Knowledge (XXG)

Greedy reductionism

Source 📝

36:. Whereas "good" reductionism means explaining a thing in terms of what it reduces to (for example, its parts and their interactions), greedy reductionism occurs when "in their eagerness for a bargain, in their zeal to explain too much too fast, scientists and philosophers ... underestimate the complexities, trying to skip whole layers or levels of theory in their rush to fasten everything securely and neatly to the foundation". Using the terminology of "cranes" (legitimate, mechanistic explanations) and "skyhooks" (essentially, fake—e.g. supernaturalistic—explanations) built up earlier in the chapter, Dennett recapitulates his initial definition of the term in the chapter summary on p. 83: "Good reductionists suppose that all Design can be explained without skyhooks; greedy reductionists suppose it can all be explained without cranes." 626: 56:. It is often said of this school of thought (which dominated the field of psychology, at least in the Anglo-American world, for part of the twentieth century) that it denied the existence of mental states such as beliefs, although at least in Skinner's original version it merely denied the theoretical utility (or necessity) of postulating such states in order to explain behavior. Notably, Skinner himself characterized his views as anti-reductionist: in 101:. In response, critics accused him of "explaining away" consciousness because he disputes the existence of certain conceptions of consciousness that he considers overblown and incompatible with what is physically possible. This is perhaps what motivated Dennett to make the greedy/good distinction in his follow-up book, to freely admit that reductionism can go overboard while pointing out that not all reductionism goes this far. 104:
A departure from strict reductionism in the opposite direction from greedy reductionism is called nonreductive physicalism. Nonreductive physicalists deny that a reductionistic analysis of a conscious system like the human mind is sufficient to explain all of the phenomena which are characteristic of
144:
Yet one occasionally hears it said that the brain is nothing but a machine. The assertion is usually made in a slurring tone which implies that the brain has been overrated in some unspecified way and is supposed to put an end to further discussion. One investigator calls this "nothing buttery"
370: 163:
Although in the 1970s the phrase "nothing-buttery" had already been in use for at least twenty years, it is often associated with the scholar Donald Mackay, who popularized its use at that time and debated publicly with B. F. Skinner.
136:
An older name for 'greedy reductionism' is "nothing-buttery", an expression based on the repeated phrase "such-and-such is nothing but...". For example, in the article title, "Consciousness is Nothing But a Word".
149:
The expression began to be used in US English from 1953, and in UK English from the beginning of the 1960s. Its usage peaked in about 1970, but the phrase continues to be used up to the present.
697: 152:
The related expression "nothing-but-ism" appeared earlier, in the 1930s. One of its earliest documented uses was in a 1935 review by W. J. H. Sprott of Carl Jung's book
72:), he wrote that while mental and neurological states did exist, behavior could be explained without recourse to either. As Dennett says, "Skinner proclaimed that 120:, who claim the true relationship between the physical and the mental may be beyond scientific understanding—and therefore a "mystery"—have been dubbed 80:—could account for all mentality, all learning, not just in pigeons but in human beings. ... Skinner was a greedy reductionist, trying to explain 562: 416:
Sprott, W. J. H. (1935). "Review of Religion and the Sciences of Life., ; Men and their Motives., ; Modern Man in Search of a Soul".
