Knowledge

Cybersquatting

Source đź“ť

110: 481:, the manager of the St. Louis Cardinals, filed a complaint against Twitter, accusing Twitter of cybersquatting. The dispute centered on a Twitter profile that used La Russa's name, had a picture of La Russa, and had a headline that said "Hey there! Tony La Russa is now using Twitter." The profile encouraged users to "join today to start receiving Tony La Russa's updates." According to La Russa, the status updates were vulgar and derogatory. La Russa argued that the author of the profile intended, in bad faith, to divert Internet traffic away from La Russa's website and make a profit from the injury to La Russa's mark. On June 26, 2009, La Russa filed a notice of voluntary dismissal after the parties settled the case. 102: 529: 253:, which was upheld by the court. Finally, the Supreme Court acquitted the four accused, understanding that the proven facts did not fit the crime of misappropriation. In this sense, it highlights that there are elements that did not concur in this case and that the actions carried out by these individuals (creation of another domain, change of passwords...) occurred prior to their termination and that, therefore, they were in willingness to do it. 1711: 73:", or the practice of registering a collection of domain names corresponding to trademarks with the intention of selling the registrations to the owners of the trademarks, within the notion of cybersquatting, while others distinguish between the two terms. In the former definition, the cybersquatter may offer to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an 1372: 664: 132:(WIPO)'s Arbitration and Mediation Center, eclipsing the 2020 level by 22%. The surge pushed WIPO cybersquatting cases to almost 56,000 and the total number of domain names covered past the 100,000 mark. As a matter of comparison, in 2006, there were 1823 complaints filed with WIPO, which was a 25% increase over the 2005 rate. 498:
Policy" that forbids non-parody impersonation. An account may be guilty of impersonation if it confuses or misleads others; "accounts with the clear intent to confuse or mislead may be permanently suspended." Twitter's standard for defining parody is whether a reasonable person would be aware that the fake profile is a joke.
518:
Facebook reserves the right to reclaim usernames on the website if they infringe on a trademark. Trademark owners are responsible for reporting any trademark infringement on a username infringement form Facebook provides. Furthermore, Facebook usernames require "mobile phone authentication". In order
497:
Twitter's name squatting policy forbids cybersquatting similar to that seen in many domain name disputes, such as "username for sale" accounts: "Attempts to sell or extort other forms of payment in exchange for usernames will result in account suspension." Additionally, Twitter has an "Impersonation
151:
WIPO UDRP cases in 2021 involved parties from 132 countries. The top three business areas were Banking and Finance (13%), Internet and IT (13%), and Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals (11%). The U.S., with 1,760 cases filed, France (938), the U.K. (450), Switzerland (326), and Germany (251) were the
135:
The accelerating growth in cybersquatting cases filed with the WIPO Center has been largely attributed by the WIPO Center to trademark owners reinforcing their online presence to offer authentic content and trusted sales outlets, with a greater number of people spending more time online, especially
68:
In popular terms, "cybersquatting" is the term most frequently used to describe the deliberate, bad faith abusive registration of a domain name in violation of trademark rights. However, precisely because of its popular currency, the term has different meanings to different people. Some people, for
509:
the verification system was changed to make it easier for individuals to get verified through the Twitter Blue program, giving accounts "Profile Labels" instead – identifying ownership information such as whether the account is an individual, business, or a government.
230:
The case revolves around four members of the religious association Alpha Education for Comprehensive Health. They created a web page (the Internet domain of which was www.alfatelevision.org) and opened a bank and PayPal account for donations made to the association.
885: 864:
In the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act 1999, US Congress accepted that as long as there is no attempt to sell on a "personal name" Web site for profit, then it is an example of "fair use" and permission is not needed from the individual in
80:
Similarly, some consider "cyberpiracy" to be interchangeable with "cybersquatting", whereas others consider that the former term relates to violation of copyright in the content of websites, rather than to abusive domain name registrations.
