375:
One reason why companies decide to use defensive publication over patents is cost. In the United States, for example, to obtain a published patent application, one must incur at least filing fee, examination fee, search fees, and early publication fees (currently $ 530, minimum plus $ 300 for early
380:"The defensive publication route is especially useful for innovations that do not warrant the high costs incurred in patent applications but to which scientists do want to retain access."
412:
138:
319:
406:
133:
433:
123:
396:
216:
293:
532:
S. Adams, V. Henson-Apollonio, "Defensive
Publishing: A Strategy of Maintaining Intellectual Property as Public Goods"
508:
393:, a company creating computer-generated variants of patent claims, which may potentially be defensively published
349:
180:
159:
108:
372:. Unintentional defensive publication by incidental disclosure can render intellectual property as prior art.
312:
221:
128:
242:
341:
186:
77:
46:
41:
495:
the successful defensive publication renders the competitor's invention obvious or lacking in novelty.
51:
588:
305:
288:
211:
201:
196:
191:
92:
369:
164:
72:
67:
486:
237:
206:
113:
557:
476:
365:
252:
118:
82:
441:
278:
257:
247:
348:
on a product, apparatus or method for instance. The strategy consists in disclosing an
582:
361:
353:
352:
description and/or drawing of the product, apparatus or method so that it enters the
401:
283:
36:
376:
publication), and meet the filing requirements for a proper patent application.
572:
533:
262:
357:
143:
490:
561:
481:
464:
87:
345:
31:
465:"Defensive use of publications in an intellectual property strategy"
553:
390:
360:. Therefore, the defensive publication of perhaps otherwise
569:
Disclosure And
Investment As Strategies In The Patent Race
344:
strategy used to prevent another party from obtaining a
567:
Baker, Scott and Doug
Lichtman and Claudio Mezzetti,
509:"Copyrights, Designs and Intellectual Property"
101:Patentability requirements and related concepts
413:United States Statutory Invention Registration
409:(existing between April 1968 and May 8, 1985)
313:
8:
571:, University of Chicago Law School. 2000. (
320:
306:
15:
480:
425:
270:
229:
172:
151:
100:
59:
23:
18:
552:(October 8, 2004). Available at SSRN:
550:Defensive Publishing by a Leading Firm
7:
407:United States Defensive Publication
364:information may work to defeat the
124:Inventive step and non-obviousness
14:
397:IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin
554:http://ssrn.com/abstract=606781
1:
173:By region / country
605:
230:By specific subject matter
181:Patent Cooperation Treaty
160:Sufficiency of disclosure
139:Person skilled in the art
109:Patentable subject matter
152:Other legal requirements
129:Industrial applicability
463:Barrett, Bill (2003).
438:Defensive Publications
415:(existing until 2013)
342:intellectual property
334:defensive publication
548:Johnson, Justin P.,
469:Nature Biotechnology
338:defensive disclosure
562:10.2139/ssrn.606781
482:10.1038/nbt0202-191
444:on 8 September 2015
60:Procedural concepts
370:patent application
165:Unity of invention
330:
329:
596:
536:
530:
524:
523:
521:
519:
504:
498:
497:
484:
460:
454:
453:
451:
449:
440:. Archived from
430:
368:of a subsequent
322:
315:
308:
16:
604:
603:
599:
598:
597:
595:
594:
593:
579:
578:
545:
543:Further reading
540:
539:
531:
527:
517:
515:
507:Huggins, John.
506:
505:
501:
462:
461:
457:
447:
445:
432:
431:
427:
422:
387:
326:
279:Patent analysis
243:Business method
12:
11:
5:
602:
600:
592:
591:
581:
580:
577:
576:
565:
544:
541:
538:
537:
525:
499:
475:(2): 191–193.
455:
424:
423:
421:
418:
417:
416:
410:
404:
399:
394:
386:
383:
382:
381:
328:
327:
325:
324:
317:
310:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
291:
286:
281:
273:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
260:
255:
250:
245:
240:
232:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
219:
214:
209:
204:
199:
194:
189:
184:
175:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
162:
154:
153:
149:
148:
147:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
103:
102:
98:
97:
96:
95:
90:
85:
80:
75:
70:
62:
61:
57:
56:
55:
54:
49:
44:
39:
34:
26:
25:
21:
20:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
601:
590:
587:
586:
584:
574:
570:
566:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
542:
534:
529:
526:
514:
510:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
483:
478:
474:
470:
466:
459:
456:
443:
439:
435:
429:
426:
419:
414:
411:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
392:
389:
388:
384:
379:
378:
377:
373:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:public domain
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
323:
318:
316:
311:
309:
304:
303:
301:
300:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
269:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
249:
246:
244:
241:
239:
236:
235:
234:
233:
228:
223:
222:United States
220:
218:
215:
213:
210:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
193:
190:
188:
185:
182:
179:
178:
177:
176:
171:
166:
163:
161:
158:
157:
156:
155:
150:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
106:
105:
104:
99:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
65:
64:
63:
58:
53:
50:
48:
45:
43:
40:
38:
35:
33:
30:
29:
28:
27:
22:
17:
568:
549:
528:
516:. Retrieved
512:
502:
494:
472:
468:
458:
446:. Retrieved
442:the original
437:
428:
402:Trade secret
374:
356:and becomes
337:
333:
331:
284:Pirate Party
114:Inventorship
93:Infringement
37:Patent claim
513:Hamradio.ME
217:Netherlands
73:Prosecution
68:Application
589:Patent law
518:27 October
448:8 December
420:References
362:patentable
238:Biological
78:Opposition
19:Patent law
358:prior art
253:Insurance
187:Australia
144:Prior art
88:Licensing
83:Valuation
52:Criticism
47:Economics
24:Overviews
583:Category
491:11821867
385:See also
350:enabling
340:, is an
294:Glossary
289:Category
271:See also
258:Software
248:Chemical
535:, USAID
366:novelty
207:Germany
134:Utility
119:Novelty
42:History
489:
434:"FAQs"
346:patent
202:Europe
192:Canada
32:Patent
391:Cloem
336:, or
212:Japan
197:China
183:(PCT)
520:2015
487:PMID
450:2020
573:pdf
558:doi
556:or
477:doi
263:Tax
585::
511:.
493:.
485:.
473:20
471:.
467:.
436:.
332:A
575:)
564:.
560::
522:.
479::
452:.
321:e
314:t
307:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.