209:
argument that "doing gender" is compulsory, however, Darwin contends that they fail to consider the impact of social change. Additionally, she critiques the focus on the gender binary in the original framework and other responses. The author furthers
Connell's framework by focusing on nonbinary gender identities rather than binary transgender identities. Darwin suggests that using the term "transgender" to encompass both binary and nonbinary transgender people fails to account for their different experiences in society, particularly in regards to the gender binary. She argues that binary transnormativity prevents authentic gender expression for nonbinary individuals. Through her research, Darwin concluded that there are a multitude of ways one may "do nonbinary gender", largely due to the many different nonbinary gender identities. She discovered that some nonbinary individuals intentionally use conflicting binary gender signals to fluctuate between these binary categories. Much of Darwin's studies focused on genderqueer individuals, who she deemed disruptive to the accountability component of the "doing gender" framework. She argued that genderqueer people refute the belief that everyone holds themselves accountable to the gender binary.
213:
suggest that reproductive expectations associated with biological sex would remain intertwined with gender identity. Due to this, they discuss the idea of "redoing gender" instead. Nordmarken critiques these works for failing to consider "doing gender" outside of a hegemonic framework, which excludes populations who do not hold themselves accountable to binary ideals. The author explored "doing gender" through a "queer trans paradigmatic" lens where he observed people being allowed to inform others of their identity, rather than having others making assumptions based on body-related cues. In particular, he reported the impact of pronouns on "doing gender". He suggested that using pronouns de-emphasize people's accountability to gender-related social standards, lessening the importance of gender norms and assumptions. He references the replacement of the body by pronouns for doing and interpreting gender as the queering of "doing gender". Nordmarken's focus on pronouns has added another layer of accountability to the "doing gender" framework where individuals are held accountable for proper pronoun usage. This directly opposes accountability to societal norms, providing a more collaborative, fluid approach to the "doing gender" framework.
369:
own cultural values. The authors state that white society manufactures and normalizes racialized gender stereotypes for non-white populations. They reference how the aggressive images associated with Black women lead to the belief that they are not feminine enough, whereas the submissive representation of Asian women results in their hyperfeminization. The authors suggest that white dominance is reinforced using these derogatory representations of racialized individuals to manipulate them into "doing gender" in a way that emulates the idealized, white standards. Pyke and
Johnson (2003) conducted a study with one section focused on how Asian American women do gender differently depending on their setting. These respondents viewed white femininity as the standard, with many citing mainstream guidelines which frequently glorify white femininity compared to Asian femininity. The authors also discovered how the hypermasculine representation of Asian men allow white men to be viewed as less oppressive. Pyke and Johnson (2003) focused on the influence internalized oppression has on how racially and ethnically marginalized populations "do gender".
171:
Francine M. Deutsch, in "Undoing Gender" (2007), examines how the concept of doing gender has been employed in research. Deutsch uses examples of studies that use West and
Zimmerman's work to illustrate how normative gender ideals are apparent in a variety of contexts. This, she argues, contributes to the invisibility of gender transgression and does not work towards West and Zimmerman's goal of eliminating gender inequity. In order to facilitate the undoing of gender, Deutsch suggests that "The study of the interactional level could expand beyond simply documenting the persistence of inequality to examine (1) when and how social interactions become less gendered, not just differently gendered; (2) the conditions under which gender is irrelevant in social interactions; (3) whether all gendered interactions reinforce inequality; (4) how the structural (institutional) and interactional levels might work together to produce change; and (5) interaction as the site of change." By focusing on these areas, Deutsch asserts, it is easier to find practical solutions to problems cause by gender inequity.
190:
of a natural way to be male or female. The argument that arose based on these findings was that biological sex instructs people on how they should do gender. Sonny
Nordmarken supports this argument by suggesting that people learn to express themselves based on the social expectation that gender and biological sex must match. He also discusses how people are taught to use physical appearance, such as secondary sex traits, to determine other people's gender. Schilt and Westbrook suggest that the binary sex system and hierarchical gender system lead to the process of "doing inequality" through "doing gender", with masculinity and heterosexuality being anointed as the desired, therefore privileged identities. They also explain that various time periods and regions of the world have different standards and norms according to how the sex and gender systems have been enacted there. In a later work, Westbrook and Schilt support West and Zimmerman's suggestion that determining gender relies upon cues provided through "doing gender".
365:
categories often exaggerated and the behavior of the most dominant group within the category (e.g. rich white men or women) becomes idealized as the only appropriate way to fulfill one social role. This conceptualization is then employed as a means of excluding and stigmatizing those who do not or cannot live up to these standards. This process of "doing difference" is realized in constant interpersonal interactions that reaffirm and reproduce social structure. Experiencing the world through the interaction of these "essentialized" characteristics and especially through dominant group's frame of reference (power interests) produces a pattern of thought and behavior that reproduces these social inequalities.
