Knowledge (XXG)

List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Richards Court through Fauteux Court)

Source đź“ť

1413: 1403: 1347: 1342: 1398: 1443: 1352: 1483: 1463: 1433: 1493: 1488: 1423: 1478: 1418: 479: 1498: 1473: 1453: 1448: 1408: 1362: 806: 1503: 1458: 1438: 1082: 943: 1468: 1428: 1357: 1546: 1519: 1072: 1003: 1087: 1067: 881: 708: 216: 1077: 298: 863: 495: 430: 1325: 1035: 282: 1008: 1567: 1541: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1265: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1377: 36: 979: 1367: 1382: 1372: 1044: 1028: 315: 20: 673: 171: 1021: 155: 690: 961: 232: 206: 463: 842: 1048: 798: 613: 24: 580: 569: 44: 742: 552: 188: 623: 248: 47:
cases until 1949. Also between 1888 and 1926, no criminal appeals were allowed to the Privy Council.
1013: 332: 182:
Appellant held responsible for flood damage due to underground seepage into non-adjacent property
902: 511: 29: 265: 137: 80: 379: 120: 1561: 725: 396: 73:
April 8, 1875 – Act of Parliament creates the Supreme Court of Canada
786: 40: 446: 413: 639: 528: 754: 656: 925: 824: 542: 1017: 131:
Constitutionality of provincial statute regulating "Chinamen"
28:
from the formation of the Court in 1875 to the retirement of
480:
Henry Birks & Sons (Montreal) Ltd v Montreal (City of)
807:
Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co v Ford Motor Co of Canada Ltd
944:
Tennessee Eastman Co v Canada (Commissioner of Patents)
1004:
List of Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases
719:
overlap of provincial law with federal commerce laws
882:
Manitoba (AG) v Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association
767: 709:
Carnation Co v Quebec (Agricultural Marketing Board)
593: 360: 101: 54: 1532: 1512: 1391: 1335: 1324: 1096: 1055: 299:
Provincial Secretary of Prince Edward Island v Egan
864:Highway Properties Ltd v Kelly, Douglas and Co Ltd 496:Reference Re Farm Products Marketing Act (Ontario) 431:Johannesson v West St Paul (Rural Municipality of) 172:Lethbridge Northern Irrigation District v Maunsell 349:1949 – no more civil appeals to the Privy Council 283:Home Oil Distributors Ltd v British Columbia (AG) 217:Reference Re Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1063:Richards through Fauteux Court (1875–1973) 1009:List of notable Canadian Courts of Appeals cases 326:constitutionality of Japanese deportation order 684:powers of the NCC to expropriate and use land 1029: 343:Defining criminal law under the constitution 8: 91:First case heard by Supreme Court of Canada 209:, no more criminal appeals to Privy Council 1332: 1036: 1022: 1014: 991:Fiduciary duty owed by corporate officers 875:Commercial landlord-tenant relationships 563:Duty of Care in public service conduct. 1568:Lists of Supreme Court of Canada cases 316:Reference Re Persons of Japanese Race 7: 980:Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley 869:SCR 562, 2 WWR 28, 1971 CanLII 123 674:Munro v National Capital Commission 753:division of powers; law excluding 583:, arbitrary action by government. 