74:, a pioneer of research into memory, noted that associations between items aids recall of information thus the internal context of a list matters. This is because we look for any connection that helps us combine items into meaningful units. This started a lot of research into lists of to-be-remembered (tbr) words, and cues that helped them. In 1968 Tulving and Osler made participants memorise a list of 24 tbr words in the absence or presence of cue words. The cue words facilitated recall when present in the input and output of memorising and recalling the words. They concluded that specific retrieval cues can aid recall if the information of their relation to the tbr words is stored at the same time as the words on the list. Tulving and Thomson studied the effect of the change in context of the tbr by adding, deleting and replacing context words. This resulted in a reduction in the level of recognition performance when the context changed, even though the available information remained context. This led to the encoding specificity principle.
287:(AD) are unable to effectively process the semantic relationship between two words at encoding to assist in the retrieval process. The general population benefits equally from a weakly related cue word as from a strongly related cue word during a recall task, provided the weakly related word was present at encoding. Patients with AD, however, were unable to benefit from the weakly related cue even if it was present at both encoding and retrieval. Instead of relying upon semantic encoding, those with AD presented their most dominant associations to the cue words during recall test. This explains why all AD patients performed well when two strong words were matched together but very poorly when a strong and weak pairs were presented during recall. Deficits in episodic memory are now widely accepted as a characteristic symptom of Alzheimer's disease.
270:
that when presented with
Russian-language cues, participants recalled memories that occurred in a Russian-speaking environment and when presented with English-language cues, they easily recalled memories from English-speaking contexts. This is first because the cue words may have been spoken during the original event that the participant was remembering; hearing the word at encoding and again at retrieval may have been a sufficient cue to bring the memory to mind. Second, this phenomenon may be due to the general language-created ambiance of the situation in which participants were tested rather than the specific associations to individual cue words.
258:
recall and recognition during a test. In the study 39 participants were asked to read through an article one time, knowing that they would take a short test on the material. Each of the participants wore headphones while reading but some of the participants heard moderately loud background noise and others heard nothing. They found that regardless of the type of test, it is more beneficial to study and test in the same auditory environment. In line with the encoding specificity principle, this mismatch at encoding and retrieval is detrimental to test performance.
342:
suggests that what determines successful memory is cue distinctiveness. He says that good memory may be produced even if there is almost no encoding-retrieval overlap, provided the minimal overlap is highly distinctive. He characterizes memory as an "active process of discrimination" and proposes that we use cues to choose between several retrieval candidates. Increasing the encoding-retrieval match improves memory performance, he believes, but only because it increases the probability that distinctive features will come into play.
333:
on application of principles to new examples, then one should practice by applying principles during the study session. When students know the requirements for a test or the performance task they can better encode the information while studying and can perform at a higher level when tested. Studying information in a manner that is closest to the method of assessment is the optimal method of studying due to it aiding recall of the information in a similar context to that of the assessment.
319:(trying to carefully remember the visual content of the commercial) led to a much higher rate of recall for emotional advertisements. Conversely, al peptions, preferences of given object advertised) led to a much higher recall of specific advertisements. Empirical evidence regarding the nature of emotional advertising provides the advertising industry with data as to how to contour their ads to maximize recall of advertisements.
299:, is retrieved more effectively when an individual is intoxicated as compared to being sober. State-dependent memory is one example of encoding specificity. If an individual encodes information while intoxicated he or she, ideally, should match that state when attempting to recall the encoded information. This type of state-dependent effect is strongest with free recall rather than when strong retrieval cues are present.
303:
intoxication. This principle demonstrates the significance of encoding specificity; the contextual state of intoxication provides retrieval cues and information that are superior to and outweigh the negative effects on memory from a depressant substance that activates GABA and inhibits neurotransmission. In this regard, this encoding specific context trumps the importance of such neural brain activity.
47:
pattern; the specific encoding pattern may vary from instance to instance, even if nominally the item is the same, as encoding depends on the context. This conclusion was drawn from a recognition-memory task. A series of psychological experiments were undertaken in the 1970s which continued this work and further showed that context affects our ability to recall information.
