Knowledge (XXG)

Estep v. United States

Source 📝

557: 133: 358:. But he refused to be inducted, claiming that he was exempt from service because he was an ordained minister of the gospel. He was indicted under 11 of the Act for wilfully failing and refusing to submit to induction. He sought to defend on the ground that as a Jehovah's Witness he was a minister of religion and that he had been improperly denied exemption from service, because the classifying agencies acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to classify him as IV-D. 500: 420: 24: 395: 354:
against him. He took his case to the appeal board which classified him as I-A. He then asked the State and National Directors of Selective Service to appeal to the President for him. His request was refused. The local board thereupon ordered him to report for induction. He reported at the time and place indicated. He was accepted by the
353:
exempts from training and service (but not from registration) "regular or duly ordained ministers of religion". Under the regulations those in that category are classified as IV-D. Estep, a member of Jehovah's Witnesses, claimed that he was entitled to that classification. The local board ruled
401: 632: 627: 435: 382: 174: 652: 541: 662: 637: 622: 617: 657: 598: 424: 534: 564: 322: 137: 88: 107: 60: 45: 38: 527: 67: 350: 74: 56: 34: 647: 642: 591: 556: 482: 507: 439: 386: 248: 166: 446: 584: 349:
Estep's local board classified him as I-A, i.e., as available for military service. Sec. 5(d) of the
330: 81: 464: 220: 181: 355: 256: 232: 473: 244: 224: 568: 511: 455: 499: 334: 204: 389: 611: 236: 169: 326: 23: 419: 212: 185: 333:
as minister is, after exhausting administrative remedies, subject to
310:
Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
132: 17: 402:
public domain material from this U.S government document
572: 515: 628:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court
633:
Jehovah's Witnesses litigation in the United States
301: 293: 285: 277: 269: 264: 193: 161: 151: 144: 125: 347: 321:, 327 U.S. 114 (1946), was a case in which the 592: 535: 8: 599: 585: 542: 528: 345:According to the judicial opinion itself: 122: 374: 372: 108:Learn how and when to remove this message 653:Christianity and law in the 20th century 368: 44:Please improve this article by adding 120:1946 United States Supreme Court case 7: 553: 551: 496: 494: 571:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 565:Supreme Court of the United States 514:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 323:Supreme Court of the United States 138:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 663:United States Supreme Court stubs 638:Conscription in the United States 623:United States Supreme Court cases 442:114 (1946) is available from: 555: 498: 418: 393: 131: 22: 618:1946 in United States case law 1: 46:secondary or tertiary sources 563:This article related to the 679: 550: 493: 400:This article incorporates 658:Jehovah's Witnesses stubs 329:'s refusal to classify a 309: 198: 130: 147:Decided February 4, 1946 57:"Estep v. United States" 305:Burton, joined by Stone 145:Argued November 7, 1945 510:-related article is a 432:Estep v. United States 425:Estep v. United States 379:Estep v. United States 360: 318:Estep v. United States 156:Estep v. United States 126:Estep v. United States 33:relies excessively on 351:Selective Service Act 508:Jehovah's Witnesses 483:Library of Congress 233:William O. Douglas 209:Associate Justices 180:66 S. Ct. 423; 90 580: 579: 523: 522: 423:Works related to 331:Jehovah's Witness 314: 313: 249:Wiley B. Rutledge 245:Robert H. Jackson 225:Felix Frankfurter 118: 117: 110: 92: 670: 648:1946 in religion 643:Conscription law 601: 594: 587: 559: 552: 544: 537: 530: 502: 495: 487: 481: 478: 472: 469: 463: 460: 454: 451: 445: 422: 406: 397: 396: 376: 257:Harold H. Burton 194:Court membership 135: 134: 123: 113: 106: 102: 99: 93: 91: 50: 26: 18: 678: 677: 673: 672: 671: 669: 668: 667: 608: 607: 606: 605: 549: 548: 491: 485: 479: 476: 470: 467: 461: 458: 452: 449: 443: 415: 410: 409: 394: 377: 370: 365: 343: 335:judicial review 247: 235: 223: 221:Stanley F. Reed 205:Harlan F. Stone 189: 146: 140: 121: 114: 103: 97: 94: 51: 49: 43: 39:primary sources 27: 12: 11: 5: 676: 674: 666: 665: 660: 655: 650: 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 620: 610: 609: 604: 603: 596: 589: 581: 578: 577: 560: 547: 546: 539: 532: 524: 521: 520: 503: 489: 488: 465:Google Scholar 428: 414: 413:External links 411: 408: 407: 367: 366: 364: 361: 342: 339: 312: 311: 307: 306: 303: 299: 298: 295: 291: 290: 287: 283: 282: 279: 275: 274: 271: 267: 266: 262: 261: 260: 259: 210: 207: 202: 196: 195: 191: 190: 179: 163: 159: 158: 153: 152:Full case name 149: 148: 142: 141: 136: 128: 127: 119: 116: 115: 30: 28: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 675: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 615: 613: 602: 597: 595: 590: 588: 583: 582: 576: 574: 570: 566: 561: 558: 554: 545: 540: 538: 533: 531: 526: 525: 519: 517: 513: 509: 504: 501: 497: 492: 484: 475: 466: 457: 448: 447:CourtListener 441: 437: 433: 429: 427:at Wikisource 426: 421: 417: 416: 412: 405: 403: 392: (1946). 391: 388: 384: 380: 375: 373: 369: 362: 359: 357: 352: 346: 340: 338: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 265:Case opinions 263: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201:Chief Justice 200: 199: 197: 192: 187: 183: 177: 176: 171: 168: 164: 160: 157: 154: 150: 143: 139: 129: 124: 112: 109: 101: 98:December 2019 90: 87: 83: 80: 76: 73: 69: 66: 62: 59: –  58: 54: 53:Find sources: 47: 41: 40: 36: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 573:expanding it 562: 516:expanding it 505: 490: 431: 399: 378: 348: 344: 325:held that a 317: 316: 315: 252: 240: 237:Frank Murphy 228: 216: 173: 155: 104: 95: 85: 78: 71: 64: 52: 32: 15: 327:draft board 297:Frankfurter 294:Concurrence 286:Concurrence 278:Concurrence 612:Categories 363:References 341:Background 213:Hugo Black 186:U.S. LEXIS 184:567; 1946 68:newspapers 35:references 162:Citations 430:Text of 289:Rutledge 270:Majority 456:Findlaw 302:Dissent 273:Douglas 82:scholar 486:  480:  477:  474:Justia 471:  468:  462:  459:  453:  450:  444:  398:  381:, 281:Murphy 255: 253:· 251:  243: 241:· 239:  231: 229:· 227:  219: 217:· 215:  182:L. Ed. 84:  77:  70:  63:  55:  567:is a 506:This 438: 385: 89:JSTOR 75:books 569:stub 512:stub 440:U.S. 387:U.S. 356:Navy 188:2807 175:more 167:U.S. 165:327 61:news 436:327 390:114 383:327 170:114 37:to 614:: 434:, 371:^ 337:. 48:. 600:e 593:t 586:v 575:. 543:e 536:t 529:v 518:. 404:. 178:) 172:( 111:) 105:( 100:) 96:( 86:· 79:· 72:· 65:· 42:.

Index


references
primary sources
secondary or tertiary sources
"Estep v. United States"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
114
more
L. Ed.
U.S. LEXIS
Harlan F. Stone
Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas
Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson
Wiley B. Rutledge
Harold H. Burton
Supreme Court of the United States
draft board
Jehovah's Witness
judicial review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.