Knowledge

Seismic code

Source đź“ť

62:(Italy), the Royal Government of Italy established Geological Committee and Engineering Committee in early 1909 to study the disaster and recommend earthquake disaster mitigation measures. The Engineering Committee, after studying the lateral load resistance of buildings which survived the earthquake motion, recommended that the seismic ratio (seismic acceleration divided by the gravity acceleration) equal to 1/12 for the first floor and 1/8 for the floors above should be used in seismic design of buildings. The Committee proposed equivalent vertical forces much larger than the horizontal forces because vertical motion acted as impacts. This is believed to be the first known quantitative recommendation of design seismic forces in the history of seismic codes. The recommendation was adopted in Royal Decree No. 573 of April 29, 1915. The height of the buildings was limited to two stories, and the first story should be designed for a horizontal force equal to 1/8 the second floor weight and the second story for 1/6 of the roof weight. 84:(California), the city of Los Angeles adopted the first earthquake design provisions enforced in the U.S., enacted by City Council under Ordinance No. 72,968 published on September 6, 1933. The requirements included a design lateral base shear V = 0.08 W for regular use buildings, 0.10 W for school buildings and 0.04 W for the portion of a building above a flexible story. Building weight (seismic mass) was defined as W = Dead load + 0.5 Live load (except 1.0 Live for warehouses). Building frames were required to be designed to withstand at least 0.25V independent of any walls. 182: 77:
psf or more, and 0.10 W for all other buildings including those on pile foundations. Building weight (seismic mass) was defined as: W = Dead load + Live load. These provisions were inspired by Japan's newly developed seismic code. The non-mandatory lateral design provisions are not known to have been explicitly adopted by any jurisdiction at the time, but may have been used voluntarily for the design of some buildings.
43:
are constantly evolving. There are many seismic codes used worldwide. Most codes at their root share common fundamental approaches regarding how to design buildings for earthquake effects, but will differ in their technical requirements and will have language addressing local geologic conditions, common construction types, historic issues, etc.
76:
In January 1928, the first edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) was published, and included an appendix with non-mandatory matter with §2311 recommending a minimum lateral design force for earthquake resistance of V = 0.075W for buildings on foundations with allowable bearing pressures of 4,000
42:
Seismic codes were created and developed as a response to major earthquakes, including 1755 Lisbon, 1880 Luzon, and 1908 Messina which have caused devastation in highly populated regions. Often these are revised based on knowledge gained from recent earthquakes and research findings, and as such they
144:
The earliest Turkish seismic codes were published in the 1940s; TS500, Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures and the Turkish Building Seismic Code. Several revisions of the codes have been published with additional stringent specifications. The last revision was
152:
which killed 32,000 people. It drew parallels with Italy's seismic codes at the time. A seismic zonation map was also developed in 1942 which assessed the seismic hazard of all Turkish provinces on three levels; "hazardous", "less hazardous" and "no hazard". The 1948 seismic codes were prepared in
99:
for schools and Riley Act for all buildings). The 1933 Riley Act required all California local governments to have a building department and inspect new construction, mandating that all structures in the state be designed to withstand a horizontal acceleration of 0.02 times the acceleration due to
72:
In 1925, the city of Santa Barbara, California, added a building code requirement that structures be designed to withstand horizontal forces, but was nonspecific regarding design loads or procedure. This is considered to be the first explicit policy and legal consideration of the seismic safety of
168:
in which over 50,000 people died. There were high incidences of support column failure leading to the pancake type collapses which complicates rescue efforts. In a bid to shore up support going into an election in 2018, the government began to offer amnesties for violations of the building code
117:
building code was issued in 1942; since 1966, it contains a complete set of regulations for structural design and has served as a reference for municipalities across the country. In 1976, the code adopted a coherent format for all materials and structural systems, based on limit states design
38:
designed to protect property and life in buildings in case of earthquakes. The need for such codes is reflected in the saying, "Earthquakes don't kill people—buildings do." Or in expanded version, “Earthquakes do not injure or kill people. Poorly built manmade structures injure and kill
69:(Japan) and earlier events inspired Japanese engineer Toshikata Sano to develop a lateral force procedure that was officially implemented in the 1924 Japanese Urban Building Law, which directed engineers to design buildings for horizontal forces of about 10% of the weight of the building. 153:
consideration of the seismic zone map. A new code was revised in 1961 and in 1963, the seismic zonation map was updated with four hazard levels based on predicted shaking on the Modified Mercalli intensity scale. It was subsequently added a fifth hazard level in the 1972 revision.
160:
and dynamic response. Following the 1972 seismic zonation, the seismic codes were updated in 1975. It included new methods to compute seismic loading on buildings and ductile detailing for reinforced concrete. The zonation map and codes were revised in 1997.
145:
published in 2018 and came into effect the following year. These codes, however, only affects reinforced concrete buildings; historical buildings, coastal and port infrastructure were excluded.
449:"SEISMIC DESIGN AND CODES IN MEXICO", Mario ORDAZ and Roberto MELIZ, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1-6, 2004, Paper No. 4000 522: 423:
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley) Tall Buildings Initiative—Task 2 Workshop April 18, 2007
571: 73:
structures in the U.S. The city of Palo Alto, California, led by professors at Stanford, also added similar language to its building code in 1926.
169:
allowing the non-compliance. This has been done by previous governments too. Experts lamented the practice would turn cities into graveyards.
393: 301: 127: 217: 165: 229: 386:
SEAOSC Design Guide Vol. 1 "City of Los Angeles Mandatory Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Non-Ductile Concrete Buildings"
572:"NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. 2015 Edition", Federal Emergency Management Agency 594: 438:, "LOUIS JOHN GILL: Famous but Forgotten Architect", San Diego Historical Society Quarterly, Summer 1984, Volume 30, Number 3 66: 462:"On the general requirements for design of earthquake resistant buildings in the Turkish Building Seismic code of 2018" 156:
The 1968 seismic codes introduced additional demands for reinforced concrete component and modern concepts relating to
422: 88: 81: 149: 589: 157: 59: 139: 52: 220:(FEMA) publishes "Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. 2015 Edition". 55:(Portugal) resulted in prescriptive rules for building certain kinds of buildings common in the area. 473: 249: 412:. Los Angeles, CA: Inter-State Educational Assn. 1933. pp. 12 (amended insert from publisher). 371:. Long Beach, California: International Conference of Building Officials. 1928. pp. 213–214. 389: 297: 481: 477: 433: 289: 284:, in Beer, Michael; Kougioumtzoglou, Ioannis A.; Patelli, Edoardo; Au, Ivan Siu-Kui (eds.), 126:
In Spain, the seismic code is called the "Norma de ConstrucciĂłn Sismorresistente". (See the
347: 504: 326: 92: 486: 461: 448: 35: 181: 164:
Poor enforcement of seismic codes was a contributing factor to the devastation of the
583: 213: 293: 281: 547: 114: 17: 96: 91:, careful analysis of structural failures in that quake by architect 118:
philosophy. In February 2004 a new set of seismic codes was issued.
95:
formed the basis for much of the California seismic legislation (
176: 548:"Turkey earthquake failures leave Erdogan looking vulnerable" 523:"Turkey's lax policing of building codes known before quake" 282:"Global View of Seismic Code and Building Practice Factors" 466:
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
509:
Evolution of Seismic Building Design Practice in Turkey
193: 148:
The 1940 seismic code was developed in response to the
230:
2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake#Criticism of government
