Knowledge

Herbrand's theorem

Source đź“ť

856:
Remove contraction inferences on previously existentially quantified formulas, since the formulas (now with terms substituted for previously quantified variables) might not be identical anymore after the removal of the quantifier
621:
The restriction to formulas in prenex form containing only existential quantifiers does not limit the generality of the theorem, because formulas can be converted to prenex form and their universal quantifiers can be removed by
455: 1027: 1065:
Herbrand disjunctions and expansion-tree proofs have been extended with a notion of cut. Due to the complexity of cut-elimination, Herbrand disjunctions with cuts can be non-elementarily smaller than a standard Herbrand
848: 561: 733: 171: 1069:
Herbrand disjunctions have been generalized to Herbrand sequents, allowing Herbrand's theorem to be stated for sequents: "a Skolemized sequent is derivable if and only if it has a Herbrand sequent".
913: 229: 1209: 337: 305: 266: 630:
Herbrandization is performed. Herbrandization can be avoided by imposing additional restrictions on the variable dependencies allowed in the Herbrand disjunction.
612: 584: 61:. Although Herbrand originally proved his theorem for arbitrary formulas of first-order logic, the simpler version shown here, restricted to formulas in 349: 918: 757: 1185: 470: 645: 83: 231:
quantifier-free, though it may contain additional free variables. This version of Herbrand's theorem states that the above formula is
1169: 590:
containing only existential quantifiers is provable (valid) in first-order logic if and only if a disjunction composed of
28: 1041:
were not known at the time of Herbrand's proof, and Herbrand had to prove his theorem in a more complicated way.
58: 1084: 863: 751: 179: 1059: 1055: 66: 1126:
Samuel R. Buss: "Handbook of Proof Theory". Chapter 1, "An Introduction to Proof Theory". Elsevier, 1998.
853:
Starting from leaves and working downwards, remove the inferences that introduce existential quantifiers.
638:
A proof of the non-trivial direction of the theorem can be constructed according to the following steps:
1214: 1204: 591: 736: 1094: 310: 278: 54: 1079: 1051: 42: 32: 1177: 1163: 1181: 1089: 615: 50: 1034: 743: 269: 241: 232: 46: 1159: 1173: 1038: 623: 597: 569: 1198: 1137: 860:
The removal of contractions accumulates all the relevant substitution instances of
236: 450:{\displaystyle F(t_{11},\ldots ,t_{1n})\vee \ldots \vee F(t_{r1},\ldots ,t_{rn})} 1155: 1022:{\displaystyle \vdash F(t_{11},\ldots ,t_{1n}),\ldots ,F(t_{r1},\ldots ,t_{rn})} 587: 62: 17: 1062:
corresponds to a Herbrand disjunction, when restricted to first-order logic.
843:{\displaystyle \vdash (\exists y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})F(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})} 740: 747: 556:{\displaystyle (\exists y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})F(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n}).} 728:{\displaystyle (\exists y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})F(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})} 166:{\displaystyle (\exists y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})F(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})} 915:
in the right side of the sequent, thus resulting in a proof of
1115:
Travaux de la société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie
49:(1930). It essentially allows a certain kind of reduction of 1113:
J. Herbrand: Recherches sur la théorie de la démonstration.