210:, of the United States District Court of the Central District of California, ruled that the actor would have to file a complaint in a Canadian court, where the current owner of kevinspacey.com resided. Spacey later won the domain through 241:
The association's general secretary denounced the four members for a crime of misappropriation, and they were sentenced by the Provincial Court of Guadalajara, understanding that the internet domain was an asset of the association.
877: 226:
issued the first sentence on this practice, relating it to the crime of misappropriation (STS 358/2022, of April 7). An unprecedented fact that established the legal fit of this computer crime in Spanish jurisprudence.
1740: 474:, a new form of cybersquatting involves registering trademark-protected brands or names of public figures on popular social media websites. Such cases may be referred to as "username squatting". 256:
In addition, the sentence reflects cases in which cybersquatting could have criminal relevance. In the first place, if the conduct sought to harm the rights of a brand, it could constitute a
1725: 195:(15 U.S.C.) is intended to provide protection against cybersquatting for individuals as well as owners of distinctive trademarked names. However, some notable personalities, including actor 1845: 405: 326: 2038: 412: 1404: 1914: 1755: 1513: 125: 109: 906: 2220: 2028: 1518: 172: 60:", which is the act of occupying an abandoned or unoccupied space or building that the squatter does not own, rent, or otherwise have permission to use. 2033: 1745: 931: 2018: 833: 810: 788: 744: 306: 293: 129: 118: 234:
Sometime later, there were some disagreements between the members of the association and the four defendants who opened a new website, changed the
1587: 762: 505:. Usernames stamped with the "verified account" insignia is intended to indicate that the accounts are real and authentic. However, after the 211: 1011: 2110: 2048: 238:
and the passwords of the accounts, which redirected all the donations from the followers. Later, the association dismissed the four members.
2095: 2174: 1786: 2205: 2023: 506: 372: 1660: 501:
Soon after the La Russa suit was filed, Twitter took another step to prevent "identity confusion" caused by squatting by unveiling
1640: 1390: 982: 1243: 1218: 2043: 1929: 825: 802: 489:
Social networking websites have attempted to curb cybersquatting, making cybersquatting a violation of their terms of service.
736: 101: 2215: 785:"Innovative Activity Overcomes Pandemic Disruption - WIPO's Global Intellectual Property Filing Services Reach Record Levels" 1397: 2100: 1821: 1665: 1141: 272:. Finally, if cybersquatting were used to attack a domain name, the accused would be facing a crime of computer sabotage. 203:" for which no permission is needed, unless there is an attempt to profit from the domain name by putting it up for sale. 1909: 2200: 2105: 2090: 2064: 1826: 1630: 1580: 849: 528: 199:, failed to obtain control of their names on the internet because the US ACPA considers ownership of a website name " 1292: 878:"El Tribunal Supremo se pronuncia por primera vez sobre el delito de apropiaciĂłn indebida de un dominio de internet" 2169: 1939: 1655: 722: 354: 1771: 1610: 1492: 1376: 621: 557: 168: 88:), in a 1999 report, approved by its member states, considered it as the abusive registration of a domain name. 2210: 1836: 1816: 1432: 606: 141: 121:(WIPO) has provided an administrative process wherein a trademark holder can attempt to claim a squatted site. 1924: 1791: 1467: 1447: 1414: 346: 155:
In 2007 it was stated that 84% of the claims made since 1999 were decided in the complaining party's favor.
70: 2195: 2164: 2151: 2136: 1868: 1806: 1781: 1776: 1650: 1573: 939: 702: 1801: 1116: 1091: 1066: 1041: 961: 645: 1811: 1685: 1442: 587: 334: 300: 261: 246: 223: 46: 770: 379: 113:
Geographical Distribution of Parties in WIPO Domain Name Cybersquatting Cases in 2021. Top 25 countries
1198:
La Russa Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, La Russa v. Twitter, Inc., No. CGC-09-488101, 2009 WL 1569936"
681: 1967: 1899: 1853: 1796: 1750: 1645: 1487: 502: 784: 537: 2069: 1904: 1670: 1549: 1523: 1472: 1019: 457:
in 1996, eight years before Gmail was introduced, and Gail does not appear to profit from the site.
