Knowledge

Defrocking

Source 📝

280:"deposition from the exercise of ministry if the person is ordained" does not amount to defrocking, but merely removes the right to the exercise of ministry by ordained persons. These powers are given to the diocesan bishop (in most cases) subject to appeal to a diocesan court, or the diocesan court may exercise primary jurisdiction when the bishop asks it to (for diocesan bishops the provincial metropolitan is given primary jurisdiction, for metropolitans the provincial House of Bishops is given jurisdiction, for the primate it is the national House of Bishops). All these powers are subject to appeal to courts of appeal and on matters of doctrine to the Supreme Court of the Anglican Church of Canada (Appendix 4, General Synod Canon XVIII - Discipline). General Synod 2007 clarified deposition, including forbidding the practice of suspending the licence in cases where discipline proceedings could be commenced instead (Resolution A082). 338:). A United Methodist elder or deacon may only have their credentials revoked through voluntary surrender or church trial. A minister who enters the status of honorable location retains their ordination credentials unless they voluntarily surrender them, while a minister who is involuntarily located may or may not, at the discretion of the Board of Ordained Ministry of their Annual Conference, retain their credentials of ordination. As a general rule, elders may only lose their credentials through voluntary surrender or action of a church court. Ministers who are found not competent to exercise their office may be suspended from ministry, but only for the duration of the incompetence. The 118:, (which is a solemn vesture of an archbishop,) then said he, "Which of you hath a pall, to take off my pall;" which imported as much as they, being his inferiors, could not degrade him. Whereunto one of them said, in that they were but bishops, they were his inferiors, and not competent judges; but being the pope's delegates, they might take his pall. And so they did, and so proceeding took every thing in order from him, as it was put on. Then a barber clipped his hair round about, and the bishop scraped the tops of his fingers where he had been anointed... Last of all they stripped him out of his gown into his jacket, and put upon him a poor 294:, the relevant canon provides for a bishop, priest or deacon to relinquish or be deposed from, or prohibited from functioning in, Holy Orders. Upon relinquishing or being deposed from Holy Orders, the relinquished or deposed person ceases to have any right, privilege or advantage attached to the relevant order(s) (of bishop, priest or deacon), and, if wholly relinquished or deposed, is considered, except for any Church law relating to a Church Tribunal, to be a lay person for the purposes of the Church. Where a person in Holy Orders has been prohibited from functioning, the prohibition has effect according to its terms. 269:, for instance, states that "No person who has been admitted to the order of bishop, priest, or deacon can ever be divested of the character of his order..." though the church has processes to allow any clergy (by own volition or otherwise) to cease to function in the role. Anglican clergy are generally licensed to preach and administer sacraments by the bishop of the diocese in question; however if a bishop suspends this licence, the deacon or priest may no longer exercise their respective ministerial functions lawfully in that diocese. Within the Church of England The 31: 287:, Title IV "Ecclesiastical Discipline", there are three modes of depriving a member of clergy from exercising ministerial rights: inhibition, suspension, or deposition. Inhibitions and suspensions are temporary. Clergy who are deposed are "deprived of the right to exercise the gifts and spiritual authority of God's word and sacraments conferred at ordination." (Title IV, Canon 15, Of Terminology Used in This Section, Deposition). 