118:
gender displays. For instance, colleagues may interact in a gendered manner during their lunch hour, rather than while they are working together on a project. West and
Zimmerman take issue with this piece of Goffman's perspective, claiming that this masks the ways in which gender displays permeate nearly all social situations in that individuals cannot avoid being interpreted as masculine or feminine. "Doing Gender" also comes into play in individual settings such as emotional, cognitive, or communicational behaviors interpersonally but also appears in interpersonal settings such as peer and familial relationships and their expected outcomes.
142:, where other people’s beliefs about a person affect their actions toward that person, which in turn reinforce that person’s beliefs about themselves and thus change their behavior in a way that confirms the people’s beliefs. For example, a parent might treat their daughter as fragile and vulnerable because that’s what they were raised to believe about girls. Even if the daughter did not possess either of those qualities at first, she might learn to believe those things about herself and adjust her behavior accordingly, only to confirm the parents’ original belief.
98:
accountability standards of the sex category she belongs to. Deviations from these expectations do not have an immediate effect on the accountability structure itself. Instead, failures to meet these standards are attributed to the individual rather than to the rigidity of recognized categories. With this theory, West and
Zimmerman stress the importance of social interaction in maintaining the gender structure. Because individuals "do" and assess gender in interaction, gender is visible in a wide variety of activities such as conversation.
197:" in her work, "Doing, Undoing or Redoing Gender? Learning from the Workplace Experiences of Transpeople". Connell posits that transpeople may redo gender by altering normative ideas of gender in their interactions, but may simultaneously participate in the doing of gender in other ways. Connell coins the term "doing transgender" in order to provide a way to examine how trans people must make sense of the disconnect between sex, gender and sex category, which they may obscure or actively express in interactions.
94:
taken for granted activities. This description of gender's interactive nature is supported by Joshua and
Kristin Smith (2016) where they explore what factors impact the process of "doing gender". West and Zimmerman employ the example of a professional woman in a male-dominated field, through which it becomes apparent that the woman will have to make decisions as to whether or not she should engage in "unfeminine" behavior that would otherwise be an integral part of her identity.
397:
particular circumstance. It is these constantly occurring processes, not a divinely decreed grand plan, which reproduces social structure. Individuals "do difference" when they acknowledge (knowingly or unknowingly) how their categorization renders them socially accountable to acting in a particular way in a situation. However, when individuals recalibrate "doing difference" to produce alternative ways to conceptualize interaction patterns, it amounts to social change.
373:
that within capitalist societies, it is often assumed that one's economic situation acts as a direct indication of one's capacity to achieve, further engraining sexist and racist assumptions. Given the general observation that powerful groups display heavy reliance on these ideas of natural subordination, many liberationist thinkers have concluded that this essentialism would be a prime rhetorical vehicle to subvert. Thus, the
324:
interactional process into the realms of race and class by asserting that the intersection of these three categories could not be thought of in strictly a mathematical or hierarchical sense. That is, equating these concepts to variables in a statistical model tasked with predicting life success in society will result in an inadequate understanding of systemic inequalities based on race, class, and gender.
227:
56:. According to this paper, an individual's performance of gender is intended to construct gendered behavior as naturally occurring. This façade furthers a system through which individuals are judged in terms of their failure or success to meet gendered societal expectations, called the accountability structure. The concept of doing gender was later expanded in the book
208:
Helana Darwin extends the "doing gender" framework to include challenges faced by nonbinary individuals within the binary gender system. The author references West and
Zimmerman's and Hollander's focus on accountability. She states that their proposed systems of accountability are used to justify the
200:
Jocelyn
Hollander's 2013 work focuses on accountability, where she argues that it has three parts: "orientation", "assessment", and "enforcement". Hollander describes orientation as self-accountability to biological sex. Assessment is explained as the process of measuring an individual's way of
189:
A 2009 article by
Kristen Schilt and Laurel Westbrook expands upon West and Zimmerman's initial framework for "doing gender" by emphasizing how it is impacted by heteronormativity. They found that heterosexual norms were disrupted when biological sex and "doing gender" differed, due to the perception
170:
The concept of doing gender has been critiqued by scholars who assert that it does not take human agency and acts of resistance into account. In order to illustrate the possibility of change, several works have been published in which researchers claim to document an 'undoing' or 'redoing' of gender.