1117:, Class III, Sciences MathĂ©matiques et Physiques, 33, 1930. 57:. Herbrand's theorem is the logical foundation for most 1029:, from which the Herbrand disjunction can be obtained. 921: 866: 760: 648: 600: 572: 473: 352: 313: 281: 244: 182: 86: 1021: 907: 842: 727: 606: 578: 555: 449: 331: 299: 260: 223: 165: 1135:Dale Miller: A Compact Representation of Proofs. 235:if and only if there exists a finite sequence of 1162:, in Maurice, Daniel; Leivant, RaphaĂ«l (eds.), 626:. Conversion to prenex form can be avoided, if 8: 1210:Theorems in the foundations of mathematics 1007: 985: 954: 935: 920: 896: 877: 865: 831: 812: 793: 774: 759: 716: 697: 678: 659: 647: 599: 571: 541: 522: 503: 484: 472: 460:is valid. If it is valid, it is called a 435: 413: 382: 363: 351: 312: 280: 249: 243: 212: 193: 181: 154: 135: 116: 97: 85: 33:Herbrand's theorem on ramification groups 1050:Herbrand's theorem has been extended to 1106: 176:be a formula of first-order logic with 908:{\displaystyle F(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})} 224:{\displaystyle F(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})} 1045:Generalizations of Herbrand's theorem 594:of the quantifier-free subformula of 7: 268:, possibly in an expansion of the 1165:Logic and Computational Complexity 767: 652: 477: 90: 25: 1170:Lecture Notes in Computer Science 754:, there is a cut-free proof of 1016: 978: 963: 928: 902: 870: 837: 805: 799: 764: 722: 690: 684: 649: 547: 515: 509: 474: 444: 406: 391: 356: 218: 186: 160: 128: 122: 87: 1: 1058:. The deep representation of 618:(propositionally derivable). 332:{\displaystyle 1\leq j\leq n} 300:{\displaystyle 1\leq i\leq r} 1141:, 46(4), pp. 347--370, 1987. 41:is a fundamental result of 1231: 26: 59:automatic theorem provers 27:Not to be confused with 1160:"On Herbrand's Theorem" 1085:Herbrand interpretation 1044: 752:cut-elimination theorem 69:, became more popular. 67:existential quantifiers 1023: 909: 844: 729: 608: 592:substitution instances 580: 566:Informally: a formula 557: 451: 333: 301: 262: 261:{\displaystyle t_{ij}} 225: 167: 29:Herbrand–Ribet theorem 1060:expansion-tree proofs 1056:expansion-tree proofs 1024: 910: 845: 746:, which follows from 730: 609: 581: 558: 452: 334: 302: 263: 226: 168: 1172:, Berlin, New York: 919: 864: 758: 646: 598: 570: 471: 462:Herbrand disjunction 350: 311: 279: 242: 180: 84: 1095:Compactness theorem 55:propositional logic 1080:Herbrand structure 1052:higher-order logic 1019: 905: 840: 735:is valid, then by 725: 604: 576: 553: 447: 329: 297: 258: 221: 163: 43:mathematical logic 39:Herbrand's theorem 1187:978-3-540-60178-4 1090:Herbrand universe 607:{\displaystyle A} 579:{\displaystyle A} 51:first-order logic 16:(Redirected from 1222: 1190: 1142: 1133: 1127: 1124: 1118: 1111: 1035:sequent calculus 1028: 1026: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1014: 993: 992: 962: 961: 940: 939: 914: 912: 911: 906: 901: 900: 882: 881: 849: 847: 846: 841: 836: 835: 817: 816: 798: 797: 779: 778: 744:sequent calculus 734: 732: 731: 726: 721: 720: 702: 701: 683: 682: 664: 663: 613: 611: 610: 605: 585: 583: 582: 577: 562: 560: 559: 554: 546: 545: 527: 526: 508: 507: 489: 488: 456: 454: 453: 448: 443: 442: 421: 420: 390: 389: 368: 367: 338: 336: 335: 330: 306: 304: 303: 298: 267: 265: 264: 259: 257: 256: 230: 228: 227: 222: 217: 216: 198: 197: 172: 170: 169: 164: 159: 158: 140: 139: 121: 120: 102: 101: 65:containing only 47:Jacques Herbrand 21: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1195: 1194: 1188: 1174:Springer-Verlag 1156:Buss, Samuel R. 1154: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1112: 1108: 1103: 1076: 1047: 1039:cut-elimination 1003: 981: 950: 931: 917: 916: 892: 873: 862: 861: 827: 808: 789: 770: 756: 755: 712: 693: 674: 655: 644: 643: 642:If the formula 636: 624:Herbrandization 596: 595: 568: 567: 537: 518: 499: 480: 469: 468: 431: 409: 378: 359: 348: 347: 309: 308: 277: 276: 245: 240: 239: 208: 189: 178: 177: 150: 131: 112: 93: 82: 81: 75: 36: 23: 22: 18:Herbrand theory 15: 12: 11: 5: 1228: 1226: 1218: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1186: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1128: 1119: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1046: 1043: 1031: 1030: 1018: 1013: 1010: 1006: 1002: 999: 996: 991: 988: 984: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 960: 957: 953: 949: 946: 943: 938: 934: 930: 927: 924: 904: 899: 895: 891: 888: 885: 880: 876: 872: 869: 858: 854: 851: 839: 834: 830: 826: 823: 820: 815: 811: 807: 804: 801: 796: 792: 788: 785: 782: 777: 773: 769: 766: 763: 724: 719: 715: 711: 708: 705: 700: 696: 692: 689: 686: 681: 677: 673: 670: 667: 662: 658: 654: 651: 