Knowledge (XXG)

Data Quality Act

Source πŸ“

99:(a) In General. – The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall, by not later than September 30, 2001, and with public and Federal agency involvement, issue guidelines under sections 3504(d)(1) and 3516 of title 44, United States Code, that provide policy and procedural guidance to Federal agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies in fulfillment of the purposes and provisions of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, commonly referred to as the Paperwork Reduction Act. 281:
disseminated by the agency, the plain language of the legislation fails to define these terms. 44 U.S.C. Β§ 3516. Moreover, the history of the legislation fails to provide any indication as to the scope of these terms. Absent any "meaningful standard" against which to evaluate the agency's discretion, the Court finds that Congress did not intend the IQA to provide a private cause of action, and therefore Blaske Marine Plaintiffs' IQA claim fails."
142: 81:(OMB) to issue government-wide guidelines that "provide policy and procedural guidance to federal agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies". Other federal agencies are also required to publish their own guidelines for information quality and 244:
The Data Quality Act has been criticized as providing a vehicle for special interest groups to challenge regulations on the grounds of not meeting information quality requirements. However, others view unchecked data and lack of peer-review as a tool of political corruption leading to the imposition
316:
In July 2019, the Department of Justice maintained that there was "no basis" for lawsuits based on the Information Quality Act. Protect Democracy Project Inc. and the Brennan Center for Justice had filed a suit demanding the U. S. Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security correct a
312:
claimed that the food industry is adding too much salt to foods. The motion to dismiss was granted "because the Plaintiffs lack standing to sue, there is no private right of action under the Information Quality Act, and the NHLBI's actions regarding the DASH-Sodium Trial data are not subject to
288:
reiterated that "The language of the IQA reflects Congress's intent that any challenges to the quality of information disseminated by federal agencies should take place in administrative proceedings before federal agencies and not in the courts. The first and only court to address this issue
280:
led to a case in which the District Court declared that "the IQA directs the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") to issue guidelines that provide policy and procedural guidance to Federal agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information
112:(A) issue guidelines ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by the agency, by not later than 1 year after the date of issuance of the guidelines under subsection (a); 273:(EPA)'s "Climate Action Report 2002" published May 2002, claiming the research did not meet requirements of the Federal Data Quality Act (FDQA), which came into effect in October 2002. The case was dismissed in November 2003. 115:(B) establish administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and disseminated by the agency that does not comply with the guidelines issued under subsection (a); and 866: 886: 190:
Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines (corrected), 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22. 2002)
179:
OMB, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines, with Request for Comments (Oct 1, 2001)
830: 300:
in federal court using the Information Quality Act. The suit alleged that federal scientists lacked evidence that salt was harmful to health but was dismissed by a trial and appellate court. The
253:, said "there’s no doubt that we were funded by industry" and they wanted the IQA to be used as a tool to challenge government information. However, it does not confer any right to 876: 336: 418:"Thanks to a little-known piece of legislation, scientists at the EPA and other agencies find their work questioned not only by industry, but by their own government" 550:
Thanks to a little-known piece of legislation, scientists at the EPA and other agencies find their work questioned not only by industry, but by their own government
332: 292:
This statement was made in a brief that successfully asked for the dismissal of a lawsuit lodged by the Salt Institute (a salt-producers' association) and the
301: 178: 837: 637: 365:
Information Quality Act: National Agricultural Statistics Service Implements First Steps, but Documentation of Census of Agriculture Could Be Improved
305: 593: 297: 93: 43: 369: 223: 761:
Despite Big Health Concerns, Food Industry Can't Shake Salt: Scientists Struggle to Find An Acceptable Substitute; Diners Are Hooked, Too
386: 342: 285: 67: 881: 453: 233: 183: 121:(i) the number and nature of complaints received by the agency regarding the accuracy of information disseminated by the agency; and 806: 266: 71: 481: 270: 214: 78: 434: 202: 355: 309: 548: 417: 47: 422: 407: 106:(1) apply to the sharing by Federal agencies of, and access to, information disseminated by Federal agencies; and 449: 871: 782: 710: 293: 686: 476: 687:"In re Operation of the Missouri River System Litigation, 363 F. Supp. 2d 1145 | Casetext Search + Citator" 507:
Simpson, Michael (2011), "Quality Data Act (Information Quality Act (IQA))", in Jordan, David Alan (ed.),
59: 39: 662:
Agree to dismissal: Competitive Enterprise Institute (plaintiff) v. George Walker Bush et al (defendants)
257:
if people have sought to change information and been unsuccessful in convincing the agency (see below).
215:
Requirements for Documentation, Approval, and Dissemination of NASA Scientific and Technical Information
209:
HHS Information Quality / Peer Review Ensuring the Quality of Information Disseminated by HHS Agencies
402: 189: 397: 63: 21: 56: 594:"Massachusetts case may give new teeth to the Information Quality Act : Sunlight Foundation" 574:
Campbell Meshkin, Catherine (December 2010). "Unchecked Data: A Tool for Political Corruption?".
246: 220: 391:"The Data Quality Act: A revolution in the role of science in policy making or a can of worms?" 430: 254: 227: 759: 522: 277: 141: 860: 734: 326: 660: 554: 412: 639:
CEI's Petition Against Further Dissemination Of EPA's "Climate Action Report 2002"
317:
report linking immigration with terrorism. The report remained online, unchanged.
617: 390: 82: 440: 351: 250: 381: 364: 289:
determined that the IQA does not provide for a private cause of action.”.
102:(b) Content of Guidelines. – The guidelines under subsection (a) shall – 234:
Cabinet, Executive Agency, and Independent Regulatory Agency guidelines
668:, District of Columbia: United States District Court, November 4, 2003 735:"Salt Institute v. Leavitt, 440 F.3d 156 | Casetext Search + Citator" 445:"Information Quality and the Law, or, How to Catch a Difficult Horse" 109:(2) require that each Federal agency to which the guidelines apply – 807:"DOJ Looks To Nix Suit Over 'Inaccurate' Terrorism Report - Law360" 444: 208: 196:
Guidelines developed by agencies pursuant to IQA and OMB guidelines
783:"Salt Institute v. Thompson, 345 F. Supp. 2d 589 (E.D. Va. 2004)" 711:"Salt Institute v. Thompson, 345 F. Supp. 2d 589 (E.D. Va. 2004)" 329:
gives the historical background and purposes of the DQA (FindLaw)
493: 346: 276:
In 2004, a multi-party dispute regarding the management of the
360: 136: 509:
Free Course Book for Course 3: Statutory Law and Intelligence
437:), ch. 8 ("Wine, Jazz, and 'Data Quality'"), pp. 102–20. 625:, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State, U.S., May 2002 867:
United States federal government administration legislation
887:
Riders to United States federal appropriations legislation
327:
Susan Bisong, Federal Agencies Subject to Data Quality Act
313:
judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act."
261:
Information Quality Act failing as a basis for law suits
153: 70:, it had no name given in the actual legislation. The 16:
US federal law on improving civil service information