257: 268:
in a deceitful way to cause an error in the transfer of assets, the accused could face a crime of
2131: 2126: 1952: 1889: 1615: 562: 287: 1317: 1947: 1620: 716: 137: 84:
Because of the various interpretations of the term, World Intellectual Property Organization (
2074: 1957: 1730: 1193: 1168: 682:"The management of internet names and addresses: intellectual property issues. Final report" 596: 583: 207: 191:
adopted the U.S. Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999. This expansion of the
2146: 2141: 1972: 1962: 1735: 1695: 1477: 425: 235: 74: 453:. However, gail.com claims that the site was created after Gail's husband bought her the 990: 962:"Administrative Panel Decision Primedia Magazine Finance Inc. v. Next Level Productions" 1894: 1675: 1635: 1497: 1462: 1457: 1452: 1418: 617: 572: 567: 433: 429: 361: 1382: 206:
Jurisdiction is an issue, as shown in the case involving Kevin Spacey, in which Judge
2189: 1680: 1544: 1482: 1247: 1222: 612: 601: 578: 478: 188: 163:
Some countries have specific laws against cybersquatting beyond the normal rules of
1858: 552: 533: 196: 1173:
La Russa Complaint, La Russa v. Twitter, Inc., No. CGC-09-488101, 2009 WL 1569936"
1863: 1625: 1539: 766: 265: 176: 38: 668: 17: 1919: 826:"Geographical Distribution of Parties in WIPO Domain Name Cases Top 25 (2021)" 365: 317: 192: 1700: 1596: 1554: 1012:"Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen | Internet Trademark Case Summaries" 342: 184: 180: 164: 57: 50: 42: 519:
to obtain a username, the individual needs to verify the account by phone.
1371: 1346: 711:. An early UDRP decision regarding the domain name wal-marksuck.com. 2000. 1873: 467: 313: 200: 1272: 663: 590: 471: 1142:"A Good Place: The happy accident of mistakenly logging onto gail.com" 1993: 449:
engineer, gail.com, could be accused of cybersquatting on a typo for
250: 1268: 175:(ACPA), cybersquatting is registering, trafficking in, or using an 1988: 450: 387: 269: 108: 100: 737:"Total Number of WIPO Domain Name Cases and Domain Names by Year" 1998: 1565: 707: 539:
2021 WIPO's Global Intellectual Property Filing Services​
446: 145: 85: 1569: 1386: 1293:"Twitter Verification requirements - how to get the blue check" 454: 124:
Trademark owners in 2021 filed a record 5,128 cases under the
37:) is the practice of registering, trafficking in, or using an 667:
Text was copied from this source, which is available under a
395:
Swiss Arabian Perfumes Ind. Ltd. v. Nexperian Holding Limited
536:
work. Licensed under CC-BY-4.0. Text taken from
803:"Areas of WIPO Domain Name Complainant Activity (2021)" 406:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Bucci
327:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney
983:"Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Future Media Architects, Inc" 938:. Internet Business News. Oct 17, 2000. Archived from 850:"Kevin Spacey loses pivotal cybersquatting court case" 669:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
1269:"About verified accounts | Twitter Help Center" 214:(formerly known as the National Arbitration Forum). 2119: 2083: 2057: 2011: 1981: 1938: 1882: 1844: 1835: 1764: 1718: 1603: 1532: 1506: 1425: 105:
Areas of WIPO Domain Name Complainant Activity 2021
413:Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 485:Efforts to curtail cybersquatting in social media 466:With the rise of social media websites such as 907:"A hit for Jethro Tull in domain name dispute" 1756:Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy 1581: 1514:Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy 1398: 126:Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy 8: 532: This article incorporates text from a 264:. Secondly, if the intention was to use the 1341: 1339: 1841: 1588: 1574: 1566: 1519:Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act 1405: 1391: 1383: 173:Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act 27:Type of intellectual property infringement 1219:"Twitter Support: Name Squatting Policy" 1163: 1161: 1121:World Intellectual Property Organization 1096:World Intellectual Property Organization 1071:World Intellectual Property Organization 1046:World Intellectual Property Organization 834:World Intellectual Property Organization 811:World Intellectual Property Organization 789:World Intellectual Property Organization 745:World Intellectual Property Organization 650:World Intellectual Property Organization 400:Mou Limited v. Nexperian Holding Limited 320:) vs Next Level Productions (Benny Doro) 183:intent to profit from the goodwill of a 130:World Intellectual Property Organization 119:World Intellectual Property Organization 1244:"Twitter Support: Impersonation Policy" 1117:"WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2017-1079" 1092:"WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2017-0872" 1067:"WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2017-0730" 1042:"WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2017-0441" 757: 755: 634: 714: 640: 638: 763:"U.N: Cybersquatting complaints rise" 148:demonstrated its continuing primacy. 7: 245:This resolution was appealed to the 2024:International Trademark Association 646:"WIPO Internet Domain Name Process" 507:acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk 222:In relation to cybersquatting, the 167:law. For example, according to the 2221:Intellectual property infringement 1246:. Help.twitter.com. Archived from 1221:. Help.twitter.com. Archived from 1115:Arbitration and Mediation Center. 1090:Arbitration and Mediation Center. 1065:Arbitration and Mediation Center. 1040:Arbitration and Mediation Center. 960:Arbitration and Mediation Center. 932:"Madonna wins cybersquatting case" 882:Consejo General del Poder Judicial 25: 888:from the original on Apr 25, 2022 373:Nissan Motors vs. Nissan Computer 1709: 1370: 848:McCarthy, Kieren (26 Nov 2001). 769:. March 12, 2007. Archived from 662: 527: 2044:Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt 1930:Protected designation of origin 703:"Administrative Panel Decision" 187:belonging to someone else. The 159:In the United States of America 748:. 10 February 2022. p. 9. 314:Primedia Magazine Finance Inc. 1: 2075:Unregistered trademark symbol 1910:Electronic registration marks 620:, convicted of violating the 140:. Representing 70% of WIPO's 390:v. Nexperian Holding Limited 382:v. Nexperian Holding Limited 380:Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. 2065:Registered trademark symbol 152:top five filing countries. 53:belonging to someone else. 2237: 2206:Culture jamming techniques 1656:Initial interest confusion 586:about a precedent-setting 445:The personal website of a 355:Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft 56:The term is derived from " 45:intent to profit from the 2160: 1707: 1493:Domain name front running 622:Truth in Domain Names Act 558:Domain name front running 440:Accused of cybersquatting 169:United States federal law 1545:"Catchall" typosquatting 1433:Reverse domain hijacking 607:Uniform Resource Locator 258:crime against industrial 142:Generic top-level domain 1925:Geographical indication 1468:Domain name warehousing 1448:Domain name speculation 1347:"Help Center, FACEBOOK" 347:Future Media Architects 2165:Category:Trademark law 2152:World Trademark Review 2137:Trademark infringement 1869:Unregistered trademark 1651:Functionality doctrine 1318:"About profile labels" 721:: CS1 maint: others ( 193:Lanham (Trademark) Act 114: 106: 2216:Types of cyberattacks 1900:Collective trademarks 