166:) at the priest's own request. New regulations issued in 2009 regarding priests who abandon their ministry for more than five years and whose behaviour is a cause of serious scandal have made it easier for bishops to secure laicization of such priests even against the priests' wishes. Once a priest or bishop is laicized, they do not lose what is conferred to them through the graces imparted to them that relate to the 154:("acts of the power of orders") or are exercises of his power of governance or of rights and functions attached to the office he holds. As a censure, suspension is meant to cease when the censured person shows repentance. Laicization, on the contrary, is a permanent measure, whereby for a sufficient reason a cleric is from then on juridically treated as a layman. Laicization is sometimes imposed as a punishment ( 222:, he can be suspended from exercising all clerical functions. If, disregarding his suspension, he continues to liturgize or does not repent of his actions, he may be permanently deposed from the sacred orders (in common parlance, "laicized"). Strictly speaking, the deposition can be appealed at the 69:, but may also be done at their request for personal reasons, such as running for civil office, taking over a family business, declining health or old age, desire to marry against the rules for clergy in a particular church, or an unresolved dispute. The form of the procedure varies according to the 182:
theologians believe that ordination to the priesthood does not confer an indelible character on the person's soul and that laicization could remove the ordained status completely. From the time of laicization all actions of a former cleric that would have been considered sacred are normally
80:
of clergy and ministers. These rituals are generally no longer practiced and were sometimes separate from dismissals from ordained ministry, leading some to contend that modern use of "defrocking" is inaccurate. However, others maintain "defrocking" as a common synonym for laicization, one
237:, the permanent act of excommunication, against a member of the church or a former cleric is usually imposed by the decision of the synod of bishops or the ecclesiastical council. In such cases, this not only defrocks the former cleric but also banishes him from entering an 145:
clergy may be dismissed from the clerical state, an action known as "laicization". The term "defrocking" is not normally used within the Catholic Church, although journalistic reports on laicization of Catholic clergy sometimes use it. Laicization differs from
205:
Forced laicization or removal from sacred orders is a form of ecclesiastical punishment, imposed by the ruling bishop of a cleric for certain transgressions. According to the canonical procedure, if the cleric is found guilty of an infringement of a
97:
church, priests were publicly defrocked or "degraded" by having their vestments ceremonially removed. The procedure was intended to evoke shame and humiliation in the subject. A description of the degradation of Archbishop
189:
of a cleric may come as a result of a request for removal from sacred orders, or as an ecclesiastical punishment. In the first case, very often, the cleric may ask to be laicized in order to enter a second
792: 729:
Constitution & Canons, Together with the Rules of Order, For the government of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, Otherwise Known as The Episcopal Church
198:
or the death of his spouse. In this case, the man remains in good standing with the Church but is no longer a cleric. Laicization of a bishop can only be done by the convening of a
764: 727: 867: 126:'s gown, full bare and nearly worn, and as evil-favouredly made as one might lightly see, and a townsman's cap on his head; and so delivered him to the secular power". 713: 882: 862: 796: 601: 342:
outlines the specific rules for each option. Elders and deacons may not simply be defrocked by a bishop, but only through ecclesiastical due process.
877: 147: 548: 666: 519: 319: 887: 576: 339: 753: 450: 872: 284: 736: 150:. The latter is a censure prohibiting certain acts by a cleric, whether the acts are of a religious character deriving from his 503: 414: 616: 760: 291: 318:
is defrocked, his ministerial credentials are removed. Defrocking is usually the result of blatantly disobeying the
30: 277: 303: 238: 356: 136: 70: 57:
is the removal of their rights to exercise the functions of the ordained ministry. It may be grounded on
467: 223: 559: 58: 673: 527: 892: 857: 311: 262: 207: 707: 595: 446: 440: 399: 307: 266: 699: 647: 179: 818: 580: 483: 507: 391: 230: 142: 335: 99: 273:
provides for a range of sanctions up to a lifelong ban from the exercise of ministry.
76:
The words "defrocking" or "unfrocking" refers to the ritual removal of the frock-like
851: 500: 233:
of the former cleric from the church for a certain period, or indefinitely. The