511:. Teknolojik Kazalar Bilgi Sistemi. pp. 9–28. 334:14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 288:, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1–12, 499: 497: 327:"The Dawn of Structural Engineering in Japan" 8: 410:Los Angeles Annual Builders Guide, Vol. 10 485: 257:Earthquake Engineering Research Institute 140:Architecture of Turkey § Earthquakes 320: 318: 241: 286:Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering 380: 378: 7: 388:. International Code Council. 2016. 275: 273: 369:Uniform Building Code, 1927 Edition 218:Federal Emergency Management Agency 25: 325:Otani, Shunsuke (October 2008). 180: 294:10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_407-1 487:10.1088/1757-899X/737/1/012015 280:Daniell, James Edward (2014), 250:"Mitigation works: Earthquake" 1: 460:GĂĽler, K.; Celep, Z. (2020). 166:2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes 436:Journal of San Diego History 128:article in Spanish Knowledge 67:1923 Great KantĹŤ earthquake 611: 137: 89:1933 Long Beach earthquake 82:1933 Long Beach earthquake 150:1939 Erzincan earthquake 478:2020MS&E..737a2015G 434:Rev. C. Douglas Kroll, 60:1908 Messina earthquake 595:Earthquake engineering 87:Immediately after the 53:1755 Lisbon earthquake 348:"Evolution of Codes" 80:In response to the 192:. You can help by 395:978-1-60983-697-9 303:978-3-642-36197-5 210: 209: 16:(Redirected from 602: 574: 569: 563: 562: 560: 559: 544: 538: 537: 535: 534: 519: 513: 512: 501: 492: 491: 489: 457: 451: 446: 440: 431: 425: 420: 414: 413: 406: 400: 399: 382: 373: 372: 365: 359: 358: 356: 354: 344: 338: 337: 331: 322: 313: 312: 311: 310: 277: 268: 267: 265: 263: 254: 246: 205: 202: 184: 177: 104:Around the world 32:earthquake codes 21: 610: 609: 605: 604: 603: 601: 600: 599: 580: 579: 578: 577: 570: 566: 557: 555: 546: 545: 541: 532: 530: 521: 520: 516: 503: 502: 495: 459: 458: 454: 447: 443: 432: 428: 421: 417: 408: 407: 403: 396: 384: 383: 376: 367: 366: 362: 352: 350: 346: 345: 341: 329: 324: 323: 316: 308: 306: 304: 279: 278: 271: 261: 259: 252: 248: 247: 243: 238: 226: 206: 200: 197: 190:needs expansion 175: 142: 136: 124: 111: 106: 93:Louis John Gill 49: 23: 22: 18:Earthquake code 15: 12: 11: 5: 608: 606: 598: 597: 592: 590:Building codes 582: 581: 576: 575: 564: 539: 514: 493: 452: 441: 426: 415: 401: 394: 374: 360: 339: 314: 302: 269: 240: 239: 237: 234: 233: 232: 225: 222: 208: 207: 187: 185: 174: 171: 158:spectral shape 135: 132: 123: 120: 110: 107: 105: 102: 58:Following the 48: 45: 36:building codes 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 607: 596: 593: 591: 588: 587: 585: 573: 568: 565: 553: 549: 543: 540: 528: 524: 518: 515: 510: 506: 500: 498: 494: 488: 483: 479: 475: 472:(1): 012015. 471: 467: 463: 456: 453: 450: 445: 442: 439: 437: 430: 427: 424: 419: 416: 411: 405: 402: 397: 391: 387: 381: 379: 375: 370: 364: 361: 349: 343: 340: 335: 328: 321: 319: 315: 305: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 276: 274: 270: 258: 251: 245: 242: 235: 231: 228: 227: 223: 221: 219: 215: 214:United States 204: 195: 191: 188:This section 186: 183: 179: 178: 173:United States 172: 170: 167: 162: 159: 154: 151: 146: 141: 133: 131: 129: 121: 119: 116: 108: 103: 101: 98: 94: 90: 85: 83: 78: 74: 70: 68: 63: 61: 56: 54: 46: 44: 40: 37: 33: 29: 28:Seismic codes 19: 567: 556:. Retrieved 554:. 2023-02-11 551: 542: 531:. Retrieved 529:. 2023-02-10 526: 517: 508: 469: 465: 455: 444: 435: 429: 418: 409: 404: 385: 368: 363: 351:. Retrieved 342: 333: 307:, retrieved 285: 260:. Retrieved 256: 244: 211: 198: 194:adding to it 189: 163: 155: 147: 143: 125: 112: 86: 79: 75: 71: 64: 57: 50: 41: 31: 27: 26: 353:December 8, 201:August 2015 115:Mexico City 39:people.” 584:Categories 558:2023-03-09 533:2023-03-09 309:2023-08-05 236:References 138:See also: 113:The first 100:gravity. 97:Field Act 552:BBC News 224:See also 527:AP NEWS 474:Bibcode 262:26 June 212:In the 392:  300:  216:, the 134:Turkey 109:Mexico 47:Origin 330:(PDF) 253:(PDF) 122:Spain 390:ISBN 355:2017 298:ISBN 264:2014 65:The 51:The 34:are 505:"2" 482:doi 470:737 290:doi 196:. 30:or 586:: 550:. 525:. 507:. 496:^ 480:. 468:. 464:. 377:^ 332:. 317:^ 296:, 272:^ 255:. 130:) 561:. 536:. 490:. 484:: 476:: 398:. 357:. 336:. 292:: 266:. 203:) 199:( 20:)

Index

Earthquake code
building codes
1755 Lisbon earthquake
1908 Messina earthquake
1923 Great KantĹŤ earthquake
1933 Long Beach earthquake
1933 Long Beach earthquake
Louis John Gill
Field Act
Mexico City
article in Spanish Knowledge
Architecture of Turkey § Earthquakes
1939 Erzincan earthquake
spectral shape
2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes

adding to it
United States
Federal Emergency Management Agency
2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake#Criticism of government
"Mitigation works: Earthquake"


"Global View of Seismic Code and Building Practice Factors"
doi
10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_407-1
ISBN
978-3-642-36197-5

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