Knowledge (XXG)

Center for Food Safety

Source 📝

254:(CGFI), a pro genetically-engineered food organisation, claims that in one case, Kimbrell was said to have released a baseless food poisoning scare in the Wall Street Journal, following a request to exempt Monsanto from recalling of CANOLA oil from seed with a not yet US approved gene, (although approved in Canada) found in small quantities in their oil, after deciding to concentrate on a different gene that had similar results. 213:
sugar beets in the US. He indicated that "the Agriculture Department had not adequately assessed the environmental consequences before approving them for commercial cultivation". This decision was reversed in 2011, with the appellate court citing studies that indicated that there was no molecular difference between sugar produced by the GMO and non-GMO variants of sugar beets.
165:, APHIS deregulated the product in 2005. In 2006, this decision was challenged by Geertson Seed Farms and other parties including the Center for Food Safety. This led to a decision by the US District Court of San Francisco to suspend the deregulated status of RRA and place an injunction on the sale and planting of RRA until the completion of an 182:. This 7–1 decision in favor of Monsanto Company declared the injunction against RRA invalid, allowing the sale and planting of the product; it did not, however, restore the deregulated status of the crop. Upon completion of the Environmental Impact Statement, RRA was officially deregulated in January 2011. 257:
GE crop development scientists, molecular biologists, pro GE organisations, and the broader scientific community disagree with anti GE organisations such as the CFS, and argue that the FDA and the courts are careful, scientific and truthful, and that most of the anti GE claims from organisations like
212:
Earlier in 2010, Judge Jeffrey S. White allowed the planting of GM sugar beets to continue, but he also warned that this may be blocked in the future while an environmental review was taking place. Finally, on 13 August 2010, Judge White ordered the halt to the planting of the genetically modified
126:, and Portland, Oregon. CFS's mission is to empower people, support farmers, and protect the earth from the harmful impacts of industrial agriculture through groundbreaking legal, scientific, and grassroots action. It was founded in 1997. 202: 558: 242:(EPA) decided to reaffirm its denial of the petition, and to allow continued usage of these chemicals, and in 2014 the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) gave a green light to allow the seeds to be used. 553: 473: 228:
These developments have been made to combat newly resistant weeds and insects, immune to developed pesticides and herbicides, which became "a problem needing national attention" according to a
316: 258:
CFS are based on emotion, on misrepresented facts and not on science and the scientific method nor do they reflect the consensus held among scientists regarding GE crops.
578: 573: 583: 151: 492: 193:. In 2013 the United States District Court of San Francisco issued a ruling for the case in favor of the defendant, Thomas Vilsack, Secretary of APHIS. 235:
Kimbrell's most alarming claim is that according to some, the reliance on this non-diverse type of grain, may be "a threat to global food production".
548: 457: 369: 189:, in October, 2012. The CFS alleged that RRA had been improperly reviewed by APHIS, arguing that it should be considered a "Plant Pest" under the 304: 499:(CGFI Website) The FDA according to this article replied that there was no need for concern, for several detailed reasons given in the article. 568: 178: 543: 209:. This case involves Monsanto's breed of pesticide-resistant sugar beets. This lawsuit was also organised by Center for Food Safety. 324: 443: 239: 206: 162: 166: 251: 229: 221:
In a 2012 article on the Huffington Post blog, Kimbrell noted that Monsanto developed soy, corn and cotton resistant to
474:
Agent Orange GMO? After USDA backs 2,4-D seeds, Michael Pollan and Marion Nestle lead activist hype of discredited link
508: 563: 135: 305:
Supreme Court Lifts Ban on Planting GM Alfalfa New York Times, Energy & Environment, Retrieved 28 August 2012.
70: 370:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131016004552/https://articles.law360.s3.amazonaws.com/0228000/228390/monsanto.pdf
489: 454: 345: 111: 373: 422: 190: 391: 134:
The Center for Food Safety has been an associated party in challenges against the planting of
173: 115: 36: 356: 496: 461: 404: 277: 59:
protecting the environment and communities from harmful effects of industrial agriculture
537: 155: 119: 185:
The Center for Food Safety also launched a separate lawsuit against RRA in the case
317:"USDA Announces Decision to Fully Deregulate Roundup Ready Alfalfa - USDA Newsroom" 423:
Less than One Month to Comment on Corn Resistant to Agent Orange Herbicide 2,4-D
439: 123: 49: 435: 46: 425:, On the chemical arms race with weeds (May 2012, Huffington Post website) 147: 158: 85: 523: 477: 203:
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
225:
which would cause a switch in herbicide usage towards more 2,4-D.
222: 107: 436:
Gene amplification delivers glyphosate-resistant weed evolution
176:
reversed the District Court decision in 2010, in the case of
559:
Medical and health organizations based in Washington, D.C.
528: 205:
has been considering the case involving the planting of