124:(ii) how such complaints were handled by the agency. 454:"Unchecked Data: A Tool for Political Corruption?" 48: 542: 540: 337:Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy 249:regulations. The "driving force behind the IQA", 403:"'Data Quality' Law Is Nemesis Of Regulation" 8: 302:Journal of the American Dietetic Association 269:filed a lawsuit to prevent dissemination of 636:Horner, Christopher C. (February 9, 2003), 118:(C) report periodically to the Director – 74:uses the name "Information Quality Act". 877:Acts of the 106th United States Congress 642:, Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) 471: 469: 456:Engage Volume 11, Issue 3, December 2010 306:National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute 477:"Agency Information Quality Guidelines" 465: 298:Department of Health and Human Services 184:OMB, Guidelines (Draft of Jan. 3, 2002) 62:). Because the Act was a two-sentence 94:Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 44:Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 7: 758:Ellison, Sarah (February 25, 2005), 133:Guidelines developed pursuant to IQA 387:Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 343:Center for Regulatory Effectiveness 284:Four days after this judgement the 203:FTC Information Quality Guidelines 53:Tooltip Public Law (United States) 14: 619:U.S. Climate Action Report – 2002 547:Mooney, Chris (August 28, 2005), 521:U.S. Government Printing Office. 308:(NHLBI) which is part of the US 267:Competitive Enterprise Institute 140: 72:Government Accountability Office 482:Office of Management and Budget 382:Center for Effective Government 271:Environmental Protection Agency 79:Office of Management and Budget 221:Information Quality Guidelines 1: 429:(New York: Basic Books, 2005 427:The Republican War on Science 310:National Institutes of Health 370:GAO report on implementation 219:Patent and Trademark Office 525:. Fish and Wildlife Service 903: 450:Catherine Campbell Meshkin 207:Health and Human Services 882:Data laws of the Americas 523:"Information Quality Act" 201:Federal Trade Commission 294:U.S. Chamber of Commerce 247:arbitrary and capricious 333:Information Quality Act 598:sunlightfoundation.com 232:List of links to all 42:in Section 515 of the 40:United States Congress 38:), passed through the 764:, Wall Street Journal 286:Department of Justice 843:on 20 December 2019 416:, August 28, 2005, 401:, August 16, 2004, 398:The Washington Post 22:Information Quality 553:, Interrogations, 226:2010-03-23 at the 152:. You can help by 831:"Wayback Machine" 494:National Archives 347:DataQualityAct.US 170: 169: 894: 852: 851: 849: 848: 842: 836:. Archived from 835: 827: 821: 820: 818: 817: 803: 797: 796: 794: 793: 779: 773: 772: 771: 769: 755: 749: 748: 746: 745: 731: 725: 724: 722: 721: 707: 701: 700: 698: 697: 683: 677: 676: 675: 673: 667: 657: 651: 650: 649: 647: 633: 627: 626: 624: 614: 608: 607: 605: 604: 590: 584: 583: 571: 565: 564: 563: 561: 544: 535: 534: 532: 530: 518: 512: 511: 504: 498: 497: 491: 489: 473: 363:September 2005, 356:Data Quality Act 165: 162: 144: 137: 96:Sec. 515 reads: 77:IQA directs the 54: 50: 32:Data Quality Act 902: 901: 897: 896: 895: 893: 892: 891: 872:Science and law 857: 856: 855: 846: 844: 840: 833: 829: 828: 824: 815: 813: 805: 804: 800: 791: 789: 781: 780: 776: 767: 765: 757: 756: 752: 743: 741: 733: 732: 728: 719: 717: 709: 708: 704: 695: 693: 685: 684: 680: 671: 669: 665: 659: 658: 654: 645: 643: 635: 634: 630: 622: 616: 615: 611: 602: 600: 592: 591: 587: 573: 572: 568: 559: 557: 546: 545: 538: 528: 526: 520: 519: 515: 506: 505: 501: 487: 485: 475: 474: 467: 463: 378: 323: 263: 255:judicial review 242: 228:Wayback Machine 198: 175: 166: 160: 157: 150:needs expansion 135: 91: 89:Text of the IQA 52: 17: 12: 11: 5: 900: 898: 890: 889: 884: 879: 874: 869: 859: 858: 854: 853: 822: 811:www.law360.com 798: 774: 750: 726: 702: 678: 652: 628: 609: 585: 566: 536: 513: 499: 464: 462: 459: 458: 457: 447: 438: 420: 405: 393: 384: 377: 374: 373: 372: 367: 358: 349: 340: 330: 322: 321:External links 319: 278:Missouri