238:—"Separate the people from the problem"—applies to the interaction between the two parties to a negotiation. The authors point out that negotiators are people first—people who have different values, cultural backgrounds, and emotions. The relationship between parties tends to become entangled with the problem that the parties are discussing; therefore, issues of perception, emotion, and communication need to be addressed during a negotiation.
509:
particular, the book does not discuss in enough detail distributive bargaining, in which a gain for one party is a loss for the other. Fisher responded that the book is intended to give advice, and that "distributional problems" can be reconceptualized as "shared problems". Nevertheless, Fisher reported that when teaching a negotiation course he tore a copy of the book in half to emphasize that it was imperfect.
573:, but that such a negotiation style is not always more ethical than positional negotiation. It is possible for both types of negotiation to be unethical. Instead, it is ethical for a lawyer to be able to adjust negotiation strategies to provide effective advocacy for a client. The need for flexibility in negotiation styles was echoed in a 2015 paper calling principled negotiations a "false promise".
323:. The three steps for using objective criteria in negotiations are to jointly search for such criteria, to keep an open mind about which criteria should be chosen to be applied, and to never give in to pressure or threats. The chapter on this principle concludes with an example of objective criteria being used successfully in a negotiation between a person whose car is a
281:
of 1979. The authors recommend that negotiators identify interests, such as the "basic human needs" of "economic well-being" and "control over one's life", behind the parties' positions. Both parties should then discuss their interests and keep an open mind to the other side of the argument, in order
209:
had fallen from power; paragraphs on "core concerns" and "the role of identity"; a section "How should we communicate?"; and a section "There is power in effective communication". As of 2022, Ury asserted on his website that 15 million copies of the book had been sold, and that it has been translated
535:
A 1996 paper argued that the book's distinction between "interests" and "positions" was a problem. There can be a difference between objective interests (that help an individual) and subjective interests (that the individual perceives to be helpful, but that may not be). A negotiating party's public
186:
Fisher and Ury focused on the psychology of negotiation in their method, "principled negotiation", which attempts to find acceptable solutions by determining which needs are fixed and which are flexible for negotiators. The first edition of the book was published in 1981. By 1987, the book had been
493:
in a 1982 review criticized Fisher and Ury for "describ the world as it should be, and not as it is". For instance, in practice it can be difficult to find mutually agreeable objective criteria in a negotiation. Furthermore, Fisher and Ury assume that negotiating parties are "unitary actors", but
294:
separately and possibly together. The book describes specific techniques to promote effective brainstorming; for example, a "Circle Chart" diagrams the repeated steps of
Problem, Analysis, Approaches, and Action Ideas that should occur. Options can either meet shared interests or meet different
241:
Concerning perception, the authors note that it is important for a negotiator to understand how the other party views an issue. Ways to accomplish this include "Put yourself in their shoes", "Discuss each other's perceptions", and "Face-saving: Make your proposals consistent with their values".
481:
A 2020 literature review found significant differences in negotiation styles across various cultures, suggesting that negotiators must adapt their strategies based on cultural contexts. Additionally, a 2022 literature review found that the successful application of most principled negotiation
527:
described eight areas in which he agreed with the book, but also listed reservations and disagreements. The reservations included the authors' emphasis on long-term relationships (when immediate actions are sometimes required); the assumption that trust is unnecessary in negotiation; and the
218:
The book begins with a chapter "Don't
Bargain Over Positions" that explains the undesirable characteristics of positional bargaining, in which the negotiating parties argue over a sequence of positions. Such an argument "produces unwise outcomes", "is inefficient", and "endangers an ongoing
508:
is not scholarly or analytical and relies on anecdotal evidence, and that "the authors seem to deny the existence of a significant part of the negotiation process, and to oversimplify or explain away many of the most troublesome problems inherent in the art and practice of negotiation". In
515:
noted in 1984 that legal negotiators might adopt some of Fisher and Ury's ideas by using a problem solving approach instead of an adversarial approach. Nevertheless, she felt that ideas such as "separate the people from the problem" would not apply. In 2006, Menkel-Meadow praised
418:
The book has been called "arguably one of, if not the most famous, works on the topic of negotiation" as well as a "wellspring for cutting-edge academic research". The principles in the book have been applied to numerous negotiations. Nevertheless, it has received criticisms.