346:
positively, not due to them being encoded at the time of learning but due to pre-experimentally derived associations. Suggesting that the word on the list 'came to mind' at the time of the experiment and that anyone could have given the positive answer. This is seen as even more likely with strong cues. This is known as the 'lucky guessing' criticism.
241:
while underwater in scuba gear, the other was given the same list on dry land. When asked to recall the information the participants remembered the list of words better when tested in the environment where the list was studied. This experiment illustrates how recreating the physical environment of encoding can aid in the retrieval process.
249:: context can be a useful cue for memory but only when it is needed. One will only turn to context as a cue when better cues are unavailable. In recognition tests, cues other than the immediate encoding context and environment are superior, whereas in free-recall tests, the immediate environment serves as the only cue to trigger memory.
269:
are more accessible when the language at encoding and recall match. Researchers conducted interviews with
Russian and English speaking bilingual students in both languages and asked participants to retrieve the first memory that comes to mind when hearing a generic word in either language. They found
257:
The level and kind of noise in any given encoding environment will affect the ability to recall the information encoded in a different auditory environment. Grant, et al. (1998) performed a study to test how the auditory environment during encoding and the auditory environment during testing effected
85:
do not always play a role in encoding specificity; memory, rather, depends upon the context at encoding and retrieval. Early research has shown that semantically related cues should be effective in retrieving a word provided the semantic cue was encoded along with the target word. If the semantically
332:
The encoding specificity principle has an implication for studying; as the recall of information is aided by the context of encoding the information, suggesting one should study in a similar context to the exam. The way an individual studies should match the way he or she is tested. If one is tested
353:
conducted experiments on the encoding specificity principle to check the generalisability of the concept. The first experiment focused on the normative strength go the cues presented on the encoding and recall of words and the second on the presence of weak cues in seconding and recall. The results
240:
The location and environment in which one learns something readily affects how freely it is recalled. In an experiment by Godden and
Baddeley in 1975, researchers took two groups of individuals and asked them to study and remember a list of given words. One group was given a list of words to study
93:
Regardless of semantic relatedness of the paired words, participants more effectively recalled target words that had been primed when prompted for recall. Many of the following experiments employed a method modeled off of
Thomson and Tulving's. All, however, had slight variations which allowed the
89:
In a laboratory study, a subject presented with an unrelated word pair is able to recall a target word with much more accuracy when prompted with the unrelated word it was matched with at the time of encoding, than if presented with a semantically related word that was not available during the time
323:
displays this emotional nature of content. A political advertisement from Lyndon B. Johnson's 1964 presidential campaign is inherently emotional in nature and therefore very easily remembered. If this advertisement re viewed and encoded in an episodic mode, due to its emotional nature, it would be
46:
who suggested that contextual information is encoded with memories which affect the retrieval process. When a person uses information stored in their memory it is necessary that the information is accessible. The accessibility is governed by retrieval cues, these cues are dependent on the encoding
345:
Phillip Higham has also criticised the design and interpretation of
Thomson and Tulving's original experiments which used strong and weak cues to generate the encoding specificity principle. He states that the use of forced-report retrieval may have resulted in participants responding to the cues
244:
The type of environment itself did not matter, just that the environment was constant during encoding and recall, as the effect on recall of the environment of recall depends on the environment of original learning. Memory tested through recognition, however, was not affected. This phenomenon is
341:
James S. Nairne of Purdue
University is the primary opponent of Thomson and Tulving's encoding specificity principle. He argues that the encoding-retrieval match is correlational rather than causal and states that many cognitive psychologists consider the principle to be "sacrosanct". Nairne
302:
This finding is a variation of the context-dependency effect of the encoding specificity principle and is much more apparent with low-imagery words than high-imagery words. Both high and low imagery words, however, are less likely to be recalled while intoxicated due to the inherent nature of
324:
easily recalled because of the mode of memory during the encoding process. This advertisement is a lasting example of emotional advertisements being easily recalled: it aired only once on
September 7, 1964, yet is one of the most remembered and famous campaign advertisements to date.
