Knowledge (XXG)

Two-gospel hypothesis

Source 📝

432:(1716–1795) in a piece he published in 1764, and by Friedrich Andreas Stroth (1750–1785) in an article he published anonymously in 1781. Griesbach (1745–1812), to whom this source hypothesis was first accredited, alluded to his conclusion that Matthew wrote the first of the canonical gospels and that Luke, not Mark, made first use of Matthew in composing the second of the canonical gospels in an address celebrating the Easter season at the University of Jena in 1783. Later, for similar Whitsun programs at Jena (1789–1790), Griesbach published a more detailed "Demonstration that the Whole Gospel of Mark is Excerpted from the Narratives of Matthew & Luke." 390:) state that information unique to Matthew ("M") and Luke ("L") came from unknown sources. The two-gospel hypothesis, by placing the authorship of the gospels earlier, assumes "M" to be mostly Saint Matthew's eyewitness testimony and "L" to be eyewitness account interviewed by Luke mentioned in the first verses of Luke's gospel. The two-gospel theory is more of a conjecture, as it depends on assuming the accounts of the early church of Matthean priority to be correct, despite there being some good scholarly reasons for skepticism, most notably the long time gaps between the creation of the gospels and the earliest surviving accounts of their authors. 551:, writing 30 years earlier than Irenaeus from the same location (Rome), loosely quotes gospels but does not give them their modern attributions, suggesting that these attributions were made at some point between 150–180. If the stories of Mark recording Peter's speeches truly originated from Rome circa 60 AD, why did Justin not refer to Mark or Peter? Even if Justin simply omitted mention coincidentally, it is still a long time for a chain of oral transmission traditions on authorship before it is recorded. As such, the Church Fathers should not be assumed to have special insight into the truth on this matter. 225: 40: 354:
preached on the contents of Matthew. Knowing Matthew better than Luke, Peter was more likely to mention details found in Matthew and not Luke than vice versa. This would explain why there are more details found in Mark and Matthew but not Luke than there are details found in Mark and Luke but not Matthew. It also explains why Mark is so much shorter than Matthew and Luke, is more anecdotal and emotional, is less polished, and why only it begins immediately with
345:, to testify that Luke's account was accurate. According to early church sources, Peter gave a series of speeches to senior Roman army officers. Due to the commonality between Mark and Luke, these speeches would have constituted Peter's public "seal of approval" upon Luke's gospel. These church sources suggest that Peter was ambivalent when Mark asked him if he could write down the words of the speeches. However, since the 498:"The argument from omission": why would Mark and Peter omit such remarkable and miraculous events as virgin birth of Jesus and particularly his appearance to apostles following resurrection? Both Matthew and Luke explicitly attest that Jesus appeared to the eleven disciples, including Peter, after his resurrection, and it seems incredible that Peter would not testify to that fact in his public speeches. And why is the 568: 495:
do share a lot of text which is not present in Mark, almost all of it is confined to teachings and parables. Construction of the gospels in accordance with the two-gospel hypothesis would require Luke to rewrite major parts of Matthew's narrative – even though Matthew was presumably an eyewitness who lived in Jerusalem and was surrounded by other eyewitnesses, and Luke was neither.
