217:"In this case, all three factors, applied purposively and flexibly, favour granting public interest standing to the respondents. In fact, there is no dispute that the first and second factors are met: the respondents’ action raises serious justiciable issues and the respondents have an interest in the outcome of the action and are fully engaged with the issues that they seek to raise. Indeed, the constitutionality of the prostitution provisions of the Criminal Code constitutes a serious justiciable issue and the respondents, given their work, have a strong engagement with the issue...
259:
government a chance to write new laws. Following the announcement of the decision
Valerie Scott, one of the applicants, stated in the media that, regardless of the decision, sex workers must be involved in the process of constructing the new legislation: "The thing here is politicians, though they may know us as clients, they do not understand how sex work works. They won't be able to write a half-decent law. It will fail. That's why you must bring sex workers to the table in a meaningful way."
403:, for instance, a person may share accommodation with someone without necessarily living on their earnings. The Court found this a reasonable limit on the presumption of innocence because the intent was to prevent exploitation by pimps and that there was no real danger of innocent persons being found guilty if they provided evidence to the contrary, thereby constituting reasonable doubt. It was felt that this provision protected sex workers from abuse.
116:
by governmental action, as guaranteed by section 7 of the
Charter. The reference to the court also included the bawdy house provisions which were held to not infringe the guarantee of freedom of expression provided for by section 2(b) of the Charter. Finally the impugned infringement of the freedom of expression guaranteed by section 2(b) of the Charter was justifiable under section 1 of the Charter as being a reasonable limit on a protected right.
318:
Edward VII, chapter 8, section 2, the section was repealed and a new one enacted in the same terms but with the addition at the end, of the words “or occupied or resorted to by one or more persons for such purposes.” That case reversed an
Ontario Court of Appeal decision acquitting a woman convicted of offering sexual services on her own. The court pointed to the words
123:
The court must first characterize the objective of the law (a remedy for solicitation in public places and the eradication of social nuisance from the public display of the sale of sex). This was constructed as restricted to taking prostitution off the streets and out of public view. In this respect,
369:
was not indecent
Toronto passed a by-law prohibiting close-contact dancing. However the Court of Appeal reversed the decision on the grounds that this constituted prostitution (R. v. Mara, 27 O.R. (3d) 643). Furthermore, the court ruled that Parliament intended to abolish prostitution as a form of
140:
A part of section 198(1)(d) was challenged in 1991, namely that a previous conviction of keeping a disorderly house amounts to proof of the nature of the premises in subsequent proceedings. This was held to contravene sections 11(d) and 7 of the
Charter (R. v. Janoff (1991), 68 C.C.C. (3d) 454 (Que.
172:
in June, 2011. On March 26, 2012 the Appeal court came to a decision which upheld the lower court's ruling on bawdy houses, modified the ruling on living on the avails to make exploitation a criminal offence, but reversed the decision on soliciting, holding that the effect on communities justified
115:
dissenting), agreed that freedom of expression was restricted by what was now 213(1)(c) it did not infringe or deny the freedom of association guaranteed by section 2(d) of the
Charter. He also held that it did not infringe the right to be treated fairly when life, liberty and security are affected
258:
In a decision dated 20 December 2013, the
Supreme Court of Canada struck down the laws in question, ruling that a ban on solicitation and brothels violated prostitutes' rights to safety. They delayed the enforcement of their decision for one year—also applicable to the Ontario sections—to give the
317:
The wording of section 197 allows of some interpretation. As noted by the
Supreme Court of Canada in Cohen "Prior to 1907, a common bawdy house was defined by section 225 of the Code as “a house, room, set of rooms or place of any kind kept for purposes of prostitution,” but in that year, by 6-7
299:
In
February 2020, an Ontario court judge struck down three parts of the PCEPA as unconstitutional: the prohibitions on advertising, procuring and materially benefiting from someone else's sexual services were violations of the 'freedom of expression' and 'security of the person' as defined in the
345:
the majority held that the acts were not indecent since they did not fall below the community standard of tolerance, citing the circumstances surrounding the act, the degree of harm that could result from public exposure, and expert evidence. No complaints had been received; the acts were in a
39:
issues (whether a jurisdiction, such as a
Provincial Government or municipality, has the powers to legislate on the matter). In 2013, three provisions of the current law were overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada, with a twelve-month stay of effect. In June 2014, the Government introduced
222:
This case constitutes public interest litigation: the respondents have raised issues of public importance that transcend their immediate interests. Their challenge is comprehensive, relating as it does to nearly the entire legislative scheme. It provides an opportunity to assess through the
325:
Another requisite is that a place must be resorted to for prostitution on a habitual and regular basis (R. v. Patterson (1968), 67 D.L.R. (2d) 82 (S.C.C.)). A woman who used her own apartment, alone, but regularly was convicted (R. v. Worthington (1972), 22 C.R.N.S. 34 (Ont. C.A.)).