190:
In 1991, the book was issued in a second edition with Bruce Patton, an editor of the first edition, listed as a co-author. The main difference between the second and first editions was the addition of a chapter after the main text entitled "Ten
Questions People Ask About
245:
Concerning emotion, the authors encourage negotiators to explore the causes of both their own and the other party's emotions. Techniques may be needed to defuse anger, such as allowing the other party to voice grievances and to provide an apology as a symbolic gesture.
528:
suggestion to "avoid starting from extremes". The main disagreement was that the book did not consider the need of a negotiator to prevail when a negotiation involves a power struggle. Fisher replied that he agreed with some of McCarthy's criticisms, for example that "
536:
position may be different from that the course of action that the party will actually pursue. If a party's interest is in maintaining internal unity, it may adopt a position that preserves that unity, thus causing an overlap between position and interest.
435:) formed a department to implement principled negotiation. The purpose was to address the problems of increasing competition, rising healthcare prices, and increased customer expectations. For instance, the company used principled negotiation to form a
351:". The BATNA is "the results you can obtain without negotiating". The authors give three suggestions to develop a BATNA that both protects the negotiator from accepting an agreement that should be rejected and improves any agreement that is accepted:
268:
The second principle—"Focus on interests, not positions"—distinguishes the positions that the parties hold from the interests that led them to those positions. For example, in 1978 Israel and Egypt both held positions about occupying the
38:
587:. He called Fisher and Ury's book "a groundbreaking treatise" and wrote "I still agree with many of the powerful bargaining strategies in the book". But he criticized their methods as inadequate for hostage negotiations such as the
374:". One method is to ask a third party to mediate. In this "one-text procedure", the third party explores the parties' interests and iteratively develops a solution with them. The authors cite the negotiations that led to the 1978
591:: "I mean, have you ever tried to devise a mutually beneficial win-win solution with a guy who thinks he's the messiah?" Voss presented alternative techniques for such situations, including "the flip side of
398:. Instead, the parties should negotiate about the rules of negotiation using the four principles stated earlier in the book. This can overcome tactics such as misrepresentation and psychological pressure.
173:
consisting of "separate the people from the problem"; "focus on interests, not positions"; "invent options for mutual gain"; and "insist on using objective criteria". Although influential in the field of
226:
consortium) by Fisher, Ury, and Patton. The purpose of principled negotiation is to "decide issues on their merits rather than through a haggling process". The method is based on four principles:
560:
is a "classic text". Nevertheless, the book failed to realistically account for competition among negotiating parties and failed to consider complex personal dynamics during negotiations. A 2013
339:
All three editions of the book provide answers to three questions about the method of principled negotiation. The second and third editions answer ten other questions about negotiation.
566:
article asserted that the techniques in the book do not work for three reasons: people do not trust other people, people are not rational, and people do not enjoy negotiating.
205:
The third edition was published in 2011. Among other changes to the second edition, the third edition added newer examples of negotiations, such as a conflict in Iraq after
202:"Best-Seller" book list. As of December 2007, it was still making appearances on the list as one of the "Longest Running Best Sellers" in paperback business books.
290:
The third principle—"Invent options for mutual gain"—seeks to benefit both parties that are negotiating. To generate options, the authors suggest that the parties
474:
negotiations "if interests are defined to include cultural interests". For example, when negotiating with people in China, a negotiator should be aware of the
915:
520:
for inspiring a "rich research and teaching agenda", but also claimed that the factors leading to successful versus failed negotiations are still unclear.
348:
1887:
311:
of the will of either side". This approach can help produce "wise agreements amicably and efficiently", as in the case of negotiations about the
450:, principled negotiation can be used to advocate for a client's interests. For example, a social worker may need to negotiate with a government
970:
549:. It maintained that the book is written from a male perspective, and that some of its advice may not be appropriate for female negotiators.