354:
of the experiments failed to support the encoding specificity principle as strong extra-list cues facilitated the recall of tbr words in the presence of weak encoded cues and recall of the original weak encoded cues failed to be recognised in the context of new strong cues.
50:
The context may refer to the context in which the information was encoded, the physical location or surroundings, as well as the mental or physical state of the individual at the time of encoding. This principle plays a significant role in both the concept of
62:
Examples of the use of the encoding specificity principle include; studying in the same room as an exam is taken and the recall of information when intoxicated being easier when intoxicated again.
741:
Grant, Harry; Lane C. Bredahl; John Clay; Jennifer Ferrie; Jane Groves; Timothy McDorman; Veronica Dark (1998). "Context-dependent memory for meaningful material: Information for students".
90:
of encoding. During a recall task, people benefit equally from a weakly related cue word as from a strongly related cue word, provided the weakly related word was present at encoding.
94:
researchers to discover their own individual findings. The following table shows the importance of priming through word pairs to achieve enhanced recall of words encoded together.
690:
694:
1072:
1006:
Weingartner, Herbert; Wolansa
Adefras; James E. Eich; Dennis L. Murphy (1976). "Encoding-imagery specificity in alcohol state-dependent learning".
790:
666:
764:
1044:
Friestad, Marian; Esther
Thorson (1993). "Remembering ads: the effects of encoding strategies, retrieval cues and emotional response".
315:
affects the rate of recall for the advertised product. When the nature of the advertisement was emotional, an encoding focus on
1319:
408:
Tulving, Endel; Thomson, Donald M. (1971). "Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context".
232:
Multiple studies have shown a dependence on context of one's environment as an aid to recall specific items and events.
857:
Granholm, Eric; Nelson
Butters (1988). "Associative encoding and retrieval in Alzheimer's and Huntington's Disease".
1218:"Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited"
630:
Godden, D.R.; A.D. Baddely (1975). "Context-Dependent Memory in Two Natural Environments: On Land and Underwater".
86:
related word is not present at the time of encoding, it will not be efficient at cuing recall for the target word.
23:
is the general principle that matching the encoding contexts of information at recall assists in the retrieval of
246:
52:
1076:
266:
1172:
750:
562:
Tulving, Endel; Donald Thomson (1973). "Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory".
370:
Tulving, Endel; Donald Thomson (1973). "Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory".
296:
284:
56:
320:
535:
Reder, Lynne; John Anderson; Robert Bjork (1974). "A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity".
1177:
755:
1198:
939:
882:
836:
811:
Marian, Viorica; Ulric Neisser (2000). "Language Dependent recall of autobiographical memories".
684:
579:
514:
387:
71:
1296:
1288:
1247:
1239:
1190:
1138:
1103:
1023:
988:
980:
931:
874:
828:
786:
672:
662:
506:
489:
Hannon, Brenda; Fergus Craik (2001). "Encoding specificity revisited: The role of semantics".
468:
460:
443:
Tulving, Endel; Osler, Shirley (1968). "Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words".
425:
28:
1278:
1229:
1182:
1130:
1053:
1015:
970:
921:
913:
866:
820:
760:
720:
639:
609:
571:
544:
498:
452:
417:
379:
1121:
Mathews, C. O. (1938). "Comparison of methods of study for immediate and delayed recall".
316:
24:
711:
Godden, Duncan; Alan Baddely (1980). "When Does Context Influence Recognition Memory?".
900:
Adam, S.; M. Van der Linden; A. Ivanoiu; A.-C. Juillerat; S. Bechet; E. Salmon (2007).
724:
643:
312:
1057:
1313:
870:
43:
943:
902:"Optimization of encoding specificity for the diagnosis of early AD: The RI-48 task"
886:
583:
518:
391:
1202:
840:
36:
824:
350:
1186:
917:
1292:
1243:
1142:
1107:
1019:
984:
676:
659:
Cognitive psychology : connecting mind, research and everyday experience
464:
429:
27:. It provides a framework for understanding how the conditions present while
82:
1300:
1251:
1194:
935:
832:
765:
10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(1998120)12:6<617::aid-acp542>3.0.co;2-5
510:
1027:
992:
901:
878:
472:
1283:
1266:
1234:
1217:
975:
958:
926:
1163:
Nairne, James S. (2002). "The myth of the encoding-retrieval match".
