98:
178:
124:
that, following the Civil War and up to the 1950s, policies of housing discrimination "flourished with almost no legal restraint." Further, due to the "separate but equal" doctrine, Robison notes that cases challenging the constitutionality of these policies were initially unsuccessful in the
70:
found that the plaintiffs were "in desperate need of decent, safe and sanitary housing." Finally the Court found that the St. Louis
Housing Authority repeatedly denied black applicants housing where the only units left were in buildings reserved for white residents.
215:(Mayor of St. Louis). In addition, state officials involved in the administration of public housing were included as defendants: Arthur A. Blumeyer, Eugene Farrell, Louis C. Justi, Rev. John E. Nance, and Charles L. Farris.
94:") the Authority from discriminating against qualified housing applicants based on their race. Further, the Authority was prohibited from maintaining policies of racial segregation in their housing units.
30:
45:
464:
188:
was a class action lawsuit brought by a group of
African American residents of St. Louis, Missouri, all of whom were eligible for public housing through the St. Louis Housing Authority.
155:
130:
505:
134:
515:
126:
434:
66:
In the early 1950s, a shortage of units for black residents led some black applicants to apply for admission to buildings reserved for white residents. The Court in
282:
500:
177:
63:
and John J. Cochran
Project to white residents. Similarly, the Court found that the Carr Square Village facilities were limited to black residents.
510:
495:
90:
found the St. Louis
Housing Authority's policy of racial segregation unconstitutional. Judge Moore's order permanently prohibited ("forever
520:
312:
55:, it was the policy of the Authority to maintain separate facilities for white and black public housing residents. The Court in
29:
the Saint Louis
Housing Authority from refusing to rent certain units to qualified African Americans. The case was heard in the
97:
412:
44:
The St. Louis
Housing Authority is a municipal corporation in St. Louis, Missouri. The Authority is federally funded by the
442:
87:
265:
U.S. District Court for the
Eastern (St. Louis) Division of the Eastern District of Missouri. 2/28/1887- (1938–1992).
151:
379:
328:
48:(HUD). The Authority is tasked, in part, with renting public housing units to qualifying applicants.
201:
137:
were integral in litigation challenging racial segregation in areas such as housing and education.
120:" doctrine in the United States. Professor of Law Joseph B. Robison wrote in a 1961 volume of the
116:
is one of the landmark cases that brought an end to public policies of racial segregation and the "
204:
serving as the lead attorney. Freeman went on to a celebrated career as a civil rights attorney.
276:
117:
308:
60:
423:(1): 101–127 – via Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons.
212:
163:
150:
argued that the St. Louis
Housing Authority's policies were unconstitutional under the
489:
142:
121:
302:
266:
189:
25:
to challenge explicit racial discrimination in public housing. The decision
22:
181:
Statue of civil rights attorney
Frankie Muse Freeman in St. Louis, Missouri
91:
26:
198:
National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
197:
176:
96:
435:"NAACP | NAACP Names Frankie Muse Freeman 96th Spingarn Medalist"
211:
were the City of St. Louis, the St. Louis Housing Authority, and
31:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
159:
380:"Civil Liberties Docket - Vol. I, No. 3 - February, 1956"
329:"Civil Liberties Docket - Vol. I, No. 3 - February, 1956"
358:
59:
found that it was the Authority's policy to limit the
21:
is a landmark class-action lawsuit filed in 1952 in
268:Ted Davis, et. al. v. St. Louis Housing Authority
46:U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
18:Davis et al. v. The St. Louis Housing Authority
413:"Housing--The Northern Civil Rights Frontier"
8:
506:United States racial discrimination case law
465:"Civil Rights Pioneer: Frankie Muse Freeman"
101:Judgment by Judge Moore on December 27, 1955
516:United States racial desegregation case law
281:: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
301:Wright, John A. Sr. (September 18, 2012).
125:courts. Finally, Robison notes that the
271:. Series: Civil Case Files, 1938 - 1992.
