49:
Thus, if A has a right with regard to B, an analysis of their relationship from B's point of view must imply that B has a duty to A. An owner of land may hold four distinct entitlements: rights, privileges, powers, and immunities. Hohfeld linked each entitlement to a correlative and its opposite:
209:
Denning had argued, wrongly, that when a local council has a right to inspect a building under construction, the council has a corresponding duty of care to "inspect properly".
38:
Hohfeld was concerned that there was some ambiguity in the explanation of the similarities and differences between concepts in law. Hence, with the focus on the nature of
46:
and the one necessarily implies the other. When two concepts are
Hohfeldian opposites (technically, logical contradictions), they are mutually exclusive.
244:
42:, he proposed a system of analysis based on "jural correlatives" and "jural opposites". A correlative is where two concepts are
234:
154:
128:
23:
239:
141:
43:
149:
192:
146:
228:
27:
167:
26:
to describe the philosophical relationships between fundamental legal concepts in
221:, ed. by W.W. Cook (1919); reprint, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, (1964).
124:
196:
219:
Fundamental Legal
Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
139:
owes a duty to him. This reasoning of Dias' was used in
22:("corelative," UK spelling) is the term adopted by
8:
155:Dutton v Bognor Regis Urban District Council
135:, which means that if someone has a right,
131:have declared that rights and duties are
179:
187:Dias, Reginald Walter Michael (1976).
7:
142:Murphy v Brentwood District Council
14:
245:Concepts in political philosophy
1:
52:
261:
145:(1991) to disapprove
24:Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld
84:Privilege or Liberty
44:logically consistent
34:Hohfeldian analysis
235:Philosophy of law
133:jural corelatives
116:
115:
252:
210:
207:
201:
200:
184:
123:Jurists such as
53:
16:Legal philosophy
260:
259:
255:
254:
253:
251:
250:
249:
225:
224:
217:Hohfeld, W. N.
214:
213:
208:
204:
186:
185:
181:
176:
164:
152:'s judgment in
121:
36:
17:
12:
11:
5:
258:
256:
248:
247:
242:
237:
227:
226:
223:
222:
212:
211:
202:
178:
177:
175:
172:
171:
170:
163:
160:
120:
117:
114:
113:
110:
107:
103:
102:
99:
96:
92:
91:
88:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
70:
69:
64:
59:
35:
32:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
257:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
232:
230:
220:
216:
215:
206:
203:
198:
194:
190:
189:Jurisprudence
183:
180:
173:
169:
166:
165:
161:
159:
157:
156:
151:
148:
144:
143:
138:
134:
130:
126:
118:
111:
108:
105:
104:
100:
97:
94:
93:
89:
86:
83:
82:
78:
75:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
54:
51:
47:
45:
41:
33:
31:
29:
28:jurisprudence
25:
21:
240:Human rights
218:
205:
188:
182:
168:Civil rights
153:
147:Lord Denning
140:
137:someone else
136:
132:
122:
66:
62:Correlatives
61:
56:
48:
39:
37:
19:
18:
125:Mickey Dias
119:In practice
109:Disability
101:Disability
20:Correlative
229:Categories
174:References
112:Liability
98:Liability
106:Immunity
87:No Right
79:No Right
67:Opposites
162:See also
158:(1972).
57:Elements
197:2668655
129:Hohfeld
195:
95:Power
73:Right
40:rights
90:Duty
76:Duty
193:OCLC
127:and
231::
191:.
150:MR
30:.
199:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.