522:constitutional division of powers 390:Breach of the peace, peeping toms 14: 779: 776: 773: 770: 605: 602: 599: 596: 372: 369: 366: 363: 156:R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co 113: 110: 107: 104: 66: 63: 60: 57: 1073:Dickson Court (1984–1990) 769: 691:Peso Silver Mines Ltd v Cropper 595: 362: 259:Constitutional status of Inuit 103: 56: 1083:McLachlin Court (2000 to 2017) 1068:Laskin Court (1973–1984) 962:Calder v British Columbia (AG) 1: 1078:Lamer Court (1990–2000) 836:pre-Charter right to silence 233:Reference Re Alberta Statutes 21:list of notable cases decided 149:Federalism and criminal law 1088:Wagner Court (2017 to date) 1584: 893:Trade and Commerce power, 854:Trade and Commerce power, 702:director fiduciary duties 590:1960 – 1969 357:1950 – 1959 165:Trade and Commerce power. 98:1900 – 1949 610: 464:Saumur v Quebec (City of) 347: 203: 71: 43:cases until 1933 and for 843:Caloil Inc v Canada (AG) 546:required for possession 18:This is a chronological 1049:Supreme Court of Canada 799:Canadian Bill of Rights 614:Canadian Bill of Rights 25:Supreme Court of Canada 1547:"By the Court" reasons 1520:"By the Court" reasons 973:Aboriginal land title 895:Constitution Act, 1867 856:Constitution Act, 1867 570:Roncarelli v Duplessis 276:racial discrimination 207:Statute of Westminster 919:civil duty to rescue 743:Walter v Alberta (AG) 736:Definition of arrest 650:intoxication defence 553:Priestman v Colangelo 189:Edwards v Canada (AG) 1056:Notable cases by era 937:fundamental justice 249:Reference Re Eskimos 1535:by type of judgment 333:Margarine Reference 309:division of powers 1045:Cases and reasons 952:December 22, 1972 903:Horsley v MacLaren 851:November 24, 1970 795:November 20, 1969 624:O'Grady v Sparling 612:August 10, 1960 – 512:Switzman v Elbling 405:December 18, 1950 126:(1914), 49 SCR 44 39:heard appeals for 1555: 1554: 1533:Cases and reasons 1528: 1527: 995: 994: 970:January 31, 1973 872:February 1, 1971 761: 760: 587: 586: 354: 353: 271:(1939), SCR 139 95: 94: 1575: 1333: 1038: 1031: 1024: 1015: 916:October 5, 1971 768: 731:(1969), SCR 46 594: 424:Seditious libel 361: 102: 55: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1551: 1534: 1524: 1508: 1387: 1327: 1320: 1098: 1097:Reasons by year 1092: 1051: 1042: 1000: 815:April 28, 1970 766: 592: 359: 266:Christie v York 199:"Persons Case" 138:Bedard v Dawson 100: 81:Kelly v Sulivan 53: 12: 11: 5: 1581: 1579: 1571: 1570: 1560: 1559: 1553: 1552: 1550: 1549: 1544: 1538: 1536: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1523: 1522: 1516: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1414:L'Heureux-DubĂ© 1411: 1406: 1401: 1395: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1339: 1337: 1330: 1322: 1321: 1319: 1318: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1263: 1258: 1253: 1248: 1243: 1238: 1233: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1203: 1198: 1193: 1188: 1183: 1178: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1123: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1102: 1100: 1099:(1982 to date) 1094: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1033: 1026: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1006: 999: 996: 993: 992: 989: 988:June 29, 1973 986: 983: 975: 974: 971: 968: 965: 957: 956: 953: 950: 947: 939: 938: 935: 934:June 29, 1972 932: 929: 921: 920: 917: 914: 911: 898: 897: 891: 890:June 28, 1971 888: 885: 877: 876: 873: 870: 867: 859: 858: 852: 849: 846: 838: 837: 834: 833:June 26, 1970 831: 828: 820: 819: 816: 813: 810: 802: 801: 796: 793: 790: 782: 781: 778: 775: 772: 765: 762: 759: 758: 751: 749: 746: 738: 737: 734: 732: 729: 721: 720: 717: 715: 712: 704: 703: 700: 699:June 20, 1966 697: 694: 686: 685: 682: 680: 677: 669: 668: 665: 663: 660: 652: 651: 648: 646: 643: 635: 634: 632: 630: 627: 619: 618: 608: 607: 604: 