398:
such as this contravenes the presumption of evidence under section 11(d) of the Charter and was challenged. The Supreme Court found this justifiable in Downey v. R.( 2 S.C.R. 10). The majority accepted that an accused might be convicted despite the existence of
233:
The impugned Criminal Code provisions, by criminalizing many of the activities surrounding prostitution, adversely affect a great number of women. These issues are also clearly justiciable ones, as they concern the constitutionality of the challenged
173:
the limitation. Two of the five judges dissented from the last ruling, stating that the law on solicitation was not justifiable. The court continued a stay of effect of a further twelve months on the first provision, and thirty days on the second.
130:
The court must determine if the effects of the law so infringe a protected right that it outweighs the objective. It was held that the curtailment of street solicitation was in keeping with the interests of society, for its nuisance‑related
244:
Granting standing will not only serve to enhance the principle of legality with respect to serious issues of direct concern to some of the most marginalized members of society, but it will also promote the economical use of scarce judicial
84:
disagreed, holding that infringement of freedom of expression was a justifiable limitation as no “clear and convincing” alternative was available for dealing with the nuisance of street prostitution (R. v. Jahelka (1987), 79 A.R. 44).
180:
agreed to hear the appeal. The Supreme Court also agreed to hear a cross-appeal by sex-trade workers on the Court of Appeal for Ontario's decision to ban solicitation. The Supreme Court of Canada heard the case on June 13, 2013.
127:
The court must assess the proportionality of the legislation to the objectives; in particular any infringement of rights must be the minimum to achieve this. It was held the provisions were not unduly intrusive.
370:
violence against women, and thus the dancing exceeded public acceptability. The Supreme Court confirmed this in June 1997 holding that sexual contact constitutes prostitution and exceeds community standards.
810:
House of Commons. C-36 An Act to amend the Criminal Code in response to the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Attorney General of Canada v. Bedford and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
375:
This type of activity is harmful to society in many ways. It degrades and dehumanizes women; it desensitizes sexuality and is incompatible with the dignity and equality of each human being
124:
Dickson disagreed with the opinion of another justice that the legislative objective addressed the broader questions of the exploitation, degradation and subordination of women.
855:
533:
821:
Statement by the Minister of Justice Regarding Legislation in Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Ruling in Attorney General of Canada v. Bedford et al. June 4 2014
168:
in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on September 28, 2010, the prostitution laws were declared invalid. The decision was stayed and an appeal was heard in by the
956:
386:
Participation alone is insufficient under 210 (1), without “some degree of control over the care and management of the premises” (R. v. Corbeil, 1 S.C.R. 83).
681:
610:
784:
209:
who released their decision on September 21, 2012. They dismissed the appeal enabling the case to once again proceed in the court of first instance.