358:. Peter was giving public speeches as to what he saw, and never intended his speeches to become a full gospel. This was asserted by early church historians, and explains why there are so few commentaries on Mark (as opposed to Matthew, Luke and John) until a relatively late date. It appears to have been considered the least important gospel in the early church. 371:. The two-gospel hypothesis leans very heavily on this external evidence: it embraces the views of the early church, and claims that a strong reason needs to be provided to justify dismissing the traditions of the early Church maintained over the authorship of the gospels. The two-source hypothesis, in contrast, is based largely on the internal evidence for 399: 216:. Proponents of the two-gospel hypothesis generally also support the traditional claims of authorship as accurate to disciples and their direct associates, which implies the gospels were written comparatively soon after Jesus's death, rather than the later dates of authorship supported by other schools of thought. 453:
began to be seriously proposed in the 18th century, was fleshed out during the 19th century, and became established scholarly fact by the 20th century, with the two-source hypothesis the most popular variant. By the 1960s, scholars considered the two-source hypothesis to be the unquestioned solution
366:
Proponents generally separate arguments made from the text of the gospels themselves ("internal evidence") and evidence from preserved writings of the early church ("external evidence"). For example, early church documents claim that Mark's Gospel was created after Mark made fifty copies of a series
494:
If Luke had access to the final version of Matthew (as opposed to both drawing independently on other sources), why are there so many significant differences between Luke and Matthew on issues such as Jesus' genealogy, circumstances of birth, and events following resurrection? While Luke and Matthew
334:. Paul commissioned his associate, Luke, who consulted the Gospel of Matthew as well as other sources. Once the gospel had been written, its publication was delayed, however. Paul decided that he needed Peter's public testimony as to its accuracy, since neither Paul nor Luke had known Jesus before 282:
The proposal suggests that Matthew was written by the apostle Matthew, probably in the 40s AD. At the time, the church had yet to extend outside of Jerusalem. The primary political problem within the church community was caused by the fact that Jewish authorities were outright hostile to Jesus and
536:
Proponents also cite the early Church Fathers as holding a position of Matthaean priority. However, the early Church Fathers disagreed with each other on many issues, and held various positions given credence by essentially no one today. The earliest reference to all four canonical gospels that
349:
who heard the speeches liked them, they asked for copies, and so Mark made fifty copies of Peter's speeches. These copies began circulating, and became Mark's gospel. Only after the speeches by Peter were made (and Mark's transcriptions began circulating) did Paul feel confident enough to publish
554:
Conversely, if the early Church Fathers really are reliable, then why not trust them on their ordering of Matthew - Mark - Luke? The two-gospel hypothesis introduces a delay in the dissemination of Luke to explain the traditional order, but such a delay is never described explicitly in ancient
353:
The two-gospel hypothesis assumes that Peter made sure that his speeches agreed with both Matthew and the still unpublished Luke. Since Matthew was the primary source for Luke, and Matthew's gospel (the only published gospel at the time) would have been well known to Peter, he mostly would have
283:
his followers. Matthew wrote his account in order to show that Jesus was actually the fulfillment of what Jewish scripture had prophesied. It has been long recognized that Matthew is the most "Jewish" of the gospels. It, for example, heavily references Jewish scripture and Jewish history.
435:
Griesbach's theory was what German scholars came to call a "utilization hypothesis." Griesbach's main support for his thesis lies in passages where Matthew and Luke agree over and against Mark (e.g. Matthew 26:68; Luke 22:64; Mark 14:65), the so-called Minor Agreements.
382:. By the two-gospel hypothesis, this material was copied by Luke from Matthew, but not testified to by Mark because Peter had not seen it. Proponents of later dates of authorship (due to seeming familiarity with the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in the 375:. Since the two-source hypothesis does not accept the conjecture of the early church, it follows from internal evidence (such as the shortness of Mark) and logic (e.g. 'why would Mark write a shorter version of a gospel in existence?') 509:
are not unusual in antiquity, with thousands of references by surviving works to books that were not preserved. Even strictly theologically, lost works are attested to directly in scripture: an
228:
Almost all of Mark's content is found in Matthew, and much of Mark is similarly found in Luke. Additionally, Matthew and Luke have a large amount of material in common that is not found in Mark.
409:
The Church Fathers settled on Matthaean priority themselves, but kept to the order seen in the New Testament: Matthew, Mark, Luke, then John. This would later be referred to as the
490:
also work as arguments against the two-gospel hypothesis. While it is impossible to list all arguments in favor and against the theory, some notable arguments are as follows.
378:
Approximately 25% of Matthew and 25% of Luke are identical, but are not found in Mark. This has been explained in the two-source hypothesis as coming from the hypothetical
1912: 424:. The Griesbach hypothesis is similar to the modern two-gospel hypothesis. However, unlike the two-gospel hypothesis, the Griesbach hypothesis is principally a 439:
A related theory has Luke drawing not directly from Matthew, but from a common source, seen as a proto-Matthew. This was advanced in the nineteenth century by
1907: 939: 1965: 1729: 1635: 1268: 521:, a deuterocanonical book considered scripture in the Catholic and Orthodox traditions, directly states it is an abridgement of a five-volume work by 327: 237: 1690: 1670: 1275: 470:. At a conference in 1979, proponents agreed to change the name from "Griesbach hypothesis" to "two-gospel hypothesis". Others such as 2011: 971: 1685: 721: 2106: 1927: 1124: 912: 884: 862: 845: 793: 525:, but this original work has been lost. Even if taken on its own terms, the two-gospel hypothesis cites patristic evidence such as 440: 2057: 1650: 932: 755: 2178: 1958: 1932: 368: 342: 311: 299: 241: 233: 1721: 2173: 2080: 1922: 539: 208:, the most popular and accepted scholarly hypothesis. Supporters say that it does not require lost sources like the 1660: 1362: 1290: 925: 1917: 828:
For Griesbach's life and work, including the full text of the cited work in Latin and in English translation, cf.
