Knowledge

Commissary notes

Source πŸ“

49:
of executing the impressments, experimented with multiple forms of payment. Congress originally authorized the army to fund impressments either with in-kind payments or with the paper Continental currency. However, the high levels of depreciation within the first few years of the war caused Congress to attempt to reimburse impressed goods with a new kind of promissory certificate that carried no interest rates. These so-called commissary notes began as hand-written documents but, as they became more popular, they were eventually mass-printed.
124: 86:
state-by-state data on the distribution of commissary notes are not available, the overall nominal value of these notes eventually equaled the total value of Continental currency in circulation. As a result, these notes both increased the rate of deflation and, since they were often given to the state as taxes, much of the nearly worthless
107:
After the war, commissary notes were included with other debts to be paid by the American government, but many of these notes were eventually redeemed by the states. In Massachusetts, for instance, the terms of a loan act passed in 1781 stipulated that commissary notes could be redeemed for up to one
48:
to seize necessary supplies. Although the federal government did not initially endorse the states’ use of impressments, it later gave state governments great liberties to demand goods and services from local populations. The departments of the quartermaster and commissary-general, who were in charge
85:
Although scholars have not reached a consensus as to whether commissary notes were circulated as money, these notes undoubtedly were used for certain financial transactions. Indeed, Congress had to accept these certificates as legal payments when the states collected taxes. Although comprehensive
103:
approved a new wave of commissary notes that carried six percent interest rates under the terms that states provide a portion of the supplies purchased with the notes to the army. However, many states failed to comply and commissary notes once again contributed to currency depreciation, with the
31:
authorized soldiers to provide commissary notes as compensation for impressed supplies. However, the widespread use of these certificates further contributed to the trend of currency devaluation. Although distinct from the paper currency issued by the Continental Congress, commissary notes were
90:
remained uncollected. Despite the fact that Congress had stopped issuing Continental bills in 1779, the use of commissary notes thwarted attempts to combat inflation through a reduction in the money supply. High levels of depreciation continued throughout the war even as Congress attempted to
108:
half of their face value. Overall, the high levels of depreciation during the war, in part caused by the glut of commissary notes, illustrated the dangers of allowing individual states to issue their own currencies and financial instruments, and prompted the authors of the
77:, were largely funded with commissary notes rather than with other types of bills. Nevertheless, not all necessary goods were impressed since people who gave desired goods, such as beef, rum or clothing, to the troops received more favorable payments for their donations. 91:
consolidate the money supply under a new system in which older financial instruments, including bills, certificates and even lottery tickets, were bundled together and marked with new denominations that were set at fractions of their original total face values.
32:
accepted during state tax collections. Consequently, a large portion of the nearly worthless Continental notes remained in circulation despite Congressional attempts to improve credit through a reduction in the money supply.
73:. As the war escalated, the states further resorted to the use of impressments, with Virginia appointing local commissioners to conduct impressments on the county level. Moreover, later campaigns, including 104:
Continental Congress issuing a letter to the state governments in 1781 stating that β€œ continue to obstruct every plan which hath been devised for restoring public credit and supporting the war.”
99:
As they did not pay any interest, the first commissary notes became essentially worthless and were largely removed from circulation by the states. Nevertheless, in 1780, quartermaster general
369: 61:
issued warnings against people who bought specific goods, such as wheat, for the specific purpose of resale and authorized additional impressments, a trend soon followed in
322:
Bolles, Albert Sidney. The Financial History of the United States, From 1774–1789: Embracing the Period of American Revolution. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1879.
57:
