485:
428:
60:
Psychologist Daniël Lakens has argued that the size of the effect in the original study is impossibly large. A later analysis and simulations suggested that at least part of the effect might arise from scheduling priorities – that cases with a lenient outcome required more time and so would not be
41:
was made in 2011. It found that the granting of parole was 65% at the start of a session but would drop to nearly zero before a meal break. The authors suggested that mental depletion as a result of fatigue caused decisions to increasingly favour the status quo, while rest and replenishment then
25:
is a term originally coined to describe a data pattern that judges' verdicts are more lenient after a meal break. Since the original study, the term has morphed to encompass a stream of research concerned with implications of hunger on economic and social behavior.
89:
fast. However, the opposite has been observed in experimental studies. Observant participants showed greater kindness while fasting and less so after breaking their fast. Thus, the hungry judge effect is situation specific and impacted by morality triggers.
64:
More recent studies show that certain legal decisions can get more lenient with increasing case ordering, which might be caused by a direction-of-comparison mechanism rather than decision-makers' fatigue.
324:
Plonsky, Ori; Chen, Daniel L.; Netzer, Liat; Steiner, Talya; Feldman, Yuval (2023). "Motivational drivers for serial position effects: Evidence from high-stakes legal decisions".
171:
44:
526:
412:, Christos Ioannou, & Farnoush Golshirazi (2018). The religious observance of ramadan and prosocial behavior. Economic Inquiry, 56(1), 226-237.
77:
are usually motivated by the hungry judge effect. However, some argue that the hungry judge effect is overstated in justifying the use of AI in law.
225:
469:
519:
560:
326:
512:
286:"The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated"
545:
363:"Beware the Lure of Narratives: "Hungry Judges" Should Not Motivate the Use of "Artificial Intelligence" in Law"
550:
169:
Shai
Danziger; Jonathan Levav; Liora Avnaim-Pesso (26 April 2011), "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions",
462:
256:
484:
49:
180:
120:
281:
555:
392:
307:
455:
384:
343:
208:
148:
74:
496:
439:
85:
The hungry judge effect was thought to predict greater human kindness after the break of the
374:
335:
297:
198:
188:
138:
128:
184:
124:
492:
231:
203:
143:
108:
539:
396:
42:
restored a willingness to make bold decisions. The paper, which was published in the
311:
409:
38:
427:
285:
302:
388:
193:
133:
347:
212:
152:
379:
362:
339:
86:
29:
It has been suggested that this may be an artifact of case scheduling.
413:
435:
109:"Overlooked factors in the analysis of parole decisions"
73:
Interventions of AI and algorithms in the court such as
500:
443:
61:scheduled in the time remaining before a break.
172:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
113:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
107:Weinshall-Margel, Keren; Shapard, John (2011).
45:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
520:
463:
8:
81:Economic and social behavior during Ramadan
527:
513:
470:
456:
378:
361:Chatziathanasiou, Konstantin (May 2022).
301:
202:
192:
142:
132:
227:Extraneous factors in judicial decisions
99:
164:
162:
7:
481:
479:
424:
422:
37:A study of the decisions of Israeli
499:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
442:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
414:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12480
14:
483:
426:
119:(42): E833, author reply E834.
255:Lakens, Daniel (3 July 2017).
1:
327:Journal of Applied Psychology
290:Judgment and Decision Making
577:
478:
421:
257:"Impossibly hungry judges"
303:10.1017/S1930297500004812
194:10.1073/pnas.1018033108
134:10.1073/pnas.1110910108
52:– 1,380 times by 2021.
495:-related article is a
438:-related article is a
561:Social science stubs
261:The 20% Statistician
380:10.1017/glj.2022.32
243:About 1,380 results
185:2011PNAS..108.6889D
125:2011PNAS..108E.833W
23:hungry judge effect
367:German Law Journal
340:10.1037/apl0001064
508:
507:
451:
450:
284:(November 2016),
179:(17): 6889–6892,
568:
546:Cognitive biases
529:
522:
515:
487:
480:
472:
465:
458:
430:
423:
416:
407:
401:
400:
382:
358:
352:
351:
334:(7): 1137–1156.
321:
315:
314:
305:
282:Andreas Glöckner
278:
272:
271:
269:
267:
252:
246:
245:
240:
238:
222:
216:
215:
206:
196:
166:
157:
156:
146:
136:
104:
50:cited many times
576:
575:
571:
570:
569:
567:
566:
565:
551:Decision-making
536:
535:
534:
533:
477:
476:
420:
419:
408:
404:
360:
359:
355:
323:
322:
318:
280:
279:
275:
265:
263:
254:
253:
249:
236:
234:
224:
223:
219:
168:
167:
160:
106:
105:
101:
96:
83:
75:COMPAS software
71:
58:
35:
17:
12:
11:
5:
574:
572:
564:
563:
558:
553:
548:
538:
537:
532:
531:
524:
517:
509:
506:
505:
493:social science
488:
475:
474:
467:
460:
452:
449:
448:
431:
418:
417:
402:
373:(4): 452–464.
353:
316:
296:(6): 601–610,
273:
247:
232:Google Scholar
217:
158:
98:
97:
95:
92:
82:
79:
70:
67:
57:
54:
34:
33:Original study
31:
16:Cognitive bias
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
573:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
543:
541:
530:
525:
523:
518:
516:
511:
510:
504:
502:
498:
494:
489:
486:
482:
473:
468:
466:
461:
459:
454:
453:
447:
445:
441:
437:
432:
429:
425:
415:
411:
406:
403:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
376:
372:
368:
364:
357:
354:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
328:
320:
317:
313:
309:
304:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
277:
274:
262:
258:
251:
248:
244:
233:
229:
228:
221:
218:
214:
210:
205:
200:
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
173:
165:
163:
159:
154:
150:
145:
140:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
103:
100:
93:
91:
88:
80:
78:
76:
68:
66:
62:
55:
53:
51:
47:
46:
40:
39:parole boards
32:
30:
27:
24:
19:
501:expanding it
490:
444:expanding it
433:
410:Ernan Haruvy
405:
370:
366:
356:
331:
325:
319:
293:
289:
276:
264:. Retrieved
260:
250:
242:
235:, retrieved
226:
220:
176:
170:
116:
112:
102:
84:
72:
69:Consequences
63:
59:
43:
36:
28:
22:
20:
18:
48:, has been
540:Categories
94:References
556:Law stubs
397:249047713
389:2071-8322
237:27 August
56:Responses
348:36455017
312:19192291
266:21 April
213:21482790
153:21987788
204:3084045
181:Bibcode
144:3198355
121:Bibcode
87:Ramadan
395:
387:
346:
310:
211:
201:
151:
141:
491:This
434:This
393:S2CID
308:S2CID
497:stub
440:stub
385:ISSN
344:PMID
268:2024
239:2021
209:PMID
149:PMID
21:The
436:law
375:doi
336:doi
332:108
298:doi
199:PMC
189:doi
177:108
139:PMC
129:doi
117:108
542::
391:.
383:.
371:23
369:.
365:.
342:.
330:.
306:,
294:11
292:,
288:,
259:.
241:,
230:,
207:,
197:,
187:,
175:,
161:^
147:.
137:.
127:.
115:.
111:.
528:e
521:t
514:v
503:.
471:e
464:t
457:v
446:.
399:.
377::
350:.
338::
300::
270:.
191::
183::
155:.
131::
123::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.