117:
However, these performances are optional and vulnerable to disturbance, as inappropriate gender display can just as easily be invoked as socially accepted ones. Goffman asserts that there is a "scheduling" of gender displays around activities, so that the activities themselves are not interrupted by
368:
This theme has been further addressed by Karen Pyke and Denise Johnson (2003) where they integrated the concept of "doing gender" with the study of race. They explain that being part of racially or ethnically marginalized communities can lead to conflicting gender expectations from society and their
93:
Gender is described as 'omnirelevant,' as it is apparent and relevant in almost every interaction. In their article, West and Zimmerman use examples such as bathrooms, sports, coupling, conversations, professions, and the division of labor to illustrate the ways in which gender is prevalent in many
372:
West and Fenstermaker (1995) state that social science research has rendered dubious any claim that race can simply be conflated with color; gender with genitalia; class with paycheques. The authors acknowledge that class appears less prone to ideas about natural social differentiation, but argue
327:
The authors also highlight how simply placing communities facing immense social disadvantages, such as poor black women, at the bottom of an abstract listing of vulnerable populations in the United States offers little information about how the interaction of race, class, and gender constrains and
212:
Nordmarken proposes the idea that social interactions are not only significant in "doing gender", but also in "undoing gender". In drawing upon West and Zimmerman and Barbara Risman, he acknowledged their argument that for gender to truly be undone would be for it to have no meaning. Both articles
72:
and Don Zimmerman's article by the same title, originally written in 1977 but not published until 1987. In the article, West and Zimmerman illustrate that gender is performed in interactions, and that behaviors are assessed based on socially accepted conceptions of gender. Rather than focusing on
348:
has historically been the province of white middle-class women in the developed world who were not sufficiently affected or attuned to the nature of these corollary oppressions. Furthermore, few women outside this privileged lot were able to gain access to institutions of higher education, which
161:
may be activated by the situation, such as when a person is told that a particular toddler is a boy, the perceiver often reaches for cars and robots to play with the toddler, because a common gender schema dictates that boys like to play with those types of toys. A wedding presents a situation in
97:
Another component of this theory is gendered assessment of behavior. In the above example, the woman is engaging in behavior that will be assessed as either masculine or feminine by her co-workers. According to West and Zimmerman, this woman will be evaluated based on how her actions compare to
204:
A 2016 article by J. Smith and K. Smith references the role of accountability and states that the act of "doing gender" is verified according to established standards for a specific circumstance. Determining gender is regarded as a subjective behaviour based on an individual's personal views and
182:
West and Zimmerman responded with an article titled "Accounting for Doing Gender", in which they restated their original argument, with an emphasis on accountability. In this, they argued, the doing gender framework does not hide agency, but contextualizes it. Because individuals' gender will be
178:
published a West and Zimmerman Symposium, in honor of the concept of doing gender. Nine short articles were composed for the symposium, including a piece by West and Zimmerman. Several authors argued that the doing gender framework did not allow for agency, intent or consciousness. Other authors
113:
One of the most basic natures that can be assumed from interpreting these signs is one's masculinity or femininity. Not only is gender often determined by others relatively easily, but this determination often establishes the ways in which individuals interact with one another. Goffman asserts
85:
at birth or chromosomal typing before birth. Sex category is the assumed biological category, regardless of the individual's gender identification. This is "established and sustained by the socially required identificatory displays that proclaim one's membership in one or the other category".
89:
Doing gender according to West and Zimmerman "is to advance a new understanding of gender as a routine accomplishment embedded in every day interaction". Essentially, they argue that gender is something that humans created. As humans, we have categorized and defined many aspects of life. If
396:
are in fact situationally dependent on the sort of social context in which we employ them. That is, race, class, and gender aren't just objective scientific facts, but dynamic processes of culturally constructing cues for moral behavior (for which one can be held personally accountable) in a
364:
The central theme of "difference" in this article intends to illustrate how the concepts of race and gender have been falsely conceived as biologically bound predictors of behavior and aptitude among those who of a certain skin color or sex. The commonalities within these somewhat arbitrary
323:
Doing difference is a concept that grew out of the authors' earlier idea of doing gender. In 1995, Candace West and Sarah Fenstermaker identified gender, race, and class as the three fundamental means of categorizing social difference. They sought to extend the idea of gender as an ongoing
156:
Finally, the situation refers to the effect of context on how one does gender. For example, the perception of an “appropriate” outfit can depend on the event, location, and setting. Dressing up for work will likely yield different results than dressing up for a beach party. A perceiver’s
90:
someone was not in favor of their gender role or did something that was not deemed "correct" for that gender this person would be committing an act of social deviance. West and Zimmerman proposed that the two main aspects of "doing gender" are gender performance and accountability.
332:
standpoint shifts the focus away from individual characteristics. Instead, they are understood processually as "emergent properties of social situations" which simultaneously produce systematically different outcomes for social groups and the rationale for such disparities.
