Knowledge

De opificio mundi

Source 📝

166:
a συνταζξις, referring to an "ordered composition" and may be understood as a didactic or systematic prose work in contrast to a speech or a dialogue. In addition, it is well-accepted that this work, alongside some of Philo's others, constitutes a commentary on the
147:, although he rarely refers to them and, when he does, usually not by name. Baudouin Decharneux has argued that Philo's doctrine of divine powers (δυναμεις) was influenced equally by biblical and Greek (primarily Platonic) ideas. 64:. This work also appears, with one exception, as the first text in all collected editions and translations of Philo's works (with one exception) since the edition by Turnebus in 1552. In addition, among Philo's works, the 74:
in its popularity. Reasons for this included its wholesale dedication to the topic of the creation of the world, its offering of the first monotheistic reading of the
495:
Sterling, Gregory (2013). "Different Traditions or Emphases? The Image of God in Philo's De Opificio Mundi". In Anderson, Gary; Clements, Ruth; Satran, David (eds.).
179:. This work reflected Philo's conception of the tripartite nature of the Pentateuch, insofar as it could be divided into a first section on creation (for which the 139:
Philo was working within an existing Jewish tradition of commentary and exegesis of the books of Moses, such as the earlier (and now lost) writings of
150:
Because of the lost nature of many of the works that Philo relied on or worked in the tradition of, his extensive extant writings, including the
123: 22: 105: 471:"Allegorical interpretation of the Pentateuch in Alexandria: inscribing Aristobulus and Philo in a wider literary context" 227:§§45–52. Fourth day: comments on the relationship between the number of the day (four) and what was created on this day. 497:
New Approaches to the Study of Biblical Interpretation in Judaism of the Second Temple Period and in Early Christianity
99: 527: 522: 41: 56:, although it was not the first to have ever been written, and Philo in many cases relied on earlier works in the 140: 61: 488:
Philo of Alexandria, On the Creation of the Cosmos according to Moses: Introduction, Translation and Commentary
295:
Philo of Alexandria, On the Creation of the Cosmos according to Moses Introduction: Translation and Commentary
176: 86:
and Christian Platonism in later periods), the way it elaborates an image of the divine architect, and its
53: 199:
can be divided into twenty-five chapters as follows (with the symbol §§ denoting the term "sections"):
70: 215:§§26–28. Comments that "In the beginning" refers to what God did first, as the first temporal moment. 57: 532: 462:
The Metaphysics of Light in the Hexaemeral Literature: From Philo of Alexandria to Gregory of Nyssa
75: 49: 209:§§13–15a. Comments that the six days are not literal but simply denote the order of creation. 128: 183:
was dedicated), a second part on history, and a third part on legislation (such as the
83: 516: 256: 175:
was one member of a much larger set of works by Philo that are referred to as the
252: 506:
The Legend of Mar Qardagh: Narrative and Christian Heroism in Late Antique Iraq
143:. Philo also cites some of his colleagues as well as earlier philosophers like 168: 121:
This work is not to be confused by another work of the same name, namely, the
184: 52:. It is the first surviving example of a genre of literature known as the 447:
Decharneux, Baudouin S. (2017). "Divine Powers in Philo of Alexandria's
162:
In his subsequent writings, Philo repeatedly retrospectively calls the
114:
served as an opening treatise. It is thought that Philo composed the
470: 245:§§89–128. The relationship between the Sabbath and the number seven. 218:§§29–35. Seven main components of the cosmos according to Gen 1:1–3. 239:§§72–76. Why did God use helpers to create (according to Gen 1:26)? 271:§§151–152. The origins of woman and the quest for bodily pleasure. 144: 94: 87: 79: 45: 118:
sometime between 30 and 40 AD, when he was in his fifties.
451:". In Mormodoro, Anna; Viltanioti, Irina-Fotini (eds.). 330: 328: 236:§§69–71. Comments on why man is made in God's image. 18:
1st-century commentary on Genesis creation narrative
