35:
662:
191:
A language teacher from Hong Kong had done a two-year training course at home. She came to the UK where the requirement was for three year qualifications. She did a further one-year training course. The
Secretary of State refused to recognise her qualification as comparable, because her three years
224:
requires an objective balance between the discriminatory effect of the condition and the reasonable needs of the party who applies the condition…. the employer had to show a real need on the part of the undertaking, objectively justified, although that need was not confined to economic grounds; it
225:
might, for instance, include administrative efficiency in a concern not engaged in commerce or business. Clearly it may, as in the present case, be possible to justify by reference to grounds other than economic or administrative efficiency.
56:
782:
208:
section 41. Balcombe LJ, dissenting, would have remitted the case to tribunal to assess justification. He set out the current approach for justification, relying on
509:
255:
724:
607:
478:
677:
380:
707:
621:
422:
288:
107:
777:
79:
772:
408:
565:
86:
647:
210:
192:
was not consecutive. She argued this was race discrimination. However, the
Secretary of State argued it fell within the exception under the
550:
342:
93:
692:
394:
502:
316:
248:
126:
75:
450:
60:
304:
495:
241:
100:
45:
368:
64:
49:
462:
17:
577:
193:
438:
356:
731:
714:
697:
682:
667:
652:
597:
582:
555:
592:
328:
216:
294:
274:
634:
525:
271:
538:
278:
637:
528:
487:
766:
757:
752:
741:
474:
180:
428:
412:
398:
346:
332:
34:
233:
205:
204:
The Court of Appeal, upholding the EAT, found for the
Department under
491:
237:
183:
case, concerning the test for justification of discrimination.
28:
162:
154:
146:
141:
196:section 41 (acts done under statutory authority).
168:Objective justification, indirect discrimination
222:
726:Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College
503:
249:
176:Hampson v Department of Education and Science
142:Hampson v Department of Education and Science
18:Hampson v Department of Education and Science
8:
609:Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality
63:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
510:
496:
488:
382:Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police v Khan
256:
242:
234:
138:
783:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
709:Kutz-Bauer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
623:Tottenham Green Nursery v Marshall (No 2)
424:Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
290:Stefanko v Doherty and Maritime Hotel Ltd
127:Learn how and when to remove this message
76:"Hampson v Dept of Education and Science"
663:Kontofunktionaerernes Forbund v Danfoss
409:Roma Rights Centre v Prague Immigration
566:R (Amicus) v SS for Trade and Industry
678:Rinner-Kühn v FWW Gebäudereinigung KG
648:Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz
214:which incorporated the test given in
211:Rainey v Greater Glasgow Health Board
7:
551:Johnston v Royal Ulster Constabulary
518:Sources on justifying discrimination
343:Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2)
61:adding citations to reliable sources
693:Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
395:Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary
25:
317:R (EOC) v Birmingham City Council
33:
778:1989 in United Kingdom case law
773:United Kingdom labour case law
451:English v Sanderson Blinds Ltd
1:
369:Grant v South-West Trains Ltd
305:Horsey v Dyfed County Council
264:Direct discrimination cases
799:
738:
721:
704:
689:
674:
659:
644:
632:
618:
604:
589:
574:
562:
547:
535:
523:
471:
459:
447:
435:
419:
405:
391:
377:
365:
353:
339:
325:
313:
301:
285:
269:
167:
463:Grainger plc v Nicholson
578:Sirdar v The Army Board
194:Race Relations Act 1976
439:Coleman v Attridge Law
227:
329:James v Eastleigh BC