635: 632: 603: 575: 564: 563: 552: 549: 544: 540: 536: 533: 530: 525: 521: 517: 514: 511: 506: 502: 498: 495: 492: 487: 483: 479: 476: 458: 457: 446: 441: 438: 434: 430: 427: 424: 419: 416: 412: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 388: 385: 381: 377: 374: 371: 366: 362: 358: 355: 341: 340: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 296: 293: 290: 287: 284: 255: 252: 248: 220: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 196: 192: 188: 185: 174: 173: 162: 157: 153: 149: 146: 143: 138: 134: 130: 127: 124: 119: 115: 111: 108: 105: 100: 96: 92: 89: 74: 71: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1227: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1200: 1189: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1140: 1139: 1138:Studia Logica 1132: 1129: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1110: 1107: 1100: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1000: 997: 994: 989: 986: 982: 975: 972: 969: 966: 958: 955: 951: 947: 944: 941: 936: 932: 925: 922: 897: 893: 889: 886: 883: 878: 874: 867: 859: 855: 852: 832: 828: 824: 821: 818: 813: 809: 802: 794: 790: 786: 783: 780: 775: 771: 761: 753: 749: 745: 742: 738: 717: 713: 709: 706: 703: 698: 694: 687: 679: 675: 671: 668: 665: 660: 656: 641: 640: 639: 633: 631: 629: 625: 619: 617: 601: 593: 589: 573: 550: 542: 538: 534: 531: 528: 523: 519: 512: 504: 500: 496: 493: 490: 485: 481: 467: 466: 465: 463: 439: 436: 432: 428: 425: 422: 417: 414: 410: 403: 400: 397: 394: 386: 383: 379: 375: 372: 369: 364: 360: 353: 346: 345: 344: 326: 323: 320: 317: 314: 294: 291: 288: 285: 282: 275: 274: 273: 271: 253: 250: 246: 238: 234: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 194: 190: 183: 155: 151: 147: 144: 141: 136: 132: 125: 117: 113: 109: 106: 103: 98: 94: 80: 79: 78: 72: 70: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 34: 30: 19: 1215:Metatheorems 1205:Proof theory 1164: 1136: 1131: 1122: 1114: 1109: 1066:disjunction. 1032: 737:completeness 637: 634:Proof sketch 627: 620: 565: 461: 459: 342: 175: 76: 45:obtained by 38: 37: 1176:, pp.  857:inferences. 588:prenex form 343:such that 63:prenex form 1199:Categories 1149:References 628:structural 1054:by using 1033:However, 998:… 970:… 945:… 923:⊢ 887:… 822:… 784:… 768:∃ 762:⊢ 707:… 669:… 653:∃ 616:tautology 532:… 494:… 478:∃ 426:… 401:∨ 398:… 395:∨ 373:… 324:≤ 318:≤ 292:≤ 286:≤ 203:… 145:… 107:… 91:∃ 73:Statement 1158:(1995), 1074:See also 741:cut-free 272:, with 270:language 1178:195–209 748:Gentzen 1184:  1101:Notes 614:is a 464:for 237:terms 233:valid 77:Let 1182:ISBN 1037:and 307:and 750:'s 739:of 586:in 53:to 31:or 1201:: 1180:, 1168:, 937:11 365:11 1191:. 1017:) 1012:n 1009:r 1005:t 1001:, 995:, 990:1 987:r 983:t 979:( 976:F 973:, 967:, 964:) 959:n 956:1 952:t 948:, 942:, 933:t 929:( 926:F 903:) 898:n 894:y 890:, 884:, 879:1 875:y 871:( 868:F 850:. 838:) 833:n 829:y 825:, 819:, 814:1 810:y 806:( 803:F 800:) 795:n 791:y 787:, 781:, 776:1 772:y 765:( 723:) 718:n 714:y 710:, 704:, 699:1 695:y 691:( 688:F 685:) 680:n 676:y 672:, 666:, 661:1 657:y 650:( 602:A 574:A 551:. 548:) 543:n 539:y 535:, 529:, 524:1 520:y 516:( 513:F 510:) 505:n 501:y 497:, 491:, 486:1 482:y 475:( 445:) 440:n 437:r 433:t 429:, 423:, 418:1 415:r 411:t 407:( 404:F 392:) 387:n 384:1 380:t 376:, 370:, 361:t 357:( 354:F 339:, 327:n 321:j 315:1 295:r 289:i 283:1 254:j 251:i 247:t 219:) 214:n 210:y 206:, 200:, 195:1 191:y 187:( 184:F 161:) 156:n 152:y 148:, 142:, 137:1 133:y 129:( 126:F 123:) 118:n 114:y 110:, 104:, 99:1 95:y 88:( 35:. 20:)

Index

Herbrand theory
Herbrand–Ribet theorem
Herbrand's theorem on ramification groups
mathematical logic
Jacques Herbrand
first-order logic
propositional logic
automatic theorem provers
prenex form
existential quantifiers
valid
terms
language
prenex form
substitution instances
tautology
Herbrandization
completeness
cut-free
sequent calculus
Gentzen
cut-elimination theorem
sequent calculus
cut-elimination
higher-order logic
expansion-tree proofs
expansion-tree proofs
Herbrand structure
Herbrand interpretation
Herbrand universe

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