532: 512: 303: 160:. Sprott praised Jung's book because "it does not attempt to explain away spiritual aspiration, the antithesis of 'nothing-but'-ism". 261: 625: 97:
exists, we can understand it as coming about from the coordinated activity of many components in the brain that are themselves
761: 705: 771: 555: 756: 689: 673: 522: 58: 28: 724: 657: 346: 113: 665: 548: 502: 253: 89: 248: 68: 766: 615: 193: 444: 106: 77: 735: 595: 178: 45: 600: 425: 470:
Washburn, David A. (December 1997). "The MacKay‐skinner debate: A case for "nothing buttery"".
585: 528: 508: 299: 257: 479: 121: 98: 681: 649: 44:
A canonical example of greedy reductionism, labelled as such by Dennett himself, is the (
605: 571: 23: 750: 287: 243: 183: 173: 125: 109: 94: 53: 320: 395: 140:
This 1955 example of the phrase demonstrates its use in its characteristic context:
117: 105:
that system. This idea is expressed in some theories that say consciousness is an
33: 730: 641: 49: 483: 295: 145:
thinking. It is certainly a grave insult to the brain—and to the machines.
610: 429: 198: 188: 112:
that cannot be reduced to physiological properties of neurons. Those
540: 544: 524:
Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life
716: 633: 578: 84:the design (and design power) in a single stroke". 93:, Dennett argued that, without denying that human 351:. New York: Harper & Brothers. p. 261 556: 8: 76:of the fundamental Darwinian process— 563: 549: 541: 210: 321:"Consciousness is nothing but a word" 7: 14: 624: 706:From Bacteria to Bach and Back 16:Kind of erroneous reductionism 1: 371:"n-gram of "nothing-buttery"" 443:Danielian, A. (1994-11-19). 319:Schlinger, Henry D. (2005). 396:"Oxford English Dictionary" 788: 375:Google Books n-gram Viewer 275:Losing our Minds to Darwin 273:Dennett 1995; Chapter 13, 244:Skinner, Burrhus Frederick 232:Losing our Minds to Darwin 230:Dennett 1995; Chapter 13, 59:Beyond Freedom and Dignity 725:The Philosophical Lexicon 622: 484:10.1080/09515089708573235 217:Dennett 1995; Chapter 3, 114:nonreductive physicalists 32:, is a kind of erroneous 527:, Simon & Schuster, 521:Dennett, Daniel (1995), 501:Dennett, Daniel (1991), 472:Philosophical Psychology 252:, Acton, Massachusetts: 674:Darwin's Dangerous Idea 666:Consciousness Explained 504:Consciousness Explained 345:Pfeiffer, John (1955). 292:The Science of the Mind 254:Copley Publishing Group 154:Man in Search of a Soul 90:Consciousness Explained 29:Darwin's Dangerous Idea 147: 62:and other works (e.g. 762:Metatheory of science 616:Multiple drafts model 507:, The Penguin Press, 194:Mereological nihilism 142: 87:In his earlier book 78:operant conditioning 74:one simple iteration 772:Metaphysics of mind 736:Universal Darwinism 596:Heterophenomenology 591:Greedy reductionism 179:Fallacy of division 26:, in his 1995 book 20:Greedy reductionism 757:Informal fallacies 698:Breaking the Spell 601:Intentional stance 66:and chapter 19 of 744: 743: 586:Cartesian theater 534:978-0-684-82471-0 514:978-0-316-18066-5 445:"Nothing Buttery" 305:978-0-262-56056-6 64:About Behaviorism 779: 628: 565: 558: 551: 542: 537: 517: 488: 487: 467: 461: 460: 458: 456: 440: 434: 433: 413: 407: 406: 404: 402: 392: 386: 385: 383: 381: 367: 361: 360: 358: 356: 342: 336: 335: 333: 331: 316: 310: 309: 284: 278: 271: 265: 241: 235: 228: 222: 215: 22:, identified by 787: 786: 782: 781: 780: 778: 777: 776: 747: 746: 745: 740: 712: 682:Freedom Evolves 629: 620: 574: 569: 535: 520: 515: 500: 497: 492: 491: 469: 468: 464: 454: 452: 442: 441: 437: 415: 414: 410: 400: 398: 394: 393: 389: 379: 377: 369: 368: 364: 354: 352: 348:The Human Brain 344: 343: 339: 329: 327: 318: 317: 313: 306: 298:. p. 313. 