2163: 1951: 1753: 1263: 514: 510: 1697: 2101: 2062: 1680: 1347: 1327: 586: 303: 224: 2116: 2096: 2052: 833: 295: 2024: 1640: 1342: 421: 410: 402: 383: 194: 129: 1192: 2111: 2042: 1468: 1433: 1397: 1337: 530: 487: 205: 147: 39: 1382: 1285: 526: 414: 335: 1207: 2168: 1483: 1305: 1221: 1216: 1202: 1197: 1187: 1182: 1177: 813: 544: 499: 307: 269: 253: 505:
Proponents cite the simplicity of not having to include an unknown lost tradition in Q. However,
428:
hypothesis. What came to be labeled the Griesbach Hypothesis was anticipated by the Welsh scholar
268:
gave public testimonies that validated Luke's gospel. These public speeches were transcribed into
1714: 1665: 1655: 1508: 1488: 1418: 1367: 1172: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 506: 467: 425: 315: 213: 840:, Volume 34 in SNTS Monograph Series (Cambridge University Press, hardback 1978, paperback 2005 232:
The hypothesis states that Matthew was written first, while Christianity was still centered in
2047: 1991: 1352: 1332: 1258: 1248: 1243: 948: 880: 858: 841: 789: 737: 717: 581: 455: 355: 198: 182: 162: 135: 713:
The Progressive Publication of Matthew: An Explanation of the Writing of the Synoptic Gospels
1983: 1974: 1891: 1453: 1448: 1402: 1372: 1357: 1315: 1280: 872: 471: 174: 143:
Hypothesis that the synoptic gospels were authored in the order of Matthew, Luke, then Mark
2034: 1745: 1478: 1428: 1387: 894: 829: 522: 483: 463: 450: 444: 372: 767: 2072: 2001: 1996: 1630: 1604: 1493: 1473: 1463: 1295: 810:
Die "Minor Agreements". Untersuchungen zu einer offenen Frage des synoptischen Problems
591: 190: 186: 170: 166: 2157: 1253: 1211: 961: 548: 323: 287: 273: 17: 1589: 1458: 573: 331: 291: 611: 1886: 1881: 1876: 1871: 1866: 1861: 1503: 1377: 1320: 781: 518: 462:, but this view did not receive much uptake among scholars; exceptions included 265: 177:, which concerns the pattern of similarities and differences between the three 1856: 1851: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1781: 1392: 1310: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 563: 429: 379: 346: 257: 101: 420:
The first major proponent of something like a Matthew-Luke-Mark ordering was
1776: 1771: 1584: 1569: 1564: 1559: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1300: 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 979: 245: 201:
in 1964 and given its current designation of two-gospel hypothesis in 1979.
756:
Mark's Gospel: Prior Or Posterior? A Reappraisal of the Phenomenon of Order
318:
and claimed the title of "Apostle to the Gentiles" realized the need for a
2142: 2137: 2132: 1737: 1675: 1625: 1620: 1438: 1423: 547:(written around 170–200 AD) - over a century after Jesus's death. 276: 249: 209: 1599: 1579: 1554: 1513: 398: 387: 178: 1523: 1498: 711: 319: 310:) towns. There they began preaching, and a large number of pagans in 917: 1943: 1594: 1574: 1443: 956: 397: 261: 223: 537:
calls them by the names ascribed to them now is from Irenaeus's
405:, who suggested a Matthew, Luke, Mark order on literary grounds. 1947: 921: 417:, from around 380, state that Mark used both Matthew and Luke. 197:
writing in the 1780s; it was introduced in its current form by
838:
J. J. Griesbach: Synoptic and Text-Critical Studies 1776–1976
533:". If such a document existed, it too has since been lost. 474:
have kept up support for the two-gospel hypothesis since.