57:improve this article
357:Smith v Safeway plc
372:ICR 449 (C-249/96)
748:
747:
635:Equality Act 2010
526:Equality Act 2010
485:
484:
272:Equality Act 2010
172:
171:
137:
136:
129:
111:
16:(Redirected from
790:
727:
710:
624:
610:
539:Etam plc v Rowan
512:
505:
498:
489:
425:
383:
291:
258:
251:
244:
235:
139:
132:
125:
121:
118:
112:
110:
69:
37:
29:
21:
798:
797:
793:
792:
791:
789:
788:
787:
763:
762:
749:
744:
734:
725:
717:
708:
700:
685:
670:
655:
640:
628:
622:
614:
608:
600:
593:Kreil v Germany
585:
570:
558:
543:
531:
519:
516:
486:
481:
467:
455:
443:
442:(2008) C-303/06
431:
423:
415:
401:
387:
381:
373:
361:
349:
335:
321:
309:
297:
289:
281:
265:
262:
232:
202:
189:
150:Court of Appeal
133:
122:
116:
113:
70:
68:
54:
38:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
796:
794:
786:
785:
780:
775:
765:
764:
761:
760:
755:
746:
745:
739:
736:
735:
722:
719:
718:
705:
702:
701:
690:
687:
686:
675:
672:
671:
660:
657:
656:
645:
642:
641:
633:
630:
629:
619:
616:
615:
605:
602:
601:
590:
587:
586:
575:
572:
571:
563:
560:
559:
548:
545:
544:
536:
533:
532:
524:
521:
520:
517:
515:
514:
507:
500:
492:
483:
482:
472:
469:
468:
460:
457:
456:
448:
445:
444:
436:
433:
432:
420:
417:
416:
406:
403:
402:
392:
389:
388:
378:
375:
374:
366:
363:
362:
354:
351:
350:
340:
337:
336:
326:
323:
322:
314:
311:
310:
302:
299:
298:
286:
283:
282:
270:
267:
266:
263:
261:
260:
253:
246:
238:
231:
228:
217:Bilka-Kaufhaus
201:
198:
188:
185:
170:
169:
165:
164:
160:
159:
156:
152:
151:
148:
144:
143:
135:
134:
41:
39:
32:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
795:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
770:
768:
759:
758:EU labour law
756:
754:
753:UK labour law
751:
750:
743:
742:UK labour law
737:
733:
729:
728:
720:
716:
712:
711:
703:
699:
695:
694:
688:
684:
680:
679:
673:
669:
665:
664:
658:
654:
650:
649:
643:
639:
636:
631:
626:
625:
617:
612:
611:
603:
599:
595:
594:
588:
584:
580:
579:
573:
568:
567:
561:
557:
553:
552:
546:
541:
540:
534:
530:
527:
522:
513:
508:
506:
501:
499:
494:
493:
490:
480:
476:
470:
465:
464:
458:
454:EWCA Civ 1421
453:
452:
446:
441:
440:
434:
430:
427:
426:
418:
414:
411:
410:
404:
400:
397:
396:
390:
385:
384:
376:
371:
370:
364:
359:
358:
352:
348:
345:
344:
338:
334:
331:
330:
324:
319:
318:
312:
307:
306:
300:
296:
293:
292:
284:
280:
276:
273:
268:
259:
254:
252:
247:
245:
240:
239:
236:
229:
226:
221:
219:
218:
213:
212:
207:
199:
197:
195:
186:
184:
182:
181:UK labour law
179:ICR 179 is a
178:
177:
166:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
131:
128:
120:
109:
106:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78: –
77:
73:
72:Find sources:
66:
62:
58:
52:
51:
47:
42:This article
40:
36:
31:
30:
27:
19:
723:
706:
691:
676:
661:
646:
620:
606:
591:
576:
564:
549:
537:
479:equality law
466:IRLR 4 (EAT)
461:
449:
437:
421:
407:
393:
379:
367:
355:
341:
327:
315:
303:
287:
223:
215:
209:
203:
190:
175:
174:
173:
123:
114:
104:
97:
90:
83:
71:
55:Please help
43:
26:
767:Categories
638:s 19(2)(d)
117:April 2016
87:newspapers
475:UK labour
44:does not
732:C-256/01
715:C-187/00
698:C-184/89
683:C-171/88
668:C-109/88
653:C-170/84
598:C-285/98
583:C-273/97
569:EWHC 860
556:C-222/84
542:IRLR 150
295:IRLR 322
230:See also
206:RRA 1976
200:Judgment
163:Keywords
155:Citation
730:(2004)
713:(2003)
696:(1991)
681:(1989)
666:(1989)
651:(1984)
627:ICR 320
613:ICR 768
596:(2000)
581:(1999)
554:(1986)
429:UKSC 15
413:UKHL 55
399:UKHL 11
386:UKHL 48
360:ICR 868
347:UKHL 13
320:AC 1155
308:ICR 755
158:ICR 179
101:scholar
65:removed
50:sources
333:UKHL 6
103:
96:
89:
82:
74:
529:Sch 9
275:ss 13
187:Facts
147:Court
108:JSTOR
94:books
740:see
477:and
473:see
277:and
80:news
48:any
46:cite
279:136
59:by
769::
220:.
511:e
504:t
497:v
257:e
250:t
243:v
130:)
124:(
119:)
115:(
105:·
98:·
91:·
84:·
67:.
53:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