301:
28:
912:
929:
505:
832:
949:
731:
1342:
1337:
1316:
889:
715:
58:
The new formulations of section 213 found themselves under challenge in the lower courts within a year, with conflicting results (
646:
202:
942:
583:
329:
Another relates to the alternative definition of "the practice of acts of indecency", since this leaves open the definition of
198:
77:
809:
570:
1189:
1052:
1300:
907:
758:
458:
1277:
1047:
658:
Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence Society v. Attorney General (Canada), 2008 BCSC 1726 Dec 15 2008
394:
Subsection 3 provides a presumption of offence of living on the avails, if associated with a sex worker or premise. A
702:
Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence Society v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 BCCA 439 Oct 12 2010
614:
112:
713:
Canada (Attorney General) v. Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence Society, 2012 SCC 45 Sept 21 2012
189:
A related challenge was mounted in British Columbia in 2007 , but did not proceed due to a procedural motion by the
1037:
190:
668:
103:, it upheld the sections (Reference Re Sections 193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code, 1 S.C.R. 1123])Chief
635:
96:
case of freedom of expression (Reference Re Sections 193 and 195.1(1)(c) of the Criminal Code, 6 W.W.R. 289).
89:
1266:
201:
in 2008, but successfully appealed in October 2010. The Attorney General then appealed this decision of the
80:, by constraining communication in relation to legal activity (R. v. Skinner (1987), 35 C.C.C. (3d) 203). The
1168:
206:
177:
169:
100:
81:
483:
1252:
989:
965:
669:
Sacha Ivy. The (In)Visibility of Sex Workers: A Politics of the Flesh. BC Civil Liberties Association 2010
346:
closed room between consenting adults without physical contact, while expert witnesses suggested this was
161:
1295:
1122:
1032:
982:
239:
Some aspects of the statement of claim raise serious issues as to the invalidity of the legislation...
338:
1042:
334:
1154:
917:
250:
In view of the subsequent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, this application became moot.
176:
The Government announced it would appeal this decision on April 25, and on October 25, 2012, the
701:
657:
304:. Those provisions were later upheld, however, by the Ontario Court of Appeal in February 2022.
437:
1290:
1259:
1203:
1161:
1092:
886:
863:
559:
223:
constitutional lens the overall effect of this scheme on those most directly affected by it...
155:
76:'s Appeal Court ruled the legislation violated the guarantee of freedom of expression in the
1182:
400:
284:
1132:
856:"Controversial Harper-era sex work laws are constitutional, Ontario Court of Appeal rules"
719:
17:
647:
Press Release: Charter Challenge Launched to Strike Down Prostitution Laws. August 4 2007
31:
in 1982 allowed for the provision of challenging the constitutionality of laws governing
712:
1245:
1107:
1077:
918:
Brannigan. Laws and the construction of criminal behaviours. University of Calgary 2009
908:
Canadian Criminal Law Information. Prostitution and Soliciting. Bastion Law Corporation
280:
194:
1331:
1217:
1175:
1127:
1117:
1112:
1102:
1097:
1087:
1082:
893:
534:"Prostitution law: Ontario's top court allows brothels, but soliciting ruled illegal"
510:
412:
366:
351:
276:
108:
104:
1196:
1137:
538:
395:
342:
288:
268:
820:
1238:
1231:
1210:
1072:
996:
588:
165:
93:
73:
36:
35:
in addition to interpretative case law. Other legal proceedings have dealt with
322:
as clearly indicating that operating on one's own constituted a bawdy house.
283:
began on June 11. It passed the third reading on October 6 and was approved by
212:
The Supreme Court made a number of observations regarding the issues involved:
1285:
1224:
867:
362:
347:
330:
228:
It is obvious that the claim is being pursued with thoroughness and skill...