117:
222:
The next four chapters describe the method of principled negotiation which was developed at the
Harvard Negotiation Project (part of the
1367:"Getting to Yes in the cross-cultural-context: 'one size doesn't fit all' – a critical review of principled negotiations across borders"
1328:"Getting to Yes in the cross-cultural-context: 'one size doesn't fit all' – a critical review of principled negotiations across borders"
569:
A 2012 commentary noted that
Australian practice guidelines for lawyers supported interest-based negotiation of the type described in
1825:
1793:
864:
752:
708:
1882:
1714:
1675:
1512:
1053:
524:
443:. Applying principled negotiation techniques occurred more naturally at the executive level than at lower levels of management.
1877:
657:
299:"). After a suitable option is developed, one side can draft a written agreement to make the decision easy for the other side.
1241:"Cultural Dimension Interests, the Dance of Negotiation, and Weather Forecasting: A Perspective on Cross-Cultural Negotiation"
940:
553:
410:". The questions and answers concern "fairness and 'principled' negotiation", "dealing with people", "tactics", and "power".
1389:
916:"Alternatives to Adversarial Negotiations Being Used Successfully: Could Different Bargaining Format Have Prevented Strike?"
278:
482:
techniques is often hindered by the predominantly
Western perspective through which these techniques were conceptualized.
1897:
1423:"Essay Review: The Pros and Cons of "Getting to YES" ['Reviewed by James J. White' and 'Comment by Roger Fisher']"
1240:
125:
1892:
1707:"The New Limitations of Fisher and Ury's Model of Interest-Based Negotiation: Not Necessarily the Ethical Alternative"
249:
Concerning communication, the authors point out three common problems and give suggestions to prevent or solve them:
163:
273:, but the reasons for the positions were different: Israel was interested in security and Egypt was interested in
1026:
256:
Not actively listening to the other party, but instead only listening to rebut the other party's statements; and
162:. Subsequent editions in 1991 and 2011 added Bruce Patton as co-author. All of the authors were members of the
378:
as an example of the one-text procedure, with the United States drafting agreements between Egypt and Israel.
198:
The book became a perennial best-seller. By July 1998, it had been appearing for more than three years on the
406:
The second and third editions contain a chapter after the main text entitled "Ten
Questions People Ask About
1542:
155:
48:
889:
501:
223:
307:
The fourth principle—"Insist on using objective criteria"—encourages parties to "negotiate on some basis
1141:
1092:
672:
475:
1649:
1861:
1477:
1455:
512:
1385:
652:
490:
395:
187:
adopted in several U.S. school districts to help students understand "non-adversarial bargaining".
978:
347:
If the other side "has a stronger bargaining position", the authors recommend "Develop Your BATNA—
1434:
1153:
662:
375:
1857:
1303:"Lacking pluralism? A critical review of the use of cultural dimensions in negotiation research"
1264:"Lacking pluralism? A critical review of the use of cultural dimensions in negotiation research"
1831:
1821:
1789:
1347:
1283:
1191:
870:
860:
758:
748:
714:
704:
667:
459:
370:
If the other side demands to use positional bargaining, a negotiator may attempt "negotiation
112:
1706:
1610:
1618:
1588:
1554:
1524:
1489:
1480:(October 2006). "Why Hasn't the World Gotten to Yes? An Appreciation and Some Reflections".
1339:
1275:
1218:
1183:
1145:
1096:
853:
697:
545:
387:
136:
71:
1209:
Bernstein, David A. (February 1995). "A Negotiation Model for
Teaching Critical Thinking".
451:
328:
270:
1579:
Provis, Chris (October 1996). "Interests vs. Positions: A Critique of the
Distinction".
390:
in 1938 as an example of a negotiator's failure to address "dirty tricks", in that case
1592:
1558:
1528:
1418:
1065:
741:
497:
471:
312:
206:
1742:
1458:(1984). "Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving".
1871:
1814:
1611:"Would Principled Negotiation Have Saved Eve?: A Feminist Analysis of Getting to YES"
1493:
1080:
436:
431:. In 2001, the health insurance company Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida (later
291:
1366:
1302:
948:
432:
391:
316:
1852:
1174:
Lens, Vicki (July 2004). "Principled
Negotiation: A New Tool for Case Advocacy".