265:§§136–147. The excellence of the first human being. 206:§§7–12. Preliminary comments on God and the cosmos. 274:§§153–156. Interpretation of events in the garden. 248:§§129–130. Summarizing reflection on Gen 2:4–5a. 262:§§134–135. On the making of man from the Earth. 283:§§170b–172. Moses teaches five vital lessons. 195:According to Runia, the structure of Philo's 8: 455:. Oxford University Press. pp. 127–139. 82:(opening the way for its further use by the 154:, have been used to help reconstruct them. 106:Questions and Answers on Genesis and Exodus 93:Philo also wrote other commentaries on the 394: 346: 280:§§167–170a. The consequence of wickedness. 230:§§53–61. Fourth day: the creation events. 406: 382: 334: 312: 277:§§157–166. Interpretation of the snake. 58:Alexandrian school of biblical exegesis 370: 319: 430: 418: 358: 7: 23:De opificio mundi (John Philoponus) 268:§§148–150. Man naming the animals. 14: 508:. University of California Press. 100:Allegorical Commentary on Genesis 251:§§131–133. On the separation of 453:Divine Powers in Late Antiquity 242:§§77–88. Why was man made last? 1: 288:Translations and commentaries 37:On the Creation of the Cosmos 469:Matusova, Ekaterina (2010). 60:, such as the commentary of 475:The Studia Philonica Annual 549: 464:. Oxford University Press. 42:Genesis creation narrative 20: 460:Katsos, Isidoros (2023). 141:Aristobulus of Alexandria 62:Aristobulus of Alexandria 499:. Brill. pp. 41–56. 21:Not to be confused with 68:was second only to his 40:) is a treatise on the 504:Walker, Joel (2006). 486:Runia, David (2001). 177:Exposition of the Law 54:Hexaemeral literature 221:§§35–37. Second day. 203:§§1–6. Introduction. 233:§§62–68. Fifth day. 224:§§38–44. Third day. 171:. Furthermore, the 46:Philo of Alexandria 373:, p. 193–194. 349:, p. 127–128. 212:§§15b–25. Day one. 50:Jewish philosopher 48:, a first-century 528:Jewish literature 523:1st-century texts 449:De opificio mundi 124:De opificio mundi 44:(Genesis 1–3) by 31:De opificio mundi 540: 509: 500: 491: 482: 465: 456: 434: 428: 422: 416: 410: 404: 398: 392: 386: 380: 374: 368: 362: 356: 350: 344: 338: 332: 323: 322:, p. 15–16. 317: 97:, including his 71:Legum allegoriae 548: 547: 543: 542: 541: 539: 538: 537: 513: 512: 503: 494: 485: 468: 459: 446: 443: 438: 437: 433:, p. 8–10. 429: 425: 417: 413: 405: 401: 395:Decharneux 2017 393: 389: 381: 377: 369: 365: 357: 353: 347:Decharneux 2017 345: 341: 333: 326: 318: 314: 309: 304: 290: 193: 160: 137: 129:John Philoponus 26: 19: 12: 11: 5: 546: 544: 536: 535: 530: 525: 515: 514: 511: 510: 501: 492: 483: 466: 457: 442: 439: 436: 435: 423: 421:, p. 5–8. 411: 399: 387: 375: 363: 361:, p. 1–4. 351: 339: 324: 311: 310: 308: 305: 303: 300: 299: 298: 297:, Brill, 2001. 289: 286: 285: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 249: 246: 243: 240: 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 192: 189: 169:books of Moses 159: 156: 136: 133: 110:for which the 84:Church Fathers 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 545: 534: 531: 529: 526: 524: 521: 520: 518: 507: 502: 498: 493: 489: 484: 480: 476: 472: 467: 463: 458: 454: 450: 445: 444: 440: 432: 427: 424: 420: 415: 412: 408: 407:Sterling 2013 403: 400: 396: 391: 388: 385:, p. 41. 384: 383:Sterling 2013 379: 376: 372: 367: 364: 360: 355: 352: 348: 343: 340: 336: 335:Matusova 2010 331: 329: 325: 321: 316: 313: 306: 301: 296: 293:Douwe Runia, 292: 291: 287: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 264: 261: 258: 254: 250: 247: 244: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 201: 200: 198: 190: 188: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 157: 155: 153: 148: 146: 142: 134: 132: 130: 126: 125: 119: 117: 113: 109: 107: 102: 101: 96: 91: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 38: 33: 32: 24: 16: 505: 496: 487: 478: 474: 461: 452: 448: 426: 414: 402: 390: 378: 366: 354: 342: 315: 294: 196: 194: 180: 172: 163: 161: 151: 149: 138: 122: 120: 115: 111: 104: 98: 92: 69: 65: 36: 35: 30: 29: 27: 15: 371:Walker 2006 320:Katsos 2023 253:fresh water 533:Hexaemeron 517:Categories 431:Runia 2001 419:Runia 2001 359:Runia 2001 302:References 257:salt water 135:Influences 95:Pentateuch 90:theology. 307:Citations 191:Structure 185:Decalogue 490:. Brill. 197:Opificio 181:Opificio 173:Opificio 164:Opificio 152:Opificio 116:Opificio 112:Opificio 103:and his 66:Opificio 481:: 1–51. 441:Sources 76:Timaeus 255:from 158:Genre 145:Plato 88:Logos 80:Plato 28:The 187:). 127:of 78:by 519:: 479:22 477:. 473:. 327:^ 131:. 409:. 397:. 337:. 259:. 108:, 34:( 25:.

Index

De opificio mundi (John Philoponus)
Genesis creation narrative
Philo of Alexandria
Jewish philosopher
Hexaemeral literature
Alexandrian school of biblical exegesis
Aristobulus of Alexandria
Legum allegoriae
Timaeus
Plato
Church Fathers
Logos
Pentateuch
Allegorical Commentary on Genesis
Questions and Answers on Genesis and Exodus
De opificio mundi
John Philoponus
Aristobulus of Alexandria
Plato
books of Moses
Exposition of the Law
Decalogue
fresh water
salt water
Katsos 2023


Matusova 2010
Decharneux 2017
Runia 2001

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.