Knowledge (XXG)

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor

Source đź“ť

133: 435:(CFTC). One of the duties assigned to the CFTC was the administration of a quasi-judicial reparations procedure by which customers of commodities brokers could seek legal redress for brokers’ alleged violations of the Act or other CFTC regulations. One of the CFTC's regulations also provided the agency to adjudicate counterclaims “arising out of the same transaction or occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences set forth in the 565:, not only were the CFTC's orders reviewable in the U.S. district courts, the CFTC was not granted the full powers of an Article III court, and the parties were given the option of invoking the agency's jurisdiction, rather than being compelled to use it. Furthermore, any issue of intrusion upon the powers of state courts was irrelevant, Justice O’Connor reasoned, because federal courts may exercise 544:
situation faced by the litigants here was common: a claim and counterclaim arising out of the same transaction and occurrence, and it was well within the statutory jurisdiction of the CFTC to adjudicate such both actions. This is in keeping with Congress’ intent to create a more efficient means of adjudicating such disputes, as well as the administration's interpretation of the statute.
24: 584:, dissented on the grounds that allowing Congress to grant such jurisdictional powers to administrative agencies eroded the powers of Article III courts, and deprived litigants of the impartial decision-making authority of an independent judiciary. He accused the majority of putting concerns of convenience and 552:
is not absolute, and is subject to waiver by the parties. In this case, Schor waived his right to a trial with respect to Conti's counterclaim, and elected to have the entire dispute resolved before the CFTC. It was only after the CFTC ruled against him that he challenged the agency's jurisdiction.
543:
interpretation issue first. She held that the D.C. Circuit created a false distinction between the CFTC's jurisdiction over state law counterclaims and counterclaims arising under the CEA, simply to avoid a constitutional problem, and ignored the legislative intent of Congress in doing so. The
475:(ALJ) in the CFTC reparations proceeding ruled in Conti's favor on both claims, and it was at that point Schor challenged the CFTC's jurisdiction to hear Conti's counterclaim against him. The ALJ rejected this contention, and the CFTC declined to review the decision. Schor then petitioned the 451:
In February 1980, respondents Schor and Mortgage Services of America, Inc. filed complaints with the CFTC against brokerage firm ContiCommodity Services, Inc. (Conti) and Richard L. Sandor, one of the firm's employees, alleging violations of the CEA. Meanwhile, Conti filed an action under
439:”. The section of the statute and the CFTC regulation at issue in this case, both of which were intended to provide an inexpensive and expeditious method for the settlement of futures contract-related claims, were challenged by the customers of a broker as being violative of 556:
Additionally, Justice O’Connor held that Congress’ grant of judicial power to the CFTC for the adjudication of state-law counterclaims did not intrude on the powers of the judiciary. She concluded that while Congress could not vest administrative agencies with ancillary or
592:. Also, because the individual and structural/separation of powers issues served by Article III were “coextensive”, Brennan reasoned that the consent of the litigants to appear before a non-Article III tribunal should have no bearing on the legal analysis in this case. 1048: 1965: 479:
for review. The Court of Appeals held that the CFTC had jurisdiction over Schor's claim against Conti, but not over Conti's state-law based counterclaim against Schor for the debit balance, seeking to avoid the constitutional problems faced in
1840: 1263: 1255: 1223: 547:
She then turned to the Article III issue. Justice O’Connor chose to interpret Article III liberally, examining the underlying purposes of adjudication of cases by an independent judiciary. The right to be heard by an
1676: 476: 2021: 1925: 457: 616: 1668: 2387: 1271: 956: 1628: 1620: 681: 482: 1247: 948: 2377: 2160: 589: 1064: 460:
to recover the debit balance in Schor's account. Schor filed a counterclaim in the federal suit, asserting the same charges against Conti it had made in its complaint to the CFTC. Schor
2372: 2053: 932: 767: 709: 686: 639: 601: 237: 225: 174: 1604: 1295: 611: 1933: 916: 431:
amended the Act to create a more comprehensive regulatory framework for the trading of future contracts. To that end, Congress created an administrative agency called the
1532: 1109: 2045: 1101: 1548: 865: 356: 2367: 1311: 1452: 440: 1652: 1279: 924: 88: 60: 2382: 1343: 1126: 1556: 606: 67: 2125: 2037: 2357: 1121: 2362: 1824: 853: 74: 1303: 1072: 968: 561:
of all claims, it was not outright forbidden for Congress to vest an agency with such jurisdiction over some claims. Unlike the situation in
2069: 1564: 1408: 432: 1143: 56: 2282: 1191: 987: 1957: 1359: 900: 862: 385: 137: 2215: 413: 107: 45: 38: 1319: 1660: 1351: 879: 1997: 1949: 1287: 1199: 81: 2029: 1758: 1383: 1367: 1056: 2061: 1973: 1444: 1167: 1093: 778: 370: 1084: 1742: 1183: 1159: 366: 468:
the suit, in order to present its counterclaim against Schor for the debit balance as a defense in the CFTC action.
