Knowledge

Henry Bishop (postmaster general)

Source 📝

30: 22: 138:
but within a year of taking office he was accused of abuses. In reply, he mentions the improvements he instigated including the stamping of letters, on 2 August 1661. He served in the position until April 1663 at which time he gave up the remainder of his lease to
131:. Bishop claimed no less than £500 in compensation for the loss of income because several independent posts had been started between London and the country but were not suppressed until the act was passed; they infringed on his monopoly to carry letters. 190:
The original London Bishop Mark, first used 19 April 1661 The earliest known examples of use are in the Public Records Office, Kew, West London, consisted of a small circle of 13 mm diameter, bisected horizontally, with the month (in
206:
were introduced which ranged in size from 14 to 20 mm. The layout of these was also changed, with the month appearing at the base. This type remained in use until 1787, when it was replaced by the double circle type.
170:
A stamp is invented that is putt upon every letter shewing the day of the moneth that every letter comes to the office, so that no Letter Carryer may dare detayne a letter from post to post; which before was
99:. In the meantime his Rectory estate in Henfield had been sequestered. However, he was restored to royal favour in 1660 and served as postmaster-general between that date and 1663. At his death in 1692 ( 195:
lettering) abbreviated to two letters, in the upper half and the day of the month in the lower half. Similar marks were used later in Scotland and Ireland, as well as the North American colonies.
622: 231:'Henfield: Manors and other estates', A History of the County of Sussex: Volume 6 Part 3: Bramber Rape (North-Eastern Part) including Crawley New Town (1987), pp. 140-145. 123:
gave him the monopoly to carry letters within the kingdom. His appointment was to start on 25 June 1660, but was delayed until 29 September when the
579: 124: 68: 163:
was received by the post and to ensure that the dispatch of letters would not be delayed. These were the world's first handstruck postage stamps
119:, Henry Bishop paid £21,500 per year to farm the Post Office for a term of seven years. This was more than double the previous payment. Bishop's 453: 175:
The postmarks were usually on the back of the letter and are known initially used in the Chief Office in London but were introduced later in
115:
Before the creation of the position of Postmaster General, control of the post was in the hands of "Master of the King's Post". In 1660, at
159:
Henry Bishop introduced the world's first known postmark in London in 1661. The "Bishop Mark" was designed to show the date on which a
627: 436: 408: 80: 198:
In 1673, a new mark was brought into use which had a diameter of between 13 and 14 mm. The type used from this point was
152: 104: 34: 632: 100: 589: 140: 424: 502:
The colonial Bishop Marks did not have the bisecting line, and they appeared in various colours. Cf. Robson Lowe,
607: 335: 135: 617: 612: 460: 343: 92: 128: 84: 527: 287: 116: 432: 404: 279: 546: 542:
The history of the early postmarks of the British Isles from their Introduction down to 1840
160: 555: 531: 397: 120: 601: 184: 29: 540: 364: 88: 60: 38: 521: 199: 203: 180: 312: 95:, but was reconciled with parliament in 1647, after spending two years in 96: 72: 56: 64: 478:
The Barry Jay FRPS Collection of British Postal History, 1534 - 1867,
176: 151: 21: 557:
The History of the Post Office from its establishment down to 1836
192: 150: 28: 20: 134:
Bishop was the first officially appointed Postmaster General to
76: 504:
The Encyclopaedia of British Empire Postage Stamps, 1639-1952,
369:
The Encyclopaedia of British Empire Postage Stamps, 1661-1951,
103:) his Rectory estate in Henfield passed to his great-nephew 280:"1500: The Reformation - From King's Post to Post Office" 381:
The story of the Bishop Marks is traced in Robson Lowe,
560:. London: Richard Bentley & Son. pp. pps. 460. 202:
and this continued in use until 1713. In 1713, larger
489:
Lowe, Robson. "The American Colonial Post Offices."