183:
interpreted based on the accountability structure, the effectiveness of their resistance may not serve to "undo" gender. The authors contend that gender may be "redone" but never "undone", as accountability structures may change but gender will not disappear.
153:. Self-presentation is the opposite, where the target is more focused on adjusting their behavior based on the opinions and attitudes of others. Self-enhancement is a type of self-presentation that especially focuses on presenting oneself favorably.
114:
that, because we habitually function within such scripts, they are taken to be further evidence of essential natures. He coins the term "gender display" as a way to conceptualize the ways in which individuals act in a gender appropriate manner.
126:
In 1987, Deaux and Major proposed a model of social transaction to explain doing gender. In this model, there are three components or determinants for the social behavior of doing gender - the perceiver, the target, and the situation.
201:
doing gender in comparison to their sex. Hollander states that assessment holds people accountable to themselves and others. The third part is enforcement, which is when someone is actively held accountable to societal norms.
385:
within sociology was a central theme from the 1960s onward. This still left a somewhat gaping theoretical vacuum, one that continues to be felt by people struggling with the challenge of fundamentally altering their social cosmology.
73:
how gender is ingrained in the individual or perpetuated by institutions, West and Zimmerman emphasize the interactional level as a site where gender is invoked and reinforced. They begin by differentiating
110:
in "Gender Display". Goffman theorizes that humans make the assumption that each has an "essential nature," which can be interpreted by reading "natural signs given off or expressed by them".
361:) is less apparent today in these institutions, but the tendency remains for those in positions of power to view the world in a way that discounts the experience of marginalized groups.
1598:
1031:
Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322-335.
86:
Gender, in this context, is the degree to which an actor is masculine or feminine, in light of societal expectations about what is appropriate for one's sex category.
130:
A perceiver interprets their observations of others through a social filter consisting of their expectations and attitudes. This leads to two types of confirmations.
1040:
Kolpashnikova, K. (2018). American househusbands: New time use evidence of gender display, 2003–2016. Social Indicators Research, 140(3), 1259-1277.
179:
argued that biology needed to be focused on when considering doing gender, in order to understand what role the body plays in gender assessment.
68:
The concept of "doing" gender came from conversations of gender from sociology and gender studies. The specific term "doing gender" was used in
1759:
1784:
337:
1774:
909:
Jones, Nikki (February 2009). ""I was aggressive for the streets, pretty for the pictures": gender, difference, and the inner-city girl".
1794:
1586:
1560:
310:
106:
The idea that gender is something that individuals actively 'do' was largely inspired by the social psychological approach taken by
1022:
Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of sociology, 100(3), 652-688.
1237:
Connell, Catherine (February 2010). "Doing, undoing, or redoing gender? Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople".
1789:
1181:"Doing Gender, Determining Gender: Transgender People, Gender Panics, and the Maintenance of the Sex/Gender/Sexuality System"
248:
1524:
1059:"Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: "Gender Normals," Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality"
756:
Jurik, Nancy C.; Siemsen, Cynthia (February 2009). ""Doing gender" as canon or agenda: a symposium on West and Zimmerman".
349:
might have permitted them to engage in the academic discourse and activity about such shortcomings. Even if they had, the
291:
1636:
421:
244:
263:
1731:
1779:
81:. In this piece, sex is the socially agreed upon criteria for being male or female, usually based on an individual's
583:"What it Means to Do Gender Differently: Understanding Identity, Perceptions and Accomplishments in a Gendered World"
353:
within the academy and at leading journals made this unlikely process even more difficult. Perhaps overt racism and
872:
Messerschmidt, James W. (February 2009). "'Doing Gender': The Impact and Future of a Salient Sociological Concept".
270:
145:
A target is the person performing gender. When a target is focused on acting in a way that is consistent with their
1799:
676:
Vidal-Ortiz, Salvador (February 2009). "The figure of the transwoman of color through the lens of "doing gender"".
237:
1123:"Queering Gendering: Trans Epistemologies and the Disruption and Production of Gender Accomplishment Practices"
382:
150:
139:
138:
occurs when the target changes their behavior based on perceivers’ expectations. Together, these can lead to a
392:
has assumed the major explanatory role in these discussions by positing that the meanings of these supposedly
277:
416:
186:
The 'doing gender' framework, developed by West and Zimmerman, is highly influential in housework research.
135:
540:
389:
39:
259:
1675:
1574:
1629:"'Doing' gender in context: household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States"
1596:
McDowell, Linda (1992). "Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography".
158:
545:
1239:
988:
948:
911:
874:
837:
795:
758:
718:
678:
531:
469:
426:
1154:
1122:
69:
43:
1717:
1673:
Simpson, Sally S.; Elis, Lori (1995). "Doing gender: Sorting out the caste and crime conundrum".