601: 598: 591: 588: 585: 584: 578: 576: 573: 565: 564: 561: 559: 556: 548: 547: 538: 537:June 26, 1957 535: 532: 524: 523: 520: 518: 515: 507: 506: 504: 502: 499: 491: 490: 488: 486: 483: 475: 474: 472: 470: 467: 459: 458: 455: 453: 450: 442: 441: 439: 437: 434: 426: 425: 422: 420: 417: 409: 408: 406: 403: 400: 392: 391: 388: 386: 383: 380:Frey v Fedoruk 375: 374: 371: 368: 365: 358: 355: 352: 351: 345: 344: 341: 339: 336: 328: 327: 324: 322: 319: 311: 310: 307: 305: 302: 294: 293: 291: 289: 286: 278: 277: 274: 272: 269: 261: 260: 257: 255: 252: 244: 243: 241: 239: 236: 228: 227: 225: 223: 220: 212: 211: 201: 200: 197: 195: 192: 184: 183: 180: 178: 175: 167: 166: 163: 161: 159: 151: 150: 147: 146:June 15, 1923 144: 141: 133: 132: 129: 127: 124: 121:Quong Wing v R 116: 115: 112: 109: 106: 99: 96: 93: 92: 89: 87: 84: 76: 75: 69: 68: 65: 62: 59: 52: 49: 35:Note that the 30:GĂ©rald Fauteux 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1580: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1563: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1537: 1531: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1515: 1511: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1396: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1329: 1323: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1262: 1259: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1239: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1204: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1189: 1187: 1184: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1164: 1162: 1159: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1095: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1039: 1034: 1032: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1002: 1001: 997: 990: 987: 984: 982: 981: 977: 976: 972: 969: 966: 964: 963: 959: 958: 954: 951: 948: 946: 945: 941: 940: 936: 933: 930: 928: 927: 923: 922: 918: 915: 912: 909: 905: 904: 900: 899: 896: 892: 889: 886: 884: 883: 879: 878: 874: 871: 868: 866: 865: 861: 860: 857: 853: 850: 847: 845: 844: 840: 839: 835: 832: 829: 827: 826: 822: 821: 817: 814: 811: 809: 808: 804: 803: 800: 797: 794: 791: 789: 788: 784: 783: 763: 756: 752: 750: 747: 745: 744: 740: 739: 735: 733: 730: 728: 727: 726:R v Whitfield 723: 722: 718: 716: 713: 711: 710: 706: 705: 701: 698: 695: 693: 692: 688: 687: 683: 681: 678: 676: 675: 671: 670: 667:Election law 666: 664: 661: 659: 658: 654: 653: 649: 647: 644: 642: 641: 637: 636: 633: 631: 628: 626: 625: 621: 620: 617: 615: 609: 589: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 571: 567: 566: 562: 560: 557: 555: 554: 550: 549: 545: 544: 539: 536: 533: 531: 530: 526: 525: 521: 519: 516: 514: 513: 509: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 497: 493: 492: 489: 487: 484: 482: 481: 477: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 465: 461: 460: 456: 454: 451: 449: 448: 444: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 432: 428: 427: 423: 421: 418: 416: 415: 411: 410: 407: 404: 401: 399: 398: 397:Noble v Alley 394: 393: 389: 387: 384: 382: 381: 377: 376: 356: 350: 346: 342: 340: 337: 335: 334: 330: 329: 325: 323: 320: 318: 317: 313: 312: 308: 306: 303: 301: 300: 296: 295: 292: 290: 287: 285: 284: 280: 279: 275: 273: 270: 268: 267: 263: 262: 258: 256: 253: 251: 250: 246: 245: 242: 240: 237: 235: 234: 230: 229: 226: 224: 221: 219: 218: 214: 213: 210: 208: 202: 198: 196: 193: 191: 190: 186: 185: 181: 179: 176: 174: 173: 169: 168: 164: 162: 160: 158: 157: 153: 152: 148: 145: 142: 140: 139: 135: 134: 130: 128: 125: 123: 122: 118: 117: 97: 90: 88: 85: 83: 82: 78: 77: 74: 70: 50: 48: 46: 42: 38: 37:Privy Council 33: 31: 27: 26: 22: 16: 1542:Oral reasons 1348:Karakatsanis 1062: 978: 960: 942: 924: 907: 901: 894: 880: 862: 855: 841: 823: 805: 787:R v Drybones 785: 741: 724: 707: 689: 672: 655: 638: 622: 616:was enacted. 