484:"Bedford v. Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice on September 28, 2010"
160:
A legal challenge to three of Canada's many prostitution laws was filed in
584:"Supreme Court to hear prostitution law appeal; brothel ban stays for now"
1003:
934:
333:, which may not be universally understood or accepted. One definition of
913:
Lloyd Duhaime. Prostitution and Related Offenses (Canada), Vancouver BC
636:
Supreme Court of Canada: JUDGMENT TO BE RENDERED IN APPEAL. Dec 13 2013
887:
Supreme Court of Canada. The King v. Cohen, [1939] S.C.R. 212
506:"Government appeal argues no obligation to protect sex-trade workers"
459:"Charter Challenge on Prostitution Filed Toronto Star March 21, 2007"
271:, the Minister of Justice introduced amending legislation, C-36 the "
1027:
938:
759:"CITATION: Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72"
682:"B.C. court gives green light to prostitution laws challenge"
92:
upheld section 195.1(1)(c) on the grounds that there was no
164:
in March 2007. In a decision handed down by Madam Justice
571:
SCC to hear prostitution law appeal. CTV News Oct 25 2012
732:"Supreme Court strikes down Canada's prostitution laws"
560:
Canada v. Bedford Ontario Court of Appeal March 26 2012
287:
on November 4. On November 6, 2014, Bill C-36 received
1309:
1276:
1146:
1065:
1020:
1013:
972:
930:
Edmonton Police Service: Legalities of Prostitution
273:
Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act
833:"LEGISinfo - House Government Bill C-36 (41-2)"
785:"Canada lifts all restrictions on prostitution"
119:The justification was set out in three stages:
611:"Supreme Court of Canada - Scheduled Hearings"
185:British Columbia constitutional challenge 2007
64:, 28 C.C.C. (3d) 176 (1986).;
950:
263:Government response to Supreme Court decision
8:
757:Supreme Court of Canada (20 December 2013).
193:seeking dismissal on the grounds of lack of
70:, 54 C.R. (3d) 68 (1986).).
431:
429:
427:
1017:
957:
943:
935:
275:" (PCEPA) on June 4, 2014, which received
613:. Supreme Court of Canada. Archived from
436:Robertson, James R. (19 September 2003).
337:comes from the Supreme Court decision in
197:by the litigants. This was upheld by the
423:
302:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
29:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
582:The Canadian Press (25 October 2012).
361:was used in Ontario to determine that
377:. Mr. Justice Sopinka, 26 June 1997
150:Ontario constitutional challenge 2007
7:
313:Section 197: Bawdy house definition
40:amending legislation in response.
25:
341:, 2 S.C.R. 932. In considering
382:Section 210: Bawdy house keeping
203:British Columbia Court of Appeal
141:C.A.)), and became inoperative.
532:Jayme Poisson (26 March 2012).
854:Hasham, Alyshah (2022-02-24).
504:Linda Nguyen (10 March 2011).
78:Charter of Rights and Freedoms
1:
1301:Red-Light District (Montreal)
1190:Love in the Time of Civil War
295:Post-PCEPA legal developments
1048:Sex Professionals of Canada
291:and officially became law.
254:Supreme Court decision 2013
1359:
1343:Canadian criminal case law
1338:Prostitution law in Canada
1038:Servants Anonymous Society
191:Attorney General of Canada
153:
33:prostitution law in Canada
18:Canadian prostitution laws
1053:Stella, l’amie de Maimie
107:for the majority (Madam
90:Manitoba Court of Appeal
1169:The Diary of Evelyn Lau
765:. The Knight Foundation
440:. Department of Justice
207:Supreme Court of Canada
178:Supreme Court of Canada
170:Ontario Court of Appeal
82:Alberta Court of Appeal
54:Sections 193, 195 (213)
1253:Some Even Fall in Love
990:Prostitution Reference
966:Prostitution in Canada
835:. Parliament of Canada
390:Section 212: Procuring
379:
248:
162:Ontario Superior Court
113:Justice L'Heureux‑Dubé
1296:Hochelaga-Maisonneuve
1267:Tu as crié: Let me go
1033:Ratanak International
983:Canada (AG) v Bedford
372:
354:that caused no harm.