2298: 1500: 1375: 979: 846: 34: 2109: 1468: 2330: 2101: 1750: 1540: 1508: 1215: 995: 472: 1636: 2314: 2306: 2243: 1885: 1524: 1516: 1335: 1032: 664: 213: 814: 734: 233: 2077: 1795: 1492: 1231: 1175: 1151: 908: 566: 512: 453: 428: 409: 321: 277: 2184: 2085: 1917: 1612: 1596: 1572: 1476: 1436: 839: 771: 713: 690: 643: 461: 389: 241: 229: 166: 558: 549: 796: 1901: 1877: 1787: 1734: 1420: 1207: 891: 465: 301: 553:
To Justice O’Connor, Schor's actions constituted an express waiver of his right to a civil trial.
2290: 2176: 2133: 1989: 1869: 1770: 1588: 1428: 1327: 1023: 577: 362: 805: 254:
Congress may grant pendent jurisdiction over state law counterclaims to administrative agencies.
2322: 2190: 2168: 2152: 2117: 2093: 1848: 1684: 1580: 1484: 1135: 1003: 940: 581: 536: 532: 313: 309: 289: 1049:
Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.
2227: 1692: 1239: 1011: 787: 585: 493: 424: 269: 2274: 2235: 1981: 1941: 1893: 1460: 831: 528: 2005: 1966:
Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State
1909: 1860: 1832: 1713: 1040: 716: 646: 524: 297: 693: 2351: 1816: 1779: 516: 500:
The Court of Appeals reinstated its previous judgment, and the Supreme Court granted
496:, and remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals for further consideration under 189: 2013: 397: 393: 169: 1264:
C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
520: 285: 23: 1841:
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
488: 417: 221: 185: 1256:
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
1224:
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
668: 436: 217: 181: 1807: 1725: 823: 540: 338:
O'Connor, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
1677:
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.
477:
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
2022:
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.
1926:
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
458:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
617:
List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
210: 2262: 2213: 1711: 1669:
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Traffic Stream (BVI) Infrastructure Ltd.
1406: 877: 835: 132: 1272:
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
464:
the district court action, but the judge declined. Conti then
17: 957:
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.
1629:
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
1621:
Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
682:
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
483:
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
1248:
Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
949:
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States
2161:
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
1065:
Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.
2388:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
2054:
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn
933:
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
602:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 478
156:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor, et al.