River 262: 259: 241: 238: 237: 236: 230: 217: 211: 205: 197: 194: 193: 192: 186: 181: 174: 173:OMB guidelines 171: 168: 167: 147: 145: 134: 131: 130: 129: 128: 127: 126: 125: 122: 116: 113: 107: 90: 87: 57:106–554 (text) 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 899: 888: 885: 883: 880: 878: 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 864: 862: 839: 832: 826: 823: 812: 808: 802: 799: 788: 784: 778: 775: 763: 762: 754: 751: 740: 736: 730: 727: 716: 712: 706: 703: 692: 688: 682: 679: 664: 663: 656: 653: 641: 640: 632: 629: 621: 620: 613: 610: 599: 595: 589: 586: 581: 577: 570: 567: 556: 552: 551: 543: 541: 537: 524: 517: 514: 510: 503: 500: 495: 484: 483: 478: 472: 470: 466: 460: 455: 451: 448: 446: 442: 439: 436: 432: 428: 424: 421: 419: 415: 414: 409: 406: 404: 400: 399: 394: 392: 388: 385: 383: 380: 379: 375: 371: 368: 366: 362: 359: 357: 353: 350: 348: 344: 341: 338: 334: 331: 328: 325: 324: 320: 318: 314: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 290: 287: 282: 279: 274: 272: 268: 260: 258: 256: 252: 248: 239: 235: 231: 229: 225: 222: 218: 216: 212: 210: 206: 204: 200: 199: 195: 191: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 176: 172: 164: 155: 151: 148:This section 146: 143: 139: 138: 132: 123: 120: 119: 117: 114: 111: 110: 108: 105: 104: 103: 100: 97: 95: 88: 86: 84: 80: 75: 73: 69: 68:spending bill 65: 61: 58: 51: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 23: 845:. Retrieved 838:the original 825: 814:. Retrieved 810: 801: 790:. Retrieved 786: 777: 766:, retrieved 760: 753: 742:. Retrieved 739:casetext.com 738: 729: 718:. Retrieved 714: 705: 694:. Retrieved 691:casetext.com 690: 681: 670:, retrieved 661: 655: 644:, retrieved 638: 631: 618: 612: 601:. Retrieved 597: 588: 579: 575: 569: 558:, retrieved 555:Boston Globe 549: 527:. Retrieved 516: 508: 502: 492:– via 486:. Retrieved 480: 426: 423:Chris Mooney 413:Boston Globe 411: 408:Chris Mooney 396: 395:Rick Weiss, 315: 296:against the 291: 283: 275: 264: 243: 161:October 2014 158: 154:adding to it 149: 101: 98: 92: 76: 35: 31: 27: 20: 18: 335:, from the 83:peer review 861:Categories 847:2022-02-13 816:2022-02-13 792:2022-02-13 787:Justia Law 744:2021-03-05 720:2022-02-13 715:Justia Law 696:2022-02-13 603:2022-02-13 461:References 441:Urs Gasser 435:0465046754 376:Commentary 361:GAO Report 529:7 January 488:3 October 352:OMB Watch 251:Jim Tozzi 240:Criticism 85:agendas. 304:and the 224:Archived 339:(SKAPP) 49:Pub. L. 768:May 5, 672:May 6, 646:May 5, 576:Engage 560:May 5, 433:  55:  841:(PDF) 834:(PDF) 666:(PDF) 623:(PDF) 213:NASA 188:OMB, 66:in a 64:rider 60:(PDF) 30:) or 770:2014 674:2014 648:2014 582:(3). 562:2014 531:2013 490:2014 431:ISBN 265:The 19:The 245:of 156:. 36:DQA 28:IQA 24:Act 863:: 809:. 785:. 737:. 713:. 689:. 596:. 580:11 578:. 539:^ 479:. 468:^ 452:, 443:, 425:, 410:, 354:, 345:, 850:. 819:. 795:. 747:. 723:. 699:. 606:. 533:. 496:. 389:, 163:) 159:( 46:( 34:( 26:(

Index

Information Quality
United States Congress
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001
Pub. L.
106–554 (text)
(PDF)
rider
spending bill
Government Accountability Office
Office of Management and Budget
peer review
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001

adding to it
OMB, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines, with Request for Comments (Oct 1, 2001)
OMB, Guidelines (Draft of Jan. 3, 2002)
Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines (corrected), 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22. 2002)
FTC Information Quality Guidelines
HHS Information Quality / Peer Review Ensuring the Quality of Information Disseminated by HHS Agencies
Requirements for Documentation, Approval, and Dissemination of NASA Scientific and Technical Information
Information Quality Guidelines
Archived
Wayback Machine
Cabinet, Executive Agency, and Independent Regulatory Agency guidelines
arbitrary and capricious
Jim Tozzi
judicial review
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Environmental Protection Agency
Missouri River

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