1809:
470:
A 2008 review of literature concluded that the book's ideas could be applied to
447:
274:
175:
159:
52:
1343:
1279:
1222:
1130:"Taking Steps Toward "Getting to Yes" at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida"
17:
1781:
1149:
1100:
588:
576:
458:, principled negotiation has formed the basis for educational exercises about
455:
324:
296:
1351:
1327:
1287:
1263:
874:
1835:
762:
320:
37:
1195:
718:
1187:
629:
Getting to Peace: Transforming Conflict at Home, at Work, and in the World
494:
negotiations often involve "complex collective entities, such as states".
540:
427:
Organizational and individual negotiators have applied the principles of
1438:
1422:
1157:
1129:
621:
Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation
603:
Fisher and Ury wrote related books whose titles played on the title of
371:
1786:
Never Split the Difference: Negotiating as if Your Life Depended on It
1515:(January 1985). "The Role of Power and Principle in Getting to YES".
562:
440:
355:
Creating a list of actions one might take if no agreement is reached
277:. Addressing the underlying interests of the two nations led to the
1001:
259:
Misunderstanding or misinterpreting what the other party has said.
1650:"Back to the Future of ADR: Negotiating Justice and Human Needs"
253:
Not speaking with the other party in a direct and clear manner;
1816:
The Power of a Positive No: How to Say No and Still Get to Yes
637:
The Power of a Positive No: How to Say No and Still Get to Yes
282:
to arrive at options that satisfy their respective interests.
532:
probably overstates the case against positional bargaining".
1747:
Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective
295:
interests that are complementary (as in the nursery rhyme "
609:
Getting Together: Building a Relationship That Gets to Yes
358:
Transforming some of the more promising ideas into options
137:
1079:
Thompson, Leigh; Leonardelli, Geoffrey J. (August 2004).
641:
Getting to Yes with Yourself (And Other Worthy Opponents)
454:
agency to obtain services for a client. In the field of
855:
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
743:
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
699:
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
613:
Getting Ready to Negotiate: The Getting to Yes Workbook
543:
analysis of the book's recommendations appeared in the
151:
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
315:. Objective criteria can be based on factors such as
1081:"The Big Bang: The Evolution of Negotiation Research"
1450:
1448:
1123:
1121:
1119:
1117:
851:
Fisher, Roger; Ury, William; Patton, Bruce (2011) .
739:
Fisher, Roger; Ury, William; Patton, Bruce (1991) .
625:
Getting Past No: Negotiating in Difficult Situations
552:The author of a 2003 examination of the history of
135:
123:
111:
103:
95:
87:
77:
67:
59:
44:
27:
1981 book about negotiation methods by Roger Fisher
1813:
1413:
1411:
1409:
1407:
914:Piele, Philip K.; Stuart C. Smith (May 12, 1987).
852:
740:
696:
617:Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difficult People
1853:Summary of book on coauthor William Ury's website
1858:Getting to Yes: Negotiating in Challenging Times
1380:
1378:
1376:
633:The Third Side: Why We Fight and How We Can Stop
1676:"Why Negotiators Still Aren't 'Getting To Yes'"
1507:
1505:
1503:
1864:in June 2016 explaining concepts from the book
1743:"The False Promise of Principled Negotiations"
1643:
1641:
1128:Booth, Bridget; McCredie, Matt (August 2004).
1700:
1698:
1696:
1574:
1572:
1570:
1568:
1234:
1232:
8:
1604:
1602:
1332:International Journal of Conflict Management
1031:Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School
846:
844:
842:
840:
838:
836:
834:
832:
830:
828:
826:
824:
822:
820:
818:
816:
814:
812:
810:
808:
806:
804:
802:
800:
798:
796:
794:
792:
30:
1776:
1774:
1772:
1770:
1768:
1169:
1167:
790:
788:
786:
784:
782:
780:
778:
776:
774:
772:
734:
732:
730:
728:
690:
688:
154:is a best-selling 1981 non-fiction book by
1054:"Getting to Yes: Remembering Roger Fisher"
703:(1st ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
349:Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement
55:; and Bruce Patton in 2nd and 3rd editions
36:
29:
1245:Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
859:(3rd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
747:(2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
1657:Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution
386:The authors point to the outcome of the
1390:"Book Reviews [Getting to Yes]"
1027:"About the Harvard Negotiation Project"
684:
423:Applications of principled negotiation
361:Selecting the option that appears best
230:"Separate the people from the problem"
611:(1988). Fisher and Danny Ertel wrote
7:
941:"The Business Week Best-Seller List"
695:Fisher, Roger; Ury, William (1981).
