254:
during the royal wedding; however, the
European Court stated that there was no evidence of this and that the police had sufficient grounds for arrest due to suspicion of imminent illegal activities and that a fair balance had been made between the claimants' right to liberty and the safety of the public. Accordingly, all of the claimants' cases were dismissed as inadmissible based on the fact they were "manifestly ill-founded".
253:
The case was heard on the grounds of an alleged deprivation of liberty under
Article 5. The court found that certain types of preemptive detention were considered legal in order to allow police forces to be effective. The claimants had claimed the police had adopted an illegal policy for arrests
240:
on a point of law that they believed the arrests were unlawful and contrary to
Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court denied this on the grounds that the High Court's judgment had not been challenged. Permission was granted to appeal to the
208:
officer. Eiseman-Renyard and one other were dressed as zombies as part of a "Queer
Resistance" plan to hold a "zombie picnic"; the police arrested them based on a leaflet that suggested that "maggot confetti" would be thrown. The remainder were arrested by the
404:
172:
based on intelligence that the group intended to disrupt the wedding. The claimants argued that they had been arrested on no valid preventive basis. The Court dismissed the claim as inadmissible due to ill-founded beliefs.
245:, who ruled that the police had the right to detain someone to stop them from imminently committing an offence. Leave was then granted to the claimants to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.
414:
165:
257:
The case was reported in the media as precedent for the police to arrest people as a preventative measure even without specific prior knowledge of any planned criminality.
225:
due to the large number of monarchists on the streets supporting the royal wedding. The claimants were all later released without charge after the wedding had finished.
169:
196:
objected to the wedding and planned ways in which to disrupt it. The defendants were involved in three plans. One was attempting to go to a republican street party at
164:
is a 2019 European Court of Human Rights case between Hannah
Eiseman-Renyard and seven other applicants against the United Kingdom for an alleged breach of
409:
372:
236:
dismissed the claims on the grounds that the arrests had been proportionate to prevent any immediate breach of the peace. They appealed to the
320:
242:
237:
193:
201:
185:
214:
217:
after being found in possession of republican placards and megaphones having intended to join a
Republic tea party in
17:
210:
373:"Police right to pre-emptive arrests backed by judges after eight-year legal battle by "zombie" protestors"
233:
266:
134:
222:
205:
189:
116:
218:
229:
197:
168:. The case revolved around the Metropolitan Police arresting the claimants prior to the
181:
398:
47:
294:
129:
348:
221:. The police arrested them on the grounds that they could have caused a
405:
European Court of Human Rights cases involving the United
Kingdom
321:"Police acted legally over royal wedding arrests, court rules"
204:
political pressure group but was arrested by a plainclothes
27:
2019 court case from the
European Court of Human Rights
166:
Article 5 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
147:
106:
96:
88:
80:
56:
46:
39:
34:
371:
295:"Eiseman-Renyard and others v. the United Kingdom"
415:Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton
192:in London on 29 April 2011. The defendants being
170:wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton
349:"Royal wedding 'zombies' lose human rights case"
52:Eiseman-Renyard and others v. the United Kingdom
18:Eiseman-Reynard and others v. the United Kingdom
161:Eiseman-Renyard and others v the United Kingdom
35:Eiseman-Renyard and others v the United Kingdom
8:
278:
288:
286:
284:
282:
31:
7:
343:
341:
314:
312:
243:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
25:
370:Hymas, Charles (28 March 2019).
410:2019 in United Kingdom case law
319:Bowcott, Owen (28 March 2019).
228:The claimants then requested a
1:
215:Charing Cross railway station
184:, then second in line to the
431:
351:. BBC News. 28 March 2019
152:
143:
122:
111:
101:
211:British Transport Police
81:Language of proceedings
40:Submitted 8 August 2017
232:of their arrests. The
89:Nationality of parties
234:High Court of Justice
267:Preventive detention
42:Decided 5 March 2019
378:The Daily Telegraph
223:breach of the peace
206:Metropolitan Police
190:Catherine Middleton
107:Court composition
157:
156:
148:Instruments cited
16:(Redirected from
422:
389:
388:
386:
384:
375:
367:
361:
360:
358:
356:
345:
336:
335:
333:
331:
316:
307:
306:
304:
302:
290:
219:Trafalgar Square
32:
21:
430:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
420:
419:
395:
394:
393:
392:
382:
380:
369:
368:
364:
354:
352:
347:
346:
339:
329:
327:
318:
317:
310:
300:
298:
292:
291:
280:
275:
263:
251:
238:Court of Appeal
230:judicial review
198:Red Lion Square
179:
139:
115:
74:
72:
70:
68:
66:
64:
61:
41:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
428:
426:
418:
417:
412:
407:
397:
396:
391:
390:
362:
337:
308:
277:
276:
274:
271:
270:
269:
262:
259:
250:
247:
200:hosted by the
186:British throne
182:Prince William
178:
175:
155:
154:
150:
149:
145:
144:
141:
140:
138:
137:
135:Jovan Ilievski
132:
126:
120:
119:
109:
108:
104:
103:
99:
98:
94:
93:
90:
86:
85:
82:
78:
77:
58:
54:
53:
50:
48:Full case name
44:
43:
37:
36:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
427:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
402:
400:
379:
374:
366:
363:
350:
344:
342:
338:
326:
322:
315:
313:
309:
296:
289:
287:
285:
283:
279:
272:
268:
265:
264:
260:
258:
255:
248:
246:
244:
239:
235:
231:
226:
224:
220:
216:
212:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
176:
174:
171:
167:
163:
162:
151:
146:
142:
136:
133:
131:
128:
127:
125:
121:
118:
114:
110:
105:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
59:
55:
51:
49:
45:
38:
33:
30:
19:
381:. Retrieved
377:
365:
353:. Retrieved
328:. Retrieved
325:The Guardian
324:
299:. Retrieved
256:
252:
227:
180:
160:
159:
158:
123:
117:Aleš Pejchal
112:
102:Inadmissible
62:
29:
194:republicans
399:Categories
273:References
188:, married
177:Background
153:Article 5
130:Tim Eicke
113:President
383:28 March
355:28 March
330:28 March
301:28 March
261:See also
202:Republic
76:58462/17
73:58377/17
71:58343/17
69:58333/17
67:58326/17
65:58019/17
63:57918/17
60:57884/17
297:. Hudoc
92:British
84:English
293:ECHR.
124:Judges
97:Ruling
385:2019
357:2019
332:2019
303:2019
249:Case
57:Case
213:at
401::
376:.
340:^
323:.
311:^
281:^
387:.
359:.
334:.
305:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.