Knowledge (XXG)

Change of position

Source 📝

257: 25: 168:
and independent of any wrongdoing on the part of the recipient. Change of position provides a defence to a defendant where it would be inequitable to compel him or her to make restitution. The defence was recognised as part of the
298: 136:
which operates to reduce a defendant's liability to the extent to which his or her circumstances have changed as a consequence of an enrichment.
46: 116: 327: 97: 69: 50: 170: 76: 203: 189: 175: 291: 210: 35: 83: 317: 54: 39: 65: 284: 149: 322: 90: 133: 268: 165: 230: 153: 145: 311: 220: 256: 161: 24: 195: 157: 164:
of a gain acquired at the expense of the plaintiff. This liability was
160:
actions generated an obligation on the part of the defendant to give
144:
The historical core of the law of unjust enrichment consists of the
264: 18: 272: 240:Andrew Burrows, James Edelman and Ewan McKendrick, 292: 242:Cases and Materials on the Law of Restitution 8: 213:, 'Change of Position: the developing law' 53:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 299: 285: 117:Learn how and when to remove this message 152:, money paid to the defendant's use, 7: 253: 251: 225:Principles of the Law of Restitution 156:and quantum valebat. These personal 51:adding citations to reliable sources 271:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 255: 171:English law of unjust enrichment 23: 1: 204:Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd 190:Ministry of Health v Simpson 176:Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd 16:Defense of unjust enrichment 132:is a defence to a claim in 344: 250: 244:(2nd ed, 2007) at 762-804 328:Legal terminology stubs 235:The Law of Restitution 150:money had and received 183:Cases & Materials 66:"Change of position" 47:improve this article 193:AC 251, affirming 130:Change of position 318:Unjust enrichment 280: 279: 146:quasi-contractual 134:unjust enrichment 127: 126: 119: 101: 335: 301: 294: 287: 259: 252: 211:Charles Mitchell 173:by Lord Goff in 122: 115: 111: 108: 102: 100: 59: 27: 19: 343: 342: 338: 337: 336: 334: 333: 332: 308: 307: 306: 305: 248: 185: 142: 123: 112: 106: 103: 60: 58: 44: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 341: 339: 331: 330: 325: 320: 310: 309: 304: 303: 296: 289: 281: 278: 277: 260: 246: 245: 238: 237:(3rd ed, 2011) 231:Andrew Burrows 228: 227:(3rd ed, 2015) 218: 208: 200: 184: 181: 154:quantum meruit 141: 138: 125: 124: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 340: 329: 326: 324: 321: 319: 316: 315: 313: 302: 297: 295: 290: 288: 283: 282: 276: 274: 270: 267:article is a 266: 261: 258: 254: 249: 243: 239: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 219: 216: 212: 209: 206: 205: 201: 198: 197: 192: 191: 187: 186: 182: 180: 178: 177: 172: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 139: 137: 135: 131: 121: 118: 110: 107:November 2020 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 75: 71: 68: –  67: 63: 62:Find sources: 56: 52: 48: 42: 41: 37: 32:This article 30: 26: 21: 20: 273:expanding it 262: 247: 241: 234: 224: 221:Graham Virgo 214: 202: 194: 188: 174: 143: 129: 128: 113: 104: 94: 87: 80: 73: 61: 45:Please help 33: 323:Restitution 162:restitution 148:actions of 312:Categories 265:legal term 196:Re Diplock 179:2 AC 548. 158:common law 77:newspapers 34:does not 207:2 AC 548 140:History 91:scholar 55:removed 40:sources 199:Ch 465 166:strict 93:  86:  79:  72:  64:  263:This 215:LMCLQ 98:JSTOR 84:books 269:stub 70:news 38:any 36:cite 217:168 49:by 314:: 233:, 223:, 300:e 293:t 286:v 275:. 120:) 114:( 109:) 105:( 95:· 88:· 81:· 74:· 57:. 43:.

Index


cite
sources
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
removed
"Change of position"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
unjust enrichment
quasi-contractual
money had and received
quantum meruit
common law
restitution
strict
English law of unjust enrichment
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd
Ministry of Health v Simpson
Re Diplock
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd
Charles Mitchell
Graham Virgo
Andrew Burrows
Stub icon
legal term

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.