303:"Insist on using objective criteria"
178:, the book has received criticisms.
1134:The Academy of Management Executive
971:"The BusinessWeek Best Seller List"
264:"Focus on interests, not positions"
1593:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1996.tb00105.x
1559:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1985.tb00293.x
1529:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1985.tb00292.x
1085:Academy of Management Perspectives
977:. December 3, 2007. Archived from
888:Morrow, Lance (December 7, 1981).
25:
1674:Jensen, Keld (February 5, 2013).
890:"Essay: The Dance of Negotiation"
343:"What if they are more powerful?"
83:1981 (2nd ed. 1991, 3rd ed. 2011)
1715:James Cook University Law Review
1494:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2006.00119.x
579:, a former FBI agent, mentioned
382:"What if they use dirty tricks?"
286:"Invent options for mutual gain"
214:Method of principled negotiation
1888:Collaborative non-fiction books
1741:Reyes, Victor Martinez (2015).
658:List of books about negotiation
607:. Fisher and Scott Brown wrote
599:Related books by Fisher and Ury
1545:(January 1985). "Beyond YES".
1365:Schoen, Raphael (2022-01-11).
1326:Schoen, Raphael (2021-01-01).
1301:Schoen, Raphael (2020-04-26).
1262:Schoen, Raphael (2021-04-01).
947:. July 6, 1998. Archived from
554:alternative dispute resolution
169:The book suggests a method of
1:
210:into more than 35 languages.
1788:. New York: HarperBusiness.
1648:Sanchez, Valerie A. (2003).
1239:Provis, Chris (April 2008).
500:, a professor of law at the
394:'s negotiating tactics with
1268:Management Review Quarterly
466:Cross-Cultural-Applications
365:
164:Harvard Negotiation Project
1914:
1860:– Video of William Ury at
1427:Journal of Legal Education
1344:10.1108/IJCMA-12-2020-0216
1280:10.1007/s11301-020-00187-5
1223:10.1207/s15328023top2201_7
619:(1991, revised in 1993 as
585:Never Split the Difference
366:"What if they won't play?"
1150:10.5465/AME.2004.14776178
1101:10.5465/ame.2004.14776179
1052:Schock, Kevin R. (2013).
631:(1999, later released as
504:, suggested in 1984 that
279:Egypt–Israel peace treaty
35:
1705:Wolski, Bobette (2012).
1421:; Fisher, Roger (1984).
1394:Naval War College Review
1883:Books about negotiation
1609:Kirby, Justine (1997).
478:which may be employed.
234:The first principle of
1878:1981 non-fiction books
1211:Teaching of Psychology
1058:Arbitration Law Review
502:University of Michigan
224:Program on Negotiation
171:principled negotiation
1478:Menkel-Meadow, Carrie
1456:Menkel-Meadow, Carrie
1142:Academy of Management
1093:Academy of Management
1000:Ury, William (n.d.).
920:Eugene Register-Guard
673:Vicente Blanco Gaspar
476:Thirty-Six Stratagems
1898:Personal development
1862:University of Geneva
1820:. New York: Bantam.
1388:(March–April 1982).
1386:Steinberg, Gerald M.
951:on February 15, 2009
595:": getting to "no".