1134:
613:
575:
548:
502:
456:
421:
383:
32:
1267:"Tests of the generality of the principle of encoding specificity"
262:
Language and the voluntary retrieval of autobiographical memories
600:
Bahrick, Harry (1970). "Two-phase model for prompted recall".
1008:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
852:
850:
806:
804:
802:
530:
528:
959:"The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval"
783:
Cognitive Psychology: Applying the Science of the mind
295:
Information encoded and stored while intoxicated, see
484:
482:
906:
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
785:. Boston, MA: Pearson Publishing. pp. 246–248.
625:
623:
98:Paired-associate list and four types of prompters
736:
734:
595:
593:
706:
704:
1039:
1037:
8:
689:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
661:(4th ed.). New york: Cengage learning.
1075:. The Living Room Candidate. Archived from
776:
774:
491:Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology
693:) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
1282:
1233:
1176:
1158:
1156:
1154:
1152:
974:
925:
754:
362:
682:
224:Modeled after Table 1 Bahrick (1970)
7:
403:
401:
657:Goldstein, E. Bruce, 1941- (2015).
1216:Higham, Philip A. (January 2002).
1100:Studying. Technical Report No. 155
813:Journal of Experimental Psychology
781:Robinson-Riegler, Bridget (2008).
725:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02735.x
644:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x
537:Journal of Experimental Psychology
445:Journal of Experimental Psychology
410:Journal of Experimental Psychology
14:
1123:Journal of Educational Psychology
713:The British Journal of Psychology
632:The British Journal of Psychology
42:It was introduced by Thomson and
245:explained by what is termed the
957:Eich, James Eric (March 1980).
1265:Postman, Leo (November 1975).
1046:Journal of Consumer Psychology
21:encoding specificity principle
1:
1058:10.1016/s1057-7408(08)80072-1
16:Memory process-related theory
1071:Museum of the Moving Image.
871:10.1016/0278-2626(88)90007-3
743:Applied Cognitive Psychology
825:10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.361
96:
1336:
67:Development of the Concept
1187:10.1080/09658210244000216
918:10.1080/13803390600775339
267:Autobiographical memories
1020:10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.83
311:The emotional nature of
53:context-dependent memory
1271:Memory & Cognition
1222:Memory & Cognition
963:Memory & Cognition
297:state-dependent memory
57:state-dependent memory
31:information relate to
321:Political advertising
247:outshining hypothesis
39:of that information.
1320:Cognitive psychology
1098:Anderson, Thomas H.
602:Psychological Review
564:Psychological Review
372:Psychological Review
279:Diagnosis of disease
253:Auditory environment
236:Physical environment
195:communication (.33)
859:Brain and Cognition
285:Alzheimer's disease
99:
55:and the concept of
1284:10.3758/bf03198232
1235:10.3758/bf03195266
976:10.3758/bf03213419
97:
792:978-0-205-03364-5
668:978-1-285-76388-0
274:Specific Examples
228:Encoding Contexts
222:
221:
175:upholstery (.36)
78:Role of Semantics
25:episodic memories
1327:
1305:
1304:
1286:
1262:
1256:
1255:
1237:
1213:
1207:
1206:
1180:
1171:(5/6): 389–395.
