133:
377:. The Supreme Court focused on the section of the Amendment that reads "nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb". The Court explained that the trial had not terminated before the entry of a judgment, but with a final judgment acquitting the defendants. The Supreme Court recognized the error of the District Judge but ruled that the verdict was final and could not be reviewed without violating rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment of the Constitution.
22:
348:
The defendants (a corporation and two of its employees) were brought to trial under an indictment for conspiracy and other subsequent charges. The trial was in a
Federal District Court that had jurisdiction over them and over the subject matter. The District Judge, after hearing part, but not all,
361:. The Court of Appeals granted the petition and held that the defendants could be retried, based on its opinion that the District Judge did not have the power to direct the judgment of the jury, in this case. The case was then brought before the Supreme Court.
1277:
1257:
1267:
403:
386:
174:
489:
374:
333:
480:
492:
349:
of the government's evidence, ordered the jury to acquit the defendants, which the jury did. The judge's action was based on supposed improper conduct of the
336:
prevented the
Federal Government from bringing a defendant to trial twice for the same charge. In this case, the court ruled that despite the error of the
1262:
1272:
323:
195:
The Fifth
Amendment's protection against double jeopardy still protects a defendant even if the conduct of the defendant's trial was improper.
961:
473:
86:
315:
137:
58:
506:
105:
43:
36:
1110:
706:
242:
65:
886:
466:
350:
72:
773:
910:
843:
607:
337:
326:. While the protection from double jeopardy did not get incorporated to apply to the state governments until 1969 (see
650:
54:
1198:
1126:
535:
32:
1010:
551:
373:, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals on the grounds that its decision violated the
1118:
977:
926:
1166:
1022:
1158:
918:
862:
808:
741:
733:
666:
567:
458:
254:
658:
441:
1142:
1086:
792:
765:
757:
690:
631:
623:
588:
250:
1190:
1062:
1030:
902:
800:
519:
407:
166:
1046:
79:
953:
824:
423:
1182:
1150:
1102:
1094:
1054:
870:
714:
1134:
1070:
1038:
985:
969:
559:
353:
and the supposed lack of credibility of the prosecution's witnesses. The government filed for a
328:
230:
1174:
878:
816:
698:
226:
340:, the 5th Amendment protected the defendants from facing a second trial for the same charge.
1222:
1078:
945:
894:
414:
358:
354:
1214:
749:
682:
615:
319:
1206:
543:
432:
262:
1251:
1230:
527:
238:
169:
210:
21:
370:
218:
181:
450:
303:
Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
1008:
586:
504:
462:
132:
15:
1278:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
387:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 369
937:
854:
835:
784:
725:
642:
599:
294:
286:
270:
199:
189:
161:
151:
144:
125:
334:Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
1258:United States Supreme Court per curiam opinions
1268:United States Double Jeopardy Clause case law
474:
8:
277:
1005:
596:
583:
501:
481:
467:
459:
122:
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
318:ruling that upheld the protection from
42:Please improve this article by adding
962:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber
120:1962 United States Supreme Court case
7:
332:), the Supreme Court ruled that the
138:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1263:United States Supreme Court cases
410:141 (1962) is available from:
156:Fong Foo, et al. v. United States
707:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States
131:
20:
351:United States District Attorney
1273:1962 in United States case law
1:
490:United States Fifth Amendment
314:, 369 U.S. 141 (1962), was a
44:secondary or tertiary sources
911:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle
844:Blockburger v. United States
608:Blockburger v. United States
651:United States v. Randenbush
365:Ruling of the Supreme Court
55:"Fong Foo v. United States"
1294:
1199:J. D. B. v. North Carolina
1127:Dickerson v. United States
536:Wong Wing v. United States
451:Oyez (oral argument audio)
369:In its opinion, delivered
1111:Mitchell v. United States
1017:
1011:Self-Incrimination Clause
1004:
855:Dual sovereignty doctrine
675:Fong Foo v. United States
600:Meaning of "same offense"
595:
582:
552:United States v. Moreland
514:
500:
400:Fong Foo v. United States
311:Fong Foo v. United States
302:
275:
204:
194:
130:
126:Fong Foo v. United States
1119:United States v. Hubbell
978:North Carolina v. Pearce
927:Denezpi v. United States
887:United States v. Wheeler
1167:Corley v. United States
1159:United States v. Patane
1023:Curcio v. United States
919:Gamble v. United States
809:United States v. Dinitz
742:Ludwig v. Massachusetts
734:United States v. Wilson
667:Burton v. United States
568:United States v. Cotton
145:Argued January 16, 1962
1143:Yarborough v. Alvarado
863:United States v. Lanza
793:United States v. Perez
774:Smith v. United States
766:United States v. Dixon
758:United States v. Felix
691:Burks v. United States
632:United States v. Dixon
624:United States v. Felix
589:Double Jeopardy Clause
344:Background of the case
278:
251:William J. Brennan Jr.
