Knowledge

Constructed action and dialogue

Source ๐Ÿ“

60:
expressing the actions of another individual in the story. Often the constructed action is said to start with a break in eye contact and then the shifting of the signer's body. The constructed action in sign language also adds more information to the story being told in the sense that the words being signed will give a part of the story while the rest of the body and face will tell a reaction or some other component about the individual the story is about. Due to the added meaning from these bodily movements, constructed action is described as symbolic in sign language. Those who have learned American Sign Language show similar physical motions when using constructed action despite the differences in their education, as well as constructed action not being taught as a standard component in the sign language.
47:
when a speaker acts as the other person in a reported dialogue. The difference between constructed action and constructed dialogue in sign language users is an important distinction to make, since signing can be considered an action. Recounting a past dialogue through sign is the communication of that occurrence so therefore it is part of the dialogue whereas the facial expressions and depictions of actions that took place are constructed actions. Constructed action is very common cross-linguistically.
88:, constructed dialogue influences how others will interpret the third-party being referenced. Because of this, how someone uses constructed dialogue can cause an array of effects to the third-party. For example, the third-party group may be avoided from that point on, or they may even be interacted with more. Constructed dialogue does can be used positively, negatively or anywhere in between. 56:
speaker. Liddell gives the example of a speaker patting their pockets when talking about someone having lost their keys. Since the speaker has not lost their own keys, the only reason they would pat their pockets would be to illustrate the story they are telling. The addressee then understands these actions not as the speaker's but of a character within the story.
46:
or narrative. Metzger defines them as the way people "use their body, head, and eye gaze to report the actions, thoughts, words, and expressions of characters within a discourse". Constructed action is when a speaker performs the actions of someone else in the narrative, while constructed dialogue is
79:
Constructed dialogue is used in storytelling, when a speaker recounts the words of another to an audience. Speakers will signal that they are retelling "by changing head and body orientation, as well as gaze direction." Verbal cues like "I said," "I was like," and "he goes," are also used to signal
63:
Signers do not always define their extra body motions as constructed action, but the similarities to the term's definition as well as the function of the movements connects the two ideas together. The constructed actions are able to convey information in a faster and more efficient way than if they
55:
Constructed action is common in many languages when telling stories or reporting the actions of others. During a narrative, the speaker not only reports the actions of others but performs them as well. The actions performed are not the exact actions of the person but an action constructed by the
59:
In sign languages across the world constructed action is used in a similar way, but is limited in the sense that communication must be continued with the individual's hands. Those who use sign language will still have their hands telling the story, but the rest of their body and face will be
64:
were to be signed out, and are useful for faster relay in information. Because of this, constructed action is seen as a way to overcome the impairment that deaf individuals face and simply streamlines their communication much like people attempt to in spoken language.
80:
that the speaker is retelling an occurrence. Stories are constructed dialogue by themselves, because there is still the act of retelling the story which means it will be altered to some degree by the story teller. Constructed dialogue is also common in
76:, a speaker may utilize constructed dialogue by shifting their body to denote different characters and directing their gaze to particular points. The signs produced are then understood as the signing of the character, not of the speaker themselves. 72:
Constructed dialogue is when a speaker assumes the role of a character in the discourse. It often includes role-shifting, directed gaze, and body movement. For example, in
158:
Beal-Alvarez, Jennifer S.; Trussell, Jessica W. (2015). "Depicting Verbs and Constructed Action: Necessary Narrative Components in Deaf Adults' Storybook Renditions".
123:
Ferrara, Lindsay; Johnston, Trevor (2014-04-03). "Elaborating Who's What: A Study of Constructed Action and Clause Structure in Auslan (Australian Sign Language)".
198:
Quinto-Pozos, David (2007). "Why Does Constructed Action Seem Obligatory? An Analysis of Classifiers and the Lack of Articulator-Referent Correspondence".
326: 233:
Young, Lesa; Morris, Carla; Langdon, Clifton (2012). ""He Said What?!": Constructed Dialogue in Various Interface Modes".
309:
Tannen, Deborah (1986), "Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative",
73: 419: 322: 291: 250: 215: 175: 140: 391: 357: 314: 281: 242: 207: 167: 132: 413: 84:, and is often begun with words such as : "Oh" "Like" and "Uh". While used in 43: 17: 136: 393:
Constructed Action & Constructed Dialogue and Lexical Variation in Black ASL
318: 35: 295: 254: 219: 179: 144: 246: 211: 171: 39: 362: 345: 286: 269: 85: 81: 385:, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157โ€“175 42:
where the speaker performs the role of someone else during a
383:
Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language
346:"'Rachel's not here': Constructed dialogue in gossip" 104:
Metzger 1995, p. 256, cited in Braga and Talbot 2009
270:"Heteroglossia and Constructed Dialogue in SLA" 8: 344:Mohammad, Abeer; Vรกsquez, Camilla (2015). 361: 285: 268:LaSCOTTE, DARREN; TARONE, ELAINE (2019). 97: 390:Braga, Tiffany; Talbot, Emily (2009), 7: 339: 337: 193: 191: 189: 118: 116: 114: 112: 110: 25: 125:Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 137:10.1080/07268602.2014.887405 350:Journal of Sociolinguistics 274:The Modern Language Journal 436: 311:Direct and Indirect Speech 319:10.1515/9783110871968.311 381:Liddell, Scott (2003), 74:American Sign Language 313:, DE GRUYTER MOUTON, 247:10.1353/sls.2012.0000 235:Sign Language Studies 212:10.1353/sls.2007.0027 200:Sign Language Studies 172:10.1353/sls.2015.0023 160:Sign Language Studies 68:Constructed dialogue 32:constructed dialogue 363:10.1111/josl.12125 287:10.1111/modl.12533 51:Constructed action 28:Constructed action 18:Constructed action 16:(Redirected from 427: 406: 405: 403: 398: 386: 368: 367: 365: 341: 332: 331: 306: 300: 299: 289: 265: 259: 258: 230: 224: 223: 195: 184: 183: 155: 149: 148: 120: 105: 102: 21: 435: 434: 430: 429: 428: 426: 425: 424: 410: 409: 401: 399: 396: 389: 380: 377: 372: 371: 343: 342: 335: 329: 308: 307: 303: 267: 266: 262: 232: 231: 227: 197: 196: 187: 157: 156: 152: 122: 121: 108: 103: 99: 94: 70: 53: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 433: 431: 423: 422: 412: 411: 408: 407: 387: 376: 373: 370: 369: 356:(3): 351โ€“371. 333: 327: 301: 260: 241:(3): 398โ€“413. 225: 206:(4): 458โ€“506. 185: 150: 131:(2): 193โ€“215. 106: 96: 95: 93: 90: 69: 66: 52: 49: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 432: 421: 418: 417: 415: 395: 394: 388: 384: 379: 378: 374: 364: 359: 355: 351: 347: 340: 338: 334: 330: 328:9783110871968 324: 320: 316: 312: 305: 302: 297: 293: 288: 283: 279: 275: 271: 264: 261: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 229: 226: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 194: 192: 190: 186: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 154: 151: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 119: 117: 115: 113: 111: 107: 101: 98: 91: 89: 87: 83: 77: 75: 67: 65: 61: 57: 50: 48: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 19: 400:, retrieved 392: 382: 353: 349: 310: 304: 277: 273: 263: 238: 234: 228: 203: 199: 163: 159: 153: 128: 124: 100: 78: 71: 62: 58: 54: 44:conversation 38:features of 31: 27: 26: 402:25 November 166:(1): 5โ€“29. 420:Pragmatics 375:References 280:: 95โ€“112. 296:0026-7902 255:1533-6263 220:1533-6263 180:1533-6263 145:0726-8602 40:languages 36:pragmatic 414:Category 325:  294:  253:  218:  178:  143:  86:gossip 82:gossip 397:(PDF) 92:Notes 404:2015 323:ISBN 292:ISSN 251:ISSN 216:ISSN 176:ISSN 141:ISSN 34:are 30:and 358:doi 315:doi 282:doi 278:103 243:doi 208:doi 168:doi 133:doi 416:: 354:19 352:. 348:. 336:^ 321:, 290:. 276:. 272:. 249:. 239:12 237:. 214:. 202:. 188:^ 174:. 164:16 162:. 139:. 129:34 127:. 109:^ 366:. 360:: 317:: 298:. 284:: 257:. 245:: 222:. 210:: 204:7 182:. 170:: 147:. 135:: 20:)

Index

Constructed action
pragmatic
languages
conversation
American Sign Language
gossip
gossip





doi
10.1080/07268602.2014.887405
ISSN
0726-8602
doi
10.1353/sls.2015.0023
ISSN
1533-6263



doi
10.1353/sls.2007.0027
ISSN
1533-6263
doi
10.1353/sls.2012.0000
ISSN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