1686:Reputation parasitism 1641:Coexistence agreement 1443:Domain name drop list 588:intellectual property 335:Lamparello v. Falwell 262:intellectual property 224:Spanish Supreme Court 112: 104: 1905:Defensive trademarks 1854:Registered trademark 1751:Community Trade Mark 1701:Well-known trademark 1646:Confusing similarity 1488:IDN homograph attack 1379:at Wikimedia Commons 503:Twitter verification 388:Aviva Brands Limited 177:Internet domain name 39:Internet domain name 2111:Washington Redskins 2070:Service mark symbol 1953:Hologram trademarks 1890:Certification marks 1671:Secondary liability 1661:Good faith doctrine 1550:Wildcard DNS record 1524:PROTECT Act of 2003 1473:Doppelganger domain 837:. 10 February 2022. 814:. 10 February 2022. 791:. 10 February 2022. 290:vs. Denny Hammerton 2201:Domain Name System 2132:Trademark examiner 2127:Trademark attorney 884:. April 25, 2022. 773:on March 21, 2007. 563:Domain Name System 420:Without litigation 115: 107: 69:example, include " 2183: 2182: 2175:WP:MOS/Trademarks 2007: 2006: 1958:Motion trademarks 1948:Colour trademarks 1621:Generic trademark 1563: 1562: 1375:Media related to 1200:. Citmedialaw.org 1175:. Citmedialaw.org 477:On June 5, 2009, 138:COVID-19 pandemic 16:(Redirected from 2228: 1973:Sound trademarks 1968:Shape trademarks 1963:Scent trademarks 1940:Non-conventional 1842: 1746:Singapore Treaty 1731:Madrid Agreement 1726:Paris Convention 1713: 1712: 1590: 1583: 1576: 1567: 1407: 1400: 1393: 1384: 1374: 1358: 1357: 1355: 1354: 1343: 1334: 1333: 1331: 1329: 1322:help.twitter.com 1314: 1308: 1307: 1305: 1303: 1297:help.twitter.com 1289: 1283: 1282: 1280: 1279: 1265: 1259: 1258: 1256: 1255: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1231: 1230: 1215: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1205: 1190: 1184: 1183: 1181: 1180: 1165: 1156: 1155: 1153: 1152: 1137: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1112: 1106: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1087: 1081: 1080: 1078: 1077: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1052: 1037: 1031: 1030: 1028: 1027: 1018:. Archived from 1008: 1002: 1001: 999: 998: 989:. Archived from 979: 973: 972: 970: 969: 957: 951: 950: 948: 947: 928: 922: 921: 919: 918: 903: 897: 896: 894: 893: 874: 868: 867: 861: 860: 845: 839: 838: 830: 822: 816: 815: 807: 799: 793: 792: 781: 775: 774: 759: 750: 749: 741: 733: 727: 726: 720: 712: 699: 693: 692: 691:. 30 April 1999. 686: 678: 672: 666: 661: 659: 657: 652:. April 30, 1999 642: 597:Top-level domain 531: 117:Since 1999, the 92:Legal resolution 35:domain squatting 21: 2236: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2211:Internet ethics 2186: 2185: 2184: 2179: 2156: 2147:Trademark troll 2142:Trademark share 2115: 2079: 2053: 2003: 1977: 1934: 1895:Chartered marks 1878: 1831: 1760: 1736:Madrid Protocol 1714: 1710: 1705: 1696:Parallel import 1611:Distinctiveness 1599: 1594: 1564: 1559: 1528: 1502: 1478:Type-in traffic 1421: 1411: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1352: 1350: 1345: 1344: 1337: 1327: 1325: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1301: 1299: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1277: 1275: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1253: 1251: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1228: 1226: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1203: 1201: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1178: 1176: 1167: 1166: 1159: 1150: 1148: 1140:Nowicki, Cole. 1139: 1138: 1134: 1125: 1123: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1100: 1098: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1075: 1073: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1050: 1048: 1039: 1038: 1034: 1025: 1023: 1010: 1009: 1005: 996: 