1661:
1653:
1615:
1496:
1488:
1434:
1426:
1368:
1316:
1308:
1256:
1216:
1208:
1158:
1150:
1094:
1086:
1005:
965:
928:
891:
854:
812:
775:
735:
695:
558:
494:
486:
52:
1628:
986:(February 2009). "Accountable conduct: "Doing gender" in transsexual and political retrospect".
1729:
Williams, Clare (February 2000). "Doing health, doing gender: teenagers, diabetes and asthma".
162:
which there tend to be very specific and rigid expectations and pressures relating to gender.
1748:
1698:"Just doing gender? Transvestism and the power of underdoing gender in everyday life and work"
1582:
1556:
1480:
1418:
1360:
1300:
1200:
1142:
1078:
633:
594:
345:
131:
1740:
1709:
1684:
1645:
1607:
1533:
1472:
1410:
1352:
1292:
1248:
1192:
1134:
1070:
997:
957:
920:
883:
846:
804:
767:
727:
687:
625:
550:
478:
329:
1570:
393:
284:
1697:
1461:"Asian American Women and Racialized Femininities: 'Doing' Gender Across Cultural Worlds"
328:
directs various aspects of their lives. Their analysis of these core differences from an
1520:"Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices"
744:
1688:
1549:
1138:
983:
946:
Kitzinger, Celia (February 2009). "Doing gender: a conversation analytic perspective".
374:
107:
1744:
134:
occurs when a perceiver sees things in a way that confirms their preexisting beliefs.
1768:
1721:
1665:
1538:
1519:
1438:
1320:
1260:
1220:
1162:
1098:
1009:
969:
932:
895:
858:
816:
779:
739:
699:
613:
562:
498:
406:
1551:
Being married, doing gender: a critical analysis of gender relationships in marriage
1500:
835:
Risman, Barbara J. (February 2009). "From doing to undoing: gender as we know it".
341:
146:
529:
West, Candace; Zimmerman, Don H. (February 2009). "Accounting for doing gender".
582:
482:
411:
378:
226:
194:
1414:
629:
1657:
651:
614:"Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior"
350:
1713:
1484:
1476:
1422:
1364:
1304:
1296:
1252:
1204:
1196:
1146:
1082:
1074:
1001:
961:
924:
887:
850:
808:
771:
731:
691:
637:
598:
554:
42:
that actively surfaces in everyday human interaction. This term was used by
82:
17:
1752:
1281:"'I Demand More of People': Accountability, Interaction, and Gender Change"
193:
Catherine Connell presented the idea of "redoing gender" as well as "doing
354:
1372:
1340:
1312:
1280:
1212:
1180:
1090:
1058:
1492:
1460:
251: in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
1619:
1430:
1398:
490:
1356:
358:
78:
35:
1649:
1611:
793:
Smith, Dorothy E. (February 2009). "Categories are not enough".
344:
were not adequately considered in earlier works is because the
1518:
Bruni, Attila; Gherardi, Silvia; Poggio, Barbara (July 2004).
467:
West, Candace; Zimmerman, Don H. (June 1987). "Doing gender".
220:
74:
38:, rather than being an innate quality of individuals, is a
524:
522:
520:
518:
516:
514:
512:
510:
508:
716:
Deutsch, Francine M. (February 2007). "Undoing gender".
1341:"Doing Gender Beyond the Binary: A Virtual Ethnography"
205:
experiences, according to the aforementioned sources.
1599:
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
653:
Girl toys vs boy toys: The experiment - BBC Stories
1696:Thanem, Torkild; Wallenberg, Louise (March 2016).
1581:. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press.
1548:
60:, edited by Sarah Fenstermaker and Candace West.
462:
460:
458:
456:
454:
452:
450:
448:
446:
444:
442:
30:In psychology, sociology and gender studies, "
1760:Google scholar references on Doing Difference
671:
669:
8:
581:Smith, Joshua S.; Smith, Kristin E. (2016).
1459:Pyke, Karen D.; Johnson, Denise L. (2003).
1397:West, Candace; Fenstermaker, Sarah (1995).
1179:Westbrook, Laurel; Schilt, Kristen (2014).
1057:Schilt, Kristen; Westbrook, Laurel (2009).
1232:
1230:
1537:
830:
828:
826:
711:
709:
544:
311:Learn how and when to remove this message
612:Deaux, Kay; Major, Brenda (July 1987).
438:
1392:
1390:
1388:
1386:
1384:
1382:
174:In January 2009, the academic journal
1627:Prince Cooke, Lynn (September 2006).