1605:
Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida
1296:
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
917:
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux
612:
Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
539:, authored the opinion of the Court, addressing the 2144: 1934:
Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War
1859: 1806: 1769: 1724: 1120: 1083: 1022: 967: 890: 350: 342: 334: 329: 258: 248: 202: 197: 161: 151: 144: 125: 1533:Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley 2378:United States Constitution Article Three case law 1549:American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co. 1110:Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. 706:Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 498:Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 423:, prohibits fraudulent conduct in the trading of 2046:Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency 1102:District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman 384:, 478 U.S. 833 (1986), was a case in which the 57:"Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor" 1312:Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York 1645:Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor 1453:American Insurance Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton 847: 764:Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor 441:Article III of the United States Constitution 381:Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor 126:Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor 8: 2373:United States commodity and futures case law 1653:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson 1280:United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe 925:United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Ideal Cement Co. 749:, 478 U.S. at 867 (Brennan, J., dissenting). 188:144; 54 U.S.L.W. 5096; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. ( 2259: 2210: 1721: 1708: 1557:Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. 1403: 1344:Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. 887: 874: 854: 840: 832: 122: 730:Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n 660:Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n 636:Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor 607:List of United States Supreme Court cases 207:Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n 108:Learn how and when to remove this message 2126:FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 2038:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation 628: 44:Please improve this article by adding 2368:United States administrative case law 1304:Dolan v. United States Postal Service 1073:Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 120:1986 United States Supreme Court case 7: 2070:Clapper v. Amnesty International USA 1565:Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States 433:Commodity Futures Trading Commission 232:922 (1985); on remand, 770 F.2d 2283:Osborn v. Bank of the United States 1825:Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner 1192:Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino 988:Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy 1958:Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India 1360:Jam v. International Finance Corp. 901:Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. 386:Supreme Court of the United States 138:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2383:United States Supreme Court cases 1144:The Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon 774:833 (1986) is available from: 236:(D.C. Cir. 1985); cert. granted, 1320:Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons 131: 22: 1661:Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. 