286: 285: 281: 272: 268: 249:Verbal Behavior 242: 238: 229: 225: 216: 212: 207: 170: 156:in the journal 134: 132:Nothing-buttery 69:Verbal Behavior 42: 17: 12: 11: 5: 785: 783: 775: 774: 769: 764: 759: 749: 748: 742: 741: 739: 738: 733: 728: 720: 718: 714: 713: 711: 710: 702: 694: 686: 678: 670: 662: 654: 646: 637: 635: 634:Selected works 631: 630: 623: 621: 619: 618: 613: 608: 606:Intuition pump 603: 598: 593: 588: 582: 580: 576: 575: 572:Daniel Dennett 570: 568: 567: 560: 553: 545: 539: 538: 533: 518: 513: 496: 493: 490: 489: 478:(4): 473–479. 462: 435: 424:(173): 84–92. 408: 387: 362: 337: 311: 304: 288:Flanagan, Owen 279: 266: 236: 223: 219:Universal Acid 209: 208: 206: 203: 202: 201: 196: 191: 186: 181: 176: 169: 166: 133: 130: 41: 38: 24:Daniel Dennett 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 784: 773: 770: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 754: 752: 737: 734: 732: 729: 727: 726: 722: 721: 719: 715: 708: 707: 703: 700: 699: 695: 692: 691: 687: 684: 683: 679: 676: 675: 671: 668: 667: 663: 660: 659: 655: 652: 651: 647: 644: 643: 639: 638: 636: 632: 627: 617: 614: 612: 609: 607: 604: 602: 599: 597: 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 583: 581: 577: 573: 566: 561: 559: 554: 552: 547: 546: 543: 536: 530: 526: 525: 519: 516: 510: 506: 505: 499: 498: 494: 485: 481: 477: 473: 466: 463: 450: 449:New Scientist 446: 439: 436: 431: 427: 423: 419: 412: 409: 397: 391: 388: 376: 372: 366: 363: 350: 349: 341: 338: 326: 322: 315: 312: 307: 301: 297: 293: 289: 283: 280: 276: 270: 267: 263: 262:1-58390-021-7 259: 255: 251: 250: 245: 240: 237: 233: 227: 224: 220: 214: 211: 204: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 184:Golden hammer 182: 180: 177: 175: 174:Contextualism 172: 171: 167: 165: 161: 159: 155: 150: 146: 141: 138: 131: 129: 127: 126:Owen Flanagan 123: 119: 115: 111: 110:epiphenomenon 108: 102: 100: 96: 95:consciousness 92: 91: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 65: 61: 60: 55: 54:B. F. Skinner 51: 47: 39: 37: 35: 31: 30: 25: 21: 767:Reductionism 723: 704: 696: 690:Sweet Dreams 688: 680: 672: 664: 656: 650:The Mind's I 648: 640: 590: 523: 503: 475: 471: 465: 453:. Retrieved 448: 438: 421: 417: 411: 399:. Retrieved 390: 378:. Retrieved 374: 365: 353:. Retrieved 347: 340: 328:. Retrieved 324: 314: 291: 282: 274: 269: 247: 239: 231: 226: 218: 213: 162: 157: 153: 151: 148: 143: 139: 135: 118:Colin McGinn 103: 88: 86: 81: 73: 67: 63: 57: 43: 34:reductionism 27: 19: 18: 731:New Atheism 642:Brainstorms 264:pp. 432-452 99:unconscious 50:behaviorism 751:Categories 658:Elbow Room 495:References 122:mysterians 116:, such as 296:MIT Press 611:Memetics 579:Concepts 325:eSceptic 290:(1991). 277:(p. 395) 246:(1957), 234:(p. 395) 168:See also 107:emergent 40:Examples 455:15 June 430:2250327 401:15 June 380:15 June 355:15 June 330:15 June 221:(p. 82) 46:radical 709:(2017) 701:(2006) 693:(2005) 685:(2003) 677:(1995) 669:(1991) 661:(1984) 653:(1981) 645:(1981) 531:  511:  451:(1952) 428:  302:  260:  199:Monism 189:Holism 717:Other 426:JSTOR 205:Notes 529:ISBN 509:ISBN 457:2017 418:Mind 403:2017 382:2017 357:2017 332:2017 300:ISBN 258:ISBN 158:Mind 480:doi 124:by 82:all 52:of 753:: 476:10 474:. 447:. 422:44 420:. 373:. 323:. 294:. 256:, 128:. 48:) 564:e 557:t 550:v 486:. 482:: 459:. 432:. 405:. 384:. 359:. 334:. 308:.

Index

Daniel Dennett
Darwin's Dangerous Idea
reductionism
radical
behaviorism
B. F. Skinner
Beyond Freedom and Dignity
Verbal Behavior
operant conditioning
Consciousness Explained
consciousness
unconscious
emergent
epiphenomenon
nonreductive physicalists
Colin McGinn
mysterians
Owen Flanagan
Contextualism
Fallacy of division
Golden hammer
Holism
Mereological nihilism
Monism
Skinner, Burrhus Frederick
Verbal Behavior
Copley Publishing Group
ISBN
1-58390-021-7
Flanagan, Owen

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.