1454:
1452:
1450:
1448:
1334:
1332:
1330:
1274:
1272:
1270:
1174:
1172:
1116:
1114:
1112:
1110:
1108:
1052:
1050:
1048:
1046:
7:
587:Humboldt Journal of Social Relations
576:
574:
572:
249:adding citations to reliable sources
46:and Don Zimmerman in their article "
336:The authors assert that the reason
1689:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01171.x
1155:10.15767/feministstudies.45.1.0036
1139:10.15767/feministstudies.45.1.0036
25:
1539:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00240.x
225:
1525:Gender, Work & Organization
236:needs additional citations for
1555:. London New York: Routledge.
1279:Hollander, Jocelyn A. (2013).
122:Gender as a social transaction
58:Doing Gender, Doing Difference
1:
1745:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00340-8
1732:Social Science & Medicine
1637:American Journal of Sociology
422:Social construction of gender
1785:Prejudice and discrimination
1775:Interpersonal communication
483:10.1177/0891243287001002002
1816:
1415:10.1177/089124395009001002
1121:Nordmarken, Sonny (2019).
630:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369
1547:Dryden, Caroline (1999).
1795:Sociological terminology
1714:10.1177/1350508414547559
1477:10.1177/0891243202238977
1297:10.1177/0891243212464301
1253:10.1177/0891243209356429
1197:10.1177/0891243213503203
1075:10.1177/0891243209340034
1002:10.1177/0891243208327175
962:10.1177/0891243208326730
925:10.1177/0891243208326676
888:10.1177/0891243208326253
851:10.1177/0891243208326874
809:10.1177/0891243208327081
772:10.1177/0891243208326677
732:10.1177/0891243206293577
692:10.1177/0891243208326461
555:10.1177/0891243208326529
140:self-fulfilling prophecy
50:", published in 1987 in
1339:Darwin, Helana (2017).
417:Symbolic interactionism
166:Responses and critiques
149:, it is referred to as
136:Behavioral confirmation
1790:Social constructionism
1575:McConnell-Ginet, Sally
390:Social constructionism
132:Cognitive confirmation
77:from sex category and
27:Gender studies concept
1345:Symbolic Interaction
1240:Gender & Society
989:Gender & Society
949:Gender & Society
912:Gender & Society
875:Gender & Society
838:Gender & Society
796:Gender & Society
759:Gender & Society
719:Gender & Society
679:Gender & Society
618:Psychological Review
532:Gender & Society
470:Gender & Society
245:improve this article
1579:Language and gender
427:Sociology of gender
330:ethnomethodological
34:" is the idea that
1780:Gender and society
1465:Gender and Society
1403:Gender and Society
1399:"Doing Difference"
1285:Gender and Society
1185:Gender and Society
1063:Gender and Society
176:Gender and Society
53:Gender and Society
1800:Postmodern theory
394:ascribed statuses
346:feminist movement
321:
320:
313:
295:
151:self-verification
16:(Redirected from
1807:
1756:
1725:
1692:
1669:
1633:
1623:
1592:
1571:Eckert, Penelope
1566:
1554:
1543:
1541:
1505:
1504:
1456:
1443:
1442:
1394:
1377:
1376:
1357:10.1002/symb.316
1336:
1325:
1324:
1276:
1265:
1264:
1234:
1225:
1224:
1176:
1167:
1166:
1127:Feminist Studies
1118:
1103:
1102:
1054:
1041:
1038:
1032:
1029:
1023:
1020:
1014:
1013:
980:
974:
973:
943:
937:
936:
906:
900:
899:
869:
863:
862:
832:
821:
820:
790:
784:
783:
753:
747:
743:
713:
704:
703:
673:
664:
663:
662:
661:
656:, 16 August 2017
648:
642:
641:
609:
603:
602:
578:
567:
566:
548:
526:
503:
502:
464:
316:
309:
305:
302:
296:
294:
253:
229:
221:
217:Doing difference
40:social construct
21:
1815:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1765:
1764:
1728:
1695:
1672:
1631:
1626:
1595:
1589:
1569:
1563:
1546:
1517:
1514:
1512:Further reading
1509:
1508:
1458:
1457:
1446:
1396:
1395:
1380:
1338:
1337:
1328:
1278:
1277:
1268:
1236:
1235:
1228:
1178:
1177:
1170:
1120:
1119:
1106:
1056:
1055:
1044:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1021:
1017:
984:Connell, Raewyn
982:
981:
977:
945:
944:
940:
908:
907:
903:
871:
870:
866:
834:
833:
824:
792:
791:
787:
755:
754:
750:
715:
714:
707:
675:
674:
667:
659:
657:
650:
649:
645:
611:
610:
606:
580:
579:
570:
546:10.1.1.455.3546
528:
527:
506:
466:
465:
440:
435:
403:
317:
306:
300:
297:
254:
252:
242:
230:
219:
168:
124:
104:
66:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1813:
1811:
1803:
1802:
1797:
1792:
1787:
1782:
1777:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1762:
1757:
1739:(3): 387–396.