994: 993:on Jan 28, 2016 981: 980: 976: 967: 965: 959: 958: 954: 945: 943: 936:AllBusiness.com 930: 929: 925: 916: 914: 911:The Independent 905: 904: 900: 891: 889: 876: 875: 871: 858: 856: 847: 846: 842: 828: 824: 823: 819: 805: 801: 800: 796: 783: 782: 778: 761: 760: 753: 739: 735: 734: 730: 713: 701: 700: 696: 684: 680: 679: 675: 655: 653: 644: 643: 636: 631: 626: 548: 525: 516: 495: 487: 464: 442: 426:The White House 422: 283: 281:With litigation 278: 236:internet domain 220: 161: 99: 94: 66: 33:(also known as 28: 23: 22: 18:Cyber-squatting 15: 12: 11: 5: 2234: 2232: 2224: 2223: 2218: 2213: 2208: 2203: 2198: 2188: 2187: 2181: 2180: 2178: 2177: 2172: 2167: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2155: 2154: 2149: 2144: 2139: 2134: 2129: 2123: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2114: 2113: 2108: 2103: 2098: 2096:Debian–Mozilla 2093: 2087: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2078: 2077: 2072: 2067: 2061: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2052: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2015: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2002: 2001: 1996: 1991: 1985: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1976: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1944: 1942: 1936: 1935: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1922: 1917: 1915:Font trademark 1912: 1907: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1886: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1877: 1876: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1856: 1850: 1848: 1839: 1833: 1832: 1830: 1829: 1824: 1822:United Kingdom 1819: 1814: 1809: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1787:European Union 1784: 1779: 1774: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1748: 1743: 1738: 1733: 1728: 1722: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1708: 1706: 1704: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1691:Cybersquatting 1688: 1683: 1678: 1676:Nominative use 1673: 1668: 1663: 1658: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1638: 1636:Priority right 1633: 1631:Concurrent use 1628: 1623: 1618: 1613: 1607: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1595: 1593: 1592: 1585: 1578: 1570: 1561: 1560: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1536: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1526: 1521: 1516: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1501: 1500: 1498:Drop registrar 1495: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1463:Domain tasting 1460: 1458:Domain parking 1455: 1453:Domain sniping 1450: 1445: 1440: 1438:Cybersquatting 1435: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1402: 1395: 1387: 1381: 1380: 1377:Cybersquatting 1366: 1365:External links 1363: 1360: 1359: 1349:. Facebook.com 1335: 1309: 1284: 1260: 1235: 1210: 1185: 1157: 1132: 1107: 1082: 1057: 1032: 1003: 974: 952: 923: 898: 869: 840: 817: 794: 776: 751: 728: 694: 673: 633: 632: 630: 627: 625: 624: 618:John Zuccarini 615: 610: 604: 599: 594: 575: 573:Domain tasting 570: 568:Domain sniping 565: 560: 555: 549: 547: 544: 542:, WIPO. 524: 521: 515: 512: 494: 491: 486: 483: 463: 460: 459: 458: 441: 438: 437: 436: 434:Whitehouse.org 430:Whitehouse.com 421: 418: 417: 416: 409: 402: 397: 392: 384: 376: 369: 362:Dennis Toeppen 358: 351: 339: 331: 323: 310: 297: 282: 279: 277: 274: 219: 216: 160: 157: 144:(gTLD) cases, 98: 95: 93: 90: 75:inflated price 65: 62: 31:Cybersquatting 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2233: 2222: 2219: 2217: 2214: 2212: 2209: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2196:Trademark law 2194: 2193: 2191: 2176: 2173: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2122: 2118: 2112: 