261:, defrocking is extremely rare and often impossible. Different provinces in the 258: 167: 151: 94: 351: 327: 246: 219: 199: 735:. New York: Church Publishing Incorporated. 2006. p. 171. Archived from 672:. The Anglican Diocese of Eastern Newfoundland & Labrador. Archived from 242: 215: 107: 77: 17: 323: 234: 191: 90: 62: 700:"Resolution Number: A082, Subject: Canon XVII - The Licensing of Clergy" 331: 195: 115: 315: 211: 123: 119: 103: 54: 326:
standards. A defrocked clergyman is prohibited from celebrating the
226:, but, in modern practice, the bishop's decision is usually final. 229:
Laicization as an ecclesiastical punishment may carry with it the
155: 66: 29: 484:"'Defrocking' priests: the media keep asking the wrong question" 649:
Handbook of the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada
754:"Holy Orders (Removal from Exercise of Ministry) Canon 2017" 617:"Some Theological and Canonical Considerations (see sec. 8)" 415:"Theodore McCarrick will continue to be a Catholic priest" 106:
in 1556, based on eye-witness accounts, was recorded by
469:
Foxe's book of martyrs : an edition for the people
793:"Creech found guilty; loses ministerial credentials" 667:"Appendix 4, General Synod Canon XVIII - Discipline" 698:The Anglican Church of Canada, General Synod 2007. 283:According to the constitutions and canons of the 472:. New York: Eaton & Mains. pp. 378–379. 787: 785: 61:, disciplinary problems, or disagreements over 265:handle this differently; the canon law of the 795:. The United Methodist Church. Archived from 322:of the United Methodist Church and violating 8: 162:), or it may be granted as a favour (Latin, 819:"United Methodists Move to Defrock Lesbian" 712:: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 378:Our Sunday Visitor's Catholic Encyclopedia 439:Ayris, Paul; Selwyn, David, eds. (1999). 868:Canon law of the Eastern Orthodox Church 27:Removal of clergy from ordained ministry 841:The United Methodist Book of Discipline 368: 705: 600:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( 593: 442:Thomas Cranmer: Churchman and Scholar 285:Episcopal Church in the United States 7: 466:Berry, William Grinton, ed. (1907). 413:Schmalz, Mathew (20 February 2019). 883:Major orders in the Catholic Church 863:Canon law of the Anglican Communion 340:United Methodist Book of Discipline 770:from the original on 30 March 2021 655:(15th ed.). 2007. p. 86. 114:...when they came to take off his 25: 249:, and being blessed by a priest. 81:particularly popular in English. 376:Stravinskas, Peter M.J. (1991). 878:Laicized Roman Catholic priests 398:(3rd ed.). New York City: 817:Banerjee, Neela (2004-12-03). 615:Scouteris, Prof. Constantine. 445:. Boydell Press. p. 274. 271:Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 1: 619:. Orthodox Research Institute 501:Code of Canon Law, canon 1333 34:Defrocking of patriarch Nikon 761:Anglican Church of Australia 637:Church of England Canon C1.2 292:Anglican Church of Australia 909: 888:Clergy removed from office 134: 278:Anglican Church of Canada 873:Catholic penal canon law 168:Sacrament of Holy Orders 506:March 29, 2008, at the 488:www.catholicculture.org 304:United Methodist Church 357:Loss of clerical state 241:church, receiving the 137:Loss of clerical state 128: 71:Christian denomination 35: 396:A Catholic Dictionary 112: 33: 320:Order and Discipline 224:ecclesiastical court 183:considered invalid. 59:criminal convictions 402:. p. 140, 505. 276:Similarly, in the 263:Anglican Communion 218:or ecclesiastical 36: 400:Macmillan Company 267:Church of England 174:Eastern Orthodoxy 16:(Redirected from 900: 842: 839: 833: 832: 830: 829: 814: 808: 807: 805: 804: 789: 780: 779: 777: 775: 769: 758: 750: 744: 743: 741: 734: 724: 718: 717: 711: 703: 695: 689: 688: 686: 684: 678: 671: 663: 657: 656: 654: 644: 638: 635: 629: 628: 626: 624: 612: 606: 605: 599: 591: 589: 588: 579:. Archived from 573: 567: 566: 564: 558:. Archived from 557: 545: 539: 538: 536: 535: 526:. Archived from 516: 510: 498: 492: 491: 480: 474: 473: 463: 457: 456: 436: 430: 429: 427: 425: 419:The Conversation 410: 404: 403: 392:Attwater, Donald 388: 382: 381: 373: 180:Eastern Orthodox 21: 908: 907: 903: 902: 901: 899: 898: 897: 848: 847: 846: 845: 840: 836: 827: 825: 816: 815: 811: 802: 800: 791: 790: 783: 773: 771: 767: 756: 752: 751: 747: 739: 732: 726: 725: 721: 704: 697: 696: 692: 682: 680: 676: 669: 665: 664: 660: 652: 646: 645: 641: 636: 632: 622: 620: 614: 613: 609: 592: 586: 584: 577:"Archived copy" 575: 574: 570: 562: 555: 549:"An example of 547: 546: 542: 533: 531: 520:"An example of 518: 517: 513: 508:Wayback Machine 499: 495: 482: 481: 477: 465: 464: 460: 453: 438: 437: 433: 423: 421: 412: 411: 407: 390: 389: 385: 375: 374: 370: 365: 348: 300: 255: 231:excommunication 176: 143:Catholic Church 141:Members of the 139: 133: 87: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 906: 904: 896: 895: 890: 885: 880: 875: 870: 865: 860: 850: 849: 844: 843: 834: 823:New York Times 809: 781: 745: 742:on 2010-08-21. 