611: 581:constitution 568: 551: 541: 527: 510: 494: 478: 462: 445: 429: 412: 395: 378: 348: 331: 314: 297: 281: 264: 247: 231: 215: 204: 187: 170: 154: 136: 119: 79: 72: 34: 19: 17: 15: 908:The Ogopogo 540:subjective 447:Azoulay v R 414:R v Boucher 1444:Bastarache 1378:O'Bonsawin 1326:Reasons by 755:hutterites 640:R v George 529:Beaver v R 469:2 SCR 299 452:2 SCR 495 436:1 SCR 292 1513:Anonymous 1484:Rothstein 1464:Deschamps 1434:Iacobucci 1404:McLachlin 771:Case name 657:McKay v R 597:Case name 457:Abortion 364:Case name 105:Case name 58:Case name 32:in 1973. 1562:Category 1494:Moldaver 1489:Cromwell 1424:Gonthier 998:See also 985:SCR 592 967:SCR 313 955:Patents 949:SCR 111 931:SCR 917 926:Duke v R 913:SCR 441 887:SCR 689 848:SCR 543 830:SCR 272 825:R v Wray 818:Patents 812:SCR 833 792:SCR 282 780:Subject 774:Citation 748:SCR 383 714:SCR 238 696:SCR 673 679:SCR 663 662:SCR 798 645:SCR 871 629:SCR 804 606:Subject 600:Citation 575:SCR 121 558:SCR 615 543:mens rea 534:SCR 531 517:SCR 285 501:SCR 198 485:SCR 799 419:SCR 265 385:SCR 517 373:Subject 367:Citation 321:SCR 248 304:SCR 396 288:SCR 444 254:SCR 104 238:SCR 100 222:SCR 659 194:SCR 276 177:SCR 603 143:SCR 681 114:Subject 108:Citation 67:Subject 61:Citation 41:criminal 1479:Charron 1419:Sopinka 1368:Kasirer 1336:Current 1328:justice 1047:of the 764:1970–73 402:SCR 64 205:1933 – 86:(1876) 51:1875–99 23:by the 1499:Gascon 1474:Abella 1454:Arbour 1449:Binnie 1409:Wilson 1392:Former 1383:Moreau 1363:Martin 1343:Wagner 338:SCR 1 1504:Brown 1459:LeBel 1439:Major 1399:Lamer 1373:Jamal 45:civil 1469:Fish 1429:Cory 1358:Rowe 1353:CĂ´tĂ© 1316:2024 1311:2023 1306:2022 1301:2021 1296:2020 1291:2019 1286:2018 1281:2017 1276:2016 1271:2015 1266:2014 1261:2013 1256:2012 1251:2011 1246:2010 1241:2009 1236:2008 1231:2007 1226:2006 1221:2005 1216:2004 1211:2003 1206:2002 1201:2001 1196:2000 1191:1999 1186:1998 1181:1997 1176:1996 1171:1995 1166:1994 1161:1993 1156:1992 1151:1991 1146:1990 1141:1989 1136:1988 1131:1987 1126:1986 1121:1985 1116:1984 1111:1983 1106:1982 777:Date 603:Date 370:Date 111:Date 64:Date 1564:: 910:) 757:. 1037:e 1030:t 1023:v 906:(

Index

list of notable cases decided
Supreme Court of Canada
GĂ©rald Fauteux
Privy Council
criminal
civil
Kelly v Sulivan
Quong Wing v R
Bedard v Dawson
R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co
Lethbridge Northern Irrigation District v Maunsell
Edwards v Canada (AG)
Statute of Westminster
Reference Re Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act
Reference Re Alberta Statutes
Reference Re Eskimos
Christie v York
Home Oil Distributors Ltd v British Columbia (AG)
Provincial Secretary of Prince Edward Island v Egan
Reference Re Persons of Japanese Race
Margarine Reference
Frey v Fedoruk
Noble v Alley
R v Boucher
Johannesson v West St Paul (Rural Municipality of)
Azoulay v R
Saumur v Quebec (City of)
Henry Birks & Sons (Montreal) Ltd v Montreal (City of)
Reference Re Farm Products Marketing Act (Ontario)
Switzman v Elbling

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