214:
99:When referred to the
684:. The Globe and Mail
1043:Pivot Legal Society
335:community standards
320:one or more persons
27:The passage of the
791:. 21 December 2013
738:. 20 December 2013
718:2012-09-25 at the
617:on 15 January 2013
44:Constitutional law
1325:
1324:
1291:Downtown Eastside
1093:Anna-Louise Crago
1061:
1060:
156:Bedford v. Canada
16:(Redirected from
1350:
1183:Invisible Chains
1018:
959:
952:
945:
936:
896:
884:
878:
877:
875:
874:
860:The Toronto Star
851:
845:
844:
842:
840:
829:
823:
818:
812:
807:
801:
800:
798:
796:
781:
775:
774:
772:
770:
754:
748:
747:
745:
743:
728:
722:
710:
704:
699:
693:
692:
690:
689:
677:
671:
666:
660:
655:
649:
644:
638:
633:
627:
626:
624:
622:
607:
601:
600:
598:
596:
579:
573:
568:
562:
557:
551:
550:
548:
546:
529:
523:
522:
520:
518:
501:
495:
494:
492:
491:
480:
474:
473:
471:
470:
455:
449:
448:
446:
445:
433:
401:reasonable doubt
199:BC Supreme Court
69:
63:
21:
1358:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1321:
1305:
1272:
1142:
1133:Bridget Perrier
1057:
1021:Interest groups
1009:
968:
963:
926:
904:
899:
885:
881:
872:
870:
853:
852:
848:
838:
836:
831:
830:
826:
819:
815:
808:
804:
794:
792:
783:
782:
778:
768:
766:
756:
755:
751:
741:
739:
730:
729:
725:
720:Wayback Machine
711:
707:
700:
696:
687:
685:
679:
678:
674:
667:
663:
656:
652:
645:
641:
634:
630:
620:
618:
609:
608:
604:
594:
592:
581:
580:
576:
569:
565:
558:
554:
544:
542:
531:
530:
526:
516:
514:
503:
502:
498:
489:
487:
482:
481:
477:
468:
466:
457:
456:
452:
443:
441:
435:
434:
425:
421:
409:
392:
384:
315:
310:
297:
265:
256:
187:
158:
152:
147:
138:
105:Justice Dickson
65:
59:
56:
51:
46:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1356:
1354:
1346:
1345:
1340:
1330:
1329:
1323:
1322:
1320:
1319:
1313:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1304:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1282:
1280:
1278:Neighbourhoods
1274:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1263:
1256:
1249:
1246:She Has a Name
1242:
1235:
1228:
1221:
1214:
1207:
1200:
1193:
1186:
1179:
1172:
1165:
1158:
1150:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1141:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1108:Raymond Gravel
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1078:Nina Arsenault
1075:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1024:
1022:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1008:
1007:
1000:
993:
986:
978:
976:
970:
969:
964:
962:
961:
954:
947:
939:
933:
932:
925:
924:External links
922:
921:
920:
915:
910:
903:
900:
898:
897:
892:2013-04-15 at
879:
846:
824:
813:
802:
776:
749:
723:
705:
694:
672:
661:
650:
639:
628:
602:
574:
563:
552:
524:
496:
475:
450:
438:"Prostitution"
422:
420:
417:
416:
415:
408:
405:
391:
388:
383:
380:
339:R. v. Tremblay
314:
311:
309:
306:
296:
293:
281:second reading
264:
261:
255:
252:
186:
183:
154:Main article:
151:
148:
146:
143:
137:
134:
133:
132:
128:
125:
109:Justice Wilson
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1355:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1335:
1333:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1312:
1308:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1283:
1281:
1279:
1275:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1255:
1254:
1250:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1220:
1219:
1218:Paying for It
1215:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1178:
1177:
1176:Gods of Youth
1173:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1149:
1145:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1128:Cheryl Perera
1126:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1118:Luka Magnotta
1116:
1114:
1113:Gerald Hannon
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1103:Jessie Foster
1101:
1099:
1098:Natasha Falle
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1088:Trisha Baptie
1086:
1084:
1083:Wendy Babcock
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1068:
1064:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1016:
1014:Organizations
1012:
1006:
1005:
1001:
999:
998:
994:
992:
991:
987:
985:
984:
980:
979:
977:
975:
971:
967:
960:
955:
953:
948:
946:
941:
940:
937:
931:
928:
927:
923:
919:
916:
914:
911:
909:
906:
905:
901:
895:
894:archive.today
891:
888:
883:
880:
869:
865:
861:
857:
850:
847:
834:
828:
825:
822:
817:
814:
811:
806:
803:
790:
786:
780:
777:
764:
763:DocumentCloud
760:
753:
750:
737:
733:
727:
724:
721:
717:
714:
709:
706:
703:
698:
695:
683:
676:
673:
670:
665:
662:
659:
654:
651:
648:
643:
640:
637:
632:
629:
616:
612:
606:
603:
591:
590:
585:
578:
575:
572:
567:
564:
561:
556:
553:
541:
540:
535:
528:
525:
513:
512:
511:National Post
507:
500:
497:
485:
479:
476:
464:
460:
454:
451:
439:
432:
430:
428:
424:
418:
414:
413:Wendy Babcock
411:
410:
406:
404:
402:
397:
389:
387:
381:
378:
376:
371:
368:
367:table dancing
364:
360:
355:
353:
352:exhibitionism
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
327:
323:
321:
312:
307:
305:
303:
294:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:first reading
274:
270:
267:In response,
262:
260:
253:
251:
247:
246:
241:
240:
236:
235:
234:provisions...
