Knowledge (XXG)

English Musical Renaissance

Source 📝

17: 206:. Hughes wrote: "Sullivan's frequent forays into what was viewed as the questionable realm of operetta removed him from the equation at once. Elgar was never a contender, with his unacademic, lower-middle-class background coupled with progressive tendencies, while "Fritz" Delius was simply not English enough." The same writer suggests that Fuller Maitland's aversion to Sir Frederic Cowen was due to anti-Semitism. 279: 51:, were said to have freed themselves from foreign musical influences, to have begun writing in a distinctively national idiom, and to have equalled the achievement of composers in mainland Europe. The idea gained considerable currency at the time, with support from prominent music critics, but from the latter part of the 20th century has been less widely propounded. 346:
In 1993, Robert Stradling and Meirion Hughes argued that the proponents of the movement were "a self-appointed and self-perpetuating oligarchy" based at the Royal College of Music in London. Grove, Parry, and Vaughan Williams were "the dynastical figureheads of the renaissance establishment."
297:
ho am I that I should be believed, to the disparagement of eminent musicians? If you doubt that Eden is a masterpiece, ask Dr Parry and Dr Mackenzie, and they will applaud it to the skies. Surely Dr Mackenzie’s opinion is conclusive; for is he not the composer of Veni Creator, guaranteed as
173:
is subdivided into two parts: "Book I: Before the Renaissance (1801–1850)", and "Book II: The Renaissance (1851–1900)". Fuller Maitland's thesis was that although "it would be absurd to claim a place beside Beethoven or Schubert" for earlier British composers such as
217:
from 1898. This was another barrier between the renaissance movement and outsiders. Sullivan and Elgar regarded folk music as neither important nor interesting, and Elgar was further distanced from the renaissance set by his antipathy to English music of the
193:
graduates, like Fuller Maitland, and both were professors at music colleges. The writer Meirion Hughes describes Fuller Maitland's world as one of insiders and outsiders. Fuller Maitland rejected British composers who did not conform to his template, notably
306:
writes that the term "English musical renaissance" carries "the implicit proposition that British music had raised itself to a stature equal to the best the continent had to offer"; among the continental composers of the period were
347:
Stradling and Hughes contended that this élite was single-minded to the point of ruthlessness in promoting its conception of British music, sidelining all native composers who did not conform to its aesthetic views. The composer
359:
The contention of Fuller Maitland and others that the "English musical renaissance" had brought British music into the world class is in contrast to the title of a 1904 book by the German writer Oscar Adolf Hermann Schmitz:
292:
in his capacity as a music critic mocked the notion of an English musical renaissance led by Parry, Stanford and Mackenzie, describing their works as "sham classics" and characterising them as a "mutual admiration society":
351:
wrote that when he was a student at the Royal College under Parry "it was considered scarcely decent to mention Sullivan's name with approval in the building". Elgar, about whom Fuller Maitland wrote tepidly, was hailed by
298:
excellent music by Professor Stanford and Dr Parry? You want to know who Parry is? Why, the composer of Blest Pair of Sirens, as to the merits of which you only have to consult Dr Mackenzie and Professor Stanford.
104:'s First Symphony he wrote that the work gave "capital proof that English music has arrived at a renaissance period." Bennett developed the theme in 1884, singling out for praise a now forgotten symphony by 269:
wrote, "Parry and Stanford are rapidly getting absolute control of all the music, sacred or secular, in England; and also over our provincial Festivals and Concert societies, and other performing bodies."
229:
Those identified as leading composers of the musical renaissance theory achieved positions of power and influence in the musical world. Mackenzie became principal of the
335:. That idea was controversial at the time and later, though it retained its adherents well into the 20th century. Eatock notes that as late as 1966, 443:
Fuller Maitland used the term "English" to include the Irish Stanford and the Scottish Mackenzie and all other non-English British composers.
214: 47:
was a hypothetical development in the late 19th and early 20th century, when British composers, often those lecturing or trained at the
909: 890: 142: 452:
Elgar called Tudor compositions "museum pieces". Sullivan was less dismissive of Tudor music; in a study of Sullivan's music,
809: 541: 166: 149: 131: 71: 63: 24: 711: 849:
Schaarwächter, Jürgen (2008). "Chasing a Myth and a Legend: 'The British Musical Renaissance' in a 'Land Without Music'".
189:
Fuller Maitland regarded Stanford and Parry as the pre-eminent composers of the renaissance. Both were upper-middle-class
175: 123: 59: 28: 312: 258: 145: 91: 316: 928: 760:
Eatock, Colin (2010). "The Crystal Palace Concerts: Canon Formation and the English Musical Renaissance".
262: 234: 230: 183: 48: 113: 105: 36: 186:, the centre of the renaissance theory, was founded explicitly "to enable us to rival the Germans". 878: 289: 282: 96: 669:
Onderdonk, Julian. "The English Musical Renaissance, 1860–1940: Construction and Deconstruction,"
866: 829: 739: 414: 182:, it was not absurd to do so for his favourite British composers of the late 19th century. The 905: 886: 837: 817: 797: 777: 731: 712:"Making an English Voice: Performing National Identity during the English Musical Renaissance" 179: 118: 858: 769: 723: 320: 203: 353: 332: 308: 250: 195: 162: 67: 16: 789: 453: 386: 348: 324: 79: 922: 743: 457: 328: 223: 213:. Stanford, Parry and Mackenzie were all founding members and vice-presidents of the 32: 461: 303: 278: 266: 254: 246: 242: 238: 219: 199: 101: 55: 20: 883:
Shaw's Music: The Complete Music Criticism of Bernard Shaw, Volume 2 (1890–1893)
376: 336: 75: 209:
A major concern of the movement was the collection and preservation of English
155:
The idea of an English musical renaissance was taken up by the music critic of
141: 773: 727: 600: 596: 592: 241:
as director, and Stanford was professor of composition, with pupils including
169:. The latter became the most assiduous proponent of the theory. His 1902 book 821: 801: 781: 735: 210: 157: 841: 544:
The English Musical Renaissance and the Press 1850–1914: Watchmen of Music
902:
The English musical renaissance, 1840–1940: constructing a national music
409:
The English Musical Renaissance 1840-1940: Constructing a National Music
190: 870: 343:, stated that the English musical renaissance was "an historical fact". 398:
The Music Makers: The English Musical Renaissance from Elgar to Britten
226:, which Fuller Maitland and others were enthusiastically propagating. 862: 277: 140: 15: 405:
The English Musical Renaissance: Construction and Deconstruction
54:
Among the composers championed by proponents of the theory were
372:
The classic histories of the English Musical Renaissance are:
607:, Oxford University Press, 2004, accessed 21 September 2011 419:
Modern British Music: The Second British Musical Renaissance
597:"Parry, Sir (Charles) Hubert Hastings, baronet (1848–1918)" 671:
Notes: Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association
509:
Burton, Nigel. "Sullivan Reassessed: See How the Fates",
364:– "The Land without Music: problems of English society". 619:
Stainer, Sir John, quoted in Stradling and Hughes p. 52
74:, while it received further promotion from the critics 362:
