406:
642:, who agreed with the consulate's decision. Ascensio-Cordero and Muñoz sued the Department of State, citing that the Department of State, "had abridged Muñoz’s constitutional liberty interest in her husband’s visa application by failing to give a sufficient reason why Asencio-Cordero is inadmissible under the 'unlawful activity' bar." The District Court provided summary judgement to the State Department, however, the Ninth Circuit
371:
674:“when the denial of a visa allegedly burdens the constitutional rights of a U.S. citizen.” Since Asencio-Cordero was not a U.S. citizen, he could not invoke the exception and therefore Muñoz had to. She argued that the right to live with her spouse in her country of citizenship was disregarding her rights to due process and claimed that living with her spouse was one of her fundamental rights. According to
358:
294:
682:
the court found that since Muñoz claimed that her fundamental right to marriage included spousal cohabitation, it was implied that her spouse must enter the United States as a part of her right. The court found that the asserted right was fundamental enough to be implicit in liberty, however the deprivation of the asserted right does not cause
634:. After multiple interviews, Asencio-Cordero was denied entry citing §1182(a)(3)(A)(ii), a provision that prohibits people from out of the country to enter the United States based on suspicions of possibly committing a crime while in the United States. Asencio-Cordero suspected it was because he was a member of MS-13, a
681:
when a fundamental right is at stake, there must a careful description of the asserted fundamental liberty interest. It also holds that the Due
Process Clause only protects, “those fundamental rights and liberties which are, objectively, deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” However,
667:
The
Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Muñoz did not have a fundamental liberty interest in her spouse being admitted into the United States. The Supreme Court also noted that, "while Congress has extended special treatment to marriage in immigration matters, it has never made spousal immigration a matter
650:
to provide Muñoz with a reason for denying her husband's visa. The court further held that because the State
Department declined to give Muñoz further information earlier in the process, it had forfeited its
646:, affirming that Muñoz had a constitutionally protected protected liberty interest in her husband's visa application. Because she had a protected liberty interest, the State Department was required by the
191:
tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the
626:(USCIS) to have Asencio-Cordero classified as an immediate relative, in accordance with 8 U. S. C. §§1151(b)(2)(A)(i). USCIS granted the petition and Asencio-Cordero traveled to
454:
622:
Sandra Muñoz, the spouse of Luis
Asencio-Cordero, sought an immigrant visa for Asencio-Cordero so they could live together in the United States. Muñoz filed a petition with
846:
623:
806:
841:
836:
761:
851:
125:
229:
611:
410:
149:
207:
377:
This article already exists in the mainspace (see above). I would suggest merging your content and sources into the existing one.
36:
35:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in
Knowledge. You can find it and improve it at
336:
137:
635:
143:
93:
60:
170:
97:
from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
796:, United States Government, cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/10/05/21-55365.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2024.
656:
488:
A citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in their noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country.
676:
340:
638:. He disavowed his membership and applied for reconsideration. The consulate refused, so they petitioned the
243:
639:
332:
174:
155:
47:
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
687:
438:
44:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
699:
555:
449:
233:
188:
109:
702:, stated that the decision, "gravely undervalues the right to marriage in the immigration context..."
686:, therefore not qualifying for the second part of Washington v. Glucksberg. They also clarified that
647:
29:
547:
643:
317:
691:
683:
670:
543:
523:
511:
476:
105:
177:
to find examples of
Knowledge's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.
737:
67:
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
830:
599:
379:
261:
131:
112:. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
627:
535:
519:
503:
324:
162:
159:
762:"United States | Supreme Court rules against spousal interest in visa denial case"
695:
631:
531:
357:
293:
284:
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
104:, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
466:
786:
Sandra Munoz, Luis
Asencio-Cordero v. United States Department of State
187:
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
652:
405:
253:
24:
614:
case regarding the right to spousal immigration into the U.S.