230:
229:
225:
224:
219:
218:
213:
210:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
184:
182:
179:
174:
171:
167:
163:
157:
149:
144:
142:
135:
129:
126:
122:
121:
120:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:Supreme Court
97:
95:
91:
86:
83:
79:
75:
71:
68:
62:
53:
48:
43:
41:
38:
34:
30:
19:
1265:
1258:
1251:
1244:
1237:
1230:
1223:
1216:
1209:
1202:
1197:Men for Sale
1195:
1188:
1181:
1174:
1167:
1160:
1153:
1138:Nikki Thomas
1002:
995:
988:
981:
973:
902:Bibliography
882:
871:. Retrieved
859:
849:
837:. Retrieved
827:
816:
805:
793:. Retrieved
788:
779:
767:. Retrieved
762:
752:
740:. Retrieved
735:
726:
708:
697:
686:. Retrieved
675:
664:
653:
642:
631:
619:. Retrieved
615:the original
605:
593:. Retrieved
587:
577:
566:
555:
543:. Retrieved
539:Toronto Star
537:
527:
515:. Retrieved
509:
499:
488:. Retrieved
486:. Canlii.org
478:
467:. Retrieved
465:. 2007-03-21
462:
453:
442:. Retrieved
396:reverse onus
393:
385:
374:
373:
358:
356:
343:nude dancing
328:
324:
319:
316:
298:
289:Royal Assent
279:. Debate on
272:
269:Peter MacKay
266:
257:
249:
243:
242:
238:
237:
232:
231:
227:
226:
221:
220:
216:
215:
211:
188:
175:
159:
145:21st century
139:
118:
98:
87:
72:
66:
61:R. v. McLean
60:
57:
49:20th century
32:
26:
1239:Sex Traffic
1232:Sexe de rue
1211:Not My Life
1073:Nelly Arcan
997:R. v. Gowan
839:30 November
769:21 December
742:21 December
589:Global News
463:Thestar.com
363:lap dancing
166:Susan Himel
136:Section 198
94:prima facie
74:Nova Scotia
37:ultra vires
1332:Categories
1286:Centre-Sud
1123:Timea Nagy
873:2022-03-01
688:2010-10-23
595:25 October
490:2010-10-22
469:2010-10-22
444:2010-10-22
419:References
285:the Senate
245:resources"
111:and Madam
67:R. v. Bear
868:0319-0781
795:4 January
789:Aljazeera
348:voyeurism
331:indecency
1004:R v Hutt
890:Archived
736:CBC News
716:Archived
680:Canada.
545:26 March
407:See also
359:Tremblay
308:Case law
195:standing
131:aspects.
1317:History
517:2 April
205:to the
1155:Angela
1066:People
866:
621:13 May
1310:Other
1260:Sugar
1204:Nelly
1162:Blood
1147:Media
1028:NASHI
357:When
864:ISSN
841:2014
797:2014
771:2013
744:2013
623:2013
597:2012
547:2012
519:2011
350:and
88:The
1225:Sex
974:Law
365:or
1334::
862:.
858:.
787:.
761:.
734:.
586:.
536:.
508:.
461:.
426:^
958:e
951:t
944:v
876:.
843:.
799:.
773:.
746:.
691:.
625:.
599:.
549:.
521:.
493:.
472:.
447:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.