Knowledge (XXG)

Incorporation of international law

Source đź“ť

108:
states that "all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land." However, the term "treaty" has a more restricted sense in
112:
than in international law. Of the more than 16,000 international agreements entered into by the United States between 1946 and 1999, only 912 were ratified by the required two thirds of the
43:
states require all treaties to be incorporated before they can have any domestic legal effects. Most countries follow a treaty ratification method somewhere between these two extremes.
69:, especially in cases where the treaty "modifies provisions which are matters for statute". In such cases, incorporation is often either redundant or very little is required. 55:, treaties can normally be ratified only after they are approved by the legislature, but the treaties then become legally binding in domestic law if they are self-executing. 85:" (the executive). All treaties must be incorporated if they are to have any effect on domestic legislation. To do otherwise would violate the doctrine of the 306: 93:
value, and judges consider that Parliament, in the absence of clear contrary intention, did not intend for an Act to conflict with a ratified treaty.
286: 311: 39:
system where treaties can become law without incorporation, if their provisions are considered sufficiently self-explanatory. In contrast
224: 32:. A country incorporates a treaty by passing domestic legislation that gives effect to the treaty in the national legal system. 270: 249: 65:, ratified treaties are considered to be superior to domestic legislation. However ratification must often be approved by the 82: 105: 188:
When a dualist state signs a treaty, the treaty becomes binding only if it is incorporated by a domestic statute.
86: 175: 90: 129: 153: 267: 246: 209: 66: 35:
Whether incorporation is necessary depends on a country's domestic law. Some states follow a
201: 124: 101: 89:, which reserves legislative primacy to the British parliament. However, treaties may have 274: 253: 133:(2008). Almost all treaties must be incorporated into federal law by both chambers of the 29: 78: 300: 202: 117: 97: 40: 25: 109: 288:
Treaties and other International Agreements: the Role of the United States Senate
134: 127:
has also limited the direct effect of ratified treaties, notably in the case of
52: 62: 113: 81:, where treaty-making is considered to be the exclusive competence of " 58: 36: 21: 100:
is intermediate to the two extremes described above. The
61:is another example of a monist system. Under 8: 77:The dualist position is exemplified by the 145: 291:(Congressional Research Service 2001). 268:French Constitution of 4 October 1958. 247:French Constitution of 4 October 1958. 208:. Cambridge University Press. p.  156:. Irish Department for Foreign Affairs 7: 307:International law legal terminology 225:"A quick ABC of international law" 18:incorporation of international law 14: 223:Romano, Cesare (23 August 2006). 312:Legal doctrines and principles 204:Modern Treaty Law and Practice 1: 51:In monist systems like the 328: 106:United States Constitution 178:. Oxford University Press 87:sovereignty of Parliament 83:Her Majesty's Government 22:international agreements 20:is the process by which 154:"Irish Treaty Practice" 200:Aust, Anthony (2000). 120:of the Constitution. 96:The position of the 273:15 May 2012 at the 252:15 May 2012 at the 24:become part of the 176:"EU Law: Glossary" 130:MedellĂ­n v. Texas 67:French Parliament 319: 292: 284: 278: 263: 257: 242: 236: 235: 233: 231: 220: 214: 213: 207: 197: 191: 190: 185: 183: 172: 166: 165: 163: 161: 150: 137:to have effect. 125:US Supreme Court 102:Supremacy Clause 327: 326: 322: 321: 320: 318: 317: 316: 297: 296: 295: 285: 281: 275:Wayback Machine 264: 260: 254:Wayback Machine 243: 239: 229: 227: 222: 221: 217: 199: 198: 194: 181: 179: 174: 173: 169: 159: 157: 152: 151: 147: 143: 75: 73:Dualist systems 49: 30:sovereign state 12: 11: 5: 325: 323: 315: 314: 309: 299: 298: 294: 293: 279: 258: 237: 215: 192: 167: 144: 142: 139: 104:(VI.2) of the 91:interpretative 79:United Kingdom 74: 71: 48: 47:Monist systems 45: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 324: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 302: 290: 289: 283: 280: 277: 276: 272: 269: 262: 259: 256: 255: 251: 248: 241: 238: 226: 219: 216: 211: 206: 205: 196: 193: 189: 177: 171: 168: 155: 149: 146: 140: 138: 136: 132: 131: 126: 121: 119: 118:Treaty Clause 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 98:United States 94: 92: 88: 84: 80: 72: 70: 68: 64: 60: 56: 54: 46: 44: 42: 38: 33: 31: 27: 26:municipal law 23: 19: 287: 282: 266: 261: 245: 240: 228:. Retrieved 218: 203: 195: 187: 180:. Retrieved 170: 158:. Retrieved 148: 128: 122: 110:American law 95: 76: 57: 50: 34: 17: 15: 230:4 September 182:3 September 160:3 September 135:US Congress 53:Netherlands 301:Categories 141:References 63:French law 265:Art. 52, 244:Art. 55, 114:US Senate 271:Archived 250:Archived 116:of the 41:dualist 59:France 37:monist 28:of a 232:2008 184:2008 162:2008 123:The 16:The 210:147 303:: 186:. 234:. 212:. 164:.

Index

international agreements
municipal law
sovereign state
monist
dualist
Netherlands
France
French law
French Parliament
United Kingdom
Her Majesty's Government
sovereignty of Parliament
interpretative
United States
Supremacy Clause
United States Constitution
American law
US Senate
Treaty Clause
US Supreme Court
MedellĂ­n v. Texas
US Congress
"Irish Treaty Practice"
"EU Law: Glossary"
Modern Treaty Law and Practice
147
"A quick ABC of international law"
French Constitution of 4 October 1958.
Archived
Wayback Machine

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