899:
The Order of the Synoptics: Why Three Synoptic Gospels?
2125: 2089: 2071: 2033: 2010: 1981: 1900: 1764: 1706: 1613: 1547: 1411: 1234: 1123: 970: 955: 279:. Paul then allowed Luke's gospel to be published. 248:, Luke wrote a gospel with an intended audience of 125: 117: 107: 97: 92: 84: 76: 71: 63: 51: 46: 613:Three Views on the Origins of the Synoptic Gospels 517:, but is generally considered lost. The book of 322:specifically to the Gentiles. This gospel would 193:. The hypothesis is generally first credited to 169:, and that both were written earlier than the 1959: 933: 314:became Christians. By the mid 50s, Paul, who 204:The two-gospel hypothesis contrasts with the 8: 697: 341:Paul asked Peter, who was the leader of the 27: 502:completely omitted from both Mark and Luke? 1966: 1952: 1944: 967: 940: 926: 918: 38: 744:. New York: Western North Carolina Press. 742:The Synoptic Problem: A Critical Analysis 458:raised objections to it in his 1964 book 362:Contrasted with the two-source hypothesis 913:A Web Site for the Two Gospel Hypothesis 603: 788:. HarperCollins. p. 63–67. 26: 238:hostility between Jews and Christians 7: 367:of speeches that Peter had given in 1730:The Gospel According to St. Matthew 482:Many generic arguments in favor of 173:. It is a proposed solution to the 25: 2107:Priority of the Gospel of Marcion 330:in order to appeal to Greeks and 290:was martyred, as recorded in the 272:gospel, as recorded by the early 2058:Matthean Posteriority hypothesis 566: 543:(written around 185 AD) and the 855:Rethinking the Synoptic Problem 1: 386:in 70 AD in passages such as 814:J. C. B. Mohr 529:who believed there to be a " 2081:Jerusalem school hypothesis 2195: 1661:Five Discourses of Matthew 901:. Mercer University Press. 454:to the synoptic problem. 145: 1928:American Standard Version 1754:The Visual Bible: Matthew 1264:Massacre of the Innocents 616:, Kregel Academic, p. 10. 511:Epistle to the Laodiceans 212:and was supported by the 133:Friedrich Andreas Stroth 37: 32: 2102:Hebrew Gospel hypothesis 2063:Four-document hypothesis 1681:Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew 1328:Jesus preaches in a ship 897:; Riley, Harold (1987). 786:Jesus Before the Gospels 710:Powers, B. Ward (2010). 698:Orchard & Riley 1987 610:Robert L. Thomas (ed.), 587:Four-document hypothesis 240:. After Matthew, as the 146:Not to be confused with 2117:Independence hypothesis 2097:Multi-source hypothesis 2053:Three-source hypothesis 1686:Rabbinical translations 879:. Kregel Publications. 816:, Tübingen 1994. p. 28. 260:) were eyewitnesses of 165:was written before the 2025:Augustinian hypothesis 1641:Augustinian hypothesis 1479:Mary, sister of Martha 834:Thomas R. W. Longstaff 768:"The Priority of Mark" 716:. B&H Publishing. 422:Johann Jakob Griesbach 411:Augustinian hypothesis 406: 403:Johann Jakob Griesbach 384:First Jewish-Roman War 356:Jesus' public ministry 324:deemphasize Mosaic Law 229: 195:Johann Jakob Griesbach 130:Johann Jakob Griesbach 2179:Christian terminology 2043:Two-source hypothesis 2020:Two-gospel hypothesis 1933:World English Version 1651:Matthean Posteriority 1646:Two-gospel hypothesis 1338:Feeding the multitude 1301:Behold the bridegroom 531:Gospel of the Hebrews 488:Two-source hypothesis 401: 328:recent Jewish history 302:into Gentile (mostly 227: 206:two-source hypothesis 155:two-gospel hypothesis 148:Two-source hypothesis 67:No additional sources 28:Two-gospel hypothesis 2112:Q+/Papias hypothesis 2090:Other or no priority 1698:Joseph Smith–Matthew 1383:Crucifixion of Jesus 853:Beck, David (2001). 460:The Synoptic Problem 415:Monarchian Prologues 159:Griesbach hypothesis 112:On Dispensing with Q 33:Griesbach hypothesis 18:Griesbach hypothesis 1306:Sermon on the Mount 808:Ennulat, Andreas. 700:, pp. 208–209. 