513:Carrie Menkel-Meadow
439:with its competitor
335:Answers to questions
1581:Negotiation Journal
1547:Negotiation Journal
1517:Negotiation Journal
1482:Negotiation Journal
1188:10.1093/sw/49.3.506
1002:"About William Ury"
653:Conflict resolution
523:In a 1985 article,
491:Gerald M. Steinberg
402:Ten other questions
396:Neville Chamberlain
32:
1893:Dispute resolution
1307:Schoen-Negotiation
1033:. November 7, 2018
981:on October 3, 2008
663:Negotiation theory
615:(1995). Ury wrote
376:Camp David Accords
1513:McCarthy, William
668:Rogerian argument
583:in his 2016 book
460:critical thinking
327:and an insurance
147:
146:
118:978-0-395-31757-0
88:Publication place
16:(Redirected from
1905:
1840:
1839:
1819:
1806:
1800:
1799:
1778:
1763:
1762:
1760:
1758:
1738:
1732:
1731:
1729:
1727:
1711:
1702:
1691:
1690:
1688:
1686:
1671:
1665:
1664:
1654:
1645:
1636:
1635:
1633:
1631:
1619:Otago Law Review
1615:
1606:
1597:
1596:
1576:
1563:
1562:
1539:
1533:
1532:
1509:
1498:
1497:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1452:
1443:
1442:
1415:
1402:
1401:
1382:
1371:
1370:
1362:
1356:
1355:
1323:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1313:
1298:
1292:
1291:
1259:
1253:
1252:
1236:
1227:
1226:
1206:
1200:
1199:
1171:
1162:
1161:
1125:
1112:
1111:
1109:
1107:
1076:
1070:
1069:
1049:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1038:
1023:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1012:
997:
991:
990:
988:
986:
967:
961:
960:
958:
956:
937:
931:
930:
928:
926:
911:
905:
904:
902:
900:
885:
879:
878:
858:
848:
767:
766:
746:
736:
723:
722:
702:
692:
546:Otago Law Review
525:William McCarthy
388:Munich Agreement
139:
79:Publication date
72:Houghton Mifflin
40:
33:
21:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1868:
1867:
1849:
1844:
1843:
1828:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1796:
1780:
1779:
1766:
1756:
1754:
1740:
1739:
1735:
1725:
1723:
1709:
1704:
1703:
1694:
1684:
1682:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1652:
1647:
1646:
1639:
1629:
1627:
1613:
1608:
1607:
1600:
1578:
1577:
1566:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1511:
1510:
1501:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1460:UCLA Law Review
1454:
1453:
1446:
1419:White, James J.
1417:
1416:
1405:
1384:
1383:
1374:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1311:
1309:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1238:
1237:
1230:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1173:
1172:
1165:
1127:
1126:
1115:
1105:
1103:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1036:
1034:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1010:
1008:
999:
998:
994:
984:
982:
969:
968:
964:
954:
952:
939:
938:
934:
924:
922:
913:
912:
908:
898:
896:
887:
886:
882:
867:
850:
849:
770:
755:
738:
737:
726:
711:
694:
693:
686:
681:
649:
601:
488:
468:
452:social services
425:
416:
404:
384:
368:
345:
337:
329:claims adjuster
305:
288:
271:Sinai Peninsula
266:
232:
219:relationship".
216:
184:
128:
96:Media type
80:
31:Getting to YES
28:
23:
22:
18:Getting Past No
15:
12:
11:
5:
1911:
1909:
1901:
1900:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1870:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1855:
1848:
1847:External links
1845:
1842:
1841:
1826:
1801:
1794:
1764:
1733:
1692:
1666:
1637:
1598:
1587:(4): 305–323.
1564:
1534:
1499:
1488:(4): 485–503.
1469:
1444:
1433:(1): 115–124.
1403:
1372:
1357:
1318:
1293:
1274:(2): 393–432.
1254:
1228:
1201:
1182:(3): 506–513.
1163:
1113:
1071:
1066:Penn State Law
1044:
1018:
1006:williamury.com
992:
962:
932:
906:
880:
865:
768:
753:
724:
709:
683:
682:
680:
677:
676:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
648:
645:
605:Getting to Yes
600:
597:
593:Getting to Yes
581:Getting to Yes
571:Getting to Yes
558:Getting to Yes
530:Getting to YES
518:Getting To Yes
506:Getting to Yes
498:James J. White
487:
484:
472:cross-cultural
467:
464:
429:Getting to Yes
424:
421:
415:
412:
408:Getting to Yes
403:
400:
383:
380:
367:
364:
363:
362:
359:
356:
344:
341:
336:
333:
313:Law of the Sea
304:
301:
287:
284:
265:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:
236:Getting to Yes
231:
228:
215:
212:
207:Saddam Hussein
193:Getting to Yes
183:
180:
145:
144:
141:
133:
132:
129:
124:
121:
120:
115:
109:
108:
105:
101:
100:
97:
93:
92:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
75:
74:
69:
65:
64:
61:
57:
56:
46:
42:
41:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1910:
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1889:
1886:
1884:
1881:
1879:
1876:
1875:
1873:
1863:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1827:9780553804980
1823:
1818:
1817:
1811:
1805:
1802:
1797:
1795:9780062407801
1791:
1787:
1783:
1777:
1775:
1773:
1771:
1769:
1765:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1737:
1734:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1708:
1701:
1699:
1697:
1693:
1681:
1677:
1670:
1667:
1663:(3): 669–776.
