Knowledge

Great Salt Lake effect

Source 📝

138:
September and April or May. However a review of many more cases in 2012 found that the peaks of activity was really in the fall (mid-October to mid-December) and spring (early April) and that there was a minimum between those maximum. That same study found on average 13 events per year, well or not so well defined combined.
137:
set-up. The average is 4 to 5 well-defined events annually and the same number of marginal events. Slightly more than half of the well-defined events persist for 13 to 24 hours. In a 2000 study, researchers found that the larger number of cases were between October and February, with outlier cases in
156:
system. An accurate forecast involves identifying the crucial requirements for lake-effect precipitation. The basic requirements are a conditionally unstable environment, significant moisture and a lifting mechanism. Many different variables go into these requirements, which results in a
157:
minute-by-minute event. Through extensive analyses and field experiments the understanding of lake-effect snowstorms has improved drastically in recent years. Many general rules of thumb have been developed in order to predict the occurrence, location and severity of lake-effect snow.
70:
Lake-effect snow around the Great Salt Lake is generated in a similar fashion to elsewhere in the world. However, the Great Salt Lake primarily provides a lifting mechanism and acts as an atmospheric destabilizer, which encourages
141:
Most well-defined events leave accumulations of 8 inches (20 cm) or more, and in some cases more than 40 inches (100 cm), along a well-defined corridor.
98:
passage, where the winds are predominantly northwesterly and the air is much colder than the lake. When the land-lake breeze blows towards the lake, there is a
57: 419: 48:
to occur from September through May. Lake-enhanced snowstorms are often attributed to creating what is locally known as "The Greatest Snow on Earth".
528: 508: 518: 192:
Lake-effect is typically initiated during the night when land-breeze convergence is favored and convection occurs predominantly over the lake.
477: 44:
impacts due to their significant precipitation amounts. The Great Salt Lake almost never freezes and can warm rapidly, which allows
513: 195:
During the daytime lake-effect precipitation dissipates when solar heating creates scattered widespread convection over the land.
286: 378:"Great Salt Lake–Effect Precipitation: Observed Frequency, Characteristics, and Associated Environmental Factors" 107: 461: 434: 358: 332: 523: 149:
Forecasting skill has drastically improved in recent years due to a better observational network including the
244: 439: 382: 204:
The Great Salt Lake contributes minimal amounts of moisture so that upstream moisture is a crucial variable.
533: 337: 278: 165:
A set of rules has been developed by local forecasters to predict the development of lake enhanced snow:
56: 125:
further capitalizes on lake enhancement and can receive multiple feet of snow from lake-effect alone.
448: 391: 345: 290: 102:
that acts to channel the cold air over the center of the lake and further enhance precipitation. The
201:
Limited amounts of directional and vertical wind shear tend to produce heavier precipitation events.
183:
An inversion or stable layer below 700 mbar (70 kPa) has never yielded lake-effect snow.
172:
A minimal temperature difference of 29 °F (16 °C) between the surface and the 700 
420:"What is lake effect snow? It's impacting Utah, but what does that mean and how does it happen?" 308: 456: 399: 353: 298: 214: 111: 99: 65: 45: 481: 25: 452: 395: 349: 294: 180:) height is needed, but not necessarily sufficient in itself to cause lake-effect snow. 134: 41: 502: 177: 153: 119: 33: 219: 198:
The 700 mbar winds typically determine the geographic position of the precipitation
478:"Lake Effect of the Great Salt Lake: Scientific Overview and Forecast Diagnostics" 86:
Great Salt Lake enhanced precipitation occurs when a strong, cold, northwesterly
115: 76: 245:"Forecasting the 31 October 2004 Lake-Effect Snowstorm of the Great Salt Lake" 173: 95: 72: 37: 404: 377: 312: 303: 273: 169:
A strong Northwesterly flow maximizes precipitation for the Salt Lake Valley.
133:
The number of events varies considerably from year to year, according to the
122: 103: 80: 435:"The lake-effect of the Great Salt Lake: Overview and forecast problems" 186:
Lake-effect snow can occur in concert with synoptic scale storm systems.
21: 189:
A large lake-land temperature difference favors over-lake convergence.
150: 114:
into the overlying air. As a result, minimal amounts of moisture and
118:
are added to the air moving over the lake. The high relief of the