719: 690: 679:on 6 July 2011 658: 639: 630: 607: 568: 565:on 2013-02-28. 540: 511: 493: 475: 458: 452:978-0851157405 451: 431: 405: 383: 380:. p. 293. 367: 366: 364: 361: 360: 359: 354: 347: 344: 336:Holy Communion 299: 296: 254: 251: 214:, breaking of 210:, unrepentant 175: 172: 135:Main article: 132: 129: 100:Thomas Cranmer 86: 83: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 905: 894: 891: 889: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 855: 853: 838: 835: 824: 820: 813: 810: 799:on 2008-06-03 798: 794: 788: 786: 782: 766: 762: 755: 749: 746: 738: 731: 730: 723: 720: 715: 709: 701: 694: 691: 675: 668: 662: 659: 651: 650: 643: 640: 634: 631: 618: 611: 608: 603: 597: 583:on 2009-06-04 582: 578: 572: 569: 561: 554: 552: 544: 541: 530:on 2016-09-10 529: 525: 523: 515: 512: 509: 505: 502: 497: 494: 489: 485: 479: 476: 471: 470: 462: 459: 454: 448: 444: 443: 435: 432: 420: 416: 409: 406: 401: 397: 393: 387: 384: 379: 372: 369: 362: 358: 355: 353: 350: 349: 345: 343: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 297: 295: 293: 288: 286: 281: 279: 274: 272: 268: 264: 260: 252: 250: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 227: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 203: 201: 197: 193: 188: 184: 181: 173: 171: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 138: 130: 127: 125: 121: 117: 111: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 84: 82: 79: 74: 72: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 32: 19: 837: 826:. Retrieved 822: 812: 801:. Retrieved 797:the original 772:. Retrieved 748: 737:the original 728: 722: 693: 683:23 September 681:. Retrieved 674:the original 661: 648: 642: 633: 621:. Retrieved 610: 585:. Retrieved 581:the original 571: 560:the original 553:laicization" 550: 543: 532:. Retrieved 528:the original 524:laicization" 521: 514: 496: 487: 478: 468: 461: 441: 434: 422:. Retrieved 418: 408: 395: 386: 377: 371: 332:Holy Baptism 301: 289: 282: 275: 270: 256: 228: 204: 186: 185: 177: 163: 159: 140: 113: 88: 75: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 424:18 December 259:Anglicanism 253:Anglicanism 187:Laicization 131:Catholicism 95:Renaissance 73:concerned. 51:laicization 47:degradation 852:Categories 828:2007-07-12 803:2007-07-12 587:2009-10-04 551:pro gratia 534:2014-01-18 363:References 352:Cashiering 328:sacraments 306:, when an 247:sacraments 245:and other 220:discipline 208:sacred vow 200:Holy Synod 194:after the 164:pro gratia 152:ordination 148:suspension 43:unfrocking 39:Defrocking 18:De-frocked 893:Methodism 858:Canon law 774:5 January 522:ad poenam 298:Methodism 243:Eucharist 216:canon law 160:ad poenam 108:John Foxe 78:vestments 765:Archived 708:cite web 596:cite web 504:Archived 394:(1962). 346:See also 324:Biblical 239:Orthodox 235:anathema 192:marriage 178:Certain 91:Medieval 63:doctrine 302:In the 290:In the 196:divorce 89:In the 85:History 623:25 May 449:  316:deacon 312:bishop 212:heresy 124:beadle 120:yeoman 104:heresy 55:clergy 768:(PDF) 757:(PDF) 740:(PDF) 733:(PDF) 677:(PDF) 670:(PDF) 653:(PDF) 563:(PDF) 556:(PDF) 314:, or 308:elder 156:Latin 67:dogma 49:, or 776:2022 714:link 685:2010 625:2012 602:link 447:ISBN 426:2022 334:and 116:pall 102:for 93:and 257:In 65:or 53:of 854:: 821:. 784:^ 763:. 759:. 710:}} 706:{{ 598:}} 594:{{ 486:. 417:. 310:, 202:. 170:. 158:, 110:: 45:, 41:, 831:. 806:. 778:. 716:) 702:. 687:. 627:. 604:) 590:. 537:. 490:. 455:. 428:. 330:( 122:- 20:)

Index

De-frocked

clergy
criminal convictions
doctrine
dogma
Christian denomination
vestments
Medieval
Renaissance
Thomas Cranmer
heresy
John Foxe
pall
yeoman
beadle
Loss of clerical state
Catholic Church
suspension
ordination
Latin
Sacrament of Holy Orders
Eastern Orthodox
marriage
divorce
Holy Synod
sacred vow
heresy
canon law
discipline

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.