As the war continued, commissary notes were issued at both the Continental and state levels, especially as necessary supplies became scarce. In 1778, the government of
328:
Michener, Ron. "Backing Theories and the Currencies of Eighteenth-Century America: A Comment." The Journal of Economic History 48, no. 3 (September 1988): 682–692.
342:
Pfander, James E. "History and State Suability: An 'Explanatory' Account of the Eleventh Amendment." Cornell Law Review 83, no. 5 (July 1998): 1270–1382.
325:
Ferguson, E. James. The Power of the Purse: A History of American Public Finance, 1776–1790. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1961.
364: 374: 137: 142: 335:
Norton, William B. "Paper Currency in Massachusetts during the Revolution." The New England Quarterly 7, no. 1 (March 1934): 43–69.
343: 109: 19:
were financial certificates issued by the departments of the quartermaster and commissary-general on behalf of the
359: 44:, the Continental Congress recognized the need to impress certain goods and, in late 1776, allowed General 87: 28: 24: 100: 74: 45: 70: 20: 112:
to give the sole responsibility of issuing coinage and currency to the central government.
147: 152: 41: 353: 129: 66: 344:
http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Pfander-2.pdf
119: 62: 58: 329: 336: 40:
Given the revolutionary army’s lack of supplies when compared to the
27:. Due to the rapid depreciation of the Continental currency, the 8: 370:Historical currencies of the United States 168: 138:Economic history of the United States 7: 330:https://www.jstor.org/stable/2121549 337:https://www.jstor.org/stable/359266 143:History of the United States dollar 14: 122: 365:Banknotes of the United States 1: 375:Finance in the United States 310:Pfander 1998, pp. 1299–1304. 265:Michener 1988, pp. 686–690. 391: 110:United States Constitution 229:Ferguson 1961, pp. 63–64. 211:Ferguson 1961, pp. 60–61. 193:Ferguson 1961, pp. 57–58. 283:Bolles 1879, pp.102–103. 301:Norton 1934, pp. 67–68. 247:Michener 1988, p. 689. 202:Pfander 1998, p. 1284. 175:Pfander 1998, p. 1284. 292:Ferguson 1961, p. 68. 274:Ferguson 1961, p. 66. 256:Ferguson 1961, p. 62. 220:Ferguson 1961, p. 56. 184:Ferguson 1961, p. 64. 95:Evolution and demise 88:Continental currency 29:Continental Congress 238:Norton 1934, p. 68. 25:American Revolution 101:Timothy Pickering 46:George Washington 382: 360:Continental Army 311: 308: 302: 299: 293: 290: 284: 281: 275: 272: 266: 263: 257: 254: 248: 245: 239: 236: 230: 227: 221: 218: 212: 209: 203: 200: 194: 191: 185: 182: 176: 173: 132: 127: 126: 125: 21:Continental Army 17:Commissary notes 390: 389: 385: 384: 383: 381: 380: 379: 350: 349: 314: 309: 305: 300: 296: 291: 287: 282: 278: 273: 269: 264: 260: 255: 251: 246: 242: 237: 233: 228: 224: 219: 215: 210: 206: 201: 197: 192: 188: 183: 179: 174: 170: 161: 148:Monetary policy 128: 123: 121: 118: 97: 83: 55: 38: 12: 11: 5: 388: 386: 378: 377: 372: 367: 362: 352: 351: 348: 347: 340: 333: 326: 323: 319: 318: 313: 312: 303: 294: 285: 276: 267: 258: 249: 240: 231: 222: 213: 204: 195: 186: 177: 167: 166: 165: 160: 157: 156: 155: 153:Money creation 150: 145: 140: 134: 133: 117: 114: 96: 93: 82: 79: 54: 53:Widespread Use 51: 37: 34: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 387: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 357: 355: 345: 341: 338: 334: 331: 327: 324: 321: 320: 316: 315: 307: 304: 298: 295: 289: 286: 280: 277: 271: 268: 262: 259: 253: 250: 244: 241: 235: 232: 226: 223: 217: 214: 208: 205: 199: 196: 190: 187: 181: 178: 172: 169: 163: 162: 158: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 135: 131: 120: 115: 113: 111: 105: 102: 94: 92: 89: 80: 78: 76: 72: 68: 64: 60: 52: 50: 47: 43: 35: 33: 30: 26: 22: 18: 317:Bibliography 306: 297: 288: 279: 270: 261: 252: 243: 234: 225: 216: 207: 198: 189: 180: 171: 130:Money portal 106: 98: 84: 81:Implications 67:Pennsylvania 56: 39: 16: 15: 23:during the 354:Categories 159:References 116:See also 75:Yorktown 71:New York 63:Maryland 59:Virginia 42:British 36:Origins 164:Notes 69:and 356:: 65:, 346:. 339:. 332:.

Index

Continental Army
American Revolution
Continental Congress
British
George Washington
Virginia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
New York
Yorktown
Continental currency
Timothy Pickering
United States Constitution
Money portal
Economic history of the United States
History of the United States dollar
Monetary policy
Money creation
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2121549
https://www.jstor.org/stable/359266
http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Pfander-2.pdf
Categories
Continental Army
Banknotes of the United States
Historical currencies of the United States
Finance in the United States

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