2109: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2094: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2086: 2082: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2060: 2056: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1987: 1986: 1984: 1980: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1943: 1941: 1937: 1931: 1928: 1926: 1923: 1921: 1918: 1916: 1913: 1911: 1908: 1906: 1903: 1901: 1898: 1896: 1893: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1881: 1875: 1872: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1849: 1847: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1834: 1828: 1827:United States 1825: 1823: 1820: 1818: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1767: 1763: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1749: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1721: 1717: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1692: 1689: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1681:Disparagement 1679: 1677: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1662: 1659: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1614: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597:Trademark law 1591: 1586: 1584: 1579: 1577: 1572: 1571: 1568: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1535: 1531: 1525: 1522: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1511: 1509: 1505: 1499: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1483:Typosquatting 1481: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1408: 1403: 1401: 1396: 1394: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1378: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1348: 1342: 1340: 1336: 1323: 1319: 1313: 1310: 1298: 1294: 1288: 1285: 1274: 1270: 1264: 1261: 1250:on 2009-07-01 1249: 1245: 1239: 1236: 1225:on 2009-07-01 1224: 1220: 1214: 1211: 1199: 1197: 1189: 1186: 1174: 1172: 1164: 1162: 1158: 1147: 1143: 1136: 1133: 1122: 1118: 1111: 1108: 1097: 1093: 1086: 1083: 1072: 1068: 1061: 1058: 1047: 1043: 1036: 1033: 1022:on 2016-10-01 1021: 1017: 1013: 1007: 1004: 992: 988: 984: 978: 975: 963: 956: 953: 942:on 2007-02-14 941: 937: 933: 927: 924: 912: 908: 902: 899: 887: 883: 879: 873: 870: 866: 855: 851: 844: 841: 836: 835: 827: 821: 818: 813: 812: 804: 798: 795: 790: 786: 780: 777: 772: 768: 764: 758: 756: 752: 747: 746: 738: 732: 729: 724: 718: 710: 709: 704: 698: 695: 690: 683: 677: 674: 670: 665: 651: 647: 641: 639: 635: 628: 623: 619: 616: 614: 613:Michael Urvan 611: 608: 605: 603: 602:Typosquatting 600: 598: 595: 592: 589: 585: 581: 580: 579:Taubman Sucks 576: 574: 571: 569: 566: 564: 561: 559: 556: 554: 551: 550: 545: 543: 541: 540: 535: 530: 522: 520: 513: 511: 508: 504: 499: 492: 490: 484: 482: 480: 479:Tony La Russa 475: 473: 469: 461: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 424: 423: 419: 415: 414: 410: 408: 407: 403: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 389: 385: 383: 381: 377: 375: 374: 370: 368: 367: 363: 359: 357: 356: 352: 349: 348: 344: 340: 337: 336: 332: 329: 328: 324: 321: 319: 315: 311: 308: 304: 302: 298: 295: 291: 289: 285: 284: 280: 276:Notable cases 275: 273: 271: 267: 263: 259: 254: 252: 248: 247:Supreme Court 243: 239: 237: 232: 228: 225: 217: 215: 213: 209: 208:Gary A. Feess 204: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189:United States 186: 182: 178: 174: 171:known as the 170: 166: 158: 156: 153: 149: 147: 143: 139: 133: 131: 127: 122: 120: 111: 103: 97:International 96: 91: 89: 87: 82: 78: 76: 72: 63: 61: 59: 54: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 19: 1883:Non-standard 1859:Service mark 1690: 1437: 1413:Domain name 1351:. Retrieved 1326:. Retrieved 1321: 1312: 1300:. Retrieved 1296: 1287: 1276:. Retrieved 1263: 1252:. Retrieved 1248:the original 1238: 1227:. Retrieved 1223:the original 1213: 1202:. Retrieved 1195: 1188: 1177:. Retrieved 1170: 1149:. Retrieved 1145: 1135: 1124:. Retrieved 1120: 1110: 1099:. Retrieved 1095: 1085: 1074:. Retrieved 1070: 1060: 1049:. Retrieved 1045: 1035: 1024:. Retrieved 1020:the original 1015: 1006: 995:. Retrieved 991:the original 987:Adrforum.com 986: 977: 966:. Retrieved 955: 944:. Retrieved 940:the original 935: 926: 915:. Retrieved 913:. 