22:
85:), in the context of legal proceedings, is the process whereby each party to a case sorts through and analyzes the documents and data they possess (and later the documents and data supplied by their opponents through discovery) to determine which are sensitive or otherwise relevant to the case. Document Review is a valuable main staple of the type of work performed by
161:. In recent years, many legal staffing companies have begun to act as intermediary employers between the law firms and the attorneys hired to assist with the document review. This trend has led to controversy in the legal profession as more and more of the work traditionally performed by U.S. attorneys is being outsourced to countries like
156:
will need to obtain assistance beyond their standard resources. In these instances other attorneys are often brought into the case to assist specifically with the review of the documents. Traditionally, the additional attorneys needed to assist were hired on directly by attorneys and firms, or they
123:
that were originally created electronically or as electronic copies of documents that were originally created in a hard copy format. During the doc review process, each document may be tagged according to certain categories, including whether it is relevant to an issue in the case, whether it is
151:
At times, even with the use of electronic document review platforms the volume of documents that need to be reviewed by an attorney for a case can be expansive and many attorneys including even highly staffed international
124:
responsive to a discovery request (and therefore may need to be produced as part of the discovery process), whether it is confidential, or whether it is attorney client or otherwise
224:
254:
96:, and government and internal investigations (including internal audits). Regarding litigation, documents reviewed by attorneys are obtained through the
128:. When large amounts of documents need to be reviewed electronically, often a system is set up that includes review software. This system is known as a
281:
141:
109:
65:
105:
32:
89:
for their clients, though it is increasingly common for the work to be performed by specialized document review attorneys.
228:
101:
258:
359:
120:
137:
364:
93:
47:
43:
158:
172:
where many attorneys and firms typically hire additional attorneys to assist with document review are
165:
as a result of the legal staffing companies attempting to drive the rates down to remain competitive.
92:
Some types of cases that typically require large numbers of documents to be reviewed are litigation,
304:
129:
100:
process, which is generally governed by rules of procedure for the presiding court. In cases in
173:
145:
125:
97:
86:
353:
177:
169:
181:
133:
282:"Auto-Classification Review Technologies: What Every Attorney Needs to Know"
116:
108:(F.R.C.P.) 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 which were amended in 2006 to include
153:
148:
and other technologies to help curb the growing cost of document review.
193:
189:
185:
305:"Technology-Assisted Review: An Essential Tool in the Age of Big Data"
119:
documents today, most documents are reviewed electronically either as
200:
50:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
162:
199:
In Europe the biggest market for document review is typically
15:
329:
192:. In Canada many attorneys assist with document review in
39:
218:
216:
248:
246:
8:
66:Learn how and when to remove this message
330:"DocReview.co.uk - Legal Jobs in London"
140:have arisen to reflect the dominance of
212:
7:
104:the rules related to discovery are
14:
142:electronically stored information
115:Though attorneys do still review
110:electronically stored information
106:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
20:
1:
102:United States Federal Courts
257:. About.com. Archived from
227:. About.com. Archived from
168:Traditional markets in the
46:the claims made and adding
381:
225:"What Is Document Review?"
144:and the increasing use of
138:technology assisted review
284:. The National Law Review
94:mergers and acquisitions
159:independent contractors
134:electronic discovery
255:"Document Reviewer"
157:may have worked as
261:on 3 November 2013
231:on 3 November 2013
31:possibly contains
360:Legal professions
76:
75:
68:
33:original research
372:
344:
343:
341:
340:
326:
320:
319:
317:
315:
303:Bonney, Martin.
300:
294:
293:
291:
289:
280:Mackay, Sheila.
277:
271:
270:
268:
266:
250:
241:
240:
238:
236:
220:
174:Washington, D.C.
146:machine learning
71:
64:
60:
57:
51:
48:inline citations
24:
23:
16:
380:
379:
375:
374:
373:
371:
370:
369:
365:Discovery (law)
350:
349:
348:
347:
338:
336:
334:DocReview.co.uk
328:
327:
323:
313:
311:
302:
301:
297:
287:
285:
279:
278:
274:
264:
262:
252:
251:
244:
234:
232:
222:
221:
214:
209:
81:(also known as
79:Document review
72:
61:
55:
52:
37:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
378:
376:
368:
367:
362:
352:
351:
346:
345:
321:
295:
272:
242:
211:
210:
208:
205:
74:
73:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
377:
366:
363:
361:
358:
357:
355:
335:
331:
325:
322:
310:
306:
299:
296:
283:
276:
273:
260:
256:
253:Kane, Sally.
249:
247:
243:
230:
226:
223:Kane, Sally.
219:
217:
213:
206:
204:
202:
197:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
178:New York City
175:
171:
170:United States
166:
164:
160:
155:
149:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
90:
88:
84:
80:
70:
67:
59:
49:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
18:
17:
337:. Retrieved
333:
324:
312:. Retrieved
308:
298:
286:. Retrieved
275:
263:. Retrieved
259:the original
233:. Retrieved
229:the original
198:
167:
150:
132:. The terms
121:native files
114:
91:
82:
78:
77:
62:
53:
30:
314:20 November
182:Los Angeles
354:Categories
339:2016-09-19
288:2 November
265:2 November
235:2 November
207:References
126:privileged
83:doc review
40:improve it
309:The Times
154:law firms
117:hard copy
98:discovery
87:attorneys
44:verifying
130:platform
56:May 2012
194:Toronto
190:Chicago
186:Houston
38:Please
201:London
188:, and
163:India
316:2014
290:2013
267:2013
237:2013
136:and
196:.
42:by
356::
332:.
307:.
245:^
215:^
203:.
184:,
180:,
176:,
112:.
342:.
318:.
292:.
269:.
239:.
69:)
63:(
58:)
54:(
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.