279:, seemingly unaware that the fortress beneath them – supporting them -- was under siege". This comment was made in spite of the fact that the commission itself included academics from the Caribbean, Africa, and East Asia, as well as Europe and North America. Richard Lee suggests concrete ways that the Commission's goal of breaking down barriers between the disciplines of the social sciences might be achieved.
22:
271:, at Berkeley, offered a highly critical perspective: "We hear nothing about how and where this new knowledge will be produced. Nor do we hear for whom this knowledge will be produced, nor for what ends. Instead we have an abstract and totalizing
166:
and two from the humanities. The commission sought to produce a book length work that would identify new directions for the organization of knowledge in the next fifty years. The report was published in 1996 by
337:
126:
disciplines that developed in the nineteenth century by indicating a direction for social scientific inquiry for the next 50 years. It was founded by the
362:
357:
338:"Open the Social Sciences: To Whom and For What?" by Michael Buroway (address delivered to Portuguese Sociological Association, March 30, 2006)
39:
343:"Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences, Description of Project" on the website of the Fernand Braudel Center
311:
Burawoy, Michael (2001). "Open the Social
Sciences: To whom and for what?", Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 6(3). Retrieved from
105:
86:
58:
127:
65:
43:
72:
263:. For example, in the Indian Magazine Frontline, Sundar Sarukkai discussed its conclusions and applicability to the
54:
32:
236:
176:
139:
312:
188:
168:
151:
79:
220:
179:. To foster international debate, the report has been published in numerous languages including
244:
232:
143:
240:
228:
216:
212:
204:
180:
163:
300:
268:
224:
208:
192:
184:
123:
147:
200:
196:
159:
155:
351:
332:
276:
21:
267:
context, which he criticizes for being cliquish and unprofessional. In 2006
158:, Peter J. Taylor, Michel-Rolph Trouillot. Six of them were drawn from the
275:
that reflects the concerns of
Western academics, perched high up in the
342:
272:
256:
264:
260:
313:
http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/PS/Open%20the%20Social%20Sciences.pdf
15:
122:
sought to address inadequacies in the organization of the
301:
http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1822/18220900.htm
295:
Sarukkai, Sundar (2001). "The
Gulbenkian Prognosis",
46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
333:"Open the Social Sciences" in Encyclopedia.com
8:
130:. It held three meetings in 1994 and 1995.
106:Learn how and when to remove this message
322:Dialnet-EpistemologiaCritica-6280179.pdf
255:The ideas in the report have stimulated
288:
7:
44:adding citations to reliable sources
14:
20:
31:needs additional citations for
363:Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation
128:Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation
1:
358:Social sciences organizations
379:
299:, 18(22). Retrieved from
142:(chair), Calestous Juma,
173:Open the Social Sciences
55:"Gulbenkian Commission"
154:, Kinhide Mushakoji,
150:, Dominique Lecourt,
138:Its members included
120:Gulbenkian Commission
177:Immanuel Wallerstein
140:Immanuel Wallerstein
40:improve this article
169:Stanford University
152:Valentin Y. Mudimbe
144:Evelyn Fox Keller
116:
115:
108:
90:
370:
315:
309:
303:
293:
164:natural sciences
111:
104:
100:
97:
91:
89:
48:
24:
16:
378:
377:
373:
372:
371:
369:
368:
367:
348:
347:
329:
319:
318:
310:
306:
294:
290:
285:
269:Michael Burawoy
253:
162:, two from the
160:social sciences
136:
112:
101:
95:
92:
49:
47:
37:
25:
12:
11:
5:
376:
374:
366:
365:
360:
350:
349:
346:
345:
340:
335:
328:
327:External links
325:
324:
323:
317:
316:
304:
287:
286:
284:
281:
252:
249:
156:Ilya Prigogine
135:
132:
124:social science
114:
113:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
375:
364:
361:
359:
356:
355:
353:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
330:
326:
321:
320:
314:
308:
305:
302:
298:
292:
289:
282:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
250:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:as the book,
170:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
133:
131:
129:
125:
121:
110:
107:
99:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71:
67:
64:
60:
57: –
56:
52:
51:Find sources:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
307:
296:
291:
254:
172:
148:Jürgen Kocka
137:
119:
117:
102:
93:
83:
76:
69:
62:
50:
38:Please help
33:verification
30:
277:ivory tower
259:around the
352:Categories
283:References
237:Serbocroat
189:Portuguese
66:newspapers
297:Frontline
221:Norwegian
96:July 2018
245:Japanese
233:Romanian
241:Turkish
229:Russian
217:Italian
213:Spanish
205:Chinese
181:English
134:Members
80:scholar
273:utopia
265:Indian
257:debate
251:Debate
243:, and
225:Polish
209:Korean
193:German
185:French
82:
75:
68:
61:
53:
261:world
201:Czech
197:Dutch
87:JSTOR
73:books
118:The
59:news
175:by
42:by
354::
247:.
239:,
235:,
231:,
227:,
223:,
219:,
215:,
211:,
207:,
203:,
199:,
195:,
191:,
187:,
183:,
146:,
109:)
103:(
98:)
94:(
84:·
77:·
70:·
63:·
36:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