545:Muratorian fragment 500:Sermon on the Mount 256:(nor his associate 29: 2174:Biblical criticism 2012:Matthaean priority 1923:King James Version 1715:St Matthew Passion 1666:Calling of Matthew 1656:Genealogy of Jesus 1269:Return to Nazareth 857:. Baker Academic. 738:Farmer, William R. 468:David Laird Dungan 407: 230: 64:Additional Sources 47:Theory Information 2151: 2150: 2048:Farrer hypothesis 1992:Gospel of Matthew 1941: 1940: 1671:Kingdom of heaven 1353:Great Commandment 1333:Calming the storm 1291:Galilean ministry 1276:Kingdom of heaven 1259:Flight into Egypt 1249:Star of Bethlehem 1230: 1229: 949:Gospel of Matthew 877:Why Four Gospels? 754:Neville, David. 582:Farrer hypothesis 513:is referenced in 456:William R. Farmer 394:Scholarly history 336:Jesus's execution 298:scattered beyond 199:William R. Farmer 163:Gospel of Matthew 141: 140: 136:William R. Farmer 16:(Redirected from 2186: 2164:Synoptic problem 2126:Possible sources 1984:Synoptic Gospels 1975:Synoptic problem 1968: 1961: 1954: 1945: 1918:Wycliffe Version 1892:Magdalen papyrus 1718:(Bach, 1727/29) 1636:Textual variants 1454:John the Baptist 1403:Great Commission 1373:Passion of Jesus 1358:Olivet Discourse 1343:Walking on water 968: 942: 935: 928: 919: 902: 895:Orchard, Bernard 890: 868: 817: 806: 800: 799: 778: 772: 771: 764: 758: 752: 746: 745: 734: 728: 727: 707: 701: 695: 689: 686: 680: 677: 671: 668: 662: 659: 653: 650: 644: 641: 635: 632: 626: 623: 617: 608: 576: 571: 570: 569: 555:church writings. 540:Against Heresies 472:David Alan Black 441:Wilhelm de Wette 252:. Since neither 175:synoptic problem 118:Origination Date 108:Originating Work 72:Gospels' Sources 42: 30: 21: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2147: 2121: 2085: 2067: 2035:Marcan priority 2029: 2006: 1977: 1972: 1942: 1937: 1896: 1760: 1702: 1609: 1543: 1407: 1348:Transfiguration 1236: 1226: 1119: 959: 951: 946: 909: 893: 887: 871: 865: 852: 830:Bernard Orchard 826: 821: 820: 807: 803: 796: 780: 779: 775: 766: 765: 761: 753: 749: 736: 735: 731: 724: 709: 708: 704: 696: 692: 687: 683: 678: 674: 669: 665: 660: 656: 651: 647: 642: 638: 633: 629: 624: 620: 609: 605: 600: 572: 567: 565: 562: 523:Jason of Cyrene 484:Markan Priority 480: 464:Bernard Orchard 451:Markan priority 445:Friedrich Bleek 396: 373:Marcan priority 364: 350:Luke's gospel. 242:church expanded 222: 151: 144: 134: 132: 58: 56: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2192: 2190: 2182: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2156: 2155: 2149: 2148: 2146: 2145: 2140: 2135: 2129: 2127: 2123: 2122: 2120: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2099: 2093: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2084: 2083: 2077: 2075: 2073:Lucan priority 2069: 2068: 2066: 2065: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2039: 2037: 2031: 2030: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2016: 2014: 2008: 2007: 2005: 2004: 2002:Gospel of Luke 1999: 1997:Gospel of Mark 1994: 1988: 1986: 1979: 1978: 1973: 1971: 1970: 1963: 1956: 1948: 1939: 1938: 1936: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1904: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1895: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1824: 1819: 1814: 1809: 1804: 1799: 1794: 1789: 1784: 1779: 1774: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1759: 1758: 1750: 1742: 1741:(1971 musical) 1734: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1710: 1708: 1704: 1703: 1701: 1700: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1683: 1678: 1673: 1668: 1663: 1658: 1653: 1648: 1643: 1638: 1633: 1631:Gospel of Mark 1628: 1623: 1617: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1607: 1605:Sea of Galilee 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1557: 1551: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1542: 1541: 1536: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1501: 1496: 1494:Pontius Pilate 1491: 1486: 1481: 1476: 1474:Mary Magdalene 1471: 1466: 1464:Judas Iscariot 