1662:
1658:
1651:
1644:
1642:
1638:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1612:
1605:
1603:
1599:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1575:
1573:
1571:
1569:
1565:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1543:Fisher, Roger
1538:
1535:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1508:
1506:
1504:
1500:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1473:
1470:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1451:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1414:
1412:
1410:
1408:
1404:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1381:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1368:
1361:
1358:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1322:
1319:
1308:
1304:
1297:
1294:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1258:
1255:
1251:(3): 403–448.
1250:
1246:
1242:
1235:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1205:
1202:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1170:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1124:
1122:
1120:
1118:
1114:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1075:
1072:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1048:
1045:
1032:
1028:
1022:
1019:
1007:
1003:
996:
993:
980:
976:
972:
966:
963:
950:
946:
945:Business Week
942:
936:
933:
921:
917:
910:
907:
895:
891:
884:
881:
876:
872:
868:
866:9780143118756
862:
857:
856:
847:
845:
843:
841:
839:
837:
835:
833:
831:
829:
827:
825:
823:
821:
819:
817:
815:
813:
811:
809:
807:
805:
803:
801:
799:
797:
795:
793:
791:
789:
787:
785:
783:
781:
779:
777:
775:
773:
769:
764:
760:
756:
754:9780140157352
750:
745:
744:
735:
733:
731:
729:
725:
720:
716:
712:
710:9780395317570
706:
701:
700:
691:
689:
685:
678:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
650:
646:
644:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
598:
596:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
572:
567:
565:
564:
559:
555:
550:
548:
547:
542:
537:
533:
531:
526:
521:
519:
514:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
492:
485:
483:
479:
477:
473:
465:
463:
461:
457:
453:
449:
444:
442:
438:
437:joint venture
434:
430:
422:
420:
413:
411:
409:
401:
399:
397:
393:
389:
381:
379:
377:
373:
360:
357:
354:
353:
352:
350:
342:
340:
334:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
302:
300:
298:
293:
285:
283:
280:
276:
272:
263:
258:
255:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
237:
229:
227:
225:
220:
213:
211:
208:
203:
201:
196:
194:
188:
181:
179:
177:
172:
167:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:
142:
140:
138:LC Class
134:
130:
127:
126:Dewey Decimal
122:
119:
116:
114:
110:
106:
102:
99:Print, e-book
98:
94:
91:United States
90:
86:
82:
76:
73:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
47:
43:
39:
34:
19:
1815:
1810:Ury, William
1804:
1785:
1755:. Retrieved
1750:
1746:
1736:
1724:. Retrieved
1719:
1713:
1683:. Retrieved
1679:
1669:
1660:
1656:
1628:. Retrieved
1626:(1): 122–143
1623:
1617:
1584:
1580:
1553:(1): 67–70.
1550:
1546:
1537:
1523:(1): 59–66.
1520:
1516:
1485:
1481:
1472:
1463:
1459:
1430:
1426:
1397:
1393:
1360:
1338:(1): 22–46.
1335:
1331:
1321:
1310:. Retrieved
1306:
1296:
1271:
1267:
1257:
1248:
1244:
1217:(1): 22–24.