554:
Environmental organizations based in Washington, D.C.
359:, by ANDREW POLLACK, New York Times, August 13, 2010 80: 63: 55: 42: 32: 24: 347:Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack (17 May 2013). 509:Food Safety: Focus on Real Risks, Not Fake Ones 357:Judge Revokes Approval of Modified Sugar Beets 217:The herbicide and pesticide chemical arms race 130:Legal cases against genetically modified crops 490:Anti biotech group scares Wall Street Journal 8: 19: 529:Center for Food Safety's True Food Network 418: 416: 414: 272: 270: 154:(APHIS) for deregulation of their product 152:Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 18: 300: 298: 266: 400: 389: 278:"GEERTSON SEED FARMS DC DC v. JOHANNS" 579:Health charities in the United States 7: 574:Charities based in Washington, D.C. 179:Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms 14: 584:Organizations established in 1997 187:Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack 549:Food safety in the United States 207:genetically modified sugar beets 444:University of Western Australia 240:Environmental Protection Agency 167:Environmental Impact Statement 1: 455:EPA first denial of petition 252:Center for Global Food Issues 230:National Academy of Sciences 440:Professor Stephen B. Powels 161:(RRA). After performing an 600: 569:Genetically modified maize 136:genetically modified crops 118:It maintains an office in 16:US non-profit organization 544:Food safety organizations 71:San Francisco, California 163:Environmental Assessment 524:Center for Food Safety 100:Center for Food Safety 20:Center for Food Safety 495:May 21, 2014, at the 460:May 14, 2014, at the 238:One month later, the 112:advocacy organization 327:on 10 September 2015 191:Plant Protection Act 88:.centerforfoodsafety 21: 511:(Academics Review) 201:In 2009–2010, the 110:, U.S. non-profit 73:; Portland, Oregon 564:Anti-GMO movement 399:Missing or empty 96: 95: 591: 512: 506: 500: 487: 481: 471: 465: 452: 446: 432: 426: 420: 409: 408: 402: 397: 395: 387: 385: 384: 378: 372:. Archived from 366: 360: 354: 348: 343: 337: 336: 334: 332: 323:. Archived from 313: 307: 302: 293: 292: 290: 288: 274: 174:US Supreme Court 146:In April, 2004, 116:Washington, D.C. 92: 89: 87: 37:Washington, D.C. 22: 599: 598: 594: 593: 592: 590: 589: 588: 534: 533: 520: 515: 507: 503: 497:Wayback Machine 488: 484: 472: 468: 462:Wayback Machine 453: 449: 433: 429: 421: 412: 398: 388: 382: 380: 376: 368: 367: 363: 355: 351: 344: 340: 330: 328: 315: 314: 310: 303: 296: 286: 284: 276: 275: 268: 264: 248: 219: 199: 150:petitioned the 144: 132: 84: 76: 17: 12: 11: 5: 597: 595: 587: 586: 581: 576: 571: 566: 561: 556: 551: 546: 536: 535: 532: 531: 526: 519: 518:External links 516: 514: 513: 501: 482: 466: 447: 427: 410: 361: 349: 338: 308: 294: 265: 263: 260: 247: 244: 218: 215: 198: 195: 143: 140: 131: 128: 94: 93: 82: 78: 77: 75: 74: 67: 65: 61: 60: 57: 53: 52: 44: 40: 39: 34: 30: 29: 26: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 596: 585: 582: 580: 577: 575: 572: 570: 567: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 541: 539: 530: 527: 525: 522: 521: 517: 510: 505: 502: 498: 494: 491: 486: 483: 479: 475: 470: 467: 463: 459: 456: 451: 448: 445: 441: 437: 434:According to 431: 428: 424: 419: 417: 415: 411: 406: 393: 379:on 2013-10-16 375: 371: 365: 362: 358: 353: 350: 346: 342: 339: 326: 322: 318: 312: 309: 306: 301: 299: 295: 283: 279: 273: 271: 267: 261: 259: 255: 253: 245: 243: 241: 236: 233: 231: 226: 224: 216: 214: 210: 208: 204: 196: 194: 192: 188: 183: 181: 180: 175: 170: 168: 164: 160: 157: 156:Roundup Ready 153: 149: 141: 139: 137: 129: 127: 125: 121: 120:San Francisco 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 91: 83: 79: 72: 69: 68: 66: 62: 58: 54: 51: 48: 45: 41: 38: 35: 31: 27: 23: 504: 485: 469: 450: 430: 401:|title= 381:. Retrieved 374:the original 364: 352: 341: 331:16 September 329:. Retrieved 325:the original 320: 311: 287:16 September 285:. Retrieved 281: 256: 249: 237: 234: 227: 220: 211: 200: 186: 184: 177: 171: 145: 133: 103: 99: 97: 25:Abbreviation 232:committee. 197:Sugar beets 138:in the US. 114:, based in 538:Categories 464:April 2012 383:2022-01-02 262:References 124:California 50:non-profit 33:Founded at 246:Criticism 108:501(c)(3) 64:Locations 47:501(c)(3) 493:Archived 480:website) 458:Archived 392:cite web 321:usda.gov 148:Monsanto 442:of the 282:Findlaw 159:Alfalfa 142:Alfalfa 106:) is a 81:Website 56:Purpose 478:Forbes 438:, by 377:(PDF) 223:2,4-D 405:help 333:2015 289:2015 250:The 172:The 98:The 90:.org 43:Type 104:CFS 86:www 28:CFS 540:: 413:^ 396:: 394:}} 390:{{ 319:. 297:^ 280:. 269:^ 169:. 122:, 476:( 407:) 403:( 386:. 335:. 291:. 102:(

Index

Washington, D.C.
501(c)(3)
non-profit
San Francisco, California
www.centerforfoodsafety.org
501(c)(3)
advocacy organization
Washington, D.C.
San Francisco
California
genetically modified crops
Monsanto
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Roundup Ready
Alfalfa
Environmental Assessment
Environmental Impact Statement
US Supreme Court
Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms
Plant Protection Act
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
genetically modified sugar beets
2,4-D
National Academy of Sciences
Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Global Food Issues


"GEERTSON SEED FARMS DC DC v. JOHANNS"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.