258:, all safety activities, whether organizational, behavioural or equipment related, are subject to layers of overlapping provisions, so that if a failure should occur it would be compensated for or corrected without causing harm to individuals or the public at large. Defence in depth consists in a hierarchical deployment of different levels of equipment and procedures in order to maintain the effectiveness of physical barriers placed between radioactive materials and workers, the public or the environment, in normal operation, anticipated operational occurrences and, for some barriers, in accidents at the plant. Defence in depth is implemented through design and operation to provide a graded protection against a wide variety of transients, incidents and accidents, including equipment failures and human errors within the plant and events initiated outside the plan.
236:, wrote that sometimes redundancies backfire and produce less, not more reliability. This may happen in three ways: First, redundant safety devices result in a more complex system, more prone to errors and accidents. Second, redundancy may lead to shirking of responsibility among workers. Third, redundancy may lead to increased production pressures, resulting in a system that operates at higher speeds, but less safely.
113:
25:
66:
205:
A defence in depth strategy to fire prevention does not focus all the resources only on the prevention of a fire; instead, it also requires the deployment of fire alarms, extinguishers, evacuation plans, mobile rescue and fire-fighting equipment and even nationwide plans for deploying massive
209:
Defense-in-depth is incorporated into fire protection regulations for nuclear power plants. It requires preventing fires, detecting and extinguishing fires that do occur, and ensuring the capability to safely shutdown.
299:
Human extinction is most likely when all three defenses are weak, that is, "by risks we are unlikely to prevent, unlikely to successfully respond to, and unlikely to be resilient against".
226:
with four engines will be less likely to suffer total engine failure than a single-engined aircraft no matter how much effort goes into making the single engine reliable.
38:
289:: Preventing the scaling of a catastrophe to the global level. Example: Measures to prevent escalation of a small-scale nuclear exchange into an all-out nuclear war.
295:: Increasing humanity's resilience (against extinction) when faced with global catastrophes. Example: Measures to increase food security during a nuclear winter.
87:
74:
283:: Reducing the probability of a catastrophe occurring in the first place. Example: Measures to prevent outbreaks of new highly-infectious diseases.
222:– a system that keeps working when a component fails – over attempts to design components that will not fail in the first place. For example, an
245:
143:
44:
395:
437:
363:
168:
52:
341:
within the same environment. Different security products from multiple vendors may be deployed to defend different potential
325:
techniques to help mitigate the risk of one component of the defence being compromised or circumvented. An example could be
383:
NRC: 10 CFR Appendix R to Part 50—Fire
Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to January 1, 1979
308:
519:
139:
79:
349:, helping prevent a shortfall in any one defence leading to a wider failure; also known as a "layered approach".
382:
273:
267:
219:
186:
129:
135:
334:
318:
458:"Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter"
314:
326:
251:
424:
338:
495:
477:
433:
322:
485:
469:
358:
346:
342:
232:
406:
125:
490:
457:
255:
227:
513:
330:
189:
protections, to create a reliable system despite any one layer's unreliability.
16:
Way to guarantee safety by means of multiple and redundant layers of protection
481:
473:
499:
65:
223:
197:
The term defence in depth is now used in many non-military contexts.
124:. In particular, what is the article about? Is it a collection or
106:
59:
18:
456:
Cotton-Barratt, Owen; Daniel, Max; Sandberg, Anders (2020).
272:
Defense in depth is a useful framework for categorizing
218:
Defence in depth may mean engineering which emphasizes
268:
Global catastrophic risk § Proposed mitigation
276:mitigation measures into three layers of defense:
122:may lack focus or may be about more than one topic
321:defence in depth represents the use of multiple
333:when there is already virus protection on the
134:Please help improve this article, possibly by
426:Defence in depth in nuclear safety (INSAG-10)
8:
423:International Nuclear Energy Agency (1996).
185:uses multi-layered protections, similar to
53:Learn how and when to remove these messages
489:
169:Learn how and when to remove this message
126:list of subject areas that use this term
90:of all important aspects of the article.
