Knowledge (XXG)

Overchoice

Source đź“ť

150:
impact on the final decision and satisfaction. Second, there must not be a clearly dominant option in the choice set, meaning that all options must be perceived of equivalent quality. One option cannot stand out as being better from the rest. The presence of a superior option and many less desirable options will result in a more satisfied decision. Third, there is a negative correlation between choice assortment (quantity) and satisfaction only in people less familiar with the choice set. This means that if the person making a choice has expertise in the subject matter, they can more easily sort through the options and not be overwhelmed by the variety.
243:" by Townsend, no matter how big the choice set size. Images increase our perceived variety of options. As previously stated, variety is good when making the first step of choosing an assortment. On the other hand, verbal descriptions are processed in a way that the words that make up a sentence are perceived individually. That is, our minds string words along to develop our understanding. In larger choice sets where there is more variety, perceived complexity decreases when verbal descriptions are used. 36: 190:“according to a selective focus on positive and negative information." Evidence shows there is a different regulatory focus for others compared to the self in decision-making. Therefore, there may be substantial implications for a variety of psychological processes in relation to self-other decision-making. 135:
The phenomenon of overchoice occurs when many equivalent choices are available. Making a decision becomes overwhelming due to the many potential outcomes and risks that may result from making the wrong choice. Having too many approximately equally good options is mentally draining because each option
227:
There are two steps involved in making a choice to purchase. First, the consumer selects an assortment. Second, the consumer chooses an option within the assortment. Variety and complexity vary in their importance in carrying out these steps successfully, resulting in the consumer deciding to make a
203:
more difficult. According to Miller (1956), a consumer can only process seven items at a time. After that the consumer would have to create a coping strategy to make an informed decision. This can lead to consumers being indecisive, unhappy, and even refrain from making the choice (purchase) at all.
167:
when presented with large array situations. In this situation, cognitive dissonance results when there is a mental difference between the choice made and the choice that should have been made. More choices lead to more cognitive dissonance because it increases the chance that the decision-maker made
149:
Choice overload is not a problem in all cases, there are some preconditions that must be met before the effect can take place. First, people making the choice must not have a clear prior preference for an item type or category. When the choice-maker has a preference, the number of options has little
207:
noted that as the choice turns to overchoice, "freedom of more choices" becomes the opposite—the "unfreedom". Often, a customer makes a decision without sufficiently researching his choices, which may often require days. When confronted with too many choices especially under a time constraint, many
140:
model. In this model, having no choice results in very low satisfaction. Initially more choices lead to more satisfaction, but as the number of choices increases it then peaks and people tend to feel more pressure, confusion, and potentially dissatisfaction with their choice. Although larger choice
202:
The psychological phenomenon of overchoice can most often be seen in economic applications. There are limitless products currently on the market. Having more choices, such as a vast amount of goods and services available, appears to be appealing initially, but too many choices can make decisions
193:
Among personal decision-makers, a prevention focus is activated and people are more satisfied with their choices after choosing among few options compared to many options, i.e. choice overload. However, individuals experience a reverse choice overload effect when acting as proxy decision-makers.
234:
Complexity is the negative aspect of assortment. Complexity is important for the second step in making a choice—when a consumer needs to choose an option from an assortment. When making a choice for an individual item within an assortment, too much variety increases complexity. This can cause a
189:
Choice overload is reversed when people choose for another person. Polman has found that overload is context dependent: choosing from many alternatives by itself is not demotivating. Polman found that it is not always a case of whether choices differ for the self and others at risk, but rather
238:
Images are processed as a whole when making a purchasing decision. This means they require less mental effort to be processed which gives the consumer a sense that the information is being processed faster. Consumers prefer this visual shortcut to processing, termed "visual
141:
sets can be initially appealing, smaller choice sets lead to increased satisfaction and reduced regret. Another component of overchoice is the perception of time. Extensive choice sets can seem even more difficult with a limited time constraint.