1160:
1147:
1146:
1135:10.1037/h0055182
1118:
1112:
1111:
1095:
1089:
1088:
1086:
1084:
1079:on 26 April 2014
1068:
1062:
1061:
1041:
1032:
1031:
1003:
997:
996:
978:
954:
948:
947:
929:
897:
891:
890:
854:
845:
844:
808:
797:
796:
778:
769:
768:
758:
738:
729:
728:
708:
699:
698:
688:
680:
654:
648:
647:
627:
618:
617:
614:10.1037/h0029099
597:
588:
587:
576:10.1037/h0020071
559:
553:
552:
549:10.1037/h0036115
532:
523:
522:
503:10.1037/h0087369
486:
477:
476:
457:10.1037/h0026069
440:
434:
433:
422:10.1037/h0030186
405:
396:
395:
384:10.1037/h0020071
367:
192:extension (.17)
178:furniture (.48)
100:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1178:10.1.1.377.6640
1162:
1161:
1150:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1082:
1080:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1043:
1042:
1035:
1005:
1004:
1000:
956:
955:
951:
899:
898:
894:
856:
855:
848:
810:
809:
800:
793:
780:
779:
772:
756:10.1.1.497.6500
740:
739:
732:
710:
709:
702:
681:
669:
656:
655:
651:
629:
628:
621:
599:
598:
591:
561:
560:
556:
534:
533:
526:
488:
487:
480:
442:
441:
437:
407:
406:
399:
369:
368:
364:
360:
339:
330:
317:episodic memory
309:
293:
281:
276:
255:
238:
230:
215:feminine (.26)
80:
69:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1333:
1331:
1323:
1322:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1306:
1277:(6): 663–672.
1257:
1208:
1148:
1129:(2): 101–106.
1113:
1090:
1063:
1033:
998:
969:(2): 157–173.
949:
912:(5): 477–487.
892:
865:(3): 335–347.
846:
819:(3): 361–368.
798:
791:
770:
749:(6): 617–623.
730:
700:
667:
649:
638:(3): 325–331.
619:
608:(3): 215–222.
589:
570:(5): 352–373.
554:
543:(4): 648–656.
524:
497:(3): 231–243.
478:
451:(4): 593–601.
435:
416:(1): 116–124.
397:
378:(5): 352–373.
361:
359:
356:
338:
335:
329:
326:
313:advertisements
308:
305:
292:
289:
283:Patients with
280:
277:
275:
272:
254:
251:
237:
234:
229:
226:
220:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
179:
176:
173:
172:cushion (.09)
170:
167:
164:
160:
159:
158:chapter (.59)
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
124:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
79:
76:
68:
65:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1332:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1315:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1261:
1258:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1212:
1209:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1179:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1159:
1157:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1117:
1114:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1094:
1091:
1078:
1074:
1067:
1064:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1002:
999:
994:
990:
986:
982:
977:
972:
968:
964:
960:
953:
950:
945:
941:
937:
933:
928:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
896:
893:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
853:
851:
847:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
807:
805:
803:
799:
794:
788:
784:
777:
775:
771:
766:
762:
757:
752:
748:
744:
737:
735:
731:
726:
722:
718:
714:
707:
705:
701:
696:
692:
686:
678:
674:
670:
664:
660:
653:
650:
645:
641:
637:
633:
626:
624:
620:
615:
611:
607:
603:
596:
594:
590:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
558:
555:
550:
546:
542:
538:
531:
529:
525:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
485:
483:
479:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
439:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
404:
402:
398:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
366:
363:
357:
355:
352:
347:
343:
336:
334:
327:
325:
322:
318:
314:
306:
304:
300:
298:
290:
288:
286:
278:
273:
271:
268:
264:
263:
259:
252:
250:
248:
242:
235:
233:
227:
225:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
141:
137:
134:
131:
129:velvet (.03)
128:
125:
122:
121:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
102:
101:
95:
91:
87:
84:
77:
75:
73:
66:
64:
60:
58:
54:
48:
45:
40:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
1274:
1270:
1260:
1228:(1): 67–80.
1225:
1221:
1211:
1168:
1164:
1126:
1122:
1116:
1099:
1093:
1081:. Retrieved
1077:the original
1066:
1049:
1045:
1014:(1): 83–87.