Das Land ohne Musik: englische Gesellschaftsprobleme
564:Hughes, p. 143; and Stradling and Hughes, p. 140 90:The term originated in an article by the critic 593:"Mackenzie, Sir Alexander Campbell (1847–1935)" 295: 573:Kennedy, p. 8; and Stradling and Hughes, p. 41 513:, Vol. 141, No. 1873 (Winter, 2000), pp. 15–22 339:, successor to Hueffer and Fuller Maitland at 356:as "the first progressive English musician." 66:. Writers who propounded the theory included 8: 601:"Stanford, Sir Charles Villiers (1852–1924)" 904:. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 456:identifies occasional deliberate echoes of 285:, scourge of the English renaissance circle 900:Stradling, Robert; Meirion Hughes (2001). 665: 663: 536: 534: 532: 768:(1). University of California: 87–105. 605:Oxford Dictionary of National Biography 591:Carnegie, Moir, rev. Rosemary Firman. 476: 436: 403:Hughes, Meirion and Stradling, Robert. 627: 625: 484: 482: 480: 7: 496: 494: 460:and his slightly later contemporary 393:(London: Victor Gollancz Ltd., 1979) 383:(London: Secker & Warburg, 1966) 171:English Music in the XIXth Century 112:) and equally forgotten operas by 14: 794:The Music of Sir Arthur Sullivan 400:(New York: Schirmer Books, 1985) 651:The English Musical Renaissance 552:(2003) Vol 84 (3): pp. 507–09 391:The English Musical Renaissance 381:The English Musical Renaissance 1: 881:(1981). Dan Laurence (ed.). 885:. London: The Bodley Head. 673:, September 1995, pp. 63–66 407:(1993), revised 2nd ed. as 45:English Musical Renaissance 945: 94:in 1882. In his review in 774:10.1525/ncm.2010.34.1.087 728:10.1017/S1478572215000183 124:Charles Villiers Stanford 60:Charles Villiers Stanford 29:Charles Villiers Stanford 599:; and Firman, Rosemary. 31:(front r.) in 1910 with 814:Elgar: Orchestral Music 716:Twentieth-Century Music 609:(subscription required) 554:(subscription required) 300: 286: 263:Ralph Vaughan Williams 235:Royal College of Music 231:Royal Academy of Music 184:Royal College of Music 152: 49:Royal College of Music 40: 796:. London: Macmillan. 281: 144: 110:Scandinavian Symphony 19: 700:Schaarwächter, p. 57 500:Schaarwächter, p. 53 426:Notes and references 165:, and his successor 114:Arthur Goring Thomas 710:Owen, Ceri (2016). 167:J A Fuller Maitland 150:J A Fuller Maitland 132:Alexander Mackenzie 97:The Daily Telegraph 72:J A Fuller Maitland 64:Alexander Mackenzie 25:Alexander Mackenzie 762:19th-Century Music 595:; Dibble, Jeremy. 287: 237:, Parry succeeded 153: 41: 851:The Musical Times 550:Music and Letters 546:by Meirion Hughes 511:The Musical Times 302:The musicologist 215:Folk-Song Society 180:Sterndale Bennett 936: 915: 896: 879:Shaw, G. Bernard 874: 863:10.2307/25434554 845: 836:. London: Dent. 825: 810:Kennedy, Michael 805: 785: 748: 747: 707: 701: 698: 692: 689: 683: 680: 674: 667: 658: 657:in Eatock, p. 90 647: 641: 638: 632: 629: 620: 617: 611: 610: 589: 583: 580: 574: 571: 565: 562: 556: 555: 538: 527: 526:in Schaarwächter 520: 514: 507: 501: 498: 489: 486: 465: 450: 444: 441: 267:Sir John Stainer 944: 943: 939: 938: 937: 935: 934: 933: 919: 918: 912: 899: 893: 877: 857:(1904): 53–59. 848: 828: 816:. London: BBC. 808: 790:Hughes, Gervase 788: 759: 756: 751: 709: 708: 704: 699: 695: 690: 686: 681: 677: 668: 661: 653:(1966), p. 32, 648: 644: 639: 635: 630: 623: 618: 614: 608: 590: 586: 581: 577: 572: 568: 563: 559: 553: 540:McHale, Maria. 539: 530: 522:Grove, George, 521: 517: 508: 504: 499: 492: 487: 478: 469: 468: 451: 447: 442: 438: 428: 396:Michael Trend. 370: 368:Further reading 354:Richard Strauss 276: 265:. The composer 251:Herbert Howells 163:Francis Hueffer 88: 68:Francis Hueffer 27:(front c.) and 12: 11: 5: 942: 940: 932: 931: 921: 920: 917: 916: 910: 897: 891: 875: 846: 826: 806: 786: 755: 752: 750: 749: 702: 693: 684: 675: 659: 649:Howes, Frank. 