Knowledge (XXG)

General jurisdiction

Source ๐Ÿ“

137:
for acts that are not completely beyond their jurisdiction. For example, if a probate judge of limited jurisdiction were to sentence a person to jail, that judge would not have immunity and could be sued because the probate judge has no jurisdiction to effect a criminal sentence. However, a judge in
163:, at the behest of the woman's mother. Because the Indiana court was a court of general jurisdiction, and no law of Indiana expressly prohibited the judge from issuing such an order, the Supreme Court found that the order was not completely beyond the jurisdiction of that judge. 74:
in law and in equity, although these courts may also organize themselves into divisions or departments to handle particular matters (eg., by assigning a judge of the court of general jurisdiction to hear that court's criminal matters, or probate, or family law).
100:
is dealt with as a separate part of the federal district court, though they are viewed as the same unit, and decisions of the bankruptcy court are generally appealable to the district court. This is a result of being created under different articles of the
95:
have been described as "the courts of general jurisdiction in the federal court system" (as they can generally provide redress in both law and equity, as well as hearing both civil and criminal cases).
121:
General jurisdiction often provides courts with the widest possible ability to take jurisdiction over defendants (particularly corporations), even when contact with the forum is minimal.
110: 106: 142:
be immune from suit for sending a party to jail, because handing down a criminal sentence is not completely beyond the jurisdiction of such a judge.
160: 280: 102: 91:, limited by constitution and statute, and to the extent that they can not hear many kinds of claims brought under state law, but 97: 255: 92: 84: 230: 177: 146: 67: 60: 70:
notes that "often, states will vest their trial courts with general jurisdiction" โ€“ with the ability to hear state
25: 71: 37: 315: 172: 88: 133:
from that court might face for stepping beyond the bounds of that court. Judges are able to claim
151: 134: 205: 182: 159:
judge was immune from a suit brought by a young woman whom the judge had ordered to be
309: 296: 284: 63: 33: 29: 129:
One significant effect of the classification of a court is the liability that a
56: 138:
a court of general jurisdiction who happened to be assigned to a probate case
41: 256:"Bankruptcy Courts and Cases โ€“ Journalist's Guide | United States Courts" 156: 45: 130: 17: 145:
In the United States, this principle was established by the
117:
General jurisdiction and bringing defendants into the forum
28:, is a court with authority to hear cases in law and in 111:article that established the federal judiciary 8: 125:General jurisdiction and judicial immunity 194: 155:. The Court found in that case that an 105:, bankruptcy law was established in a 79:Federal courts of limited jurisdiction 200: 198: 7: 52:State courts of general jurisdiction 14: 210:LII / Legal Information Institute 66:with general jurisdiction. The 1: 93:United States district courts 85:United States federal courts 231:"Overview of the Judiciary" 178:Subject-matter jurisdiction 68:Legal Information Institute 332: 48:, and other legal claims. 26:law of the United States 236:. United States Courts 206:"general jurisdiction" 173:Limited jurisdiction 89:limited jurisdiction 59:often provide their 22:general jurisdiction 72:and federal matters 152:Stump v. Sparkman 135:judicial immunity 323: 300: 294: 288: 277: 271: 270: 268: 266: 260:www.uscourts.gov 252: 246: 245: 243: 241: 235: 227: 221: 220: 218: 216: 202: 107:separate article 331: 330: 326: 325: 324: 322: 321: 320: 306: 305: 304: 303: 295: 291: 278: 274: 264: 262: 254: 253: 249: 239: 237: 233: 229: 228: 224: 214: 212: 204: 203: 196: 191: 169: 127: 119: 81: 54: 32:of all kinds โ€“ 12: 11: 5: 329: 327: 319: 318: 308: 307: 302: 301: 289: 281:28 U.S.C. 272: 247: 222: 193: 192: 190: 187: 186: 185: 183:Ordinary court 180: 175: 168: 165: 126: 123: 118: 115: 87:are courts of 80: 77: 53: 50: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 328: 317: 314: 313: 311: 298: 293: 290: 286: 285:ยง 158(a) 282: 276: 273: 261: 257: 251: 248: 232: 226: 223: 211: 207: 201: 199: 195: 188: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 170: 166: 164: 162: 158: 154: 153: 148: 147:Supreme Court 143: 141: 136: 132: 124: 122: 116: 114: 112: 108: 104: 99: 94: 90: 86: 78: 76: 73: 69: 65: 62: 58: 51: 49: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 316:Jurisdiction 297:435 U.S. 349 292: 275: 263:. Retrieved 259: 250: 238:. Retrieved 225: 213:. Retrieved 209: 150: 144: 139: 128: 120: 103:Constitution 82: 64:trial courts 55: 21: 15: 240:December 8, 215:December 8, 57:U.S. states 265:8 December 189:References 161:sterilized 98:Bankruptcy 109:from the 24:, in the 310:Category 167:See also 34:criminal 299:(1978). 157:Indiana 46:probate 283:  42:family 30:equity 234:(PDF) 140:would 131:judge 61:state 38:civil 18:court 279:See 267:2023 242:2023 217:2023 83:All 149:in 20:of 312:: 258:. 208:. 197:^ 113:. 44:, 40:, 36:, 16:A 287:. 269:. 244:. 219:.

Index

court
law of the United States
equity
criminal
civil
family
probate
U.S. states
state
trial courts
Legal Information Institute
and federal matters
United States federal courts
limited jurisdiction
United States district courts
Bankruptcy
Constitution
separate article
article that established the federal judiciary
judge
judicial immunity
Supreme Court
Stump v. Sparkman
Indiana
sterilized
Limited jurisdiction
Subject-matter jurisdiction
Ordinary court

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