1461: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1415: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1303: 1298: 1296:Fishers of men 1293: 1288: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1240: 1238: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1225: 1224: 1219: 1217:27:1–12; 52–66 1214: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1129: 1127: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 976: 974: 965: 953: 952: 947: 945: 944: 937: 930: 922: 916: 915: 908: 907:External links 905: 904: 903: 891: 885: 869: 863: 825: 822: 819: 818: 801: 794: 773: 759: 747: 729: 723:978-0805448481 722: 702: 690: 681: 672: 663: 654: 645: 636: 627: 618: 602: 601: 599: 596: 595: 594: 592:Gospel harmony 589: 584: 578: 577: 561: 558: 557: 556: 552: 534: 503: 496: 479: 476: 395: 392: 363: 360: 347:Roman officers 236:, to calm the 221: 218: 171:Gospel of Mark 167:Gospel of Luke 142: 139: 138: 127: 123: 122: 119: 115: 114: 109: 105: 104: 99: 95: 94: 93:Theory History 90: 89: 86: 82: 81: 78: 74: 73: 69: 68: 65: 61: 60: 53: 49: 48: 44: 43: 35: 34: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2191: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2159: 2144: 2141: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2128: 2124: 2118: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2098: 2095: 2094: 2092: 2088: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2076: 2074: 2070: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2040: 2038: 2036: 2032: 2026: 2023: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2015: 2013: 2009: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1987: 1985: 1980: 1976: 1969: 1964: 1962: 1957: 1955: 1950: 1949: 1946: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1913:Latin Vulgate 1911: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1903: 1899: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1870: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1818: 1815: 1813: 1810: 1808: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1795: 1793: 1790: 1788: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1770: 1769: 1767: 1763: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1709: 1705: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1662: 1659: 1657: 1654: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1642: 1639: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1616: 1612: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1588: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1540: 1537: 1535: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1502: 1500: 1497: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1329: 1326: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1316:Lord's Prayer 1314: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1233: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1181: 1179: 1176: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1126: 1122: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 977: 975: 973: 969: 966: 963: 962:New Testament 958: 954: 950: 943: 938: 936: 931: 929: 924: 923: 920: 914: 911: 910: 906: 900: 896: 892: 888: 886:0-8254-2070-9 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 864:0-8010-2281-9 860: 856: 851: 850: 849: 847: 846:0-521-02055-7 843: 839: 835: 831: 823: 815: 811: 805: 802: 797: 795:9780062285232 791: 787: 783: 777: 774: 769: 763: 760: 757: 751: 748: 743: 739: 733: 730: 725: 719: 715: 714: 706: 703: 699: 694: 691: 685: 682: 676: 673: 667: 664: 658: 655: 649: 646: 640: 637: 631: 628: 622: 619: 615: 614: 607: 604: 597: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 579: 575: 564: 559: 553: 550: 549:Justin Martyr 546: 542: 541: 535: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 501: 497: 493: 492: 491: 489: 485: 477: 475: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 452: 448: 446: 442: 437: 433: 431: 427: 423: 418: 416: 412: 404: 