371:. Vol. I. London: Robson Lowe Ltd. p. 17. 396: 480:Sale 585 (June 16, 2000), description of Lot 2035 431:. Dublin: David Feldman Ltd. pp. pps. 6–10. 399:The Stamp Collector's Encyclopaedia, 6th ed. rev 395:Sutton, Richard John; Kenneth W Anthony (1966). 168: 336:"World postmark primer: how to decipher dates" 8: 564: 306: 304: 227: 225: 623:Postmasters general of the United Kingdom 429:Handbook of Irish postal History to 1840 262: 260: 258: 256: 243: 241: 239: 237: 221: 16:British postmaster general, 1605 - 1691 523:The History of the British Post Office 266: 247: 7: 403:. New York: Philosophical Library. 545:. London: L. Upcott Gill. pp.  33:Memorial tablet to Henry Bishop in 14: 520:Hemmeon, Joseph Clarence (1912). 334:Miller, Rick (23 February 2004). 91:. Henry at first fought for King 383:Handstruck Stamps of the Empire, 506:vol. V, pp. 23, 29, 57-8 (1973) 81:Sir Thomas Bishopp, 1st Baronet 493:9, no. 4 (January 1943): 62-4. 105:Sir Cecil Bishopp, 4th Baronet 1: 69:Postmaster General of England 79:. He was the second son of 35:St Peter's Church, Henfield 649: 71:and inventor of the first 586: 577: 572: 567: 628:Younger sons of baronets 427:; Kane, William (1975). 47:(1605–1691), also spelt 554:Joyce, Herbert (1893). 539:Hendy, John G. (1905). 173: 156: 41: 26: 154: 32: 24: 633:People from Henfield 476:Cavendish Auctions, 385:(1939), Appendix 2. 284:History of the Post 129:General Post Office 580:Postmaster General 568:Political offices 528:Harvard University 311:Shanahan, Eunice. 288:Bath Postal Museum 166:Bishop announced, 157: 127:reconstituted the 111:Postmaster General 42: 27: 596: 595: 587:Succeeded by 526:. Cambridge, MA: 344:Linn's Stamp News 315:. Eunice Shanahan 125:Act of Parliament 640: 565: 561: 550: 535: 507: 500: 494: 487: 481: 474: 468: 467: 466:on 9 March 2016. 465: 459:. Archived from 458: 449: 443: 442: 421: 415: 414: 402: 392: 386: 379: 373: 372: 361: 355: 354: 352: 350: 340:Refresher Course 331: 325: 324: 322: 320: 308: 299: 298: 296: 294: 276: 270: 269:, pp. 33–34 264: 251: 245: 232: 229: 648: 647: 643: 642: 641: 639: 638: 637: 608:Postal pioneers 598: 597: 592: 583: 553: 538: 519: 511: 510: 501: 497: 491:The Philatelist 488: 484: 475: 471: 463: 456: 452:Oliver, Allan. 451: 450: 446: 439: 423: 422: 418: 411: 394: 393: 389: 380: 376: 363: 362: 358: 348: 346: 333: 332: 328: 318: 316: 310: 309: 302: 292: 290: 278: 277: 273: 265: 254: 246: 235: 230: 223: 213: 149: 117:The Restoration 113: 17: 12: 11: 5: 646: 644: 636: 635: 630: 625: 620: 615: 610: 600: 599: 594: 593: 590:Daniel O'Neill 588: 585: 576: 570: 569: 563: 562: 551: 536: 516: 515: 509: 508: 495: 482: 469: 454:"Bishop Marks" 444: 437: 425:Feldman, David 416: 409: 387: 374: 356: 326: 313:"Bishop Marks" 300: 271: 252: 250:, pp. 3–4 233: 220: 219: 218: 217: 212: 209: 148: 145: 141:Daniel O'Neill 121:letters patent 112: 109: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 645: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 605: 603: 591: 582: 581: 575: 571: 566: 559: 558: 552: 548: 544: 543: 537: 533: 529: 525: 524: 518: 517: 513: 512: 505: 499: 496: 492: 486: 483: 479: 473: 470: 462: 455: 448: 445: 440: 438:0-9502619-1-2 434: 430: 426: 420: 417: 412: 410:0-517-08024-9 406: 401: 400: 391: 388: 384: 378: 375: 370: 366: 360: 357: 345: 341: 337: 330: 327: 314: 307: 305: 301: 289: 285: 281: 275: 272: 268: 263: 261: 259: 257: 253: 249: 244: 242: 240: 238: 234: 228: 226: 222: 215: 214: 210: 208: 205: 201: 196: 194: 188: 186: 185:New York City 182: 178: 172: 167: 164: 162: 153: 146: 144: 142: 137: 132: 130: 126: 122: 118: 110: 108: 106: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 45:Henry Bishopp 40: 36: 31: 23: 19: 578: 574:New creation 573: 556: 541: 522: 503: 498: 490: 485: 477: 472: 461:the original 447: 428: 419: 398: 390: 382: 377: 368: 365:Lowe, Robson 359: 347:. Retrieved 339: 329: 317:. Retrieved 291:. Retrieved 283: 274: 267:Joyce (1893) 248:Hendy (1905) 197: 189: 174: 169: 165: 158: 133: 114: 52: 48: 44: 43: 25:Henry Bishop 18: 618:1691 deaths 613:1611 births 530:. pp.  349:22 February 155:Bishop Mark 147:Bishop mark 89:West Sussex 61:West Sussex 39:West Sussex 602:Categories 584:1660–1663 211:References 204:handstamps 200:sans-serif 136:Charles II 181:Edinburgh 93:Charles I 367:(1952). 97:Virginia 87:also in 75:used on 73:postmark 57:Henfield 53:Bisshopp 514:Sources 319:1 April 293:1 April 193:serifed 65:England 55:, from 435:  407:  177:Dublin 171:usual. 161:letter 85:Parham 67:was a 49:Bishop 464:(PDF) 457:(PDF) 216:Notes 433:ISBN 405:ISBN 351:2009 321:2017 295:2017 183:and 101:N.S. 77:mail 51:and 547:204 532:261 83:of 59:in 604:: 342:. 338:. 303:^ 286:. 282:. 255:^ 236:^ 224:^ 187:. 179:, 143:. 107:. 63:, 37:, 549:. 534:. 441:. 413:. 353:. 323:. 297:.

Index



St Peter's Church, Henfield
West Sussex
Henfield
West Sussex
England
Postmaster General of England
postmark
mail
Sir Thomas Bishopp, 1st Baronet
Parham
West Sussex
Charles I
Virginia
N.S.
Sir Cecil Bishopp, 4th Baronet
The Restoration
letters patent
Act of Parliament
General Post Office
Charles II
Daniel O'Neill

letter
Dublin
Edinburgh
New York City
serifed
sans-serif

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.