1352:OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs 486:The U.S. Supreme Court granted 2358:1986 in United States case law 1998:Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 1950:Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois 1288:Republic of Austria v. Altmann 1200:Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez 569:over state law claims anyway. 447:Facts & procedural history 1: 2363:Good Behavior Clause case law 2030:DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno 1759:Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer 1368:Republic of Sudan v. Harrison 1057:Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins 224:. granted, judgment vacated, 46:secondary or tertiary sources 1974:City of Los Angeles v. Lyons 1168:Schillinger v. United States 1094:Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. 1743:Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez 1184:United States v. Wunderlich 346:Brennan, joined by Marshall 2404: 2299:Mistretta v. United States 1525:Burton v. United States II 1501:City of St. Louis v. Myers 1376:Opati v. Republic of Sudan 980:Murdock v. City of Memphis 824:Oyez (oral argument audio) 737: (D.C. Cir. 1985). 392:may, in some cases, exert 2269: 2258: 2222: 2209: 2110:TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez 1720: 1707: 1517:Burton v. United States I 1469:United States v. Jackalow 1445:Martin v. Hunter's Lessee 1415: 1402: 886: 873: 355: 263: 253: 130: 2331:Bank Markazi v. Peterson 2102:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 1751:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski 1541:Muskrat v. United States 1509:Barrett v. United States 1216:United States v. Stanley 996:Fox Film Corp. v. Muller 971:independent state ground 473:Administrative Law Judge 2315:United States v. Hatter 2307:Peretz v. United States 2244:Cramer v. United States 1886:Massachusetts v. Mellon 1637:Thomas v. Union Carbide 1336:United States v. Bormes 1085:Rooker–Feldman doctrine 1033:United States v. Hudson 2078:Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins 1796:Nixon v. United States 1493:United States v. Klein 1384:Trump v. United States 1232:Saudi Arabia v. Nelson 1176:Feres v. United States 1152:Mississippi v. Johnson 909:Burford v. Sun Oil Co. 567:ancillary jurisdiction 454:diversity jurisdiction 410:Commodity Exchange Act 278:William J. Brennan Jr. 33:relies excessively on 2236:United States v. Burr 2185:Rucho v. Common Cause 2086:Texas v. Pennsylvania 2062:Bond v. United States 1918:Sierra Club v. Morton 1613:Arizona v. New Mexico 1597:Glidden Co. v. Zdanok 1573:Wisconsin v. Illinois 1477:Ex parte Vallandigham 1437:United States v. More 1127:presidential immunity 665:740 F.2d 1262 466:voluntarily dismissed 390:administrative agency 145:Argued April 29, 1986 1160:United States v. Lee 735:770 F.2d 211 590:separation of powers 559:pendent jurisdiction 550:Article III tribunal 517:Chief Justice Burger 494:vacated the judgment 357:U.S. Const. art. III 180:106 S. Ct. 3245; 92 147:Decided July 7, 1986 1902:Altvater v. Freeman 1878:Fairchild v. Hughes 1788:Goldwater v. Carter 1735:DeFunis v. Odegaard 1421:Chisholm v. Georgia 1208:Nixon v. Fitzgerald 815:Library of Congress 322:Sandra Day O'Connor 302:Lewis F. Powell Jr. 2291:Forrester v. White 2177:Vieth v. Jubelirer 2134:Murthy v. Missouri 1990:Diamond v. Charles 1870:Bailiff v. Tipping 1771:Political question 1589:Colegrove v. Green 1429:Marbury v. Madison 1328:Samantar v. Yousuf 1122:Sovereign immunity 1024:Federal common law 863:U.S. Supreme Court 274:Associate Justices 2345: 2344: 2341: 2340: 2323:Stern v. Marshall 2254: 2253: 2205: 2204: 2201: 2200: 2191:Benisek v. Lamone 2169:Davis v. Bandemer 2118:Biden v. Nebraska 2094:Trump v. New York 1849:Trump v. New York 1703: 1702: 1685:Bowles v. Russell 1581:Crowell v. Benson 1485:Ex parte McCardle 1398: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1136:Little