2000-07-31 910: 901: 890:. Retrieved 881: 872: 863: 857:. Retrieved 854:The Register 853: 843: 832: 820: 809: 797: 779: 771:the original 743: 731: 706: 697: 688: 676: 654:. Retrieved 649: 577: 553:Brandjacking 538: 534:free content 526: 517: 500: 496: 488: 476: 465: 462:Social media 411: 404: 399: 394: 386: 378: 371: 360: 353: 341: 333: 325: 312: 299: 286: 255: 244: 240: 233: 229: 221: 205: 197:Kevin Spacey 162: 154: 150: 134: 128:(UDRP) with 123: 116: 83: 79: 67: 55: 34: 30: 29: 2101:Stolichnaya 1920:Ghost marks 1864:Trade dress 1817:Philippines 1626:Passing off 1540:Domain hack 1415:speculation 1146:The Outline 767:Yahoo! News 584:documentary 288:Jethro Tull 266:domain name 249:through an 136:during the 71:warehousing 64:Terminology 2190:Categories 1353:2013-09-22 1328:13 January 1302:13 January 1278:2016-09-27 1254:2013-09-22 1229:2013-09-22 1204:2013-09-22 1179:2013-09-22 1151:2023-01-26 1126:2017-08-15 1101:2017-08-15 1076:2017-08-15 1051:2017-08-15 1026:2016-09-27 997:2016-09-27 968:2013-09-22 946:2008-07-22 917:2013-09-22 892:2022-05-13 859:2016-09-27 629:References 582:, a short 366:Panavision 318:Tiger Beat 303:vs. Parisi 2170:Case laws 2106:Ugg boots 2091:Budweiser 1792:Hong Kong 1772:Australia 1555:Fast flux 1533:Technical 1324:. Twitter 865:question. 343:Lufthansa 185:trademark 181:bad faith 165:trademark 58:squatting 51:trademark 43:bad faith 41:, with a 2084:Disputes 1874:Wordmark 1846:Standard 1719:Treaties 1666:Fair use 1616:Dilution 1604:Concepts 1016:Finnegan 886:Archived 717:cite web 656:16 March 546:See also 514:Facebook 468:Facebook 428:against 305:, 2000 ( 292:, 2000 ( 218:In Spain 201:fair use 47:goodwill 2120:Related 2058:Symbols 1982:Related 1802:Ireland 1765:Country 1426:General 1419:parking 1273:Twitter 591:lawsuit 523:Sources 493:Twitter 472:Twitter 301:Madonna 2012:Bodies 1994:Emblem 1777:Canada 964:. WIPO 350:, 2008 338:, 2005 330:, 2001 251:appeal 2039:ICANN 2034:USPTO 2029:EUIPO 1989:Brand 1837:Types 1807:Japan 1797:India 1782:China 1741:TRIPS 1507:Legal 829:(PDF) 806:(PDF) 740:(PDF) 685:(PDF) 609:(URL) 451:Gmail 309:Case) 296:Case) 270:fraud 212:FORUM 179:with 49:of a 2049:CIPO 2019:WIPO 1999:Logo 1812:Oman 1417:and 1330:2023 1304:2023 723:link 708:WIPO 689:WIPO 658:2022 470:and 447:NASA 432:and 307:WIPO 294:WIPO 146:.com 86:WIPO 1196:see 1171:see 455:URL 364:v. 345:v. 260:or 2192:: 1338:^ 1320:. 1295:. 1271:. 1160:^ 1144:. 1119:. 1094:. 1069:. 1044:. 1014:. 985:. 934:. 909:. 880:. 862:. 852:. 831:. 808:. 787:. 765:. 754:^ 742:. 719:}} 715:{{ 705:. 687:. 648:. 637:^ 77:. 1589:e 1582:t 1575:v 1406:e 1399:t 1392:v 1356:. 1332:. 1306:. 1281:. 1257:. 1232:. 1207:. 1194:" 1182:. 1169:" 1154:. 1129:. 1104:. 1079:. 1054:. 1029:. 1000:. 971:. 949:. 920:. 895:. 725:) 671:. 660:. 593:. 322:. 316:( 20:)

Index

Cyber-squatting
Internet domain name
bad faith
goodwill
trademark
squatting
warehousing
inflated price
WIPO


World Intellectual Property Organization
Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy
World Intellectual Property Organization
COVID-19 pandemic
Generic top-level domain
.com
trademark
United States federal law
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
Internet domain name
bad faith
trademark
United States
Lanham (Trademark) Act
Kevin Spacey
fair use
Gary A. Feess
FORUM
Spanish Supreme Court

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