598:
338 U. S. 537, 547, 585 U. S. 667, 703 576 U. S. 86, 103–104.
303:
15:
356:
348:
312:
292:
690:
has never made spousal immigration a right. The dissent by
807:"SCOTUS on Consular Nonreviewability: DOS v. MUĂ‘OZ (6-3)"
655:
to insulate the decision from judicial review under the
276:
265:
85:
52:
668:
of right." The court considered exceptions found by
592:
584:
576:
568:
563:
492:
482:
472:
462:
444:
434:
424:
417:
398:
727:Department of State v. Munoz, 602 U.S. ___ (2024)
335:. If you need help with referencing, please see
331:sources are required so that information can be
784:United States, Ninth Circuit Court (9th Cir.).
323:This submission is not adequately supported by
310:Submission declined on 23 June 2024 by
22:Submission declined on 24 June 2024 by
8:
128:– a basic overview on how to edit Knowledge.
395:
847:Draft articles on politics and government
624:U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services
766:B A L | Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP
711:
183:Improving your odds of a speedy review
657:doctrine of consular nonreviewability
393:2024 United States Supreme Court case
7:
842:AfC submissions by date/23 June 2024
837:AfC submissions by date/24 June 2024
723:
721:
719:
717:
715:
588:Sotomayor, joined by Kagan, Jackson
126:Knowledge:Contributing to Knowledge
411:Supreme Court of the United States
158:– make sure your article includes
14:
742:LII / Legal Information Institute
150:Knowledge:Writing better articles
404:
369:
81:editing or submitting your draft
852:AfC submissions on other topics
50:If you need extra help, please
738:"Department of State v. MUĂ‘OZ"
138:Help:Referencing for beginners
1:
152:– how to improve your article
146:– how to develop your article
144:Knowledge:Article development
608:Department of State v. Muñoz
429:Department of State v. Muñoz
389:Department of State v. Muñoz
91:at the AfC Help Desk or get
58:at the AfC Help Desk or get
37:Department of State v. Muñoz
636:transnational criminal gang
612:United States Supreme Court
399:Department of State v Muñoz
171:Knowledge:Featured articles
140:– how to include references
868:
610:(U.S.C. 602 __ 2024) is a
597:
497:
487:
403:
383:22:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
337:Referencing for beginners
64:from experienced editors.
677:Washington v. Glucksberg
264:3 months ago. Reviewer:
640:U.S Department of State
175:Knowledge:Good articles
156:Knowledge:Verifiability
134:– how to use the markup
663:Supreme Court Decision
361:
297:
210:Add tags to your draft
119:How to improve a draft
102:feedback on your draft
790:United States Reports
644:vacated the judgement
556:Ketanji Brown Jackson
420:Decided June 21, 2024
418:Argued April 23, 2024
360:
296:
477:Opinion announcement
473:Opinion announcement
169:You can also browse
110:relevant WikiProject
163:third-party sources
811:www.lexisnexis.com
648:Due Process clause
508:Associate Justices
362:
352: 3 months ago.
298:
257: 3 months ago.
605:
604:
548:Amy Coney Barrett
366:
365:
353:
346: Declined by
302:
301:
288:
287:
269:
258:
251: Declined by
87:ask us a question
79:If you need help
74:Where to get help
54:ask us a question
859:
821:
820:
818:
817:
803:
797:
782:
776:
775:
773:
772:
758:
752:
751:
749:
748:
734:
728:
725:
493:Court membership
408:
407:
396:
382:
376:
373:
372:
351:
345:
325:reliable sources
321:
315:
304:
281:
279:
272:
271:
259:
256:
250:
220:Editor resources
214:
212:
201:Women scientists
90:
57:
33:
27:
16:
867:
866:
862:
861:
860:
858:
857:
856:
827:
826:
825:
824:
815:
813:
805:
804:
800:
783:
779:
770:
768:
760:
759:
755:
746:
744:
736:
735:
731:
726:
713:
708:
684:strict scrutiny
671:Trump v. Hawaii
665:
630:to apply for a
620:
546:
544:Brett Kavanaugh
534:
524:Sonia Sotomayor
522:
512:Clarence Thomas
419:
413:
394:
391:
386:
378:
374:
370:
347:
344:
311:
309:
289:
277:
275:
260:Last edited by
252:
249:
248:
221:
217:
216:
215:
208:
206:
184:
180:
179:
167:
120:
116:
115:
84:
75:
71:
70:
51:
40:
23:
21:
12:
11:
5:
865:
863:
855:
854:
849:
844:
839:
829:
828:
823:
822:
798:
777:
753:
729:
710:
709:
707:
704:
664:
661:
619:
616:
603:
602:
595:
594:
590:
589:
586:
582:
581:
578:
574:
573:
570:
566:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
509:
506:
501:
495:
494:
490:
489:
485:
484:
480:
479:
474:
470:
469:
464:
460:
459:
446:
442:
441:
436:
432:
431:
426:
425:Full case name
422:
421:
415:
414:
409:
401:
400:
392:
390:
387:
385:
384:
364:
363:
354:
341:Citing sources
322:
307:
300:
299:
290:
286:
285:
282:
270:
247:
246:
222:
219:
218:
205:
185:
182:
181:
166:
165:
153:
147:
141:
135:
129:
122:
121:
118:
117:
114:
113:
98:
76:
73:
72:
69:
68:
65:
48:
45:
41:
34:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
864:
853:
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
834:
832:
812:
808:
802:
799:
795:
791:
787:
781:
778:
767:
763:
757:
754:
743:
739:
733:
730:
724:
722:
720:
718:
716:
712:
705:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
680:
678:
673:
672:
662:
660:
658:
654:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
617:
615:
613:
609:
601:
600:Amendment XIV
596:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
564:Case opinions
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:Chief Justice
499:
498:
496:
491:
486:
481:
478:
475:
471:
468:
467:Oral argument
465:
461:
457:
456:
451:
447:
443:
440:
437:
433:
430:
427:
423:
416:
412:
402:
397:
388:
381:
368:
367:
359:
355:
350:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
319:
314:
308:
306:
305:
295:
291:
283:
280:
274:
273:
267:
266:Inform author
263:
255:
245:
244:Fix bare URLs
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
213:
211:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
178:
176:
172:
164:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
132:Help:Wikitext
130:
127:
124:
123:
111:
107:
103:
99:
96:
95:
89:
88:
82:
78:
77:
66:
63:
62:
56:
55:
49:
46:
43:
42:
38:
31:
26:
20:
18:
17:
814:. Retrieved
810:
801:
793:
789:
785:
780:
769:. Retrieved
765:
756:
745:. Retrieved
741:
732:
694:, joined by
675:
669:
666:
628:San Salvador
621:
607:
606:
593:Laws applied
551:
539:
536:Neil Gorsuch
527:
520:Samuel Alito
515:
504:John Roberts
453:
428:
328:
240:
237:
230:Citation bot
225:
209:
200:
196:
192:
186:
168:
101:
100:If you need
92:
86:
80:
59:
53:
792:, vol. __.
577:Concurrence
532:Elena Kagan
189:WikiProject
831:Categories
816:2024-06-24
771:2024-06-24
747:2024-06-24
706:References
618:Background
435:Docket no.
226:Easy tools
794:US Courts
692:Sotomayor
445:Citations
241:Advanced:
197:Astronomy
193:Biography
106:talk page
94:live help
83:, please
61:live help
688:Congress
569:Majority
463:Argument
380:OnlyNano
375:Comment:
333:verified
329:Reliable
278:Resubmit
262:OnlyNano
254:OnlyNano
160:reliable
39:instead.
25:OnlyNano
700:Jackson
585:Dissent
580:Gorsuch
572:Barrett
483:Holding
232: (
554:
552:·
550:
542:
540:·
538:
530:
528:·
526:
518:
516:·
514:
439:23-334
349:Liance
313:Liance
203:tags.
199:, and
696:Kagan
653:right
108:of a
698:and
632:visa
455:more
452:__ (
450:U.S.
448:602
339:and
318:talk
234:help
173:and
30:talk
833::
809:.
788:.
764:.
740:.
714:^
659:.
327:.
320:).
236:)
228::
195:,
32:).
819:.
774:.
750:.
679:,
458:)
343:.
316:(
268:.
238:|
28:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