v. Barreme 1004:Harrison v. NAACP 941:Younger v. Harris 563:Northern Pipeline 425:futures contracts 377: 376: 310:William Rehnquist 290:Thurgood Marshall 118: 117: 110: 92: 2395: 2260: 2228:Ex parte Bollman 2211: 1722: 1709: 1693:Patchak v. Zinke 1404: 1240:Clinton v. Jones 1012:Michigan v. Long 888: 875: 856: 849: 842: 833: 828: 822: 819: 813: 810: 804: 801: 795: 792: 786: 783: 777: 750: 744: 738: 732: 726: 720: 703: 697: 678: 672: 662: 656: 650: 633: 586:judicial economy 582:Justice Marshall 513:Justice O’Connor 508:Majority opinion 462:moved to dismiss 373: 270:Warren E. Burger 259:Court membership 244:1018 (1985). 135: 134: 123: 113: 106: 102: 99: 93: 91: 50: 26: 18: 2403: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2337: 2275:Stuart v. Laird 2265: 2250: 2218: 2197: 2140: 1982:Allen v. Wright 1942:Warth v. Seldin 1894:Ex parte Levitt 1855: 1802: 1765: 1716: 1699: 1461:Sheldon v. Sill 1411: 1390: 1125: 1116: 1079: 1018: 970: 963: 882: 869: 860: 826: 820: 817: 811: 808: 802: 799: 793: 790: 784: 781: 775: 759: 754: 753: 745: 741: 728: 727: 723: 704: 700: 679: 675: 658: 657: 653: 634: 630: 625: 598: 578:Justice Brennan 575: 510: 449: 406: 396:over state-law 360: 314:John P. Stevens 312: 300: 288: 193: 146: 140: 121: 114: 103: 97: 94: 51: 49: 43: 39:primary sources 27: 12: 11: 5: 2401: 2399: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2380: 2375: 2370: 2365: 2360: 2350: 2349: 2343: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2336: 2335: 2327: 2319: 2311: 2303: 2295: 2287: 2279: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2263: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2249: 2248: 2240: 2232: 2223: 2220: 2219: 2214: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2196: 2195: 2181: 2173: 2165: 2157: 2153:Hayburn's Case 2148: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2139: 2138: 2130: 2122: 2114: 2106: 2098: 2090: 2082: 2074: 2066: 2058: 2050: 2042: 2034: 2026: 2018: 2010: 2006:Raines v. Byrd 2002: 1994: 1986: 1978: 1970: 1962: 1954: 1946: 1938: 1930: 1922: 1914: 1910:Flast v. Cohen 1906: 1898: 1890: 1882: 1874: 1865: 1863: 1857: 1856: 1854: 1853: 1845: 1837: 1833:Laird v. Tatum 1829: 1821: 1812: 1810: 1804: 1803: 1801: 1800: 1792: 1784: 1775: 1773: 1767: 1766: 1764: 1763: 1755: 1747: 1739: 1730: 1728: 1718: 1717: 1714:Justiciability 1712: 1705: 1704: 1701: 1700: 1698: 1697: 1689: 1681: 1673: 1665: 1657: 1649: 1641: 1633: 1625: 1617: 1609: 1601: 1593: 1585: 1577: 1569: 1561: 1553: 1545: 1537: 1529: 1521: 1513: 1505: 1497: 1489: 1481: 1473: 1465: 1457: 1449: 1441: 1433: 1425: 1416: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1400: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1380: 1372: 1364: 1356: 1348: 1340: 1332: 1324: 1316: 1308: 1300: 1292: 1284: 1276: 1268: 1260: 1252: 1244: 1236: 1228: 1220: 1212: 1204: 1196: 1188: 1180: 1172: 1164: 1156: 1148: 1140: 1131: 1129: 1118: 1117: 1115: 1114: 1106: 1098: 1089: 1087: 1081: 1080: 1078: 1077: 1069: 1061: 1053: 1045: 1041:Swift v. Tyson 1037: 1028: 1026: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1016: 1008: 1000: 992: 984: 975: 973: 965: 964: 962: 961: 953: 945: 937: 929: 921: 913: 905: 896: 894: 884: 883: 878: 871: 870: 861: 859: 858: 851: 844: 836: 830: 829: 797:Google Scholar 758: 757:External links 755: 752: 751: 739: 721: 698: 673: 651: 627: 626: 624: 621: 620: 619: 614: 609: 604: 597: 594: 574: 571: 521:Justices White 509: 506: 448: 445: 405: 402: 375: 374: 353: 352: 348: 347: 344: 340: 339: 336: 332: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 298:Harry Blackmun 275: 272: 267: 261: 260: 256: 255: 251: 250: 246: 245: 204: 200: 199: 195: 194: 179: 163: 159: 158: 153: 152:Full case name 149: 148: 142: 141: 136: 128: 127: 119: 116: 115: 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2400: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2379: 