71:
53:
22:
81:
248:
then 3 hotlinks of SAMBA/NED/JP queries currently shown as refs and external. (The rest -- declination and such I think are at those hotlinks.) Ditch the bottom garbage 'list of notable' and the boilerplate. After the list is there, I think the pages without more content can be deleted without loss of info. My 2 cents anyway, cheers.
247:
and let be for now, until you or someone wants to work up an alternative that is shown and in place. I'd suggest your list idea is adjustable by using a table that keeps just the most important things. I would suggest it include the designator, constellation, distance, resized image (if any), and
230:
I also see two lengthy things -- a whole lot of dead wikilinks "List of notable
Seyfert galaxies", and the infobox with inclination and so forth. That seems too much to fit a list format. And I don't think it feasible to expand all the pages to be notable, the
271:
for standalone articles. Seems that a "List of ..." article would better meet the
Knowledge (XXG) design to make human knowledge widely available, and yet do it consistent with policy. THe individual articles could become
235:
doesn't work that way and anyway ... I just doubt they are ALL notable or all even HAVE anything much more to put in, or even that these are all such that might boccur so the problem would reoccur. I wouldn't want the
299:
template. Also, leave a note on each stub's talk page explaining why they were merged, and encouraging users to recreate the page as soon as there is more info available than fits into the list. Also,
175:
and just merge the contents of each stub to it? Should we delete them altogether? Or should we instead focus on expanding those pages, so that they become notable enough to include links from the main
452:
171:
A lot of the 3C Seyfert galaxies in this category are one-sentence stubs, and many of them are also orphans. Since they don't seem to be very notable, should we instead make a stand-alone
361:
303:(whether or not we merge them). All of them already have Wikidata pages, which can be accessed via the "edit links" link at the bottom of the "languages" section. --
342:
I'll see what I can do to make a list, and submit it once I get some done. I'll still keep the
Request for Comment, though, to get other users' opinions.
442:
447:
94:
58:
295:, and in all cases where the total information in the stub can be merged into the list, make the article into a redirect, using the
322:
I think creating a list article instead of this category page is a good idea. I would not delete the individual stub articles per
33:
427:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
296:
165:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
392:
172:
141:
39:
331:
21:
411:
347:
276:
to the List, and the list would of course include a link to the main article on this type of galaxies.
253:
186:
323:
326:
except if the list can include all the information, like photos and references into the list article.
249:
267:—the current articles that I looked at seem to be poor, poorly-sourced, and in general, not meet the
388:
221:"3C 223 is a Seyfert galaxy with a quasar-like appearance located in the constellation Leo Minor",
327:
212:
etcetera.) These are pretty empty 1-liners, with ref to SAMBA and NED, ext link to jb.man. e.g.
145:
273:
218:"3C 303 is a Seyfert galaxy with a quasar-like appearance located in the constellation Boötes",
373:
308:
407:
343:
237:
182:
176:
149:
86:
268:
415:
396:
377:
351:
335:
312:
285:
257:
232:
190:
436:
281:
369:
304:
76:
200:(oh, I wish that were a lever next month...) but maybe the list with mods ...
99:
70:
52:
277:
209:
205:
204:
I think you're mostly right on the problem. (And it seems also bad at
15:
365:
240:
to expand that much anyway and mess up that page too.
453:Category-Class Astronomy articles of NA-importance
387:, basically per CuriousMind01. Also NOTINK, etc.
385:Support list article and keep the stub articles
320:Support list article and keep the stub articles
138:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
224:designator, boilerplate, constellation name.
140:The consensus is to create the list article
98:, which collaborates on articles related to
133:Request For Comment: 3C Galaxies notability
301:add the information about them to Wikidata
47:
360:: I see that celestial coordinates are
49:
108:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Astronomy
92:This category is within the scope of
19:
7:
159:The following discussion is closed.
364:as a property on Wikidata, because
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
443:Category-Class Astronomy articles
423:The discussion above is closed.
448:NA-importance Astronomy articles
79:
69:
51:
20:
152:) 05:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
111:Template:WikiProject Astronomy
1:
297:Template:R with possibilities
416:03:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
397:15:44, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
378:07:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
368:to support them natively. --
352:22:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
336:12:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
313:06:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
286:16:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
258:04:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
191:20:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
469:
238:Seyfert galaxies#Examples
177:Seyfert galaxies#Examples
64:
46:
425:Please do not modify it.
173:List of Seyfert galaxies
162:Please do not modify it.
142:List of Seyfert galaxies
154:
243:In the end I suggest
95:WikiProject Astronomy
293:Support list article
269:notabilitiy criteria
265:Support list article
245:do not make it worse
366:work is in progress
102:on Knowledge (XXG).
114:Astronomy articles
34:content assessment
362:not yet supported
198:None of the above
130:
129:
126:
125:
122:
121:
460:
164:
116:
115:
112:
109:
106:
89:
87:Astronomy portal
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
433:
432:
431:
404:Consensus: List
160:
155:
135:
113:
110:
107:
104:
103:
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
466:
464:
456:
455:
450:
445:
435:
434:
430:
429:
419:
401:
400:
399:
389:SemanticMantis
381:
380:
340:
339:
338:
316:
315:
289:
288:
261:
228:
227:
226:
225:
222:
219:
202:
201:
194:
169:
168:
167:
137:
136:
134:
131:
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
117:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
454:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
440:
438:
428:
426:
421:
420:
418:
417:
413:
409:
406:Removing RFC
405:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
337:
333:
329:
328:CuriousMind01
325:
321:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
266:
263:
262:
260:
259:
255:
251:
246:
241:
239:
234:
223:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
211:
207:
199:
196:
195:
193:
192:
188:
184:
180:
178:
174:
166:
163:
157:
156:
153:
151:
147:
143:
132:
118:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
424:
422:
403:
402:
384:
357:
341:
319:
300:
292:
264:
244:
242:
229:
203:
197:
181:
170:
161:
158:
139:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
408:Skylord a52
344:Skylord a52
324:WP:preserve
250:Markbassett
183:Skylord a52
437:Categories
105:Astronomy
100:Astronomy
59:Astronomy
210:NGC 5929
206:NGC 4388
30:category
370:Slashme
358:Comment
305:Slashme
274:redirs
179:page?
146:Cunard
36:scale.
28:This
412:talk
393:talk
374:talk
348:talk
332:talk
309:talk
282:talk
254:talk
233:WP:N
187:talk
150:talk
278:N2e
439::
414:)
395:)
376:)
350:)
334:)
311:)
284:)
256:)
208:,
189:)
144:.
410:(
391:(
372:(
346:(
330:(
307:(
280:(
252:(
185:(
148:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