1726:
1708:(2): 250–271.
1693:
1670:
1658:10.1086/506417
1650:10.1086/506417
1644:(2): 442–472.
1624:
1612:10.2307/622707
1606:(4): 399–416.
1593:
1587:
1567:
1561:
1544:
1532:(4): 406–429.
1513:
1510:
1507:
1506:
1444:
1378:
1351:(3): 317–334.
1326:
1266:
1226:
1168:
1104:
1069:(4): 440–464.
1042:
1033:
1024:
1015:
996:(1): 104–111.
975:
938:
901:
864:
822:
785:
748:
726:(1): 106–127.
705:
665:
643:
624:(3): 369–389.
604:
568:
539:(1): 112–122.
504:
477:(2): 125–151.
437:
436:
434:
431:
430:
429:
424:
419:
414:
409:
402:
399:
375:deconstruction
319:
318:
260:"Doing gender"
233:
231:
224:
218:
215:
167:
164:
123:
120:
108:Erving Goffman
103:
100:
65:
62:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1812:
1801:
1798:
1796:
1793:
1791:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1781:
1778:
1776:
1773:
1772:
1770:
1761:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1733:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1638:
1630:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1594:
1590:
1588:9781107659360
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1562:9781317725114
1558:
1553:
1552:
1545:
1540:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1515:
1511:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1455:
1453:
1451:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1393:
1391:
1389:
1387:
1385:
1383:
1379:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1335:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1275:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1233:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1175:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1117:
1115:
1113:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1053:
1051:
1049:
1047:
1043:
1037:
1034:
1028:
1025:
1019:
1016:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
985:
979:
976:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
950:
942:
939:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
913:
905:
902:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
876:
868:
865:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
839:
831:
829:
827:
823:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
789:
786:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:
752:
749:
746:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
712:
710:
706:
701:
697:
693:
689:
686:(1): 99–103.
685:
681:
680:
672:
670:
666:
655:
654:
647:
644:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
608:
605:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
577:
575:
573:
569:
564:
560:
556:
552:
547:
542:
538:
534:
533:
525:
523:
521:
519:
517:
515:
513:
511:
509:
505:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
463:
461:
459:
457:
455:
453:
451:
449:
447:
445:
443:
439:
432:
428:
425:
423:
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
408:
407:Judith Butler
405:
404:
400:
398:
395:
391:
387:
384:
383:functionalism
380:
376:
370:
366:
362:
360:
356:
352:
347:
343:
339:
334:
331:
325:
315:
312:
304:
301:December 2017
293:
290:
286:
283:
279:
276:
272:
269:
265:
262: –
261:
257:
256:Find sources:
250:
246:
240:
239:
234:This section
232:
228:
223:
222:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
196:
191:
187:
184:
180:
177:
172:
165:
163:
160:
159:gender schema
154:
152:
148:
143:
141:
137:
133:
128:
121:
119:
115:
111:
109:
101:
99:
95:
91:
87:
84:
80:
76:
71:
63:
61:
59:
55:
54:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1736:
1730:
1705:
1702:Organization
1701:
1680:
1674:
1641:
1635:
1603:
1597:
1578:
1550:
1529:
1523:
1471:(1): 33–53.
1468:
1464:
1406:
1402:
1348:
1344:
1288:
1284:
1247:(1): 31–55.
1244:
1238:
1191:(1): 32–57.
1188:
1184:
1133:(1): 36–66.
1130:
1126:
1066:
1062:
1036:
1027:
1018:
993:
987:
978:
956:(1): 94–98.
953:
947:
941:
919:(1): 89–93.
916:
910:
904:
882:(1): 85–88.
879:
873:
867:
845:(1): 81–84.
842:
836:
803:(1): 76–80.
800:
794:
788:
766:(1): 72–75.
763:
757:
751:
723:
717:
683:
677:
658:, retrieved
652:
646:
621:
617:
607:
590:
586:
536:
530:
474:
468:
388:
371:
367:
363:
335:
326:
322:
307:
298:
288:
281:
274:
267:
255:
243:Please help
238:verification
235:
211:
207:
203:
199:
192:
188:
185:
181:
175:
173:
169:
155:
147:self-concept
144:
129:
125:
116:
112:
105:
96:
92:
88:
70:Candace West
67:
57:
51:
48:Doing Gender
47:
44:Candace West
32:doing gender
31:
29:
18:Doing Gender
1676:Criminology
1409:(1): 8–37.
1291:(1): 5–29.
412:Role theory
379:role theory
351:gatekeepers
195:transgender
102:Foundations
1769:Categories
660:2024-03-16
433:References
271:newspapers
1722:144150015
1683:: 47–81.