2376: 2374: 2371: 2369: 2366: 2364: 2361: 2359: 2356: 2355: 2353: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2320: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2285: 2284: 2280: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2271: 2268: 2261: 2257: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2193: 2192: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2171: 2170: 2166: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2155: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2147: 2143: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1871: 1867: 1866: 1864: 1862: 1858: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817:Poe v. Ullman 1814: 1813: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780:Baker v. Carr 1777: 1776: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1744: 1740: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1729: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1706: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1405: 1401: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1130: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1088: 1086: 1082: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1027: 1025: 1021: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1001: 998: 997: 993: 990: 989: 985: 982: 981: 977: 976: 974: 972: 966: 959: 958: 954: 951: 950: 946: 943: 942: 938: 935: 934: 930: 927: 926: 922: 919: 918: 914: 911: 910: 906: 903: 902: 898: 897: 895: 893: 889: 885: 881: 876: 872: 867: 864: 857: 852: 850: 845: 843: 838: 837: 834: 825: 816: 807: 798: 789: 780: 779:CourtListener 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 756: 748: 743: 740: 736: 731: 725: 722: 718: 715: 711: 707: 702: 699: 695: 692: 688: 684: 683: 677: 674: 670: 666: 661: 655: 652: 648: 645: 641: 637: 632: 629: 622: 618: 615: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 599: 595: 593: 591: 587: 583: 579: 572: 570: 568: 564: 560: 554: 551: 545: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 507: 505: 503: 499: 495: 491: 490: 485: 484: 478: 474: 469: 467: 463: 459: 455: 446: 444: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 419: 415: 414:7 U.S.C. 411: 403: 401: 399: 398:counterclaims 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 372: 368: 364: 358: 354: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 330:Case opinions 328: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 276: 273: 271: 268: 266:Chief Justice 265: 264: 262: 257: 252: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 208: 205: 201: 196: 191: 187: 183: 177: 176: 171: 168: 164: 160: 157: 154: 150: 143: 139: 129: 124: 112: 109: 101: 98:November 2019 90: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 62: 59: â€“  58: 54: 53:Find sources: 47: 41: 40: 36: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 2329: 2321: 2313: 2305: 2297: 2289: 2281: 2273: 2242: 2234: 2226: 2189: 2183: 2175: 2167: 2159: 2151: 2132: 2124: 2116: 2108: 2100: 2092: 2084: 2076: 2068: 2060: 2052: 2044: 2036: 2028: 2020: 2014:FEC v. Akins 2012: 2004: 1996: 1988: 1980: 1972: 1964: 1956: 1948: 1940: 1932: 1924: 1916: 1908: 1900: 1892: 1884: 1876: 1868: 1847: 1839: 1831: 1823: 1815: 1794: 1786: 1778: 1757: 1749: 1741: 1733: 1691: 1683: 1675: 1667: 1659: 1651: 1644: 1643: 1635: 1627: 1619: 1611: 1603: 1595: 1587: 1579: 1571: 1563: 1555: 1547: 1539: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1507: 1499: 1491: 1483: 1475: 1467: 1459: 1451: 1443: 1435: 1427: 1419: 1409:Jurisdiction 1382: 1374: 1366: 1358: 1350: 1342: 1334: 1326: 1318: 1310: 1302: 1294: 1286: 1278: 1270: 1262: 1254: 1246: 1238: 1230: 1222: 1214: 1206: 1198: 1190: 1182: 1174: 1166: 1158: 1150: 1142: 1134: 1108: 1100: 1092: 1071: 1063: 1055: 1047: 1039: 1031: 1010: 1002: 994: 986: 978: 969:Adequate and 955: 947: 939: 931: 923: 915: 907: 899: 763: 746: 742: 729: 724: 719: (1985). 