71:
53:
22:
142:(a Commons image) as a album artwork image, as both albums feature black, featureless covers which are ineligable for copyright, so uploading individual images for each article is redundant. If this image was uploaded with Heartfield identification, it could be used here as well as in the Heartfield article due to the fact that Heartfield's art is not under copyright. --
227:
To add, if you make your own version of this picture using the PD source, then you have three additional problems: 1. You have violated the copyright holder of the original because yours is a hand made copy, which is still infringement. 2. It is no longer "The album cover" but is instead an amateur's
157:
Indeed, I see no reason why this ain't a derived work from
Heartfield's "Five Finger", they took a public domain picture and changed its background, if I create my own derivation to look exactly their cover, but editing from the original work it is also free media, so this file should be moved with a
186:
is still PD, but it is modified, and there is no "license" to compel the artist release the derivative into the same "license", like the GPL does. It isn't a license at all. Otherwise, any original work that had even a single element of PD work in it could be considered PD, and I know this isn't
129:
artwork with a black background. Heartfield's "Five
Fingers" is in the public domain, so there shouldn't be any problem just transferring this image to Wikimedia Commons under a title identifying it as Heartfield's art with a black background.
187:
true. We would essentially be stripping away every artist's right to use imagery that exists in the public domain and call the new product their own. This isn't featureless, it is an interpretation of a public domain piece.
228:
rendition of the album cover, which is less valuable than the Fair Use version. 3. In order to make it not a copyright infringement, you would have to make it so different that it no longer resembled the album cover.
269:
209:
Yeah i'd tend to think that. It wouldn't do to end up with some copyright-holder complaining that their licensed pic' ended up at
Commons.
87:
264:
240:
199:
82:, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
83:
78:
58:
33:
131:
147:
135:
143:
39:
182:
Isn't a derivative of a PD work eligible for copyright? I think so. It doesn't take away the fact that the
235:
194:
139:
216:
174:
229:
188:
126:
245:
222:
204:
177:
151:
258:
210:
160:
125:
I was wondering, doesn't this image qualify for
Wikimedia Commons? It's just the
70:
52:
15:
86:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
47:
49:
7:
38:It is of interest to the following
96:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Albums
14:
158:good argumment on its file page.
76:This file is within the scope of
21:
19:
69:
51:
20:
132:The Black Album (Prince album)
1:
270:WikiProject Albums articles
99:Template:WikiProject Albums
286:
178:21:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
136:This Is Spinal Tap (album)
265:File-Class Album articles
152:20:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
64:
46:
246:17:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
223:17:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
205:17:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
140:File:Solid black.svg
79:WikiProject Albums
34:content assessment
243:
238:
202:
197:
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
277:
241:
236:
232:
219:
213:
200:
195:
191:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
255:
254:
230:
217:
211:
189:
127:John Heartfield
123:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
273:
272:
267:
257:
256:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
180:
122:
119:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
102:Album articles
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
260:
247:
244:
239:
233:
226:
225:
224:
220:
214:
208:
207:
206:
203:
198:
192:
185:
181:
179:
176:
175:
173:
172:
169:
166:
163:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
128:
120:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
231:Dennis Brown
190:Dennis Brown
183:
170:
167:
164:
161:
159:
124:
84:project page
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
259:Categories
88:discussion
138:both use
212:benzband
184:original
93:Albums
59:Albums
36:scale.
28:This
218:talk
148:talk
134:and
30:file
144:WTF
121:RFC
261::
237:2¢
234:-
221:)
196:2¢
193:-
171:ni
168:mo
165:ue
162:Ed
150:)
242:©
215:(
201:©
146:(
90:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