1214:
1210:
1204:
1179:
1175:
1137:
1133:
1104:. Retrieved
1088:
1084:
1074:
1061:
1057:
1047:
1035:. Retrieved
1030:
1021:
1009:. Retrieved
1005:
995:
983:. Retrieved
979:the original
975:BusinessWeek
974:
965:
953:. Retrieved
949:the original
944:
935:
923:. Retrieved
919:
909:
897:. Retrieved
893:
883:
854:
742:
698:
640:
639:(2007); and
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
602:
592:
584:
580:
575:
570:
568:
561:
557:
551:
544:
538:
534:
529:
522:
517:
511:
505:
496:
489:
480:
469:
445:
433:Florida Blue
428:
426:
417:
407:
405:
392:Adolf Hitler
385:
369:
346:
338:
317:market value
308:
306:
289:
267:
248:
244:
240:
235:
233:
221:
217:
204:
200:BusinessWeek
199:
197:
192:
189:
185:
170:
168:
156:Roger Fisher
150:
149:
148:
49:Roger Fisher
1782:Voss, Chris
1757:January 30,
1726:January 30,
1685:January 28,
1630:January 30,
1400:(2): 87–89.
1176:Social Work
1144:: 109–112.
1106:January 30,
1095:: 113–117.
1037:January 22,
1011:January 22,
985:January 22,
955:January 22,
925:January 22,
899:January 22,
448:social work
309:independent
275:sovereignty
176:negotiation
160:William Ury
53:William Ury
1872:Categories
1466:: 754–842.
1312:2024-05-07
1068:: 422–438.
679:References
589:Waco siege
577:Chris Voss
556:felt that
456:psychology
325:total loss
297:Jack Sprat
292:brainstorm
182:Background
1753:(2): 3–18
1722:: 127–158
1352:1044-4068
1288:2198-1639
875:609540048
486:Criticism
414:Reception
321:precedent
68:Publisher
1836:70718568
1812:(2007).
1784:(2016).
1439:42897936
1196:15281706
763:24318769
647:See also
643:(2015).
541:feminist
143:BF637.N4
60:Language
1158:4166097
719:7575986
539:A 1997
372:jujitsu
63:English
1834:
1824:
1792:
1680:Forbes
1437:
1350:
1286:
1194:
1156:
873:
863:
761:
751:
717:
707:
563:Forbes
441:Humana
45:Author
1710:(PDF)
1653:(PDF)
1614:(PDF)
1435:JSTOR
1154:JSTOR
1140:(3).
1091:(3).
131:158.5
104:Pages
1832:OCLC
1822:ISBN
1790:ISBN
1759:2022
1728:2022
1687:2022
1632:2022
1348:ISSN
1284:ISSN
1192:PMID
1108:2022
1039:2022
1013:2022
987:2022
957:2022
927:2022
901:2022
894:Time
871:OCLC
861:ISBN
759:OCLC
749:ISBN
715:OCLC
705:ISBN
319:and
158:and
113:ISBN
51:and
1589:doi
1555:doi
1525:doi
1490:doi
1340:doi
1276:doi
1219:doi
1184:doi
1146:doi
1097:doi
635:);
627:);
623:or
446:In
195:".
107:200
1874::
1830:.
1767:^
1749:.
1745:.
1720:19
1718:.
1712:.
1695:^
1678:.
1661:18
1659:.
1655:.
1640:^
1622:.
1616:.
1601:^
1585:12
1583:.
1567:^
1549:.
1519:.
1502:^
1486:22
1484:.
1464:31
1462:.
1447:^
1431:34
1429:.
1425:.
1406:^
1398:35
1396:.
1392:.
1375:^
1346:.
1336:33
1334:.
1330:.
1305:.
1282:.
1272:71
1270:.
1266:.
1247:.
1243:.
1231:^
1215:22
1213:.
1190:.
1180:49
1178:.
1166:^
1152:.
1138:18
1136:.
1132:.
1116:^
1089:18
1087:.
1083:.
1064:.
1060:.
1056:.
1029:.
1004:.
973:.
943:.
918:.
892:.
869:.
771:^
757:.
727:^
713:.
687:^
462:.
331:.
166:.
1838:.
1798:.
1761:.
1751:9
1730:.
1689:.
1634:.
1624:9
1595:.
1591::
1561:.
1557::
1551:1
1531:.
1527::
1521:1
1496:.
1492::
1441:.
1369:.
1354:.
1342::
1315:.
1290:.
1278::
1249:8
1225:.
1221::
1198:.
1186::
1160:.
1148::
1110:.
1099::
1062:5
1041:.
1015:.
989:.
959:.
929:.
903:.
877:.
765:.
721:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