60:
Radar image of enhanced precipitation by the lake and convergence.
55: 91: 87: 29: 333:"Climatology of lake-effect snowstorms of the Great Salt Lake" 376:
Alcott, Trevor I.; Steenburgh, W. J.; Laird, Neil F. (2012).
274:"Orographic Influences on a Great Salt Lake–Effect Snowstorm" 462:
10.1175/1520-0434(1993)008<0181:TLEOTG>2.0.CO;2
359:
10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<0709:COLESO>2.0.CO;2
331:
Steenburgh, W. J.; Halvorson, S. F.; Onton, D. J. (2000).
106:
of the Great Salt Lake prevents freezing but reduces the
40:
are a common occurrence over the region and have major
79:, where the lakes contribute significant amounts of 20:is a small but detectable influence on the local 371: 369: 272:Alcott, Trevor; Steenburgh, Jim (July 2013). 8: 326: 324: 322: 460: 403: 357: 302: 238: 236: 234: 230: 7: 14: 529:Features of the Uinta Mountains 90:blows across a relatively warm 509:Climate of the Rocky Mountains 1: 519:Snow or ice weather phenomena 75:. This is in contrast to the 145:Forecasting lake-effect snow 46:lake enhanced precipitation 550: 63: 476:Steenburgh, W. J (1999). 433:Carpenter, D. M. (1993). 108:saturation vapor pressure 94:. This is common after a 405:10.1175/WAF-D-12-00016.1 304:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00328.1 514:Natural history of Utah 440:Weather and Forecasting 383:Weather and Forecasting 24:and weather around the 252:WFO Salt Lake City, UT 61: 18:Great Salt Lake effect 59: 453:1993WtFor...8..181C 396:2012WtFor..27..954A 350:2000MWRv..128..709S 295:2013MWRv..141.2432A 62: 484:on April 25, 2007 83:and latent heat. 36:. In particular, 541: 494: 493: 491: 489: 480:. Archived from 473: 467: 466: 464: 430: 424: 423: 416: 410: 409: 407: 373: 364: 363: 361: 328: 317: 316: 306: 269: 263: 262: 260: 258: 249: 240: 215:Lake-effect snow 112:latent heat flux 100:convergence zone 66:lake-effect snow 52:Lake enhancement 549: 548: 544: 543: 542: 540: 539: 538: 524:Great Salt Lake 499: 498: 497: 487: 485: 475: 474: 470: 432: 431: 427: 418: 417: 413: 375: 374: 367: 330: 329: 320: 271: 270: 266: 256: 254: 247: 243:Jackson, Mark. 242: 241: 232: 228: 211: 163: 147: 131: 68: 54: 26:Great Salt Lake 12: 11: 5: 547: 545: 537: 536: 531: 526: 521: 516: 511: 501: 500: 496: 495: 468: 447:(2): 181–193. 425: 411: 390:(4): 954–971. 365: 344:(3): 709–727. 338:Mon. Wea. Rev. 318: 279:Mon. Wea. Rev. 264: 229: 227: 224: 223: 222: 217: 210: 207: 206: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 170: 162: 161:Rules of thumb 159: 146: 143: 130: 127: 64:Main article: 53: 50: 42:socio-economic 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 546: 535: 534:Wasatch Range 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 510: 507: 506: 504: 483: 479: 472: 469: 463: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 441: 436: 429: 426: 421: 415: 412: 406: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 384: 379: 372: 370: 366: 360: 355: 351: 347: 343: 340: 339: 334: 327: 325: 323: 319: 314: 310: 305: 300: 296: 292: 289:: 2432–2450. 288: 284: 281: 280: 275: 268: 265: 253: 246: 239: 237: 235: 231: 225: 221: 218: 216: 213: 212: 208: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 175: 171: 168: 167: 166: 160: 158: 155: 154:weather radar 152: 144: 142: 139: 136: 128: 126: 124: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 84: 82: 78: 74: 67: 58: 51: 49: 47: 43: 39: 35: 34:United States 31: 27: 23: 19: 488:February 20, 486:. Retrieved 482:the original 471: 444: 438: 428: 414: 387: 381: 341: 336: 282: 277: 267: 257:February 20, 255:. Retrieved 251: 220:Chinook wind 164: 148: 140: 132: 85: 69: 17: 15: 129:Climatology 116:latent heat 77:Great Lakes 503:Categories 226:References 96:cold front 73:convection 38:snowstorms 313:0027-0644 176:(70  123:mountains 209:See also 135:synoptic 104:salinity 81:moisture 449:Bibcode 422:. 2021. 392:Bibcode 346:Bibcode 291:Bibcode 120:Wasatch 22:climate 311:  151:NEXRAD 285:(7). 248:(PDF) 490:2019 309:ISSN 259:2019 174:mbar 110:and 92:lake 88:wind 30:Utah 16:The 457:doi 400:doi 354:doi 342:128 299:doi 287:AMS 283:141 178:kPa 28:in 505:: 455:. 443:. 437:. 398:. 388:27 386:. 380:. 368:^ 352:. 335:. 321:^ 307:. 297:. 276:. 250:. 233:^ 32:, 492:. 465:. 459:: 451:: 445:8 408:. 402:: 394:: 362:. 356:: 348:: 315:. 301:: 293:: 261:.

Index

climate
Great Salt Lake
Utah
United States
snowstorms
socio-economic
lake enhanced precipitation

lake-effect snow
convection
Great Lakes
moisture
wind
lake
cold front
convergence zone
salinity
saturation vapor pressure
latent heat flux
latent heat
Wasatch
mountains
synoptic
NEXRAD
weather radar
mbar
kPa
Lake-effect snow
Chinook wind

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.