375:
246:Defense in depth (nuclear engineering)
86:Please consider expanding the lead to
7:
451:
449:
359:Defense in depth (military strategy)
138:the article and/or by introducing a
14:
364:Defence-in-depth (Roman military)
34:This article has multiple issues.
396:"Learning from Normal Accidents"
111:
64:
23:
142:, or discuss this issue on the
78:may be too short to adequately
42:or discuss these issues on the
403:Organization & Environment
88:provide an accessible overview
1:
394:Scott D. Sagan (March 2004).
309:Defense in depth (computing)
206:resources to a major blaze.
262:Existential risk mitigation
536:
306:
265:
243:
329:installed on individual
474:10.1111/1758-5899.12786
319:Information Assurance
315:information security
303:Information security
327:anti-virus software
252:nuclear engineering
140:disambiguation page
520:Safety engineering
130:broad concept page
323:computer security
179:
178:
171:
161:
160:
105:
104:
57:
527:
504:
503:
493:
453:
444:
443:
431:
420:
414:
413:
411:
405:. Archived from
400:
391:
385:
380:
274:existential risk
233:Normal accidents
183:defence in depth
174:
167:
156:
153:
147:
115:
114:
107:
100:
97:
91:
68:
60:
49:
27:
26:
19:
535:
534:
530:
529:
528:
526:
525:
524:
510:
509:
508:
507:
455:
454:
447:
440:
429:
422:
421:
417:
409:
398:
393:
392:
388:
381:
377:
372:
355:
311:
305:
270:
264:
248:
242:
216:
203:
201:Fire prevention
195:
175:
164:
163:
162:
157:
151:
148:
133:
116:
112:
101:
95:
92:
85:
73:This article's
69:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
533:
531:
523:
522:
512:
511:
506:
505:
468:(3): 271–282.
445:
438:
415:
412:on 2004-07-14.
386:
374:
373:
371:
368:
367:
366:
361:
354:
351:
307:Main article:
304:
301:
297:
296:
290:
284:
266:Main article:
263:
260:
256:nuclear safety
244:Main article:
241:
238:
228:Charles Perrow
215:
212:
202:
199:
194:
191:
177:
176:
159:
158:
119:
117:
110:
103:
102:
82:the key points
72:
70:
63:
58:
32:
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
532:
521:
518:
517:
515:
501:
497:
492:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:Global Policy
459:
452:
450:
446:
441:
439:92-0-103295-1
435:
428:
427:
419:
416:
408:
404:
397:
390:
387:
384:
379:
376:
369:
365:
362:
360:
357:
356:
352:
350:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:Likewise, in
310:
302:
300:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
278:
277:
275:
269:
261:
259:
257:
253:
247:
239:
237:
235:
234:
229:
225:
221:
213:
211:
207:
200:
198:
192:
190:
188:
184:
173:
170:
155:
145:
141:
137:
131:
127:
123:
120:This article
118:
109:
108:
99:
89:
83:
81:
76:
71:
67:
62:
61:
56:
54:
47:
46:
41:
40:
35:
30:
21:
20:
465:
461:
425:
418:
407:the original
402:
389:
378:
331:workstations
312:
298:
292:
286:
280:
271:
249:
231:
230:, author of
217:
208:
204:
196:
182:
180:
165:
152:October 2016
149:
121:
96:October 2016
93:
77:
75:lead section
50:
43:
37:
36:Please help
33:
345:within the
214:Engineering
370:References
293:Resilience
281:Prevention
220:redundancy
39:improve it
482:1758-5899
335:firewalls
187:redundant
144:talk page
136:splitting
80:summarize
45:talk page
514:Category
500:32427180
353:See also
287:Response
224:aircraft
193:Examples
491:7228299
347:network
343:vectors
339:servers
240:Nuclear
128:, or a
498:
488:
480:
436:
430:(PDF)
410:(PDF)
399:(PDF)
496:PMID
478:ISSN
434:ISBN
337:and
254:and
486:PMC
470:doi
250:In
516::
494:.
484:.
476:.
466:11
464:.
460:.
448:^
432:.
401:.
317:/
181:A
132:?.
48:.
502:.
472::
442:.
172:)
166:(
154:)
150:(
146:.
98:)
94:(
84:.
55:)
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
