:
123:
60:
291:
127:
261:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Richards Court through Fauteux Court)
214:
equivalent provision in the criminal code regarding "disorderly houses".
191:
Davies C.J. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
210:
202:, S.C.R. 681 is a leading constitutional decision of the
299:
103:, the provinces can enact legislation to prevent crime.
75:
Court of King's Bench, Appeal Side, Province of Quebec
182:
174:
166:
158:
150:
145:
107:
89:
81:
69:
59:
49:
42:
21:
319:
8:
326:
312:
97:federal government has exclusive authority
220:, writing for the majority, held that:
255:Nova Scotia Board of Censors v. McNeil
18:
7:
271:
269:
298:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
280:
274:
27:
1:
350:Supreme Court of Canada cases
54:Dame D. Bedard v. Owen Dawson
345:Canadian federalism case law
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
73:Judgment for Dawson by the
376:
268:
209:The law was passed by the
355:1923 in Canadian case law
232:In a concurring opinion,
190:
112:
94:
26:
132:Francis Alexander Anglin
204:Supreme Court of Canada
45:Judgment: June 15, 1923
35:Supreme Court of Canada
257:(1978) - similar case.
140:Pierre-Basile Mignault
136:Louis-Philippe Brodeur
43:Hearing: May 17, 1923
290:This article about
360:Canadian law stubs
117:Louis Henry Davies
307:
306:
195:
194:
85:Appeal dismissed.
367:
328:
321:
314:
286:
285:
284:
283:
278:
270:
218:Justice Idington
121:Puisne Justices:
108:Court membership
31:
19:
375:
374:
370:
369:
368:
366:
365:
364:
335:
334:
333:
332:
281:
279:
273:
266:
251:
199:Bedard v Dawson
119:
44:
38:
22:Bedard v Dawson
17:
12:
11:
5:
373:
371:
363:
362:
357:
352:
347:
337:
336:
331:
330:
323:
316:
308:
305:
304:
287:
264:
263:
258:
250:
247:
246:
245:
234:Justice Anglin
230:
229:
193:
192:
188:
187:
184:
180:
179:
176:
172:
171:
168:
164:
163:
160:
156:
155:
152:
148:
147:
143:
142:
114:Chief Justice:
110:
109:
105:
104:
92:
91:
87:
86:
83:
79:
78:
71:
67:
66:
63:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
372:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
342:
340:
329:
324:
322:
317:
315:
310:
309:
303:
301:
297:
293:
288:
277:
272:
267:
262:
259:
256:
253:
252:
248:
243:
239:
238:
237:
235:
227:
223:
222:
221:
219:
215:
212:
207:
205:
201:
200:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
146:Reasons given
144:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:John Idington
122:
118:
115:
111:
106:
102:
99:to legislate
98:
95:Although the
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
70:Prior history
68:
64:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
300:expanding it
292:Canadian law
289:
265:
240:
231:
224:
216:
208:
198:
197:
196:
120:
113:
101:criminal law
53:
33:
186:Mignault J.
183:Concurrence
175:Concurrence
167:Concurrence
159:Concurrence
154:Idington J.
339:Categories
178:Brodeur J.
128:Lyman Duff
65:S.C.R. 681
170:Anglin J.
61:Citations
249:See also
244:(p. 685)
228:(p. 684)
151:Majority
236:added:
162:Duff J.
90:Holding
211:Quebec
82:Ruling
294:is a
296:stub
341::
138:,
134:,
130:,
126:,
327:e
320:t
313:v
302:.
77:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