1666:144790912
1485:0891-2432
1439:220476362
1423:0891-2432
1365:0195-6086
1321:145382164
1305:0891-2432
1261:145275500
1221:146382206
1205:0891-2432
1163:182522215
1147:0046-3663
1099:145354177
1083:0891-2432
1010:144915358
970:143104943
933:144121901
896:144971443
859:144997602
817:144473680
780:144468830
740:220442752
700:143693702
638:1939-1471
599:0160-4341
593:: 62–78.
563:146342542
541:CiteSeerX
499:220519301
83:genitalia
1753:10626762
1577:(2013).
1501:33823557
1373:90011687
1313:23486615
1213:43669855
1091:20676798
401:See also
355:classism
1493:3081813
285:scholar
64:Summary
1751:
1720:
1664:
1656:
1620:622707
1618:
1585:
1559:
1499:
1491:
1483:
1437:
1431:189596
1429:
1421:
1371:
1363:
1319:
1311:
1303:
1259:
1219:
1211:
1203:
1161:
1153:
1145:
1097:
1089:
1081:
1008:
968:
931:
894:
857:
815:
778:
738:
698:
636:
597:
561:
543:
497:
491:189945
489:
359:sexism
287:
280:
273:
266:
258:
79:gender
36:gender
1718:S2CID
1662:S2CID
1654:JSTOR
1632:(PDF)
1616:JSTOR
1497:S2CID
1489:JSTOR
1435:S2CID
1427:JSTOR
1369:JSTOR
1317:S2CID
1309:JSTOR
1257:S2CID
1217:S2CID
1209:JSTOR
1159:S2CID
1151:JSTOR
1095:S2CID
1087:JSTOR
1006:S2CID
966:S2CID
929:S2CID
892:S2CID
855:S2CID
813:S2CID
776:S2CID
736:S2CID
696:S2CID
559:S2CID
495:S2CID
487:JSTOR
357:(and
342:class
292:JSTOR
278:books
1749:PMID
1583:ISBN
1557:ISBN
1481:ISSN
1419:ISSN
1361:ISSN
1301:ISSN
1201:ISSN
1143:ISSN
1079:ISSN
745:Pdf.
634:ISSN
595:ISSN
381:and
340:and
338:race
264:news
1741:doi
1710:doi
1685:doi
1646:doi
1642:112
1608:doi
1534:doi
1473:doi
1411:doi
1353:doi
1293:doi
1249:doi
1193:doi
1135:doi
1071:doi
998:doi
958:doi
921:doi
884:doi
847:doi
805:doi
768:doi
728:doi
688:doi
626:doi
551:doi
479:doi
377:of
247:by
75:sex
1771::
1747:.
1737:50
1735:.
1716:.
1706:23
1704:.
1700:.
1681:33
1679:.
1660:.
1652:.
1640:.
1634:.
1614:.
1604:17
1602:.
1573:;
1530:11
1528:.
1522:.
1495:.
1487:.
1479:.
1469:17
1467:.
1463:.
1447:^
1433:.
1425:.
1417:.
1405:.
1401:.
1381:^
1367:.
1359:.
1349:40
1347:.
1343:.
1329:^
1315:.
1307:.
1299:.
1289:27
1287:.
1283:.
1269:^
1255:.
1245:24
1243:.
1229:^
1215:.
1207:.
1199:.
1189:28
1187:.
1183:.
1171:^
1157:.
1149:.
1141:.
1131:45
1129:.
1125:.
1107:^
1093:.
1085:.
1077:.
1067:23
1065:.
1061:.
1045:^
1004:.
994:23
992:.
964:.
954:23
952:.
927:.
917:23
915:.
890:.
880:23
878:.
853:.
843:23
841:.
825:^
811:.
801:23
799:.
774:.
764:23
762:.
734:.
724:21
722:.
708:^
694:.
684:23
682:.
668:^
632:.
622:94
620:.
616:.
591:38
589:.
585:.
571:^
557:.
549:.
537:23
535:.
507:^
493:.
485:.
473:.
441:^
1755:.
1743::
1724:.
1712::
1691:.
1687::
1668:.
1648::
1622:.
1610::
1591:.
1565:.
1542:.
1536::
1503:.
1475::
1441:.
1413::
1407:9
1375:.
1355::
1323:.
1295::
1263:.
1251::
1223:.
1195::
1165:.
1137::
1101:.
1073::
1012:.
1000::
972:.
960::
935:.
923::
898:.
886::
861:.
849::
819:.
807::
782:.
770::
742:.
730::
702:.
690::
640:.
628::
601:.
565:.
553::
501:.
481::
475:1
314:)
308:(
303:)
299:(
289:·
282:·
275:·
268:·
241:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