1011:
1007:
1001:
966:
962:
952:
909:
905:
895:
862:
858:
816:
812:
782:
746:
742:
716:
712:
658:
652:
635:
631:
605:
601:
567:
563:
557:
540:
536:
494:
490:
448:
444:
438:
413:
409:
375:
371:
365:
348:
344:
340:
331:
310:
301:
294:
282:
265:
261:
260:
256:
243:
239:
231:
223:
209:child (.03)
152:comic (.15)
149:print (.02)
138:azure (.58)
135:green (.28)
118:4 (.38-.59)
115:3 (.23-.36)
112:2 (.09-.21)
109:1 (.01-.08)
92:
88:
81:
70:
61:
49:
41:
20:
18:
1083:18 November
1052:(1): 1–23.
351:Leo Postman
307:Advertising
218:coed (.54)
212:cute (.18)
198:dial (.59)
189:pole (.04)
155:read (.35)
927:2268/28214
719:: 99–104.
358:References
186:telephone
169:leg (.02)
132:grey (.1)
72:Ebbinghaus
1293:0090-502X
1244:0090-502X
1173:CiteSeerX
1143:0022-0663
1108:967611520
985:0090-502X
751:CiteSeerX
685:cite book
677:885178247
465:0022-1015
430:0022-1015
337:Criticism
106:Response
103:Stimulus
83:Semantics
1314:Category
1301:24203908
1252:11958356
1195:12396651
944:31325865
936:17564913
887:20415261
833:11006905
584:14879511
519:17570987
511:11605558
392:14879511
349:In 1975
328:Studying
29:encoding
1203:8085159
1073:"Daisy"
1028:1249533
993:7382817
879:2969744
841:4107490
473:5672271
291:Alcohol
44:Tulving
1299:
1291:
1250:
1242:
1201:
1193:
1175:
1165:Memory
1141:
1106:
1026:
991:
983:
942:
934:
885:
877:
839:
831:
789:
753:
675:
665:
582:
517:
509:
471:
463:
428:
390:
166:chair
37:recall
33:memory
1199:S2CID
940:S2CID
883:S2CID
837:S2CID
580:S2CID
515:S2CID
388:S2CID
206:girl
203:TILE
183:WENT
146:book
143:SHOE
126:blue
123:TIME
1297:PMID
1289:ISSN
1248:PMID
1240:ISSN
1191:PMID
1139:ISSN
1104:OCLC
1085:2011
1024:PMID
989:PMID
981:ISSN
932:PMID
875:PMID
829:PMID
787:ISBN
695:link
691:link
673:OCLC
663:ISBN
507:PMID
469:PMID
461:ISSN
426:ISSN
163:TOP
35:and
19:The
1279:doi
1230:doi
1183:doi
1131:doi
1054:doi
1016:doi
971:doi
922:hdl
914:doi
867:doi
821:doi
817:129
761:doi
721:doi
640:doi
610:doi
572:doi
545:doi
541:102
499:doi
453:doi
418:doi
380:doi
1316::
1295:.
1287:.
1273:.
1269:.
1246:.
1238:.
1226:30
1224:.
1220:.
1197:.
1189:.
1181:.
1169:10
1167:.
1151:^
1137:.
1127:29
1125:.
1102:.
1048:.
1036:^
1022:.
1010:.
987:.
979:.
965:.
961:.
938:.
930:.
920:.
910:29
908:.
904:.
881:.
873:.
861:.
849:^
835:.
827:.
815:.
801:^
773:^
759:.
747:12
745:.
733:^
717:71
715:.
703:^
687:}}
683:{{
671:.
636:66
634:.
622:^
606:77
604:.
592:^
578:.
568:80
566:.
539:.
527:^
513:.
505:.
495:55
493:.
481:^
467:.
459:.
449:77
447:.
424:.
414:87
412:.
400:^
386:.
376:80
374:.
59:.
1303:.
1281::
1275:3
1254:.
1232::
1205:.
1185::
1145:.
1133::
1110:.
1087:.
1060:.
1056::
1050:2
1030:.
1018::
1012:2
995:.
973::
967:8
946:.
924::
916::
889:.
869::
863:7
843:.
823::
795:.
767:.
763::
727:.
723::
697:)
679:.
646:.
642::
616:.
612::
586:.
574::
551:.
547::
521:.
501::
475:.
455::
432:.
420::
394:.
382::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.