304:African Americans in Downtown St. Louis
224:
160:Mound City Bar Association of St. Louis
274:
260:
258:
256:
254:
252:
250:
248:
246:
244:
242:
240:
238:
236:
234:
232:
230:
228:
146:brief on behalf of the plaintiffs in
7:
406:
404:
402:
400:
353:
351:
349:
296:
294:
292:
501:United States class action case law
14:
359:"The St. Louis Housing Authority"
441:. March 22, 2011. Archived from
162:and the Kappa Sigma chapter of
511:Civil rights movement case law
496:1956 in United States case law
158:. The brief was filed by the
1:
521:Public housing in St. Louis
411:Robison, Joseph B. (1961).
537:
417:Western Reserve Law Review
122:Western Reserve Law Review
196:were represented by the
170:Legal Representation in
152:Equal Protection Clause
61:Clinton Peabody Terrace
307:. Arcadia Publishing.
182:
102:
180:
100:
23:Saint Louis, Missouri
384:sunsite.berkeley.edu
333:sunsite.berkeley.edu
202:Frankie Muse Freeman
156:Fourteenth Amendment
135:Fifteenth Amendments
469:www.americanbar.org
88:Federal Judge Moore
183:
118:separate but equal
103:
213:Raymond R. Tucker
528:
480:
479:
477:
475:
461:
455:
454:
452:
450:
431:
425:
424:
408:
395:
394:
392:
390:
376:
370:
369:
367:
365:
355:
344:
343:
341:
339:
325:
319:
318:
298:
287:
286:
280:
272:
262:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
486:
485:
484:
483:
473:
471:
463:
462:
458:
448:
446:
445:on July 6, 2020
433:
432:
428:
410:
409:
398:
388:
386:
378:
377:
373:
363:
361:
357:
356:
347:
337:
335:
327:
326:
322:
315:
300:
299:
290:
273:
264:
263:
226:
221:
175:
111:
80:
42:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
524:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
488:
487:
482:
481:
456:
426:
396:
371:
345:
320:
313:
288:
223:
222:
220:
217:
207:Defendants in
174:
168:
164:Phi Beta Sigma
110:
104:
79:
73:
41:
35:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
491:
470:
466:
460:
457:
444:
440:
436:
430:
427:
422:
418:
414:
407:
405:
403:
401:
397:
385:
381:
375:
372:
360:
354:
352:
350:
346:
334:
330:
324:
321:
316:
314:9781439614655
310:
306:
305:
297:
295:
293:
289:
284:
278:
270:
269:
261:
259:
257:
255:
253:
251:
249:
247:
245:
243:
241:
239:
237:
235:
233:
231:
229:
225:
218:
216:
214:
210:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
179:
173:
169:
167:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:amicus curiae
138:
136:
132:
128:
123:
119:
115:
109:
105:
99:
95:
93:
89:
85:
77:
74:
72:
69:
64:
62:
58:
54:
49:
47:
40:
36:
34:
32:
28:
24:
20:
19:
472:. Retrieved
468:
459:
447:. Retrieved
443:the original
438:
429:
420:
416:
387:. Retrieved
383:
374:
362:. Retrieved
336:. Retrieved
332:
323:
303:
267:
208:
206:
193:
185:
184:
171:
166:fraternity.
147:
141:
139:
113:
112:
107:
83:
81:
75:
67:
65:
56:
52:
51:Previous to
50:
43:
38:
17:
16:
15:
490:Categories
219:References
190:Plaintiffs
131:Fourteenth
106:Legacy of
277:cite book
92:enjoined
78:Decision
27:enjoined
474:May 31,
449:May 31,
389:May 30,
364:May 30,
338:May 30,
200:, with
154:of the
82:In the
37:Before
311:
133:, and
86:case,
439:NAACP
209:Davis
194:Davis
186:Davis
172:Davis
148:Davis
127:Fifth
114:Davis
108:Davis
84:Davis
76:Davis
68:Davis
57:Davis
53:Davis
39:Davis
476:2020
451:2020
391:2020
366:2020
340:2020
309:ISBN
283:link
192:in
140:An
492::
467:.
437:.
421:13
419:.
415:.
399:^
382:.
348:^
331:.
291:^
279:}}
275:{{
227:^
129:,
33:.
478:.
453:.
393:.
368:.
342:.
317:.
285:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