705: 701: 696: (1982). 680: 676: 659: 654: 649: (1986). 635: 631: 580:, joined by 576: 562: 555: 546: 515:, joined by 511: 501: 497: 487: 481: 470: 450: 420: 407: 394:jurisdiction 380: 379: 378: 351:Laws applied 317: 305: 293: 281: 206: 198:Case history 173: 155: 104: 95: 85: 78: 71: 64: 52: 32: 15: 866:Article III 671: 1984). 427:. In 1974, 286:Byron White 2352:Categories 892:Abstention 880:Federalism 623:References 502:certiorari 489:certiorari 404:Background 192:) ¶ 23,116 186:U.S. LEXIS 184:675; 1986 68:newspapers 35:references 669:D.C. Cir. 588:ahead of 541:statutory 533:Rehnquist 437:complaint 218:D.C. Cir. 182:L. Ed. 2d 162:Citations 1861:Standing 1808:Ripeness 1726:Mootness 868:case law 762:Text of 596:See also 525:Blackmun 429:Congress 418:§ 1 388:held an 367:§ 1 335:Majority 2216:Treason 788:Findlaw 573:Dissent 537:Stevens 504:again. 456:in the 421:et seq. 412:(CEA), 343:Dissent 249:Holding 220:1984), 82:scholar 2334:(2016) 2326:(2011) 2318:(2001) 2310:(1991) 2302:(1989) 2294:(1988) 2286:(1824) 2278:(1803) 2264:Others 2247:(1945) 2239:(1807) 2231:(1807) 2194:(2019) 2180:(2004) 2172:(1986) 2164:(1985) 2156:(1792) 2145:Others 2137:(2024) 2129:(2024) 2121:(2023) 2113:(2021) 2105:(2021) 2097:(2020) 2089:(2020) 2081:(2016) 2073:(2013) 2065:(2011) 2057:(2011) 2049:(2007) 2041:(2007) 2033:(2006) 2025:(2000) 2017:(1998) 2009:(1997) 2001:(1992) 1993:(1986) 1985:(1984) 1977:(1983) 1969:(1982) 1961:(1978) 1953:(1977) 1945:(1975) 1937:(1974) 1929:(1973) 1921:(1972) 1913:(1968) 1905:(1943) 1897:(1937) 1889:(1923) 1881:(1922) 1873:(1805) 1852:(2020) 1844:(1985) 1836:(1972) 1828:(1967) 1820:(1961) 1799:(1993) 1791:(1979) 1783:(1962) 1762:(2023) 1754:(2021) 1746:(2016) 1738:(1974) 1696:(2018) 1688:(2007) 1680:(2005) 1672:(2002) 1664:(1995) 1656:(1986) 1648:(1986) 1640:(1985) 1632:(1982) 1624:(1977) 1616:(1976) 1608:(1974) 1600:(1962) 1592:(1946) 1584:(1932) 1576:(1929) 1568:(1926) 1560:(1921) 1552:(1916) 1544:(1911) 1536:(1908) 1528:(1906) 1520:(1905) 1512:(1898) 1504:(1885) 1496:(1871) 1488:(1869) 1480:(1864) 1472:(1862) 1464:(1850) 1456:(1828) 1448:(1816) 1440:(1805) 1432:(1803) 1424:(1793) 1387:(2024) 1379:(2020) 1371:(2019) 1363:(2019) 1355:(2015) 1347:(2014) 1339:(2012) 1331:(2010) 1323:(2008) 1315:(2007) 1307:(2006) 1299:(2005) 1291:(2004) 1283:(2003) 1275:(2003) 1267:(2001) 1259:(1999) 1251:(1998) 1243:(1997) 1235:(1993) 1227:(1991) 1219:(1987) 1211:(1982) 1203:(1978) 1195:(1964) 1187:(1951) 1179:(1950) 1171:(1894) 1163:(1882) 1155:(1867) 1147:(1812) 1139:(1804) 1113:(2005) 1105:(1983) 1097:(1923) 1076:(1943) 1068:(1938) 1060:(1938) 1052:(1928) 1044:(1842) 1036:(1812) 1015:(1983) 1007:(1959) 999:(1935) 991:(1896) 983:(1875) 960:(1983) 952:(1976) 944:(1971) 936:(1964) 928:(1962) 920:(1959) 912:(1943) 904:(1941) 827:  821:  818:  812:  809:  806:Justia 803:  800:  794:  791:  785:  782:  776:  733:, 708:, 685:, 667: ( 663:, 529:Powell 416:  365:  363:U.S.C. 320: 318:· 316:  308: 306:· 304:  296: 294:· 292:  284: 282:· 280:  209:, 740 84:  77:  70:  63:  55:  770: 747:Schor 712: 689: 642: 240: 228: 203:Prior 89:JSTOR 75:books 772:U.S. 714:U.S. 691:U.S. 644:U.S. 535:and 519:and 471:The 408:The 242:U.S. 230:U.S. 222:cert 214:1262 211:F.2d 175:more 167:U.S. 165:478 61:news 1124:and 768:478 717:568 710:473 687:458 647:833 640:478 371:27f 238:474 234:211 226:473 190:CCH 170:833 37:to 2354:: 2188:/ 766:, 694:50 638:, 531:, 527:, 523:, 492:, 443:. 400:. 361:7 359:; 48:. 855:e 848:t 841:v 369:- 216:( 178:) 172:( 111:) 105:( 100:) 96:( 86:· 79:· 72:· 65:· 42:.

Index


references
primary sources
secondary or tertiary sources
"Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
833
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
CCH
F.2d
1262
D.C. Cir.
cert
473
U.S.
211
474
U.S.
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
Byron White

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