Knowledge

Digital era governance

Source đź“ť

86:
and functioning to the nature of the public problems they seek to address". This will create a more holistic and efficient way of tackling citizens’ needs and future technological advances. Since the digital era management challenges are also about harmonizing "delivery-first, user-centric, agile work models while also satisfying, or alternatively, challenging, onerous hierarchical accountability requirements", public sector organizations require fundamental change of the inflexible culture of bureaucratic organizations, e.g., by establishing cross-functional problem-oriented teams.
77:
without dealing with bureaucracy". This new course of action on the one hand entails a significant transformation of government practices while on the other hand proactive or new services (e.g., automated assistants) might rely on third parties who are leveraging government information. This shift from government-provided towards third party services represents a distinct approach and forces public management to transfer some of their control by forming policy knowledge and resource networks.
68:
government offices that are less effective regarding the creation of public values. A reorientation towards more innovative approaches is necessary. The mere implementation of technological instruments however does not necessarily require a change of management. For an improved government it is necessary to go from traditional management approaches towards innovative approaches.
76:
One approach is a highly collaborative way of managing future policy implementations such as the development of proactive public services. Such proactive services require little to no action by the users and eliminate the "burden and confusion for citizens and businesses, who can now obtain services
67:
To create a better government by means of ICT, public sector organizations cannot rely on their traditional methods. Firstly, traditional public services often are fragmented, duplicative, and inconsistent across government. Secondly, silo-like organizational management then leads to more individual
85:
Another approach refers to a change of mindset. This means that management should consider the transformation from service-oriented governance towards problem-oriented governance which is an "approach to policy design and implementation that emphasizes the need for organizations to adapt their form
58:
Since the popularization of the theory, it has been applied and enriched through the empirical works, such as the case study done on Brunei's Information Department. The case study demonstrated that digital dividends that can be secured through the effective application of new technology in the
50:
and their co-authors as replacing NPM since around 2000 to 2005. DEG has three key elements: reintegration (bringing issues back into government control, like US airport security after 9/11); needs-based holism (reorganizing government around distinct client groups); and
55:(fully exploiting the potential of digital storage and Internet communications to transform governance). Digital era governance implies that public sector organizations are facing new challenges and rapidly changing information technologies and information systems. 129:
Duni, G. (1978). L'utilizzabilità delle tecniche elettroniche nell’emanazione degli atti e nei procedimenti amministrativi. Spunto per una teoria dell’atto amministrativo emanato nella forma elettronica. Riv.
151:
Omar, A. M. (2020). Digital Era Governance and Social Media: The Case of Information Department Brunei. In Employing Recent Technologies for Improved Digital Governance (pp. 19-35). IGI Global.
180: 142:
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Tinkler, J., & Bastow, S. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press.
201: 16:
The first idea of a digital administrative law was born in Italy in 1978 by Giovanni Duni and was developed in 1991 with the name
395: 173: 405: 390: 110: 290:"Digital government units: what are they, and what do they mean for digital era public management renewal?" 400: 31: 24: 366: 319: 224: 17: 358: 311: 270: 350: 301: 260: 216: 43: 47: 384: 370: 323: 228: 105: 100: 306: 289: 220: 95: 52: 362: 315: 274: 265: 248: 247:
Mayne, Quinton; de Jong, Jorrit; Fernandez-Monge, Fernando (2019-11-08).
338: 354: 27: 337:
Mergel, Ines; Ganapati, Sukumar; Whitford, Andrew B. (2020-05-18).
174:"Embracing innovation in government global trends 2020" 202:"Collaborative innovation and human-machine networks" 249:"State Capabilities for Problem-Oriented Governance" 253:Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 63:Management approaches for digital era governance 8: 305: 264: 294:International Public Management Journal 122: 7: 242: 240: 238: 195: 193: 167: 165: 163: 161: 159: 157: 138: 136: 14: 186:from the original on 2020-11-26. 339:"Agile: A New Way of Governing" 1: 307:10.1080/10967494.2019.1686447 288:Clarke, Amanda (2019-11-22). 221:10.1080/14719037.2019.1645873 343:Public Administration Review 59:digital governance process. 81:Problem oriented governance 422: 209:Public Management Review 72:Collaborative management 111:Government by algorithm 36:digital era governance 34:(NPM), the concept of 396:Public administration 266:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz023 32:new public management 25:public administration 200:Kattel, R. (2020). 406:Digital technology 355:10.1111/puar.13202 18:teleadministration 391:Political science 215:(11): 1652–1673. 413: 375: 374: 334: 328: 327: 309: 285: 279: 278: 268: 244: 233: 232: 206: 197: 188: 187: 185: 178: 169: 152: 149: 143: 140: 131: 127: 44:Patrick Dunleavy 42:) is claimed by 421: 420: 416: 415: 414: 412: 411: 410: 381: 380: 379: 378: 336: 335: 331: 287: 286: 282: 246: 245: 236: 204: 199: 198: 191: 183: 176: 171: 170: 155: 150: 146: 141: 134: 128: 124: 119: 92: 83: 74: 65: 12: 11: 5: 419: 417: 409: 408: 403: 398: 393: 383: 382: 377: 376: 349:(1): 161–165. 329: 300:(3): 358–379. 280: 234: 189: 153: 144: 132: 121: 120: 118: 115: 114: 113: 108: 103: 98: 91: 88: 82: 79: 73: 70: 64: 61: 48:Helen Margetts 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 418: 407: 404: 402: 401:Public policy 399: 397: 394: 392: 389: 388: 386: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 333: 330: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 303: 299: 295: 291: 284: 281: 276: 272: 267: 262: 258: 254: 250: 243: 241: 239: 235: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 203: 196: 194: 190: 182: 175: 172:OECD (2020). 168: 166: 164: 162: 160: 158: 154: 148: 145: 139: 137: 133: 126: 123: 116: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 93: 89: 87: 80: 78: 71: 69: 62: 60: 56: 54: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 26: 21: 19: 346: 342: 332: 297: 293: 283: 259:(1): 33–44. 256: 252: 212: 208: 147: 125: 106:E-government 101:E-governance 84: 75: 66: 57: 53:digitization 39: 35: 22: 15: 96:Cyberocracy 385:Categories 117:References 371:219439672 363:0033-3352 324:213995905 316:1096-7494 275:2398-4910 229:202329946 181:Archived 90:See also 23:In the 369:  361:  322:  314:  273:  227:  30:about 28:debate 367:S2CID 320:S2CID 225:S2CID 205:(PDF) 184:(PDF) 177:(PDF) 359:ISSN 312:ISSN 271:ISSN 130:amm. 38:(or 351:doi 302:doi 261:doi 217:doi 40:DEG 387:: 365:. 357:. 347:81 345:. 341:. 318:. 310:. 298:23 296:. 292:. 269:. 255:. 251:. 237:^ 223:. 213:22 211:. 207:. 192:^ 179:. 156:^ 135:^ 46:, 20:. 373:. 353:: 326:. 304:: 277:. 263:: 257:3 231:. 219::

Index

teleadministration
public administration
debate
new public management
Patrick Dunleavy
Helen Margetts
digitization
Cyberocracy
E-governance
E-government
Government by algorithm








"Embracing innovation in government global trends 2020"
Archived


"Collaborative innovation and human-machine networks"
doi
10.1080/14719037.2019.1645873
S2CID
202329946

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