Knowledge (XXG)

Court of Wards (India)

Source 📝

117:. Estates sometimes welcomed the intervention of the Court of Wards because the stewardship of the British authorities, who invested funds wisely, had a tendency to boost their economic position. They were often badly managed prior to the involvement of the court because complex systems, influenced by both nepotism and sycophancy, dramatically affected the rental income of the ruling families. The bureaucratic system introduced by the Court, whose appointed officials had no ties to the area, resolved the issue although, being focussed entirely on what was best for the owners, it did so without considering the consequences for the tenants. 63:. The court had powers of supervision regarding the finances and upbringing of the heirs to estates, in case an estate owner died or was incapacitated. Its powers extended as far as allowing the Court to choose different heirs, to dissolve successions, and to take direct control of estates, including taking such control over lands and revenues as was found necessary to protect the interests of the British. Similar institutions were later established in other areas controlled by the East India Company - 39:
and therefore incapable of acting independently. Estates would be managed on behalf of the heir, who would also be educated and nurtured through the offices of the Court in order to ensure that he gained the necessary skills to manage his inheritance independently. Control of the estates would in
47:
leaving his young son safely in the care of his brother Askari, even though the two had an acrimonious relationship. The usefulness of creating a Court of Wards in the country was recognised by
43:
Rulers in India had some informal provisions for the physical protection of their young heirs before the European control of large parts of the sub-continent, as exemplified by
76: 211: 51:, a member of the Council of Bengal, as early as 1773, but it was not until August 1797 that the institution was finally established in the 234: 92: 35:
that had existed in England from 1540 to 1660. Its purpose was to protect heirs and their estates when the heir was deemed to be a
60: 84: 48: 32: 17: 56: 229: 169:
Cohen, Benjamin B. (March 2007), "The Court of Wards in a Princely State: Bank Robber or Babysitter?",
52: 186: 107: 28: 103: 207: 80: 72: 68: 201: 178: 64: 106:. Less similar was the body created to serve the self-governing princely state of the 223: 203:
The Limited Raj: Agrarian Relations in Colonial India, Saran District, 1793-1920
114: 36: 182: 190: 44: 100: 88: 96: 40:
normal circumstances return to the heir on his coming of age.
137: 135: 113:The Court of Wards continued in the era of the 8: 95:- and were emulated by rulers such as the 131: 141: 7: 152: 206:, University of California Press, 14: 27:was a legal body created by the 1: 77:North West Frontier Province 33:Court of Wards and Liveries 18:Court of Wards and Liveries 251: 235:British East India Company 31:on a model similar to the 15: 183:10.1017/s0026749x05002246 200:Yang, Anand A. (1989), 195:(subscription required) 171:Modern Asian Studies 53:Presidency of Bengal 16:For other uses, see 108:Nizam of Hyderabad 29:East India Company 213:978-0-52005-711-1 73:Central Provinces 69:Bombay Presidency 242: 216: 196: 193: 156: 155:, pp. 83–86 150: 144: 139: 93:United Provinces 57:Governor-General 250: 249: 245: 244: 243: 241: 240: 239: 220: 219: 214: 199: 194: 168: 160: 159: 151: 147: 140: 133: 123: 21: 12: 11: 5: 248: 246: 238: 237: 232: 222: 221: 218: 217: 212: 197: 177:(2): 395–420, 158: 157: 145: 130: 129: 122: 119: 61:Sir John Shore 49:Philip Francis 25:Court of Wards 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 247: 236: 233: 231: 228: 227: 225: 215: 209: 205: 204: 198: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 167: 166: 165: 164: 154: 149: 146: 143: 138: 136: 132: 128: 127: 120: 118: 116: 111: 109: 105: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 41: 38: 34: 30: 26: 19: 230:Law of India 202: 174: 170: 163:Bibliography 162: 161: 148: 142:Cohen (2007) 125: 124: 112: 42: 24: 22: 153:Yang (1989) 115:British Raj 224:Categories 121:References 91:, and the 126:Citations 104:samasthan 191:4132357 99:of the 55:by the 45:Humayun 210:  189:  101:Gadwal 85:Punjab 83:, the 81:Orissa 75:, the 71:, the 67:, the 187:JSTOR 89:Sindh 65:Assam 37:minor 208:ISBN 97:raja 23:The 179:doi 226:: 185:, 175:41 173:, 134:^ 110:. 87:, 79:, 59:, 181:: 20:.

Index

Court of Wards and Liveries
East India Company
Court of Wards and Liveries
minor
Humayun
Philip Francis
Presidency of Bengal
Governor-General
Sir John Shore
Assam
Bombay Presidency
Central Provinces
North West Frontier Province
Orissa
Punjab
Sindh
United Provinces
raja
Gadwal
samasthan
Nizam of Hyderabad
British Raj


Cohen (2007)
Yang (1989)
doi
10.1017/s0026749x05002246
JSTOR
4132357

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.