642: 633: 621: 612: 584: 582:Hughes, p. 144 575: 566: 557: 528: 515: 502: 490: 475: 474: 473: 467: 466: 454:Gervase Hughes 445: 435: 434: 433: 432: 427: 424: 423: 422: 412: 401: 394: 387:Peter J. Pirie 384: 369: 366: 349:Thomas Dunhill 275: 272: 224:Stuart periods 146:Joseph Bennett 106:Frederic Cowen 92:Joseph Bennett 87: 84: 80:Peter J. Pirie 35:(back r.) and 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 941: 930: 929:English music 927: 926: 924: 913: 911:0-7190-5829-5 907: 903: 898: 894: 892:0-370-31271-6 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 758: 757: 753: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 722:(1): 77–107. 721: 717: 713: 706: 703: 697: 694: 688: 685: 679: 676: 672: 666: 664: 660: 656: 652: 646: 643: 640:Eatock, p. 90 637: 634: 628: 626: 622: 616: 613: 606: 603:, all in the 602: 598: 594: 588: 585: 579: 576: 570: 567: 561: 558: 551: 547: 545: 537: 535: 533: 529: 525: 519: 516: 512: 506: 503: 497: 495: 491: 488:Eatock, p. 88 485: 483: 481: 477: 471: 470: 463: 459: 458:Thomas Morley 455: 449: 446: 440: 437: 430: 429: 425: 420: 416: 415:Karolyi, Otto 413: 410: 406: 402: 399: 395: 392: 388: 385: 382: 378: 375: 374: 373: 367: 365: 363: 357: 355: 350: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 305: 299: 294: 291: 284: 280: 273: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 233:; and at the 232: 227: 225: 221: 216: 212: 207: 205: 201: 197: 192: 187: 185: 181: 177: 172: 168: 164: 160: 159: 151: 147: 143: 139: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 98: 93: 85: 83: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 52: 50: 46: 38: 34: 33:Edward German 30: 26: 22: 18: 901: 882: 854: 850: 833: 813: 793: 765: 761: 719: 715: 705: 696: 687: 682:Hughes, p. 3 678: 670: 654: 650: 645: 636: 631:Shaw, p. 429 615: 604: 587: 578: 569: 560: 549: 543: 523: 518: 510: 505: 462:John Dowland 448: 439: 418: 408: 404: 397: 390: 380: 371: 361: 358: 345: 340: 304:Colin Eatock 301: 296: 290:Bernard Shaw 288: 283:Bernard Shaw 259:John Ireland 255:Gustav Holst 247:Frank Bridge 243:Arthur Bliss 239:George Grove 228: 208: 188: 170: 156: 154: 135: 127: 117: 109: 102:Hubert Parry 95: 89: 56:Hubert Parry 53: 44: 42: 21:Hubert Parry 691:Reed, p. 61 377:Frank Howes 337:Frank Howes 313:Tchaikovsky 76:Frank Howes 37:Dan Godfrey 23:(back l.), 830:Reed, W.H. 472:References 274:Dissention 222:and early 211:folk songs 148:(top) and 128:Savonarola 86:Conception 822:252020259 802:500626743 782:0148-2076 744:191680798 736:1478-5722 341:The Times 176:Macfarren 158:The Times 119:Esmeralda 39:(front l. 923:Category 871:25434554 832:(1946). 812:(1970). 792:(1959). 542:Review: 325:Bruckner 196:Sullivan 191:Oxbridge 842:8858707 754:Sources 333:Puccini 136:Columba 908:  889:  869:  840:  820:  800:  780:  742:  734:  655:quoted 524:quoted 421:(1994) 411:(2001) 329:Mahler 317:Dvořák 309:Brahms 204:Delius 130:) and 867:JSTOR 834:Elgar 740:S2CID 431:Notes 321:Fauré 220:Tudor 200:Elgar 108:(the 906:ISBN 887:ISBN 838:OCLC 818:OCLC 798:OCLC 778:ISSN 732:ISSN 331:and 261:and 202:and 178:and 138:). 78:and 70:and 62:and 43:The 859:doi 855:149 770:doi 724:doi 548:, 122:), 100:of 925:: 865:. 853:. 776:. 766:34 764:. 738:. 730:. 720:13 718:. 714:. 662:^ 624:^ 531:^ 493:^ 479:^ 417:. 389:. 379:. 327:, 323:, 319:, 315:, 311:, 257:, 253:, 249:, 245:, 198:, 161:, 82:. 58:, 914:. 895:. 873:. 861:: 844:. 824:. 804:. 784:. 772:: 746:. 726:: 464:. 134:( 126:( 116:(

Index


Hubert Parry
Alexander Mackenzie
Charles Villiers Stanford
Edward German
Dan Godfrey
Royal College of Music
Hubert Parry
Charles Villiers Stanford
Alexander Mackenzie
Francis Hueffer
J A Fuller Maitland
Frank Howes
Peter J. Pirie
Joseph Bennett
The Daily Telegraph
Hubert Parry
Frederic Cowen
Arthur Goring Thomas
Esmeralda
Charles Villiers Stanford
Alexander Mackenzie

Joseph Bennett
J A Fuller Maitland
The Times
Francis Hueffer
J A Fuller Maitland
Macfarren
Sterndale Bennett

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.