147:Decided March 19, 1962
31:relies excessively on
1191:Berghuis v. Thompkins
1031:Griffin v. California
903:United States v. Lara
801:United States v. Jorn
659:Ball v. United States
520:Hurtado v. California
1087:Doe v. United States
954:Palko v. Connecticut
825:Blueford v. Arkansas
255:Charles E. Whittaker
1183:Maryland v. Shatzer
1151:Missouri v. Seibert
1103:McNeil v. Wisconsin
1095:Illinois v. Perkins
1055:Williams v. Florida
871:Bartkus v. Illinois
836:Multiple punishment
715:McElrath v. Georgia
442:Library of Congress
1135:Chavez v. Martinez
1071:Edwards v. Arizona
1063:Michigan v. Tucker
1039:Miranda v. Arizona
986:Benton v. Maryland
970:Baxstrom v. Herold
560:Beck v. Washington
493:criminal procedure
329:Benton v. Maryland
324:federal government
231:William O. Douglas
215:Associate Justices
1245:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1175:Florida v. Powell
1047:Boulden v. Holman
1000:
999:
996:
995:
879:Waller v. Florida
817:Oregon v. Kennedy
699:Evans v. Michigan
578:
577:
307:
306:
243:John M. Harlan II
227:Felix Frankfurter
180:82 S. Ct. 671; 7
116:
115:
108:
90:
1285:
1223:Salinas v. Texas
1079:Oregon v. Elstad
1006:
946:Ex parte Bigelow
895:Heath v. Alabama
726:After conviction
597:
584:
502:
483:
476:
469:
460:
455:
449:
446:
440:
437:
431:
428:
422:
419:
413:
359:Court of Appeals
355:writ of mandamus
281:
200:Court membership
135:
134:
123:
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1237:
1215:Howes v. Fields
1013:
992:
933:
850:
831:
780:
750:Grady v. Corbin
721:
683:Ashe v. Swenson
643:After acquittal
638:
616:Grady v. Corbin
591:
574:
510:
496:
487:
453:
447:
444:
438:
435:
429:
426:
420:
417:
411:
395:
383:
375:Fifth Amendment
367:
346:
320:double jeopardy
253:
241:
229:
185:
146:
140:
121:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
41:
37:primary sources
25:
12:
11:
5:
1291:
1289:
1281:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1250:
1249:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1236:
1235:
1227:
1219:
1211:
1207:Bobby v. Dixon
1203:
1195:
1187:
1179:
1171:
1163:
1155:
1147:
1139:
1131:
1123:
1115:
1107:
1099:
1091:
1083:
1075:
1067:
1059:
1051:
1043:
1035:
1027:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1009:
1002:
1001:
998:
997:
994:
993:
991:
990:
982:
974:
966:
958:
950:
941:
939:
935:
934:
932:
931:
923:
915:
907:
899:
891:
883:
875:
867:
858:
856:
852:
851:
849:
848:
839:
837:
833:
832:
830:
829:
821:
813:
805:
797:
788:
786:
785:After mistrial
782:
781:
779:
778:
770:
762:
754:
746:
738:
729:
727:
723:
722:
720:
719:
711:
703:
695:
687:
679:
671:
663:
655:
646:
644:
640:
639:
637:
636:
628:
620:
612:
603:
601:
593:
592:
587:
580:
579:
576:
575:
573:
572:
564:
556:
548:
544:Maxwell v. Dow
540:
532:
524:
515:
512:
511:
505:
498:
497:
488:
486:
485:
478:
471:
463:
457:
456:
424:Google Scholar
394:
393:External links
391:
390:
389:
382:
379:
366:
363:
345:
342:
338:District Judge
305:
304:
300:
299:
296:
292:
291:
288:
284:
283:
273:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
263:Potter Stewart
216:
213:
208:
202:
201:
197:
196:
192:
191:
187:
186:
179:
163:
159:
158:
153:
152:Full case name
149:
148:
142:
141:
136:
128:
127:
119:
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1290:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1255:
1253:
1233:
1232:
1231:Vega v. Tekoh
1228:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1003:
988:
987:
983:
980:
979:
975:
972:
971:
967:
964:
963:
959:
956:
955:
951:
948:
947:
943:
942:
940:
936:
929:
928:
924:
921:
920:
916:
913:
912:
908:
905:
904:
900:
897:
896:
892:
889:
888:
884:
881:
880:
876:
873:
872:
868:
865:
864:
860:
859:
857:
853:
846:
845:
841:
840:
838:
834:
827:
826:
822:
819:
818:
814:
811:
810:
806:
803:
802:
798:
795:
794:
790:
789:
787:
783:
776:
775:
771:
768:
767:
763:
760:
759:
755:
752:
751:
747:
744:
743:
739:
736:
735:
731:
730:
728:
724:
717:
716:
712:
709:
708:
704:
701:
700:
696:
693:
692:
688:
685:
684:
680:
677:
676:
672:
669:
668:
664:
661:
660:
656:
653:
652:
648:
647:
645:
641:
634:
633:
629:
626:
625:
621:
618:
617:
613:
610:
609:
605:
604:
602:
598:
594:
590:
585:
581:
570:
569:
565:
562:
561:
557:
554:
553:
549:
546:
545:
541:
538:
537:
533:
530:
529:
528:Ex parte Bain
525:
522:
521:
517:
516:
513:
508:
503:
499:
494:
491:
484:
479:
477:
472:
470:
465:
464:
461:
452:
443:
434:
425:
416:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
392:
388:
385:
384:
380:
378:
376:
372:
364:
362:
360:
356:
352:
343:
341:
339:
335:
331:
330:
325:
321:
317:
316:Supreme Court
313:
312:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
274:
271:Case opinions
269:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:Chief Justice
206:
205:
203:
198:
193:
188:
183:
177:
176:
171:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
150:
143:
139:
129:
124:
118:
110:
107:
99:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
39:
38:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
1229:
1221:
1213:
1205:
1197:
1189:
1181:
1173:
1165:
1157:
1149:
1141:
1133:
1125:
1117:
1109:
1101:
1093:
1085:
1077:
1069:
1061:
1053:
1045:
1037:
1029:
1021:
984:
976:
968:
960:
952:
944:
925:
917:
909:
901:
893:
885:
877:
869:
861:
842:
823:
815:
807:
799:
791:
772:
764:
756:
748:
740:
732:
713:
705:
697:
689:
681:
674:
673:
665:
657:
649:
630:
622:
614:
606:
566:
558:
550:
542:
534:
526:
518:
399:
368:
347:
327:
310:
309:
308:
276:
258:
246:
239:Tom C. Clark
234:
222:
173:
155:
117:
102:
96:January 2013
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
30:
287:Concurrence
211:Earl Warren
1252:Categories
507:Grand Jury
371:per curiam
279:Per curiam
219:Hugo Black
66:newspapers
33:references
182:L. Ed. 2d
162:Citations
495:case law
398:Text of
381:See also
415:Findlaw
357:to the
322:by the
295:Dissent
190:Holding
80:scholar
1234:(2022)
1226:(2013)
1218:(2012)
1210:(2011)
1202:(2011)
1194:(2010)
1186:(2010)
1178:(2010)
1170:(2009)
1162:(2004)
1154:(2004)
1146:(2004)
1138:(2003)
1130:(2000)
1122:(2000)
1114:(1999)
1106:(1991)
1098:(1990)
1090:(1988)
1082:(1985)
1074:(1981)
1066:(1974)
1058:(1970)
1050:(1969)
1042:(1966)
1034:(1965)
1026:(1957)
989:(1969)
981:(1969)
973:(1966)
965:(1947)
957:(1937)
949:(1885)
930:(2022)
922:(2019)
914:(2016)
906:(2004)
898:(1985)
890:(1978)
882:(1970)
874:(1959)
866:(1922)
847:(1932)
828:(2012)
820:(1982)
812:(1976)
804:(1971)
796:(1824)
777:(2023)
769:(1993)
761:(1992)
753:(1990)
745:(1976)
737:(1833)
718:(2024)
710:(2016)
702:(2013)
694:(1978)
686:(1970)
678:(1962)
670:(1906)
662:(1896)
654:(1834)
635:(1993)
627:(1992)
619:(1990)
611:(1932)
571:(2002)
563:(1962)
555:(1922)
547:(1900)
539:(1896)
531:(1887)
523:(1884)
509:Clause
454:
448:
445:
439:
436:
433:Justia
430:
427:
421:
418:
412:
290:Harlan
261:
259:·
257:
249:
247:·
245:
237:
235:·
233:
225:
223:·
221:
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
938:Other
406:
298:Clark
87:JSTOR
73:books
408:U.S.
175:more
167:U.S.
165:369
59:news
404:369
184:629
170:141
35:to
1254::
402:,
46:.
482:e
475:t
468:v
178:)
172:(
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