400: 393: 391: 389: 385: 381: 376: 374: 370: 361: 359: 357: 351: 348: 344: 339: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 284: 280: 278: 275: 274:Church father 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 226: 219: 217: 215: 211: 207: 202: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 149: 137: 131: 128: 124: 120: 116: 113: 110: 106: 103: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 70: 66: 62: 54: 50: 45: 41: 36: 31: 19: 2019: 1752: 1744: 1736: 1728: 1713: 1645: 1590:Jordan River 1444:Jesus Christ 1398:Resurrection 1244:Jesus' birth 898: 876: 873:Black, David 854: 837: 827: 809: 804: 785: 782:Ehrman, Bart 776: 762: 750: 741: 732: 712: 705: 693: 684: 675: 666: 657: 648: 639: 630: 621: 612: 606: 574:Bible portal 538: 507:lost sources 481: 459: 449: 438: 434: 419: 408: 377: 365: 352: 340: 292:Book of Acts 285: 281: 231: 214:early Church 203: 161:is that the 158: 154: 152: 111: 1765:Manuscripts 1757:(1993 film) 1749:(1973 film) 1733:(1964 film) 1504:Simon Peter 1378:Last Supper 1363:Ten Virgins 1321:Golden Rule 1237:and phrases 519:2 Maccabees 244:beyond the 2169:Hypotheses 2158:Categories 1908:Greek Text 1707:In culture 1393:Empty tomb 1311:Beatitudes 1286:Temptation 598:References 515:Colossians 430:Henry Owen 380:Q document 126:Proponents 102:Henry Owen 98:Originator 80:Matt, Luke 1772:Papyrus 1 1722:Structure 1585:Jerusalem 1570:Capernaum 1565:Bethsaida 1560:Bethlehem 1539:Sanhedrin 1534:Sadducees 1529:Pharisees 1368:Anointing 1133:Matthew 1 980:Matthew 1 478:Criticism 316:converted 306:but also 300:Jerusalem 296:disciples 246:Holy Land 234:Jerusalem 2143:L source 2138:M source 2133:Q source 1746:Godspell 1738:Godspell 1691:Shem Tob 1676:Immanuel 1626:M source 1621:Q source 1439:Jeremiah 1424:Caiaphas 972:Chapters 875:(2001). 784:(2016). 740:(1964). 560:See also 426:literary 343:Apostles 277:Irenaeus 250:Gentiles 220:Overview 210:Q source 1901:Sources 1614:Related 1600:Samaria 1580:Galilee 1555:Bethany 1514:Zebedee 1484:Matthew 1281:Baptism 1208:16:2b–3 836:(ed.), 824:Sources 486:and/or 388:Mark 13 312:Antioch 288:Stephen 183:Matthew 179:Gospels 1548:Places 1524:Angels 1520:Groups 1509:Thomas 1499:Rachel 1489:Philip 1459:Joseph 1419:Andrew 1412:People 1388:Burial 1235:Events 1193:13:1–3 1125:Verses 883:  861:  844:  792:  720:  527:Papias 413:. The 332:Romans 320:gospel 308:Syriac 294:, the 270:Mark's 189:, and 1595:Judea 1575:Egypt 1434:James 1429:Herod 957:Bible 688:Black 670:Black 652:Black 643:Black 634:Black 304:Greek 286:When 266:Peter 262:Jesus 57:Luke 55:Matt 52:Order 1982:The 1469:Mary 1449:John 1254:Magi 881:ISBN 859:ISBN 842:ISBN 832:and 790:ISBN 718:ISBN 679:Beck 661:Beck 625:Beck 466:and 443:and 369:Rome 326:and 258:Paul 254:Luke 191:Luke 187:Mark 153:The 121:1764 88:Matt 85:Luke 77:Mark 59:Mark 1887:110 1882:105 1877:104 1872:103 1867:102 1862:101 848:). 181:of 157:or 2160:: 1857:96 1852:86 1847:83 1842:77 1837:73 1832:71 1827:70 1822:62 1817:53 1812:45 1807:44 1802:37 1797:35 1792:25 1787:21 1782:19 1222:28 1212:19 1203:15 1198:14 1188:12 1183:11 1178:10 1115:28 1110:27 1105:26 1100:25 1095:24 1090:23 1085:22 1080:21 1075:20 1070:19 1065:18 1060:17 1055:16 1050:15 1045:14 1040:13 1035:12 1030:11 1025:10 812:. 447:. 338:. 264:, 185:, 1967:e 1960:t 1953:v 1777:4 1210:, 1173:9 1168:8 1163:7 1158:6 1153:5 1148:4 1143:3 1138:2 1020:9 1015:8 1010:7 1005:6 1000:5 995:4 990:3 985:2 964:) 960:( 941:e 934:t 927:v 889:. 867:. 798:. 770:. 726:. 150:. 20:)

Index

Griesbach hypothesis

Henry Owen
Johann Jakob Griesbach
William R. Farmer
Two-source hypothesis
Gospel of Matthew
Gospel of Luke
Gospel of Mark
synoptic problem
Gospels
Matthew
Mark
Luke
Johann Jakob Griesbach
William R. Farmer
two-source hypothesis
Q source
early Church

Jerusalem
hostility between Jews and Christians
church expanded
Holy Land
Gentiles
Luke
Paul
Jesus
Peter
Mark's

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.