158:
Decision-makers in large choice situations enjoy the decision process more than those with smaller choice sets, but feel more responsible for their decisions. Despite this, more choices result with more dissatisfaction and
176:
the attractiveness of their own choices. The amount of time allotted to make a decision also has an effect on an individual's perception of their choice. Larger choice sets with a small amount of time results in more
761:
Townsend, Claudia; Kahn, Barbara E. (2014). "The "Visual Preference Heuristic": The Influence of Visual versus Verbal Depiction on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice Overload".
215:, from soaps to cars, have been steadily rising for over half a century. In just one example—different brands of soap and detergents—the numbers of choices offered by an average US 181:
with the decision. When more time is provided, the process of choosing is more enjoyable in large array situations and results in less regret after the decision has been made.
168:
the wrong decision. These large array situations cause the chooser to feel both enjoyment as well as feel overwhelmed with their choices. These opposing emotions contribute to
231:
Variety is the positive aspect of assortment. When selecting an assortment during the perception stage, the first stage of deciding, consumers want more variety.
117:
is the paradoxical phenomenon that choosing between a large variety of options can be detrimental to decision making processes. The term was first introduced by
283: 394: 136:
must be weighed against alternatives to select the best one. The satisfaction of choices by number of options available can be described by an
219:
went from 65 in 1950, through 200 in 1963, to over 360 in 2004. The more choices tend to increase the time it requires to make a decision.
46: 57: 818: 738: 365: 75: 172:, and causes the chooser to feel less motivated to make a decision. This also disables them from using psychological processes to 607:
Miller, George A. (1956). "The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information".
211:
The existence of over choice, both perceived and real, is supported by studies as early as the mid-1970s. Numbers of various
823: 742: 828: 442:
Shah, Avni M.; Wolford, George (2007). "Buying Behavior as a Function of Parametric Variation of Number of Choices".
90:
the advantages of diversity and individualization are canceled by the complexity of buyer's decision-making process.
290: 833: 369: 686:
Gourville, John T.; Soman, Dilip (2005). "Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires".
616: 173: 799: 137: 50:
that states a Knowledge (XXG) editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
572:
Polman, Evan (2012). "Effects of self–other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload".
425: 267: 169: 164: 621: 262: 778: 703: 642: 549: 467: 339: 272: 252: 731:
Positive Psychology in a Nutshell: A Balanced Introduction to the Science of Optimal Functioning
257: 208:
people prefer to make no choice at all, even if making a choice would lead to a better outcome.
734: 634: 589: 459: 417: 361: 331: 770: 695: 626: 581: 541: 503: 451: 409: 323: 664: 390: 812: 707: 455: 204: 118: 96: 646: 471: 343: 782: 553: 123: 101: 311: 277: 216: 530:"Can There Ever be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload" 529: 507: 413: 327: 17: 491: 335: 240: 699: 638: 593: 463: 421: 395:"When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?" 630: 585: 178: 160: 528:
Scheibehenne, Benjamin; Greifeneder, Rainer; Todd, Peter M. (2010).
774: 545: 310:
Chernev, Alexander; Böckenholt, Ulf; Goodman, Joseph (April 2015).
212: 492:"Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste" 800:
Schwartz, Barry (2004). "Choice overload burdens daily life".
29: 358:
Democracy and Social Injustice: Law, Politics, and Philosophy
47:
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
312:"Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis" 490:
Inbar, Yoel; Botti, Simona; Hanko, Karlene (May 2011).
53: 665:"Consumer Perceptions: Overchoice in the Market Place" 235:consumer to delay or opt out of making a decision. 27:
Degradation of decision making with too many choices
163:in decisions. The feeling of responsibility causes 88: 8: 663:Golden, Linda L.; Settle, Robert B. (1974). 574:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 402:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 756: 754: 752: 750: 620: 496:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 385: 383: 381: 379: 377: 76:Learn how and when to remove this message 567: 565: 563: 725: 723: 721: 719: 717: 485: 483: 481: 302: 284:The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less 523: 521: 519: 517: 7: 733:, Personal Well-Being Centre, 2006, 658: 656: 360:, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, 25: 185:Reversal when choosing for others 456:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01906.x 34: 287:, a 2004 book by Barry Schwartz 316:Journal of Consumer Psychology 1: 669:Advances in Consumer Research 763:Journal of Consumer Research 534:Journal of Consumer Research 850: 508:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.011 414:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995 393:; Lepper, Mark R. (2000). 328:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002 291:Tyranny of small decisions 154:Psychological implications 819:Sociological terminology 700:10.1287/mksc.1040.0109 223:Variety and complexity 198:In an economic setting 92: 56:by rewriting it in an 743:Google Print, p.74-75 444:Psychological Science 131:Psychological process 824:Cognitive psychology 609:Psychological Review 268:Information overload 170:cognitive dissonance 165:cognitive dissonance 370:Google Print, p.143 263:Choice architecture 829:Consumer behaviour 391:Iyengar, Sheena S. 273:Market cannibalism 253:Analysis paralysis 121:in his 1970 book, 58:encyclopedic style 45:is written like a 688:Marketing Science 356:Thomas W. Simon, 86: 85: 78: 16:(Redirected from 841: 787: 786: 758: 745: 729:Ilona Boniwell, 727: 712: 711: 683: 677: 676: 660: 651: 650: 631:10.1037/h0043158 624: 604: 598: 597: 586:10.1037/a0026966 569: 558: 557: 525: 512: 511: 487: 476: 475: 439: 433: 432: 430: 424:. Archived from 399: 387: 372: 354: 348: 347: 307: 106: 81: 74: 70: 67: 61: 38: 37: 30: 21: 849: 848: 844: 843: 842: 840: 839: 838: 834:Decision theory 809: 808: 796: 794:Further reading 791: 790: 769:(5): 993–1015. 760: 759: 748: 728: 715: 685: 684: 680: 662: 661: 654: 622:10.1.1.308.8071 606: 605: 601: 571: 570: 561: 527: 526: 515: 489: 488: 479: 441: 440: 436: 428: 408:(6): 995–1006. 397: 389: 388: 375: 355: 351: 309: 308: 304: 299: 258:Buyer's remorse 249: 225: 200: 187: 156: 147: 133: 115:choice overload 108: 94: 82: 71: 65: 62: 54:help improve it 51: 39: 35: 28: 23: 22: 18:Choice overload 15: 12: 11: 5: 847: 845: 837: 836: 831: 826: 821: 811: 810: 807: 806: 795: 792: 789: 788: 775:10.1086/673521 746: 713: 694:(3): 382–395. 678: 652: 599: 580:(5): 980–993. 559: 546:10.1086/651235 540:(3): 409–425. 513: 502:(3): 533–540. 477: 450:(5): 369–370. 434: 431:on 2013-11-30. 373: 349: 322:(2): 333–358. 301: 300: 298: 295: 294: 293: 288: 280: 275: 270: 265: 260: 255: 248: 245: 224: 221: 199: 196: 186: 183: 155: 152: 146: 143: 132: 129: 87: 84: 83: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 846: 835: 832: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 816: 814: 805: 803: 798: 797: 793: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 757: 755: 753: 751: 747: 744: 740: 739:0-9548387-8-5 736: 732: 726: 724: 722: 720: 718: 714: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 682: 679: 674: 670: 666: 659: 657: 653: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 623: 618: 614: 610: 603: 600: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 568: 566: 564: 560: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 524: 522: 520: 518: 514: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 486: 484: 482: 478: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 438: 435: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 396: 392: 386: 384: 382: 380: 378: 374: 371: 367: 366:0-8476-7938-1 363: 359: 353: 350: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 306: 303: 296: 292: 289: 286: 285: 281: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 250: 246: 244: 242: 236: 232: 229: 222: 220: 218: 214: 209: 206: 205:Alvin Toffler 197: 195: 191: 184: 182: 180: 175: 171: 166: 162: 153: 151: 145:Preconditions 144: 142: 139: 130: 128: 126: 125: 120: 119:Alvin Toffler 116: 112: 107: 104: 103: 98: 97:Alvin Toffler 91: 80: 77: 69: 59: 55: 49: 48: 43:This article 41: 32: 31: 19: 801: 766: 762: 730: 691: 687: 681: 672: 668: 615:(2): 81–97. 612: 608: 602: 577: 573: 537: 533: 499: 495: 447: 443: 437: 426:the original 405: 401: 357: 352: 319: 315: 305: 282: 237: 233: 230: 226: 210: 201: 192: 188: 157: 148: 134: 124:Future Shock 122: 114: 110: 109: 102:Future Shock 100: 93: 89: 72: 63: 44: 278:Satisficing 228:purchase. 217:supermarket 813:Categories 297:References 138:inverted U 111:Overchoice 66:April 2023 802:USA Today 708:153443146 617:CiteSeerX 336:1057-7408 241:heuristic 675:: 29–37. 647:15654531 639:13310704 594:22429272 472:17879240 464:17576272 422:11138768 344:46655935 247:See also 783:6758197 554:5802575 174:enhance 95:— From 52:Please 781:  737:  706:  645:  637:  619:  592:  552:  470:  462:  420:  364:  342:  334:  213:brands 179:regret 161:regret 105:, 1971 779:S2CID 704:S2CID 643:S2CID 550:S2CID 468:S2CID 429:(PDF) 398:(PDF) 340:S2CID 735:ISBN 635:PMID 590:PMID 460:PMID 418:PMID 362:ISBN 332:ISSN 771:doi 696:doi 627:doi 582:doi 578:102 542:doi 504:doi 452:doi 410:doi 324:doi 127:. 113:or 815:: 777:. 767:40 765:. 749:^ 741:, 716:^ 702:. 692:24 690:. 671:. 667:. 655:^ 641:. 633:. 625:. 613:63 611:. 588:. 576:. 562:^ 548:. 538:37 536:. 532:. 516:^ 500:47 498:. 494:. 480:^ 466:. 458:. 448:18 446:. 416:. 406:79 404:. 400:. 376:^ 368:, 338:. 330:. 320:25 318:. 314:. 99:, 804:. 785:. 773:: 710:. 698:: 673:1 649:. 629:: 596:. 584:: 556:. 544:: 510:. 506:: 474:. 454:: 412:: 346:. 326:: 79:) 73:( 68:) 64:( 60:. 20:)

Index

Choice overload
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
help improve it
encyclopedic style
Learn how and when to remove this message
Alvin Toffler
Future Shock
Alvin Toffler
Future Shock
inverted U
regret
cognitive dissonance
cognitive dissonance
enhance
regret
Alvin Toffler
brands
supermarket
heuristic
Analysis paralysis
Buyer's remorse
Choice architecture
Information overload
Market cannibalism
Satisficing
The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less
Tyranny of small decisions
"Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis"
doi
10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